logo
Speaking French, Swedish, German… the migrants booted out of EU in asylum crackdown & on small boats to ‘soft touch' UK

Speaking French, Swedish, German… the migrants booted out of EU in asylum crackdown & on small boats to ‘soft touch' UK

The Sun17 hours ago

MORE than 2,000 migrants are massing in the Jungle camp outside Dunkirk in northern France.
And their aim — to cross the Channel and take advantage of 'soft touch' Britain after they were turfed out by the EU countries where they previously lived.
4
Shocking new figures have revealed that while the number of asylum claims across Europe is falling, the figure for the UK is going up.
And as small boat crossings to Britain are increasing daily, the level of 'irregular' crossings into the EU countries from Africa, the Balkans and Eastern Europe have significantly reduced.
When The Sun visited the overcrowded Dunkirk camp, we were shocked to find that although it was packed full of Eritreans, Afghans and Somalis, we heard fluent conversations in German, Swedish, Belgian and Danish.
And that is because a huge majority of the migrants waiting to come here have lived in those European countries for years.
Somali mum-of-two Huda Abdi, 34, was among a large number of people we interviewed who said they were heading to the UK to try their luck again, after their asylum claims were rejected in other European countries.
These are people who have already paid out thousands to people- smugglers to reach the Continent and had no wish to leave.
Huda plans to apply for asylum in the UK after her original claim in the Netherlands was turned down when she was living in the northern city of Groningen.
She told The Sun: 'I don't want to cross the Channel, but what choice do I have?
"I spent seven years living in Holland and I was happy and settled there.
'Then one day in 2023 they told me to leave.
"They said my asylum claim had been rejected and I would be deported.
'They kicked me out of the refugee camp and I became homeless the same day.
'I was very upset and I still don't know why my asylum claim was turned down.
"The people doing the interview did not believe what I said.
'But I know many, many people who had their claims rejected in Holland.
"I don't think the Dutch government understands the situation in Somalia.
'I've tried to claim asylum in France, too, but they told me to go back to Holland.
'Now I'm sleeping in the Jungle and as soon as I can, I will make the crossing to the UK to claim asylum again.
'HUMANITY IN BRITAIN'
'There is more humanity in Britain and I want my children, who are ten and eight, to join me over there.'
The decision by EU countries to get tough on immigration — in response to rising public concern — is reflected in the latest figures.
In the first quarter of this year, there was a 17.6 per cent fall in asylum claims across the EU, according to the European Commission's statistics service Eurostat.
At the same time, there was a 17 per cent rise in asylum claims in the UK, from 93,150 to 109,343, according to the Home Office.
EU countries clamping down include the Netherlands, where the Party for Freedom, founded and led by firebrand Geert Wilders, rose to power before quitting the governing coalition this month.
Elsewhere, the Alternative for Germany has become a major force, while in Italy, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was elected on an anti-immigration ticket.
Even centrist French President Emmanuel Macron has been forced to act tough on migration to see off the threat of Marine Le Pen' s far-right National Rally party.
European leaders have yanked away the welcome mat at the same time as they are ploughing millions into border security — with significant results.
Irregular crossings to the Canary Islands from Morocco, Western Sahara, Mauritania, Senegal and The Gambia in West Africa were down 34 per cent in the first quarter of this year, according to the EU's border security agency Frontex.
4
Crossings into what is termed the Western Mediterranean — Africa into mainland Spain — were down ten per cent over the same period.
The Central Mediterranean crossing point, where migrants take small boats from Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Algeria to Italy and Malta — has witnessed a three per cent fall compared to last year.
Meanwhile, there has been a 30 per cent reduction in crossings along the Eastern Mediterranean migrant route into Greece, Cyprus and Bulgaria, where barbed wire fences have been erected along the border with Turkey.
The Western Balkan passage through Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia has seen a 58 per cent reduction.
And crossings from the Eastern land border, from Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine and the Russian Federation, have dropped 37 per cent despite Vladimir Putin pushing migrants in that direction to stoke political unrest.
The only border bucking the trend is what Frontex terms 'exits towards the UK', with Channel crossings up five per cent compared to the first three months of last year.
Around 50,000 small boat asylum seekers are expected to reach our shores by the end of 2025 — each paying smugglers around £2,000 — which puts the UK on course to have more arrivals than Italy, where only 23,004 people landed in the past six months, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
This is a huge reduction on the 157,651 who reached Italy in 2023, before the Italians paid £85million to Tunisia to boost border security.
That figure seems like a bargain compared to the £476million that was given to French border police over three years by the UK Home Office.
Aid worker Rob Lawrie has seen at first hand how the migrant wave has turned towards the UK, having spent ten years helping out at camps in northern France.
'CRIMINAL NETWORKS'
Rob, from Leeds, who hosts the To Catch A Scorpion podcast, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the Dunkirk camp is now 'very full', with a 'few thousand' living there.
He previously told the same programme: 'The problem is that asylum cases are dropping off massively in Europe in terms of being accepted.
'What we see in the camps of France is different nationalities from African nations — from Afghanistan, Iraq and other nations — they speak either German or Swedish or Belgian and Danish.
'And that's because they've been in those countries for two or three years and eventually had their second or third appeal denied.
'They're not going to go back to Eritrea, or whatever their country was, because of why they left.
'So their only option is now to go down to northern France and once again put their lives into the hands of these organised criminal networks.'
Teenager Adau Abraham, from South Sudan, was among a stream of people travelling back and forth from Dunkirk's Jungle camp to the nearby Auchan supermarket when The Sun visited.
Adau, 18, said: 'It is clear they don't want me here in France.
"I tried to claim asylum at the application centre, but they told me I was too late and I would have to come back the next day and try again.
'Then, when I was walking back to the Jungle, the police stopped me and arrested me.
"They said that as I didn't have any papers, I was illegal in France.
"They put me in jail for three hours, which was terrifying.
'They told me they didn't want to see me again, that I had one week to leave France, or else.'
Student Ali Yousef, 25, intends to move to Britain after he was kicked out of Germany.
He said: 'I was living in Munich for a year or so and everything was good until they told me to leave.
'I had friends there and German people seemed nice, but the authorities do not care about our needs.
'They rejected my claim, even though I have tribal issues in Somalia.
"I was deported last year and now I will go to the UK and try again.'
Sadia Hassan, 20, from Adale, Somalia, had her asylum claims rejected by two EU countries.
Standing with a female friend outside the Auchan store, she said: 'I lived in Holland for two years and they wasted my time.
"Then I went to Germany and lived there for three months, but they said no, too.
'I can't afford to waste any more time in Europe so I am going to England to try again.
'If they reject me, I don't know what I will do"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's the point of the UK talking to Tehran? More than you might think…
What's the point of the UK talking to Tehran? More than you might think…

