logo
Complexities of Balochistan

Complexities of Balochistan

Express Tribune26-03-2025

Listen to article
Mehrang Langov is in jail. She was arrested while inspecting the dead bodies recovered after the Jaffar Express operation that killed hundreds, including innocent men, women, and children, alongside scores of security personnel. According to state media, she stormed into the hospital to claim the bodies, defying the image of a so-called pacifist.
For years, Mehrang has been at the forefront of protests against enforced disappearances, something that she and many in Balochistan believe is part of a state policy aimed at suppressing the separatist movement. This movement, simmering since decades, has grown increasingly violent over the past decade. While Mehrang presents herself as a human rights activist, Pakistan's state institutions see her as a pawn in the hands of foreign forces, particularly India.
She has been accused of supporting the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), a group that has not only waged war against the state but has also slaughtered thousands of innocent people, particularly those of Punjabi origin. She has also openly backed the Pashtun Tahaffuz Movement (PTM) despite its known anti-Pakistan rhetoric and activities. Repeatedly asked in media interviews to condemn the BLA and PTM, Mehrang has consistently dodged the question, instead doubling down on the narrative of enforced disappearances.
The question arises: whose bodies was she looking for at the morgue? Were they passengers, personal acquaintances, or fellow members of the Baloch Yakjehti Council (BYC), which she leads? Why was she so concerned about retrieving them? According to state sources, the bodies Mehrang sought to claim belonged to BLA militants killed in the Jaffar Express ambush. If she insists that these individuals were linked to her and the BYC, does that not imply an implicit endorsement of their violence? If, in her view, the state's alleged "kill and dump" policy is unacceptable, then why does she not extend the same moral standard to terrorist organisations?
It is undeniable that the state's heavy-handed response to the grievances of the people of Balochistan has, at times, exacerbated the crisis. When Baloch families marched to Islamabad in 2023 seeking answers about their missing loved ones, their concerns should have been met with dialogue rather than force. A more diplomatic approach, one balancing "carrot and stick", could have prevented the situation from reaching this point, where even terrorists are being painted as victims.
However, it is also essential to dismantle the false victimhood narrative surrounding Mehrang Langov. Contrary to claims that she was deprived of educational opportunities, Mehrang, a doctor by profession, received her degree from Bolan Medical College on a full scholarship. The story that her mother had to sell her clothes to raise a meager Rs5,000 annual fee is nothing but a fabrication designed to bolster the illusion of systematic oppression. Balochistan, like the rest of Pakistan, has undeniable educational challenges, but the claim that Baloch youth are entirely deprived of opportunities is misleading.
The very activists leading the BYC today — educated, articulate and well-versed in political discourse — received their education in Pakistan, not in India, Afghanistan, or the West. If they now stand against the state, it is not because they were denied education but because separatist elements have hijacked their cause.
The BLA of today bears little resemblance to the separatist movement of the early 2000s. It has devolved into a terrorist outfit, run by thugs rather than ideologues. If their real concern was the well-being of the Baloch people, why would they sabotage CPEC? Why would they attack passenger trains and buses carrying innocent civilians? Why would they keep Balochistan in a perpetual state of violence, suffocating its economic potential under the pretext of resistance? The BLA's actions have only worsened the very conditions they claim to oppose.
Pakistan's federal structure is not without fault, but it is essential to ask: who truly holds the power in Balochistan? The province has long been controlled by feudal lords and tribal chieftains, who perpetuate a cycle of exploitation. Elections, governance, and even insurgency revolve around the same elite families. One tribal chief wins an election and enters the assembly. His rival? His own brother. Meanwhile, another family member leads an armed rebellion against the state. They control both power and insurgency, ensuring that no real progress is ever made — only the common people of Balochistan continue to suffer.
When BLA terrorists recruit Baloch daughters and sisters for suicide bombings, Akhtar Mengal remains silent. His sudden decision to use the "women's rights" card for a so-called Long March is nothing more than a desperate attempt to revive his dwindling political career.
Despite the complexities, Balochistan's problems cannot be solved through brute force alone. The province needs a genuine healing touch, one that emerges from within its own sociopolitical framework. Someone from within the warring factions must take the lead in dousing the flames of separatism before the propaganda becomes too deeply entrenched to counter.
Mehrang Langov and others like her are doing no service to Balochistan or Pakistan. Instead, they are acting as useful instruments in the hands of foreign powers intent on destabilising the country. If Balochistan is to progress, it must first identify its real oppressors - not in Islamabad, but within its own feudal hierarchy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences
US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences

