Trump vs Newsom: federal court rules US President has control over California National Guard in LA protest response
A federal appeals court has granted President
Donald Trump
continued authority over the
California National Guard
, allowing thousands of troops to remain under federal command in response to protests against immigration enforcement actions in Los Angeles. The unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
overturned a lower court ruling that had sided with California Governor Gavin Newsom.
The court's action comes as part of an ongoing legal battle over who controls the state's military forces during periods of civil unrest. Trump invoked federal law in early June 2025 to federalize nearly 4,100 California National Guard members and deployed an additional 700 active-duty Marines to Los Angeles, where demonstrators had gathered outside federal buildings in protest of immigration raids. This marks the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state's National Guard without the governor's consent.
Governor Newsom, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's authority, arguing that the move was illegal and exceeded presidential powers. On June 12, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer agreed with Newsom, ordering Trump to return control of the troops to the state. However, the appeals court quickly issued a stay, and Thursday's ruling extended that suspension while the legal dispute continues.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
In their decision, the appeals court judges wrote, 'Given that deference to the President, we find it likely that he exercised his statutory powers lawfully.' The panel emphasized that judicial review of presidential decisions to federalize the National Guard should be 'highly deferential,' citing longstanding legal precedent. The judges also noted that the temporary restraining order issued by the lower court could have adversely affected the public interest amid widespread protests.
The court's decision was issued by a panel that included two Trump appointees and one appointed by former President
Joe Biden
. Legal experts say the ruling reflects a broader judicial trend of granting the president significant discretion in matters of national security and military deployment.
Live Events
Governor Newsom has condemned the decision, calling the deployment an 'unnecessary provocation' and warning that it sets a dangerous precedent for federal overreach in state affairs. He has vowed to continue his legal challenge, and legal analysts suggest California may seek emergency intervention from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, Trump and his administration have defended the deployment as necessary to restore order and protect federal property and agents. 'The president has broad—though not 'unreviewable'—authority to deploy the military in American cities,' wrote Judge Mark J. Bennett, one of the panel's members, in the court's opinion.
As of Thursday, approximately 4,800 federal military personnel remain deployed in Los Angeles, including about 4,100 National Guard members and 700 Marines. While the intensity of protests has subsided somewhat in recent days, the legal and political standoff over the use of military forces in domestic law enforcement continues to unfold.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russian drones slam into 2 Ukrainian cities, killing at least 1 person in nighttime attack
Russian drones slam into 2 Ukrainian cities, killing at least 1 person in night-time attack (Image: AP) KYIV: Russian drones slammed into two Ukrainian cities, killing at least one person in night time attacks, authorities said Friday, as a Kremlin official said he expected an announcement next week on dates for a fresh round of direct peace talks. Russia's overnight drone assault targeted the southern Ukraine port city of Odesa and the north-eastern city of Kharkiv, hitting apartment blocks, officials said. The barrage of more than 20 drones injured almost two dozen civilians, including girls aged 17 and 12, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. "Russia continues its tactics of targeted terror against our people," Zelenskyy said on messaging app Telegram, urging the United States and the European Union to crank up economic pressure on Russia. Russia has shown no signs of relenting in its attacks, more than three years after it invaded its neighbour. It is pressing a summer offensive on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and has kept up long-range strikes that have hit civilian areas. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday that the date for the next round peace talks is expected to be agreed upon next week. Kyiv officials have not recently spoken about resuming talks with Russia, last held when delegations met in Istanbul on June 2, though Ukraine continues to offer a ceasefire and support U.S.-led by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting. The two rounds of brief talks yielded only agreements on the exchange of prisoners and wounded soldiers. Ukraine and Russia's Defence Ministry announced the latest swap Friday, although they did not specify how many troops were involved. Zelenskyy said most of those returning home had been in captivity for more than two years. A fire caused by Russia's nighttime strike on Odesa engulfed a four-story residential building, which partly collapsed and injured three emergency workers. A separate fire spread across the upper floors of a 23-story high-rise, leading to the evacuation of around 600 residents. In Kharkiv, at least eight drones hit civilian infrastructure, injuring four people, including two children, according to Ukraine's Emergency Service. Russia launched 80 Shahed and decoy drones overnight, Ukraine's air force said, claiming that air defences shot down or jammed 70 of them.
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran-Israel war: Can US' GBU-57 bunker buster destroy Iran's underground Fordow nuclear site? Experts make stunning claim, say Trump is unsure of...