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

What's the point of the UK talking to Tehran? More than you might think…

Europe's frantic diplomatic mission in Geneva may go down as one of its most arduous ventures on the world stage – and also one of its most consequential. The foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany must persuade a battered Iranian regime to kow-tow to the US and Israel over its nuclear ambitions, or face likely annihilation. All three European powers would, of course, love to see the back of supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei's corrupt and brutal theocracy. But they rightly fear the regime's capacity to unleash death and destruction before it goes. If Trump joins Israel in the war on Iran with US bunker-busting bombs on nuclear sites, and it succeeds in killing Khamenei, there will still be plenty of Iranian hardliners left who will be willing to fight to the death. Previous inhibitions will not apply. That could mean use of a dirty bomb in the West, or chaos unleashed in the Strait of Hormuz, through which 90 per cent of the Gulf's oil passes. For the world at large, the stakes are that high. British foreign secretary David Lammy – after meeting his US counterpart, Marco Rubio, and presidential envoy Steve Witkoff in Washington on Thursday – said that the UK was 'determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon". He thinks a window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution, as Trump dithers over whether to attack the regime, as US neo-cons and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu are demanding – or whether to heed the no-more-wars mantra of his Maga base. And so, in search of a diplomatic solution, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi is meeting with his European counterparts in Switzerland. But what can be achieved? For all their good intentions – French president Emmanuel Macron said the diplomats would make a "comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation" to Iran – the Europeans are unlikely to persuade the Iranians to pull back from the brink. At least not on their own. While one Iranian diplomat said Tehran was willing to pursue 'a balanced and pragmatic policy in its dealings with Europe, and engage rationally with both East and West', Araghchi said there will be 'no talks' with the US over Iran's nuclear programme while the Israeli bombardment continues: 'The Americans want negotiations and have sent messages several times, but we have clearly said that there is no room for dialogue.' But there is a useful point to holding talks on neutral ground with Tehran – and it's not simply to ask them nicely and face-to-face if they wouldn't mind stopping with their nuclear enrichment programme. Rather than relaying Trump and Netanyahu's demands to Iran, Geneva is about feeding back to the White House – translating Tehran's position for the US president. The Europeans aren't there to stop the war, they're Trump-whispering for the Ayatollah. It's not clear that European diplomats have the connections they need to have a greater role to play than this, useful though it will prove. But when it comes to a practical breakthrough, some of the Gulf states might, however. Behind the scenes, figures in what some dub 'Iran's deep state' – many of them members of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – are talking to representatives of Oman and Qatar; it might be these Middle Eastern countries that can make the difference, in a second stage of dialogue. Qatar, for its part, will likely hold more sway over Washington than London or Paris. All the peacemakers, though, will be battling the plans of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Nothing less that the obliteration of the regime in Tehran will satisfy him. Worryingly, Israel's premier appears to have been joined by an increasingly pro-war Fox News, with Sean Hannity this week declaring that Iran 'is the biggest existential threat to the entire western world'. The West should have learnt by now – after the disasters in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya – that enforced regime change in the Middle East is best avoided. Andreas Krieg, a leading Iran expert at King's College London thinks regime change in Iran would 'not be clean or peaceful'. If the current theocracy falls, there is no significant alternative political-social structure to lead this country of 92 million into the light. The IRGC, a ruthless military-industrial complex, would not easily cede control of the Iranian economy. Instead, with 190,000 personnel and a similar number of Basij paramilitaries to call on, it might well create a military dictatorship. The West and Israel would be back to square one. And the Iranian people would be no better off. Ironically, the last time the West brought about regime change in Iran – by booting out, in 1953, the democratically elected premier Mohammad Mosaddegh (for which we have British Petroleum and the CIA to thank) – it laid the groundwork for the emergence of the current Islamic Republic in the 1970s. In between rounds of golf, as he ponders his next steps in the Middle East, you can't help wishing Potus would be shown – by Lammy or anyone else – the relevant pages of a history book. It is within the president's power to unleash hell – or stop history repeating itself. After the Geneva talks, let's hope he listens to what the Trump-whisperers tell him.

