
U.S. attorney in L.A. moves to ‘neutralize' California's sanctuary rules
The top federal prosecutor in Los Angeles is ratcheting up immigration enforcement in jails as the Trump administration looks for more ways to remove more immigrants from sanctuary cities.
U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli announced this week a pilot program dubbed 'Operation Guardian Angel' intended to 'neutralize' sanctuary state laws. The office identifies individuals with criminal records who have been deported and charges them with illegally reentering the United States, a federal crime.
The tactic focuses federal resources at the main place sanctuary rules have impeded the work of immigration agents — county jails and state prisons.
'Under the Trump Administration we will not allow sanctuary jurisdictions to stand in the way of keeping the American People safe,' Essayli posted on X in announcing the program.
State officials say they already cooperate with federal officials in regards to immigrants who have committed crimes.
'While the Trump Administration may seek to blame California as it grows desperate to deliver on its misguided, inhumane mass deportation agenda, immigration enforcement is and always has been the federal government's job,' said a spokesperson for California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta.
The practice of prosecuting individuals for illegal entry was widely employed under the Obama and second Bush administrations, but fell out of use in recent years. The resumption of it could increase the number of immigration arrests in the region, experts say.
Essayli, former state assemblyman and the son of Lebanese immigrants, was appointed last month. He told Fox News he created a dedicated group of federal officials to comb through databases to identify jailed immigrants who had been deported. The new effort could yield dozens of charges every week.
The administration has been frustrated with California's policy that prohibits local law enforcement from arresting someone solely for a deportation order or holding someone in jail for extra time so immigration agents can detain them.
Immigration officials in the past relied on local police to help them with enforcement, but over the last decade California and other states have increased protections for immigrants. The state scaled back its involvement in immigration enforcement on the streets and in jails, culminating in a 2018 law that ended the use of 287(g) agreements, which allowed local jailers to screen suspects for immigration violations.
Immigration activists argued those agreements eroded trust with the community and punished immigrants with minor infractions.
The Trump administration has aggressively pushed to revive such programs across the country as it attempts to make good on its promise of mass deportation.
'The days of giving criminal illegal aliens a free pass are over,' Essayli said in a statement. 'While California may be presently disregarding detainers, it cannot ignore federal arrest warrants.'
There still is plenty of collaboration between state and federal immigration authorities.
Under the state law, California prison officials can transfer any inmate to immigration custody, but they do have to give the person a written notice. And police can notify immigration agents of someone's release if they have certain convictions. Those include any felony that resulted in state prison, most other felonies on their record in the previous 15 years, and some high-level misdemeanors within the last five years.
President Trump has painted sanctuary cities as more dangerous, and much of his immigration agenda is framed around removing criminals. Experts say the rhetoric doesn't match with reality.
'The foundational assumption is widespread immigrant criminality,' said Charis Kubrin, a criminology professor at UC Irvine. Her research and others show no connection between sanctuary status and crime.
'Immigrants do not commit crime at a higher rate than the native born, and immigration to an area does not cause crime rates to rise,' she said.
Essayli's office stated that his office will file charges and seek arrest warrants so federal agents can 'take as many defendants as possible into custody from state jails.'
In 2023 and 2024, federal prosecutors in the California's Central District — covering seven counties including Los Angeles — charged a total of 17 individuals with illegal reentry following removal, according to the office.
Between Jan. 20 and May 1, the office charged 347 people with illegal reentry. In the first five days of the program that began May 10, 13 people have been arrested, which is actually a slower rate than the three previous months.
But even if the numbers ramp up, the program could run into a roadblock created by its own success, as the number of prosecutions mount.
'At the end of the day they will, they will run into ... issues of capacity,' said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute.
Staff Writer Andrea Castillo contributed to this story.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: AG Pam Bondi announces major criminal arrest
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier The Evening Edit with Elizabeth Macdonald FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: AG Pam Bondi announces major criminal arrest


Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup
Amid the messy ongoing divorce between the president and the world's richest man, this much is already clear: Donald Trump has sole custody of the House GOP. Republican lawmakers are making clear that, if forced to choose, it's Trump — not Elon Musk — they're sticking by as leaders race to contain the fallout for their 'one big, beautiful bill.' Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who helms a House panel inspired by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative, blasted Musk's public attacks on Trump as 'unwarranted' and criticized his 'lashing out on the internet.' 'America voted for Donald Trump on Nov. 4, 2024 — every single vote mattered just as much as the other,' Greene said in a brief interview. 'And whether it was $1 that was donated or hundreds of millions of dollars, the way I see it, everybody's the same.' Like many Americans, GOP members watched Thursday's online exchange with a sense of car-crash-like fascination. Many shared that they hoped Musk and Trump could somehow patch things up. But many — including some of the former DOGE chief's biggest backers on Capitol Hill — were wholly unsurprised to see the billionaire suddenly cut down to size after months of chatter about who was really calling the shots at the White House. 'It's President Trump, not President Musk,' said one lawmaker granted anonymity to speak frankly about prevailing opinions inside the House GOP. Speaker Mike Johnson made no secret of where he stands on the public breakup. He told reporters Friday that he hoped the two men 'reconcile' and that it would be 'good for the party and the country if all this worked out.' But in the nearly same breath, Johnson quickly reaffirmed his allegiance to the president and issued a warning to Musk. 'Do not doubt, do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party. He is the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era. And he's doing an excellent job for the people.' Other House Republicans concurred with the speaker's assessment Friday, even as they faced the looming threat of Musk targeting them in the upcoming midterms or at least pulling back on his political giving after pouring more than $250 million into the 2024 election on behalf of Trump and the GOP ticket. 'I think it's unfortunate,' said Rep. Tim Moore (R-N.C.) of the breakup. 'But Donald Trump was elected by a majority of the American people.' Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, who was one of only two Republicans to oppose Trump's megabill in the House last month, also made clear he stood with the president over Musk. 'He does not have a flight mode — he's fight, fight, fight … and he's been pretty measured,' Davidson said of Trump. 'I think Elon Musk looked a little out of control. And hopefully he gets back and grounded.' GOP leaders who have spent weeks cajoling their members to vote for the sprawling domestic-policy bill hardly hid their feelings as Musk continued to bash the legislation online, even calling on Americans to call their representatives in an effort to tank it. 'Frankly, it's united Republicans even more to go and defend the great things that are in this bill — and once it's passed and signed into law by August, September, you're going to see this economy turning around like nothing we've ever seen,' Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in a brief interview Friday. 'I'll be waiting for all those people who said the opposite to admit that they were wrong,' Scalise added. 'But I'm not expecting that to happen.' A few Republicans are still trying to walk a fine line by embracing both Trump and Musk — especially some fiscal hawks who believe Musk is right about the megabill adding trillions to the national debt. 'I think Elon has some valid points about the bill, concerns that myself and a handful of others were working to address up until the passage of it,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said in an interview. 'I think that'll make the bill stronger. I think it'll help our standing with the American people.' Both Trump and Musk 'have paid a tremendous price personally for this country,' Cloud added. 'And them working together is certainly far better for the country.' Notably, House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, a key Musk ally on the Hill, declined to engage Thursday when asked about the burgeoning feud. Instead, the Ohio Republican responded by praising the megabill Musk had moved to tank. Democrats, for their part, watched the unfolding and public breakup with surprise and a heavy dose of schadenfreude. 'There are no good guys in a fight like this,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'You just eat some popcorn and watch the show.'


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
The conservative House Freedom Caucus said on Friday that it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter the legislation. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post on social media on Friday, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' they added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' said the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead of the Republican leadership as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed.