logo
Mark Mitchell Wants Short Prison Sentences Scrapped In Hope Of Reducing Reoffending

Mark Mitchell Wants Short Prison Sentences Scrapped In Hope Of Reducing Reoffending

Scoop05-05-2025

Article – RNZ
Labour's Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb says it's 'depressing' the government can't come up with better solutions. Lillian Hanly, Political reporter
The Corrections Minister is looking at scrapping short prison sentences in favour of longer ones, in the hope of reducing reoffending.
Mark Mitchell said people with longer sentences have more access to rehabilitation and therefore more successfully re-enter society.
The idea is only being looked into, but it's Mitchell's preference if it led to fewer victims overall – even if it required building more prisons due to an increase in the prison population.
'When violent offenders receive short sentences or are released without proper rehabilitation, it puts the public at risk. I have asked Corrections to look into how short sentences relate to re-offending with a view of gaining a better understanding,' Mitchell told RNZ.
'We want to see offenders turn their lives around and become meaningful, contributing members of society.
'With that comes tough decisions to ensure serious crime leads to serious consequences, alongside investing in programmes that break the cycle of reoffending,' Mitchell said.
The Opposition is scoffing at the idea though, with the Greens and Labour both saying it goes against the evidence and would come at a significant cost.
Labour's Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said it was 'depressing' the government couldn't come up with better solutions.
'It's the usual rhetoric about putting people in prison for long periods of time.
'We know that whilst imprisonment is necessary in some cases, in terms of reducing crime in the long term, putting everyone in prison simply doesn't work.'
Webb said rehabilitation was 'absolutely' important, but said the lowest reoffending rates came from those who were sentenced to community sentences where they could access drug and alcohol programmes and rehabilitation programmes in the community.
'The correction system at the moment doesn't have the resources to deliver them. The community is the best place for that.'
He said they had to address offending and risks of offending at the 'earliest possible stage,' and by the time people were put in prison 'you've missed the boat.'
'Prisons are a waste of money… they are unbelievably expensive to build and unbelievably expensive to manage,' Webb said.
'We should be putting money into where we can avoid crime, which is into education, into health, into addiction and into mental health and building more prisons is building a big concrete ambulance.'
Mitchell, however, pushed back on the previous government's approach to corrections.
'For too long, the balance in our justice system has shifted away from accountability, and this government is taking action that puts victims first, ahead of offenders.'
'My top priority as Corrections Minister is keeping Corrections staff and New Zealanders safe,' he said.
The Greens justice spokesperson Tamatha Paul told RNZ longer and harsher prison sentences do not lead to better outcomes.
She said it was 'extremely expensive and costly', not just financially, but the 'human potential that it will waste, and the families that will be torn them apart for longer as a result of this policy.'
Paul pointed to criminologists who considered the issue, and what happened in prisons, and said it was 'pretty clear' that 'sentencing is not a silver bullet.'
'The thing that this government loves to do is they like to create this assumption that every single person that is in prison has done a violent, heinous, serious crime.
'That is simply not the case.'
She said the idea of making people stay in prison for longer because of 'public safety' didn't match up with who was actually in prison, given shorter sentences were due to more minor crimes like burglary or theft.
Paul said the government seemed to think they could 'continue to just build prisons and prisons and prisons and keep filling them up' and that was good policy.
'The best policy decision would be actually reducing the drivers of crime, things like poverty, homelessness, mental health and addiction issues, the presence of drugs in our communities, those are the kinds of things that actually help to reduce crime.'
She said researchers, criminologists, lawyers and judges had said this over the years, but 'we have a government that is completely agnostic towards that advice.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game organisation
Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game organisation

Otago Daily Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Reform to ‘modernise' Fish & Game organisation