Trump is unsure whether the GBU-57 bunker buster can take out Iran's Fordow nuclear site. (File) Iran-Israel war: US President Donald Trump has threatened to join its ally Israel in its war against Iran, demanding an 'unconditional surrender' from Tehran, and even threatening to assassinate Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. However, beyond the war rhetoric, Trump remains undecided on whether to commit the United States to a war in the Middle East which it may not be able to pull out of for at least 5-10 years, especially since the US President remains skeptical about whether its lethal bunker buster bombs have the capability to destroy Iran's underground Fordow nuclear facility. Trump unsure about bunker buster's ability to destroy Fordow site According to defense experts, Donald Trump is unsure whether even the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster, aka the 'mother of all bombs', would be able to destroy the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is basically buried beneath a gigantic mountain, and is protected by multiple units of Russian-made S-300 air defense systems. As per media reports, Trump has told defense officials that the US would be justified in attacking Iran only if the bunker buster bomb is guaranteed to destroy the uranium enrichment facility at Fordow. The US President was told that the gargantuan 30,000lbs (13.6 tonne) GBU-57 bunker buster would destroy the Fordow facility, but Trump remains unconvinced, and as such has not yet given the green light for America to join the Israel-Iran war. Additionally, experts believe that Trump is also looking at the possibility of Iran coming to the table for a 'deal' due to fear of US involvement in the Iran-Israel war. US would need tactical nukes to take out Fordow? The GBU-57, aka the bunker buster bomb, is a 30,000 pound bomb which is dropped using the US' B2 stealth bombers, and while its capable of taking out any other hardened underground facility, the Fordow site is unique as it has been specially built to withstand US' capabilities, particularly its ultra-heavy bunker buster bombs. The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is a hardened, ultra-secure nuclear facility built deep beneath a mountain, and surrounded by tall peaks on all sides. The mountainous terrain renders even the most advanced cruise missiles ineffective, and the site is protected by a large number of air defense systems concentrated in a small region, making it almost impossible for any missile or drone to go through. US defense officials believe that only a tactical nuclear weapon would be able to completely destroy the Fordow nuclear facility, but Trump is not in favor of using nukes to attack the site. Quoting people familiar with the matter, The Guardian reported that Israeli intelligence estimates that the Fordow nuclear plant, which is built under a mountain near the Qom city, could be up to 90 meters deep. To reach such a depth, the US would have to have to weaken the ground with conventional bombs and then drop a tactical nuclear bomb from a B2 bomber to wipe out the entire facility. However, Donald Trump, at least for now, is not in favor of using the nuclear option, the report said.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Canadian intelligence agency confirms Khalistani extremists in Canada
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has acknowledged the presence of Khalistani extremists operating from Canadian soil, stating they use the country 'as a base for promotion, fundraising, or planning of violence primarily in India.' The findings were detailed in the CSIS Public Report 2024 released on Wednesday, which also emphasized that only a small group of individuals are considered Khalistani extremists. The report was released shortly after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on the sidelines of the G7 summit. The leaders agreed to work toward mending bilateral relations, which had deteriorated following the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in 2023 — a Canadian national designated a terrorist by India. Accusations by former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleging India's involvement had led to a major diplomatic standoff. Clarifying Canada's stance, the report noted that non-violent advocacy for an independent Khalistan is not treated as extremism under Canadian law. However, it flagged politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE) as a concern, particularly from Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs), a phenomenon present since the mid-1980s. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Highlighting India's long-standing concerns, the report referenced New Delhi's view that Canada has historically been a safe haven for anti-India activities, especially in light of the 1985 Air India bombing and related terrorism in India. While no CBKE-related attacks occurred in Canada in 2024, the report noted that 'real and perceived Khalistani extremism emerging from Canada continues to drive Indian foreign interference activities in Canada.' The report also addressed the Canadian government's and RCMP's ongoing investigation into Nijjar's killing, stating that 'links between the Government of India and the Nijjar murder signal a significant escalation in India's repression efforts against the Khalistan movement.' Live Events Additionally, the report referred to the first phase of the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference (PIFI), which began in March 2024. It alleged that both Indian and Pakistani officials engaged in foreign interference, with Pakistan aiming to counter India's growing global influence. The report concluded by recommending sustained vigilance regarding India's 'continued foreign interference' in Canadian affairs.
