logo
Trump's cuts to US-funded broadcasters a 'gift to autocracies', say media experts

Trump's cuts to US-funded broadcasters a 'gift to autocracies', say media experts

Yahoo21-03-2025

After US President Donald Trump announced cuts to Voice of America (VOA) and its sister broadcasters last Friday, state-run media outlets in autocratic countries like China and Russia were quick to celebrate.
The Global Times, a newspaper controlled by China's ruling communist party, rejoiced in the shuttering of VOA, calling it a 'lie factory' that had been 'discarded by its own government like a dirty rag'.
The reaction in Russia was similarly euphoric, with Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of the state-backed RT network, epitomising the mood in pro-Kremlin circles.
'We couldn't shut them down, unfortunately, but America did so itself,' she said.
Since their founding in the 1940s and 1950s, the US-funded VOA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) have been seen by the West as beacons for the international free press.
Beamed into countries where independent journalism is often hard to find, the networks have delivered news to tens of millions of people in dozens of local languages each year.
But Trump's recent executive order, which aimed to stop American taxpayers from funding what he called 'radical propaganda', has put the future of such reporting in doubt.
More than 1,300 people were put on administrative leave at VOA over the weekend, while RFE/RL's grant agreement has been terminated, leaving it in financial uncertainty.
The funding cuts affected all outlets under the umbrella of the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM), including Radio and TV Martí, which report on Cuba, and Radio Free Asia.
As with the slashing of the country's foreign aid and development agency, USAID, some see the Trump administration's attack against USAGM outlets as an act of national self-harm which will diminish American soft power overseas.
Alsu Kurmasheva, a Russian-American journalist who works for RFE/RL's Tatar-Bashkir service, shares this view.
'This is similar to an own goal in football — it bothers me that we're handing a gift to autocracies. RFE/RL has always been incredibly important for American interests,' Kurmasheva told Euronews.
'We know the Kremlin is celebrating, we saw the glee all over their state-sponsored propaganda channels. The beneficiaries are autocrats who don't want their citizens to have access to independent news and information. Their survival depends on keeping their populations in the dark,' she added.
Kurmasheva, who was detained in Russia for nine months between 2023 and 2024 because of her reporting, said RFE/RL's greatest strength is the trust it has built up with its audiences over the past 75 years.
'They relied on us for news about Chernobyl, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and major events both domestic and global. They know we don't play games with the news.'
Hundreds of messages and calls have poured in from concerned audience members since last Friday, said Kurmasheva, including people living under repressive regimes in Afghanistan, Bulgaria and Russia.
"The beneficiaries are autocrats who don't want their citizens to have access to independent news and information. Their survival depends on keeping their populations in the dark."
Liam Scott, a VOA press freedom reporter, who, like around 500 of his colleagues, found out on Sunday that his contract will be terminated at the end of March, is also worried about the consequences of Trump's executive order.
'I think it's noteworthy that state-run media in places like Russia and China have been really celebrating this move. And they've been doing that because VOA, RFE and Radio Free Asia are really good at delivering balanced coverage,' Scott told Euronews.
'I have concerns about what the potential demise of VOA and its sister outlets could mean for our audiences' access to independent news in places where it is hard to come by,' he said.
Americans may not be its intended audience, but they are still key stakeholders in its work, said Scott. 'Because VOA is a really key component of the US' soft power. We model what a free press looks like to the rest of the world,' he explained.
Gypsy Guillén Kaiser, the chief global affairs officer at the Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), a press freedom charity, said Trump's cuts would have severe repercussions for the millions of people whom USAGM outlets serve.
In closed media landscapes like in Myanmar, where war has been raging since a military coup in 2021, a dangerous gap would be left if accurate, uncensored information is withdrawn, Guillén Kaiser explained.
'You're creating a void that ultimately serves the needs of those interested in pursuing mis- and disinformation, while at the same time making journalists vulnerable,' she said.
Ten people working for USAGM entities are currently in jail in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Myanmar, Russia and Vietnam, according to Reporters Without Borders, which is calling, along with the CPJ and others, for the Trump administration to reverse its decision.
'I have concerns about what the potential demise of VOA and its sister outlets could mean for our audiences' access to independent news in places where it is hard to come by,'
'What we are demanding at this point in time is that Congress reinstate the funding, which is legally mandated and cannot be politicised,' Guillén Kaiser said.
RFE/RL announced on Tuesday that it was suing the Trump administration over the withholding of funds allocated to the broadcaster by Congress.
Over in Europe, countries such as the Czech Republic, where RFE/RL has its headquarters, have raised the possibility of helping to fund the organisation.
In an attempt to justify its actions against the USAGM's outlets, Trump and his allies not only claim VOA, RFE/RL and their partner broadcasters are biased against the Republican party, but also that their reporting benefits the US' enemies.
Kari Lake, a Trump ally who is currently serving as a senior adviser to the USAGM, recently derided the agency's news organisations for producing 'a product that often parrots the talking points of America's adversaries'.
This interpretation is hard to square with reality, according to Thomas Kent, the former president and CEO of RFE/RL.
'Any reasonable look at what the agencies are doing would very quickly reveal that we certainly report the US side of things,' he said. 'Adversaries like Russia and China must feel we are pretty pro-American or they wouldn't make such frantic efforts to block us.'
'If these shutdowns go through, the US will be depriving itself unilaterally of some of the most powerful tools it has to communicate with foreign populations,' he stressed.
Kent recognises that improvements could be made.
'If you wanted to improve USAGM, you would have to start with a decision — which outside commentators have quarrelled over forever, as to what it's supposed to be,' he said, noting the tension over whether its services should primarily be seen as an objective news source or a tool of US government messaging.
Other things could also be assessed, including whether to merge Radio and TV Martí's reporting on Cuba with VOA's wider Latin American coverage, Kent said.
Related
Trump cuts off funding for pro-democracy media outlets VOA and RFERL
Will the EU be able to save Radio Free Europe after Trump's funding cuts?
'These are the types of things that could legitimately be discussed by the administration with an eye to efficiency, cutting out waste and so forth. But you don't advance that by shutting everything down and firing everyone,' he said.
Kent noted that a major benefit of RFE/RL is that its news products are believed to reach 10% of the Russian population on a regular basis.
'Not everyone who listens to us is necessarily pro-American. People who have an open mind want to hear what we have to say,' he said.
'And that's our greatest goal. In Russia or any other country, it's the undecideds — the people who are looking for information from different sides — who make a difference in the direction a country ultimately goes.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread
Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread

As protests against his immigration policies balloon nationwide, President Donald Trump is seeing one of his favorite musicals on Wednesday night: 'Les Misérables,' the story of an anti-government uprising, abusive police and harsh imprisonment. Trump is going to opening night of the famous musical's one-month run at Washington, D.C.'s John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, whose entire board of trustees he replaced in February and had them name him chairman. 'We've seen it many times,' Trump said upon arriving at the Kennedy Center with first lady Melania Trump. 'Love it. One of my favorites.' When a reporter asked him which side of the musical's conflict he most identified with, Trump laughed and refused to answer. 'That's tough. You better answer that one, honey,' he said, gesturing to the first lady. 'I don't know.' When another reporter asked how he felt about reports that some of the 'Les Misérables' cast would be boycotting the night of his performance, Trump said he 'couldn't care less.' 'All I do is run the country well,' he retorted. Trump received a mixture of cheers and boos when he took his seat at the theater. His attendance comes after he deployed National Guard troops to face largely peaceful protesters in Los Angeles and announced he was sending in Marines, despite pushback from local leadership. 'Les Misérables,' the musical based on the 1862 novel of the same name, tells the story of French peasant Jean Valjean after he emerges from a 19-year prison sentence for stealing a loaf of bread for his niece. Much of the musical centers around student demonstrations against the French monarchy. One of the musical's most recognizable songs ― 'Do You Hear The People Sing?' ― has a long history as an anthem at pro-democracy demonstrations. It's also an apparent favorite of Trump's, as he played the song right before walking onstage to announce his third presidential run in 2022. Several drag performers also attended the show Wednesday night to protest Trump, who announced in February there would be 'NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA' at the Kennedy Center going forward. They received applause as they walked in to the theater, social media videos show. Vagenesis, whose government name is Anderson Wells, was one of the planned attendees. 'Theater is supposed to be a place of community, a place of storytelling, a place of celebration, joy, catharsis and it should be open and available to all,' Vagenesis told NPR on Wednesday. Trump's former Vice President Mike Pence similarly caused a stir when he went to see 'Hamilton' shortly after winning the 2016 election. He was loudly booed when he arrived at the Manhattan theater. When Pence was trying to exit the theater after the final curtain call, actor Brandon Dixon, who was playing the part of Aaron Burr, asked him to stay and delivered a message to him. 'We, sir, we are the diverse America, who are alarmed and anxious that your new administration will not protect us, our planet, our children, our parents or defend us and uphold our inalienable rights,' Dixon said. 'We truly hope that this show has inspired you to uphold our American values and to work on behalf of all of us,' he continued. Pam Bondi Warns Of More Arrests In California Amid Protests Against Immigration Raids Karoline Leavitt Snaps At Reporter For 'Stupid Question' About Peaceful Protests There's Growing Anger Over Flags Flown At LA Protests. Here's What Everyone Is Getting Wrong.