Southern Fish & Game councils say they broadly welcome proposed improvements to the organisation's operations, signalled by the government yesterday. Hunting and Fishing Minister James Meager has announced proposed new legislation governing Fish & Game, aimed at streamlining and compartmentalising the roles of the national body and its 12 regional councils. He said it would "modernise and strengthen" the organisation. "I want to make it as easy as possible for Kiwis to go hunting and fishing in New Zealand. This long overdue reform to Fish & Game will refocus the organisation on its core job of managing our sport fishing and game bird resources and implement a more professional approach to national decision making," he said. Key changes would include clarifying council and national body roles; shifting to a nationalised fee collection and funding distribution system; and voting changes. The proposed new act would also "require Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making". New national advocacy policy would restrict court proceedings to within that policy. Southland Fish & Game chairman David MacGregor said the minister had provided further clarification on that last point during interviews yesterday. "The minister has clarified that Fish & Game can still advocate for the health of waterways where it improves fisheries, which is entirely consistent with Southland Fish & Game's involvement in the Water & Land Plan, where the court found there were significant adverse effects on aquatic life," he said. Federated Farmers Southland clashed with Fish & Game Southland last year following a Court of Appeal decision regarding effluent discharge Federated Farmers claimed would prevent them farming. "Fish & Game has never taken frivolous court action, and funding for much of the Southland case came from the New Zealand council, so I can't see our advocacy function changing," Mr MacGregor said. Otago Fish & Game Council chairman Adrian McIntyre said he welcomed modernisation. "Making it easier for New Zealanders to go hunting and fishing is something we all support, and it's encouraging to see a proposal that retains strong regional decision-making — close to where the action is happening. "Regional autonomy is essential to what we do. It's great to see that the minister has preserved the ability of regional councils to make decisions based on local knowledge and direct engagement with hunters, anglers, landowners, iwi and scientists. That connection is one of our biggest strengths." A Federated Farmers spokesman said his organisation remained concerned about Fish & Game's political advocacy functions. "We're welcoming a review of Fish & Game's advocacy function, something Federated Farmers have been vocal in calling for, but we have serious concerns changes won't go far enough."

The David Seymour ‘bots' debate: Do online submission tools help or hurt democracy?
The David Seymour ‘bots' debate: Do online submission tools help or hurt democracy?

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

The David Seymour ‘bots' debate: Do online submission tools help or hurt democracy?

ACT Party leader David Seyour in studio for an interview on season 3 of 30 with Guyon Espiner. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly A discussion document on a Regulatory Standards Bill is not, on the face of it, the sort of thing that might have been expected to prompt 23,000 responses. But in an age of digital democracy, the Ministry for Regulation was probably expecting it. The bill , led by ACT Party leader David Seymour, is controversial. It sparked a response from activists, who used online tools to help people make their opposition known. Of the 23,000 submissions, 88 percent were opposed. Seymour this week told RNZ's 30 with Guyon Espiner , that figure reflected "bots" generating "fake" submissions. He did not provide evidence for the claim and later explained he wasn't referring to literal bots but to "online campaigns" that generate "non-representative samples" that don't reflect public opinion. Seymour has previous experience with this sort of thing. The Treaty Principles Bill got a record 300,000 submissions when it was considered by the Justice Committee earlier this year. Is Seymour right to have raised concerns about how these tools are affecting public debate? Or are they a boon for democracy? Submission tools are commonly used by advocacy groups to mobilise public input during the select committee process. The