School dropout rate reaches 27% across Latin America
June 4 (UPI) -- Latin America is facing an escalating education crisis as school dropout rates continue to climb, affecting not only the region's poorest countries but also those with historically strong public education systems, such as Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay. In Argentina, despite its educational potential, nearly 40% of the population -- about 17.9 million people -- lives in poverty, a factor that directly impacts school attendance and completion.
Statistics show that roughly 160 million people in Latin America and the Caribbean are of school age -- nearly a quarter of the region's total population. About half of them do not complete their education, and many are considering leaving their home countries for the United States, Spain or other developed nations in search of better opportunities.
The Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean and other international organizations have warned that the region's dropout crisis poses a serious threat to its development.
A report by the Inter-American Development Bank found that 27% of students drop out before completing their education. UNESCO estimates that around 23 million children and teenagers in the region are not enrolled in school.
Countries with the lowest dropout rates include Chile (7%), Peru (10%) and Bolivia (16%). The highest rates are in Guatemala (57%), Honduras (53%) and Uruguay (37%). Venezuela's rate is estimated at 27%, while Paraguay and Ecuador report dropout rates of 32% and 28%, respectively.
In Mexico, more than 4 million children and teenagers are not in school, and another 600,000 are at risk of dropping out, according to a UNICEF report. The problem becomes more pronounced with age: three in 10 teens aged 15 to 17 are no longer attending school.
ECLAC attributes part of the crisis to extended school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic, which lasted more than 70 weeks on average. These interruptions severely disrupted schooling and widened existing inequalities, particularly at the secondary level.
Experts agree that school dropout is a multifaceted issue. While the pandemic worsened the situation, studies show the trend predates COVID-19 and is rooted in deep structural problems.
Contributing factors include poverty, single-parent or broken families and low parental education levels, all of which push many students to leave school to work or care for family members. Teenage pregnancy is another key factor.
Other factors are student disengagement, lack of motivation, disruptive classroom environments and the inability of youth to see education as a path to a better future. Drug use and recruitment by drug trafficking gangs further undermine student retention.
Although less prevalent today, the traditional lack of value placed on technical education in the region has also contributed to the problem. Stronger connections between vocational training and the job market could provide a path forward for many young people.
Early school dropout significantly undermines economic development across Latin America. Young people who leave school early are less likely to find formal, stable or well-paying jobs, leading to a less skilled workforce and lower productivity. This, in turn, slows national economic growth, reduces competitiveness and hampers innovation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford calls out municipalities as housing money goes unspent
Ontario is having trouble giving money away for housing, but challenging times are making it hard to get. As Premier Doug Ford presented Toronto with a $67.2 million cheque to help build new homes amid a shortage that has pushed prices higher, his housing minister lamented more municipalities aren't meeting the housing targets entitling them to cash. 'We're going to hand out some nice 'building faster fund' cheques, not as many and for as much this year as we did last year,' Rob Flack said Friday at city hall with Mayor Olivia Chow. Toronto broke ground on 21,000 new homes last year, 88 per cent of its target. 'That's why we have the big cheque,' said Chow, who noted 'building is slowing' because of high interest rates, and higher costs that mean 'builders just can't afford to build.' The $1.2 billion housing fund was established in 2023 to provide financial incentives for municipalities over three years to build homes. It's intended to pay for infrastructure like water lines, sewers, roads and sidewalks. Money is paid as a reward to municipalities reaching 80 per cent of the target set out by the province. Ford promised in 2022 to build 1.5 million new homes by 2031 but the province is at half the pace needed to reach that number in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the challenging business conditions that followed. While an average of 150,000 new homes a year is needed over the decade, the Progressive Conservative government's spring budget projected housing starts will fall this year to 71,800 — down from 74,600 in 2024. To spur construction, Ford's PCs passed Bill 17, the Protect Ontario By Building Faster and Smarter Act, which streamlines the approval process and fees for homebuilders, allows municipalities to reduce development charges on developers and delays payment until new homes are occupied instead of when a building permit is issued. As well, the legislation given royal assent this week extends the power to grant minister's zoning orders that override municipal bylaws, raising concerns among critics about preferential treatment for some builders. Ford repeated his calls for the Bank of Canada to lower interest rates and said economic uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs isn't helping the housing business. 'People are nervous if they're going to have a job or not.' Ford also pointed the finger at mayors of some municipalities he did not name, but who he said 'absolutely refuse to build.' 'We are going to work with the ones that want to build,' the premier added. 'They're going to get the money. The other ones aren't.' The premier reiterated that he would like to axe the provincial portion of the 13 per cent HST on new homes and has asked Prime Minister Mark Carney to scrap the federal portion. 'We just have to get everyone on the same page,' Ford said.

Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran investor makes surprising Fed rate call after jobs report
Okay, Jerome Powell, now it's your turn. President Donald Trump on June 6 took a break from bashing Elon Musk to vent his spleen - again - at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Trump took to his social media platform to call on Powell to slash interest rates by a full percentage point. "'Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster!" Trump said on Truth Social. "Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none. Despite him, our Country is doing great. Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!" Trump made his demand even though the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that U.S. hiring in May rose more than predicted. Nonfarm payrolls rose 139,000 for the month, exceeding estimates for 125,000. The last time the central bank made a single rate cut of a full percentage point was in March 2020 to address economic fallout from the onset of the Covid-19 Fed cut rates by one full point in total during President Joe Biden's final year in office. "If 'Too Late' at the Fed would CUT, we would greatly reduce interest rates, long and short, on debt that is coming due," Trump said, using the two-word name he calls Powell. "Biden went mostly short term." More Economic Analysis: Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming GreeceA critical industry is slamming the economyReports may show whether the economy is toughing out the tariffs "There is virtually no inflation (anymore), but if it should come back, RAISE "RATE" TO COUNTER. Very Simple!!! He is costing our Country a fortune. Borrowing costs should be MUCH LOWER!!!" It seems like only yesterday when the president was giving Musk - Tesla's (TSLA) CEO and a big-time Trump backer - all kinds of misery after the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency decried Trump's "big beautiful bill" of tax breaks and spending cuts as pork-laden and a "disgusting abomination." Actually, it was yesterday, come to think of it, when Trump suggested that an easy way to save "Billions and Billions of Dollars" was to terminate all of Musk's government contracts and subsidies. Tesla and Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, both benefit from a a number of government programs. Musk, who took credit for getting Trump elected, also decided it would be a good idea to bring up Jeffrey Epstein's name while Tesla shares nosedived. TheStreet Pro's Peter Tchir says that if you're looking for excitement, this is the social-media donnybrook to watch. Unlike the payroll data. The veteran investor said in a recent TheStreet Pro column that the report looked decent on the surface but "there are a lot of things to pick on." "The prior two months were revised down by 95,000," he said. "That negates much of this month's reported gain in the Establishment Survey." The Establishment Survey, also known as the Current Employment Statistics survey, provides monthly data on employment, hours and earnings of workers on nonfarm payrolls. "The Household Survey, used for the unemployment rate, lost over 600,000 jobs," Tchir said. "The unemployment rate remained unchanged only because labor-force participation dropped by a similar amount." Related: An investor looks at navigating tariff wars The birth/death model, which estimates the number of jobs created by new businesses and lost from defunct businesses, added 199,000 jobs, he added. "With low survey response rates, etc., there are a lot of things to question about the quality of the data (the seemingly endless downward revisions validate that 'questioning'), but this number is back to 'bothering' me,'" Tchir said. Without this calculated number, he explained, "we would have lost jobs in the Establishment Survey "kind of like the Household Survey indicated." "Sure, it is possible that in a time of peak uncertainty, lots of new businesses were formed, but the number seems high," Tchir said. "It is the second month in a row when there is a lot of uncertainty, where birth/death adjustment was bigger than the number itself. That is why I would weigh this into being more dovish, if I was at the Fed." Foul weather might have also had a negative impact on the data. "If the Fed was looking to cut rates, it could probably come up with a story around this data to let it do so," Tchir said. "Since the Fed doesn't seem to be looking to cut rates, though, there is enough of a narrative in this report to keep it on hold." "After this data, I remain in the three-to-four-cuts-this-year camp, starting in July." Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
US goods import drop by a record 20% in April
