Malaysian Agency Targets $1 Billion of Late Tycoon's Assets: NST
Malaysia's anti-graft agency is targeting assets worth at least 4.5 billion ringgit ($1 billion) in five other countries belonging to the late tycoon and former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, the New Straits Times reported.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission plans to send a restraining order request to the respective countries using the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 2002, the newspaper cited the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Chief Commissioner Azam Baki as saying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Thai Premier Paetongtarn's Support Slumps in Poll Amid Protest
Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's support has slumped to single digits in an opinion poll as the premier's popularity reels from a diplomatic scandal. Only 9.2% of respondents support Paetongtarn, the youngest daughter of former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, according to the June 19-25 survey by the National Institute of Development Administration, or Nida. That compares with 30.9% who backed her as premier in the previous survey conducted in March.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The 5 Most Interesting Analyst Questions From Kulicke and Soffa's Q1 Earnings Call
Kulicke and Soffa's first quarter results fell short of Wall Street's expectations, with both revenue and adjusted earnings missing analyst estimates. The market responded negatively, reflecting investor concerns about ongoing volatility in the company's core semiconductor equipment markets. Management attributed the underperformance to customer hesitation in capital equipment spending, particularly in Southeast Asia's automotive and industrial sectors, a trend they linked to global trade uncertainty. CEO Fusen Chen described the quarter as impacted by 'hesitation and a more defensive capacity planning approach,' noting that the company's restructuring efforts, including the discontinuation of its electronics assembly equipment business, contributed to near-term margin pressure. Is now the time to buy KLIC? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $162 million vs analyst estimates of $165.1 million (5.9% year-on-year decline, 1.9% miss) Adjusted EPS: -$0.52 vs analyst estimates of $0.19 (significant miss) Adjusted EBITDA: -$22.37 million vs analyst estimates of $8.85 million (-13.8% margin, significant miss) Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $145 million at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $188.8 million Adjusted EPS guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $0.05 at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $0.35 Operating Margin: -52.3%, up from -61.1% in the same quarter last year Inventory Days Outstanding: 171, down from 213 in the previous quarter Market Capitalization: $1.84 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Krish Sankar (TD Cowen) asked about the drivers of the pronounced slowdown in Southeast Asia and whether the weakness was concentrated in general semiconductors or auto/industrial sectors. CEO Fusen Chen explained the majority of the sequential revenue decline was due to automotive uncertainty in Southeast Asia, but noted improved utilization in China and Taiwan. Tom Diffely (D.A. Davidson) inquired about the revenue run rate and profitability of the discontinued EA business. CFO Lester Wong clarified that EA contributed $25–30 million in annual revenue with modest gross profit and operating expenses, and provided details on expected wind-down costs. Charles Shi (Needham & Co.) questioned the regional divergence in order activity and the specifics of the company's fluxless thermo-compression bonding (TCB) capacity. Chen emphasized that capacity constraints in fluxless TCB are being addressed and that current growth targets remain intact. Craig Ellis (B. Riley Securities) asked whether elevated utilization rates could lead to a demand pull-forward, impacting future quarters. Wong replied that customers remain cautious due to tariff uncertainty, and the company does not expect a subsequent drop in utilization rates. Dave Duley (Steelhead Securities) sought clarification on utilization rates and the company's exposure to future DRAM opportunities. Wong noted utilization in China and Taiwan exceeds 80%, while Chen outlined plans to increase exposure to DRAM and high-bandwidth memory markets in 2026. In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will closely monitor (1) the pace at which elevated utilization rates in China and Taiwan lead to new capacity purchases as trade policy uncertainty resolves, (2) the progress and customer adoption of recently launched advanced packaging products such as ATPremier MEM Plus and Sonotrode-enabled pin welding systems, and (3) the company's execution on winding down the electronics assembly equipment business and managing associated costs. Additionally, we will watch for signs of renewed order activity in Southeast Asia's automotive and industrial markets as macro conditions evolve. Kulicke and Soffa currently trades at $37.14, up from $31.74 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? See for yourself in our full research report (it's free). The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025. While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
With 47% ownership, Able Global Berhad (KLSE:ABLEGLOB) insiders have a lot riding on the company's future
Able Global Berhad's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company Institutional ownership in Able Global Berhad is 17% This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of Able Global Berhad (KLSE:ABLEGLOB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). So it follows, every decision made by insiders of Able Global Berhad regarding the company's future would be crucial to them. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Able Global Berhad. Check out our latest analysis for Able Global Berhad Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Able Global Berhad. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Able Global Berhad, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Able Global Berhad. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Able Global Berhad's case, its Top Key Executive, Keng Ng, is the largest shareholder, holding 12% of shares outstanding. Mia Goh is the second largest shareholder owning 9.8% of common stock, and Swee Goh holds about 9.6% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Swee Goh is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Able Global Berhad. Insiders have a RM220m stake in this RM471m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Able Global Berhad. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It seems that Private Companies own 4.1%, of the Able Global Berhad stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Able Global Berhad better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Able Global Berhad . Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
