Coles sees strong demand in home brand, keeps 'eye on' tariff ripple effects
Australian supermarket chain
Coles' chief said on Wednesday that shoppers remain sharply focused on value, driving strong quarterly growth in its premium home-brand line, while it keeps a close eye on potential impacts from global tariffs.
CEO Leah Weckert flagged that while the company is not directly affected by tariffs levied by U.S. President Donald Trump, it has been "keeping an eye on" indirect effects of the global trade war, such as on beef production.
The company's latest survey had shown a "modest uptick in terms of how people are feeling ... although I would say that some of the events from the U.S. and around the tariffs are probably offsetting that - the uncertainty that is bringing," she told reporters on a conference call.
Coles reported third quarter group sales of A$10.38 billion ($6.64 billion), 3.4 per cent higher than last year, reflecting strong growth at its supermarket business on higher volumes.
Weckert said customers were looking for more affordable options, resulting in a 13.7 per cent rise in sales at Coles Finest, the company's
premium home brand
.
Coles said product availability improved during the quarter as new
automated distribution centres
came online, while warehouse enhancements contributed to a smoother experience for online shoppers.
Analysts at Jefferies said the quarterly result was a solid outcome given sales accelerated from a relatively strong base in the same quarter a year earlier.
Investors, however failed to cheer the results, with the Coles stock trading 1.3 per cent lower in Sydney.
The grocer flagged that supermarket sales growth in the fourth quarter remained broadly in line with the previous three months.
"The Q4 outlook appears to be running in line with Q3 at this stage, which again is decent but fell short of wowing investors and that's why Coles' stock price had a hard time garnering much enthusiasm today," said Tim Waterer, market analyst at KCM Trade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's tariffs remain in effect for longer, US Appeals Court says: What does it mean?
Donald Trump can continue to enforce his global tariffs for now until the appeals proceed, a federal appeals court held in a win for the president on one of his signature economic policies. The order Tuesday by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends an earlier, short-term reprieve for the administration as it presses a challenge to a lower court ruling last month that blocked the tariffs. The Justice Department argued that the concerns of US officials over ongoing trade negotiations took precedence over the economic harm reported by the small businesses that filed the lawsuit. What does it mean? The court ruling means that President Donald Trump can, for now, continue enforcing his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on imports from most US trading partners. This includes a separate set of tariffs specifically imposed on Canada, China, and Mexico.
Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump's ‘Liberation Day' tariffs to remain in effect after US appeals court grants stay
A federal appeals court in the US on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on the grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC means Donald Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most US trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico, news agency Reuters reported. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Donald Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with US trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
DoorDash customer misleading claims row: Did food ordering company fool users with ‘drip pricing'? What we know
DoorDash, a popular food delivery platform, is under fire following a lawsuit filed by Canada's Competition Bureau, alleging the company engaged in 'drip pricing', a deceptive practice that misleads customers by advertising lower prices than what they ultimately pay. The claims suggest DoorDash amassed nearly $1 billion in hidden fees over a decade. The Competition Bureau filed an application with Canada's Competition Tribunal, accusing DoorDash and its Canadian subsidiary of drip pricing, where advertised prices exclude mandatory fees revealed only at checkout. The Bureau claims customers cannot purchase items at the promoted price due to fees like service, delivery, expanded range, small order, and regulatory response fees. Read More: Walmart faces renewed boycott calls over owner Christy Walton's action - Here's what happened The Bureau added that it estimates DoorDash collected nearly $1 billion in mandatory fees from Canadian consumers over nearly a decade. The lawsuit seeks penalties, an end to deceptive pricing, cessation of misrepresenting fees as taxes, and restitution for affected customers. DoorDash called the lawsuit 'misguided and excessive', denying it hides fees or misleads customers. 'Transparency with customers is a top priority at DoorDash. All fees on DoorDash, which support the high-quality operations of our platform, are clearly labeled and disclosed to consumers through the ordering process — including a final review before payment. To be crystal clear, DoorDash does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way,' a spokesperson told The Street. Read More: What is Insurrection Act? 1807 law Donald Trump could invoke in Los Angeles amid anti-ICE riots The Bureau said its investigation found that fees are often hidden or not displayed near advertised prices until checkout. A 2023 t.-action lawsuit in the US similarly alleged DoorDash's fees, including 'city' or 'regulatory response' charges, mislead consumers into believing they're government-imposed. These fees, kept by DoorDash, circumvent local fee caps, the suit claimed.