Family of former Fort Novosel namesake believes new order is a slap in the face: ‘I am just appalled'
Family of former Fort Novosel namesake believes new order is a slap in the face: ‘I am just appalled'

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Family of former Fort Novosel namesake believes new order is a slap in the face: ‘I am just appalled'

Ft. Novosel, Ala. (WDHN) — President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that his administration would work to change the names of seven Army bases, including Fort Novosel, that previously bore the names of Confederate Army officers. K. Denise Rucker Krepp, a cousin of Confederate Colonel Edmund Rucker, for whom Fort Novosel was previously named, believes the order from President Trump to restore the names of army bases is a step backward, despite the base being named in honor of a different Rucker. 'Rucker is not that important. My family committed treason,' Krepp said. 'We should not be looking to the past. Why are you doing this, and as a Rucker, I am just appalled.' Trump says he will reverse Fort Novosel name change After almost two years, with the base renamed to Fort Novosel, President Trump called for all Army bases that had their names changed in 2023 under the previous administration to revert to their original names. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts, it's no time to change,' President Donald Trump said. 'It was a gut punch, it hurts, and it was quite sad. My family committed treason, lost a war, and an American base in the United States should have never been named in honor of one of my family members,' Krepp said. The base was renamed in honor of Chief Warrant Officer 4 Michael Novosel Sr., a local Army aviator who served in three wars and saved 29 soldiers during a medevac mission. It will now be in honor of a Missouri native, Captain Edward Rucker, a distinguished service cross recipient pilot for extraordinary heroism in World War 1. Fort Novosel to be reverted to Fort Rucker with new namesake. Who is it? 'It's being named for him because of his last name, not about what he did — Novosel was a hero, and that's who it should be named after,' Krepp said. 'Heartbreaking to see the disrespect to Vietnam veterans. Novosel was a Vietnam veteran, and when you take his name off it's disrespectful to his family and everybody who fought,' She added. Krepp encourages people to do research on Novosel, and she says, despite the name change, she will still refer to it as Fort Novosel. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress
Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress

Most Democrats disapprove of how their party's lawmakers in Congress are handling their jobs, according to a new national poll. Fifty-three percent of Democrats questioned in a Quinnipiac University survey released Wednesday gave their party's congressional members a thumbs-down, while 41% approved of their performance. According to the poll, conducted June 5-8, just 21% of all voters approved of the way Democrats in Congress were handing their jobs, with seven in ten disapproving. Head Here For The Latest Fox News Polling The 21% approval is the same as in Quinnipiac's February national poll, matching "an all-time low since Quinnipiac University first asked this question of registered voters in March 2009." The survey indicates 79% of GOP voters approve of the way congressional Republicans are handling their job, with 13% disapproving. Read On The Fox News App Where Trump Stands In Fox News Polling 100 Days Into His Second Term Among all voters, 32% approved of how GOP congressional members were performing their duties, while just over six in ten disapproved. Overall approval for Republicans in Congress has dropped eight points since Quinnipiac's February poll, with disapproval jumping nine points. The Democratic Party has been in the political wilderness since November's elections, when Republicans won back control of the White House and the Senate and defended their fragile House majority. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base. Since President Donald Trump's return to power earlier this year, an increasingly energized base of Democrats is urging party leaders to take a stronger stand in pushing back against the president's sweeping and controversial agenda during the opening months of his second administration. And their anger is directed not only at Republicans, but at Democrats they feel aren't vocal enough in their opposition to Trump. And that's fueled a plunge in the Democratic Party's favorable ratings, which have hit historic lows in several surveys the past couple of months. The new poll from Quinnipiac also indicates a decline in Trump's approval ratings among voters nationwide. Thirty-eight percent of those questioned in the survey said they approve of the way the president is handling his duties, down three points from Quinnipiac's early April poll. Fifty-four percent in the new poll gave Trump a thumbs-down for his handling of his job as president, down one point from the April survey. Trump's approval ratings were mostly above water as he returned to the White House in late January, but his numbers soon slid underwater in many national surveys and remain in negative territory nearly five months into his second article source: Poll: Majority of Democrats give thumbs-down to their leaders in Congress

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store