online tools often offer a template for users to fill out or suggested wording that can be edited or submitted as is. Each submission is usually still sent by the individual. Taxpayers' Union spokesperson Jordan Williams said submitting to Parliament used to be "pretty difficult". "You'd have to write a letter and things like that. What the tools do allow is for people to very easily and quickly make their voice heard." The tools being used now are part of sophisticated marketing campaigns, Williams said. "You do get pressure groups that take particular interest, and it blows out the numbers, but that doesn't mean that officials should be ruling them out or refusing to engage or read submissions." The Taxpayers' Union has created submission tools in the past, but Williams said he isn't in favour of tools that don't allow the submitter to alter the submission. He has encouraged supporters to change the contents of the submission to ensure it is original. "The ones that we are pretty suspicious of is when it doesn't allow the end user to actually change the submission, and in effect, it just operates like a petition, which I don't think quite has the same democratic value." Clerk of the House of Representatives David Wilson said campaigns that see thousands of similar submissions on proposed legislation are not new, they've just taken a different form. "It's happened for many, many years. It used to be photocopied forms. Now, often it's things online that you can fill out. And there's nothing wrong with doing that. It's a legitimate submission." However, Wilson pointed out that identical responses would likely be grouped by the select committee and treated as one submission. "The purpose of the select committee calling for public submissions is so that the members of the committee can better inform themselves about the issues. They're looking at the bill, thinking about whether it needs to be amended or whether it should pass. So if they receive the same view from hundreds of people, they will know that." But that isn't to say those submissions are discredited, Wilson said. "For example, the committee staff would say, you've received 10,000 submissions that all look exactly like this. So members will know how many there were and what they said. But I don't know if there's any point in all of the members individually reading the same thing that many times." Jordan Williams co-founded the Taxpayers' Union in 2013 with David Farrar. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly But Williams said there were risks in treating similar submissions created using 'tools' as one submission. "Treating those ones as if they are all identical is not just wrong, it's actually undemocratic," he said. "It's been really concerning that, under the current parliament, they are trying to carte blanche, reject people's submissions, because a lot of them are similar." AI should be used to analyse submissions and identify the unique points. "Because if people are going to take the time and make a submission to Parliament, at the very least, the officials should be reading them or having them summarised," Williams said. Labour MP Duncan Webb is a member of the Justice Committee and sat in on oral submissions for the Treaty Principles Bill. He said he attempted to read as many submissions as possible. "When you get a stock submission, which is a body of text that is identical and it's just been clicked and dragged, then you don't have to read them all, because you just know that there are 500 people who think exactly the same thing," he said. "But when you get 500 postcards, which each have three handwritten sentences on them, they may all have the same theme, they may all be from a particular organisation, but the individual thoughts that have been individually expressed. So you can't kind of categorise it as just one size fits all. You've got to take every single case on its merits." Webb said he takes the select committee process very seriously. "The thing that struck me was, sure, you read a lot [of submissions] which are repetitive, but then all of a sudden you come across one which actually changes the way you think about the problem in front of you. "To kind of dismiss that as just one of a pile from this organisation is actually denying someone who's got an important point to make, their voice in the democratic process." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]
Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]