PARIS: U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is discouraging governments around the world from attending a U.N. conference next week on a possible two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, according to a U.S. cable seen by Reuters. The diplomatic demarche, sent on Tuesday, says countries that take 'anti-Israel actions' following the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to U.S. foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from Washington. The demarche, which was not previously reported, runs squarely against the diplomacy of two close allies France and Saudi Arabia, who are co-hosting the gathering next week in New York that aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. 'We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages,' read the cable. President Emmanuel Macron has suggested France could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territories at the conference. French officials say they have been working to avoid a clash with the U.S., Israel's staunchest major ally. UN conference on two-state solution to Mideast conflict set for June 'The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' the cable read. The United States for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of U.S. Middle East policy. The Republican president has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. But on Tuesday, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a long-time vocal supporter of Israel, said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a U.S. foreign policy goal. Gaza war 'Unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day,' the cable read, referring to when Palestinian Hamas carried out a cross-border attack from Gaza on Israel in 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages. Hamas' attack triggered Israel's air and ground war in Gaza in which almost 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of the 2.3 million population displaced and the enclave widely reduced to rubble. If Macron went ahead, France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, would become the first Western heavyweight to recognise a Palestinian state. This could lend greater momentum to a movement hitherto dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel. Macron's stance has shifted amid Israel's intensified Gaza offensive and escalating violence against Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, and there is a growing sense of urgency in Paris to act now before the idea of a two-state solution vanishes forever. The U.S. cable said Washington had worked tirelessly with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, free the hostages and end the conflict. 'This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted.' This week Britain and Canada, also G7 allies of the United States, were joined by other countries in placing sanctions on two Israeli far-right government ministers to pressure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to bring the Gaza war to an end. 'The United States opposes the implied support of the conference for potential actions including boycotts and sanctions on Israel as well as other punitive measures,' the cable read. Israel has repeatedly criticised the conference, saying it rewards Hamas for the attack on Israel, and it has lobbied France against recognising a Palestinian state. 'Nothing surprises me anymore, but I don't see how many countries could step back on their participation,' said a European diplomat, who asked for anonymity due to the subject's sensitivity. 'This is bullying, and of a stupid type.' The U.S. State Department and the French Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

FO rejects Indian FM's 'irresponsible' remarks
FO rejects Indian FM's 'irresponsible' remarks

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

FO rejects Indian FM's 'irresponsible' remarks

Listen to article The Foreign Office (FO) rejected recent remarks made by India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in Brussels, describing them as "irresponsible" and advising India to refrain from spinning misleading narratives. The statement comes after Jaishankar launched another verbal attack on Pakistan, calling it 'Terroristan'. Speaking at a joint press conference in Brussels on Tuesday alongside European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, Jaishankar said, 'I'd like you to understand this is not a conflict between two states per se." 'This is actually a response to the threat and the practice of terrorism. So, I would urge you to make it. Don't think of it as India or Pakistan; think of it as India–Terroristan. You will then appreciate it,' he added. In a statement issued on Wednesday, the FO condemned the Indian minister's rhetoric and stressed that the discourse of top diplomats should promote peace and harmony, rather than producing 'bellicose punchlines.' "The tone and tenor of a foreign minister should be commensurate with his dignified status," the spokesperson said, underscoring the importance of maintaining diplomatic decorum in international relations. 🔊PR No:1️⃣6️⃣8️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Pakistan Rejects the Remarks by the Indian External Affairs Minister Pakistan categorically rejects the irresponsible remarks made by the External Affairs Minister of India during different media engagements in Brussels. The discourse of top diplomats… — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) June 11, 2025 The spokesperson also pointed out India's ongoing campaign to mislead the international community with a fabricated narrative of victimhood. "India's continued anti-Pakistan diatribe cannot mask its sponsorship of terrorism beyond its borders nor its state-sanctioned oppression in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK)," the statement read. The FO further called out India for attempting to deflect attention from its own involvement in terrorism, subversion, and targeted assassinations, urging the Indian government to reflect on its actions rather than pointing fingers at others. It highlighted the frustration evident in India's narrative, especially after its failed military operations against Pakistan last month. 'The narrative emerging from India betrays sheer frustration, following an unsuccessful military adventure against Pakistan,' the statement read. Read More: Jaishankar's 'terroristan' remark overlooks India's own role in regional instability, aggression The FO reiterated its commitment to peaceful coexistence, dialogue, and diplomacy but stressed its firm resolve to defend its sovereignty. 'Pakistan stands resolute in its intent and ability to safeguard its sovereignty against any aggression,' it added, pointing to Pakistan's robust response to India's recent strikes. The statement concluded by suggesting that Indian leaders improve the quality of their diplomatic discourse. 'History will judge not by who shouted the loudest, but by who acted the wisest,' it said.

Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb
Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb

Business Recorder

time6 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Minimum wage to remain unchanged at Rs37,000 in FY26, says Aurangzeb

Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Wednesday said the government hadn't increased the minimum wage in the budget for the financial year 2025-26 and it would remain at Rs37,000 per month. The finance minister didn't mention about the minimum wage in his budget speech on Tuesday, as he announced Pakistan's federal budget 2025-26 'for a competitive economy' on Tuesday, targeting a modest 4.2% growth for the coming fiscal year, compared to 2.7% expected in the outgoing FY25. The budget was announced with a total outlay of Rs17.6 trillion, down 7% or Rs1.3 trillion as compared to the Rs18.9 trillion budgeted outlay of FY25. Key highlights of Pakistan budget for 2025-26 Last year, the government increased the minimum per month wage to Rs37,000 from previously Rs32,000. However, the government has kept it unchanged this year. This comes despite a demand from a key ally of Pakistan Muslim League - Nawaz (PML-N) led government, Pakistan People's Party (PPP) to increase the minimum wage to Rs50,000.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store