UK preparing to charter flights from Israel, David Lammy says
UK preparing to charter flights from Israel, David Lammy says

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

UK preparing to charter flights from Israel, David Lammy says

The UK is arranging charter flights to return British nationals from Israel once Israeli airspace re-opens, the foreign secretary has Lammy confirmed the government was working with the Israeli authorities to provide flights out of Tel Aviv airport, the number of which will be based on demand. Israeli airspace is currently closed due to the ongoing conflict with Iran. The two nations have exchanged waves of air strikes since Israel targeted military and nuclear sites, as well as military commanders and nuclear scientists, a week statement came as Lammy arrived in Geneva for talks with Iran, in the hopes of negotiating an agreement on Tehran's nuclear programme. British nations who wish to return home from Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories have been advised to complete a form with their email and UK passport number. Lammy said this was to "register their presence in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories to be contacted with further guidance on these flights". Flights will only be provided to those who hold a UK passport, the Foreign Office said. Land routes out of Israel remain open and Lammy said UK staff will be on hand to support British nationals who have crossed the border - including providing transportation to nearby the Foreign Office said families of staff at the UK embassy in Tel Aviv and the British consulate in Jerusalem had been temporarily withdrawn "as a precautionary measure".The talks in Geneva with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi will also include top diplomats from the EU, Germany and France.

Poll of the day: Do you support the assisted dying bill?
Poll of the day: Do you support the assisted dying bill?

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Poll of the day: Do you support the assisted dying bill?

The assisted dying bill returns to Parliament today for its final reading amid growing controversy – and a vote that could determine whether the legislation moves forward or falls entirely. A group of Labour MPs dramatically withdrew their support on Thursday night, citing serious concerns about the removal of key safeguards, including the requirement for High Court oversight. They warned that the bill had been 'drastically weakened' and no longer offers enough protection for vulnerable patients. If passed, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow people in England and Wales with fewer than six months to live to apply for a medically assisted death. Approval would be required from two doctors and a panel including a senior legal figure, a social worker, and a psychiatrist. Campaigners are making a final push on both sides of the debate, and with a narrow majority at stake, every vote counts. MPs have a free vote and are not bound by party lines. Supporters argue that the bill offers dignity and choice to those in need. Meanwhile, opponents argue it opens the door to abuse and erodes trust in end-of-life care. With so much at stake and such deeply personal questions at the heart of this debate, we want to hear from you: do you support the assisted dying bill? Vote in our poll and let us know your thoughts in the .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store