US goods imports fell 20% in April, a record drop reported by the US Census Bureau, coming off of President Trump's April 8 "Liberation Day" tariffs. Yahoo Finance senior columnist Rick Newman discusses supply chain shocks and whether Elon Musk can rally opposition to Trump's "Big, Beautiful" tax and spending bill. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. US goods imports plummeted in April, falling by 20% from the prior month. The numbers giving some startling insights into the challenges everyday shoppers may be facing over the next few months. For more on the looming import shortage, let's welcome in Yahoo Finance's Rick Newman for this week's rendition of Trumpnomics. So, Rick, what do we learn from those numbers? Hey, guys. Uh, you know, most people pay no attention to import data, export data. I do. Uh, and, uh, it's pretty startling when you see the biggest drop month to month in imports on record, in data that goes back to 1992. We know why that is, because, uh, companies do not want to import, uh, stuff from other countries with the Trump tariffs in place. So, a lot of companies that import stuff, there's big companies like Walmart, Walmart, and a bunch of very small businesses. Um, a lot of them are just waiting. They they think maybe Trump will make some of these trade deals, and the current tariff rates will go lower. And if they can get pay a lower tax in the future, uh, they'd rather do that. Others, we know they are actually paying the higher tariffs because, uh, tariff revenue actually went up, even though imports went down in April and May. This is all coming to a store near you sometime soon. I mean, these are not these seem like abstract numbers, but this is telling you that the amount of stuff coming into the United States is declining. Uh, I've been talking to some economists and other analysts who are likening this to the early days of the Covid pandemic in 2020, when there were, uh, huge disruptions in supply chains. I mean, think back to what that was like. We had some product shortages on store shelves. After a while, we saw a lot of big price increases. Now, that is not baked in yet. Um, if Trump relents on, uh, his tariffs, then maybe we it won't be quite that bad. But if things stay like they are, we're going to start to see COVID style shortages and price hikes within one, two, or three months. Rick, switching gears, I have a different question for you, which is, I am curious whether you think the Trump Musk bromance breakup could impact Trump's budget bill. And here I have a note from Brian Gardner, very smart strategist over at Stifel. Here was his take, Rick. Here's what he told his clients, speaking of the bromance breakup. Brian says, unlikely to result in meaningful changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill. He says that does not mean that some Senate Republicans won't try to reduce spending by more than what the House proposed, but Musk's sway among Republican voters, he says, is limited. It's unlikely that he'll be able to influence a legislative process that has already moved well down the tracks. You agree with Brian, Rick? Disagree? What do you say? Man, I was wondering what your out of left field question was going to be, and I'm like, Musk, Musk, Musk, it's got to be Musk, I guess, right. Um, I think it depends what happens next. I think it depends how hard Elon Musk wants to go after this bill. And you have to keep in mind that, um, Musk does not need to persuade five or 10 or 20% of Republican voters that this bill stinks. I mean, most most Americans are not paying attention to this bill. They'll they'll, you know, figure out what's in it after it passes. What who Musk is talking to is a small number of conservatives in the House and Senate, um, who who don't like the bill. They do not almost none of them want to be the lone Republican who goes up against Trump and bucks his legislation, uh, and might bring down the whole bill. But if Musk gives them top cover, maybe something will happen. So, I think, you know, having tweeted about this bill a few times in the last week, that's not enough. If he really wants to go to the mat and kill this thing, um, he's going to have to keep at it. He's going to have to start talking to people in Congress, um, and and and see what kind of, uh, muscle twisting he can really do. Um, now we do we know where this is headed? I think we have no idea. He is completely unpredictable. Um, he's created a firestorm here. Is he just going to retreat? I think he's going to continue to agitate. I just don't know if it's going to be enough to make a difference. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data