Scoop

time9 hours ago

  • Scoop

Choose Clean Water - Latest News [Page 1]

Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Game's ability to advocate for the health of rivers. More >> 'Don't Be Fooled': Govt's Freshwater Reforms Means More Pollution In Your Water & Commercial Control Of Public Resources Friday, 30 May 2025, 7:30 pm | Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water says it's important for the public to make submissions on the changes (these can be made until 27 July 2025) but it's just as important for the public to contact MPs and Ministers directly to voice their opposition. More >> National Direction Changes Expected To Advance Dangerous ACT Ideology At Expense Of The Health Of NZers And Environment Monday, 26 May 2025, 3:04 pm | Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water says the cabinet paper's prioritising of 'the enjoyment of private property rights' in public policy is straight out of an extreme libertarian ideology and becomes incoherent and dangerous when applied to communities' needs ... More >> Farm Model Weakness Proves Strength Of Input Controls To Save Rivers Wednesday, 11 August 2021, 4:57 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners say the independent review of farm modelling tool, 'Overseer', released today has found profound weaknesses with the tool and in doing so has proved the strength of Government and regional councils turning to greater control of inputs ... More >> Government Must Stand Strong On Freshwater Reform For All New Zealanders Wednesday, 14 July 2021, 1:52 pm | Choose Clean Water Campaigners say the Government must stand strong against pressure from some in the agricultural sector to weaken freshwater reforms, following the release today of the Government's consultation document on freshwater farm plans and fencing rules. ... More >> Wairarapa Water Ltd.'s Bad Science And Poor Process A Warning Bell For All Monday, 21 December 2020, 1:31 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners say Wairarapa iwi Rangitāne o Wairarapa statement released today highlighting their concerns around Wairarapa Water Ltd's 'rushed time frames and incorrect information' is an important warning bell for the public and politicians. ... More >> Fish & Game Endangers Its Vital Public Role By Moving Closer To Federated Farmers Friday, 27 November 2020, 3:49 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater Campaigners Say The NZ Fish And Game Council Is Endangering Its Vital Public Role In The Protection Of Rivers And Lakes If It Moves Closer To Federated Farmers, Following Today's Announcement On The Two Organisations' Intention To ... More >> Water Campaigners Welcome Greens' Focus On Nitrogen Pollution Saturday, 12 September 2020, 12:16 pm | Choose Clean Water Water campaigners are welcoming the Greens' focus on nitrogen pollution in the party's 'Farming for the future' policy released today. 'Excessive nitrogen in our waterways is impacting the health of people, rivers and lakes, and wildlife ... More >> Water Storage Should Not Be Prioritised Over Waste & Drinking Water Infrastructure Thursday, 11 June 2020, 5:03 pm | Choose Clean Water The Government should be putting public health first in its post-Covid spending, freshwater campaigners say, prioritising waste and drinking water infrastructure over water storage Campaigners from Choose Clean Water were disappointed to learn ... More >> Crucial Policy Missing From Government's Water Announcement, Say Campaigners Thursday, 28 May 2020, 12:16 pm | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners are frustrated the Government has delayed a crucial decision on nitrogen pollution for a further 12 months until after the election. 'We have urged the Government many times to put in place clear and unequivocal limits for ... More >> Strong Water Rules Essential As New Report Shows Most NZ Rivers Polluted Thursday, 16 April 2020, 12:39 pm | Choose Clean Water A government report released today shows most New Zealand rivers are polluted, highlighting why strong water rules are urgently needed, say freshwater campaigners. The report shows most of our waterways are under stress and many are severely impacted. In our ... More >> Industry Lobbyists And Politicians – Don't Exploit Covid-19 Crisis To Push Long-held Agendas Monday, 23 March 2020, 11:18 am | Choose Clean Water It is irresponsible and dishonest for agricultural industry lobbyists and opportunistic politicians to exploit the Covid-19 crisis for their unrelated political agendas, say freshwater campaign group Choose Clean Water. Federated Farmers have called for ... More >> 'Don't Fail Us On Water, PM': Togs, Towels And A Serious Message At Parliament Today Monday, 2 March 2020, 7:38 am | Choose Clean Water A group of young freshwater campaigners are getting their togs on, grabbing a towel and heading to parliament at rush hour this morning with a message to Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern; 'Don't fail us on water.' The group, from the student-established ... More >> 'Strong Water Rules Now': Campaigners Remind PM Of Clean River Promises Outside Parliament Today Tuesday, 11 February 2020, 6:59 am | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners will be outside parliament today with large banners reminding the Prime Minister of her party's 2017 pre-election promises to clean up the country's rivers. The group from Choose Clean Water, a student-established campaign to strengthen ... More >> Stats NZ shows urban & rural NZers agree on water pollution Wednesday, 2 October 2019, 3:00 pm | Choose Clean Water Results of the General Social Survey highlighted today by Stats NZ today show that urban and rural New Zealanders agree on freshwater pollution, say freshwater campaigners. 'Information on the General Social Survey 2018 released today by Stats NZ today ... More >> Freshwater policy holds potential if Gov resists pressure Thursday, 5 September 2019, 11:03 am | Choose Clean Water Freshwater campaigners welcome the release of Action for healthy waterways policy discussion documents today saying they hold great potential to deliver on the Government's election promise. However, it is clear there is intense pressure from dairy lobbyists ... More >> Dairy-led water accords do nothing to stop intensification Monday, 2 September 2019, 4:22 pm | Choose Clean Water Dairy industry-led water accords have done nothing to stop intensification over the last decades, which has led to the decline of the health of the country's rivers and lakes, say freshwater campaigners. And there is no commitment from dairy leaders ... More >> An 'action plan' with no action and a fatal flaw Tuesday, 5 June 2018, 4:20 pm | Choose Clean Water An 'action plan' with no action and a fatal flaw: Why agricultural leaders continue to fail New Zealand's rivers and their industry For immediate use 4pm Tuesday, 5 June 2018 Choose Clean Water NZ The Good Farming Practice: Action Plan for Water ... More >>

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store