logo
Hampstead Ladies' Pond fails to ban trans women

Hampstead Ladies' Pond fails to ban trans women

Telegraph30-04-2025

Hampstead Heath Ladies' Pond has refused to ban trans women despite a Supreme Court ruling.
The women-only bathing spot is maintaining its inclusive policy even though the UK's highest court has found that trans women are not legally female.
Kenwood Ladies' Pond, which opened a century ago for women and girls, became a flashpoint in the debate over trans rights after the City of London Corporation adopted a self-ID policy in 2019.
Gender-critical feminists have fought to 'reclaim' the pond – the UK's sole women-only natural bathing pool – but their campaign has been contested bitterly by trans activists, including broadcaster India Willoughby.
On Wednesday, the London authority – which also oversees the neighbouring Hampstead Heath men's and mixed ponds – confirmed its self-ID policy would 'remain in effect at this time' while it considered the implications of the Supreme Court judgment.
The decision not to suspend pond access for trans women has drawn sharp criticism from feminist campaigners, who call the policy 'invasive, discriminatory and unlawful'. A prominent barrister also told The Telegraph that continuing to label the ponds as 'men's' and 'ladies'' could now expose the corporation to legal challenge.
Sarah Vine KC said that if the City of London Corporation wished to maintain its gender self-ID stance, it 'should not describe the ponds as anything other than mixed sex'.
'Any continued description of two of the ponds as 'men's' and 'ladies' will expose the Corporation to discrimination claims; the practical effect of doing so is far more likely to result in a de facto single sex facility for men, who can enjoy the consequential privacy, with no corresponding provision for women,' she said.
She added: 'This is despite the fact that women's overall need for safety and privacy is generally higher than that of men.'
Venice Allan, 49, a feminist activist at the centre of a campaign to restore the pond as a single-sex space, told The Telegraph she was not surprised by the local authority's response.
'It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that the Corporation is trying to fudge this,' she said.
Ms Allan was the first woman to be banned from the Kenwood Ladies' Pond Association, which represents regular users, after objecting to biological men being granted access.
Explaining her passion for the issue, she told The Telegraph that women 'need women's spaces for our safety, privacy and dignity, and also – in this case – for our joy.'
'The ponds are stunningly beautiful and special to any woman who goes. Going for the first time when I was 21 was one of my first experiences of a women-only space that wasn't utilitarian. I thought, 'Oh wow, this is what women-only spaces can be like.'
There's no splashing, shouting or pushing in, like in most mixed pools where boys and men dominate.'
On August 27, 2022, she participated in a 'Let Women Swim' protest on Hampstead Heath against the gender self-ID policy. The campaign was opposed by prominent trans women including Willoughby.
On the morning of the protest, Willoughby, who is in a long-running row with JK Rowling over trans rights, sunbathed beside the ladies pool wearing a bikini and posted it online, saying it was 'a great way to keep fit'.
Fiona McAnena, director of campaigns at the human rights charity Sex Matters, told The Telegraph: 'Feminist campaigners have been telling the City of London for years that its policy allowing men into facilities such as Kenwood Ladies' Pond on Hampstead Heath is invasive, discriminatory and unlawful, but those women were ignored.
'Now the Supreme Court's decision makes the inclusion of men in designated women's spaces untenable.
'The City of London and those managing women's swimming facilities need to admit defeat and immediately restore boundaries that respect the safety, dignity and privacy of women who have the right to expect clear rules based on biological sex.
'Each day the City of London and other local authorities delay aligning their policies on women's spaces with the law is one more day at serious risk of legal action.'
'Is compliant with existing UK law'
On Wednesday a spokesman for the City of London Corporation told The Telegraph its policy was not unlawful.
He said: 'These accusations are completely false. The City Corporation is compliant with existing UK law.
'In line with other affected organisations we are carefully considering the judgment and awaiting statutory guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission – which service providers must take into account.
He added that 'a carefully considered decision... will be take in due course' and that they 'reman committed to providing a safe... environment for all'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?
Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?

Daily Record

timea day ago

  • Daily Record

Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?

The San Jose is a Spanish galleon that was sunk in 1708 by the Royal Navy, carrying a serious amount of treasure A shipwreck believed to contain one of history's hugest bounties of treasure- amounting to around £16 billion- has been confirmed by researchers, sparking a fiery legal battle over who should own the cash. The Spanish galleon San Jose is packed with gold, silver and emeralds, and it had been lost beneath the Caribbean waters for more than 300 years. But the location of this long-lost ship has now reached the surface, as academics in Colombia have now definitively identified the wreckage. A wreck found near Baru Island, off the coast of Cartagena, in 2015, has now been confirmed as the legendary ship that sank in 1708 following a fierce battle with the Royal Navy, according to The Telegraph. ‌ Now known as the "holy grail of shipwrecks" for its bountiful riches, the San Jose was transporting treasure from Peru to Spain to finance the Spanish side of the War of the Spanish Succession. But on its journey, the vessel was intercepted by a British squadron led by Charles Wager, who later became First Lord of the Admiralty. ‌ During the clash, the ship's powder magazines detonated, sending it and its valuable cargo to the murky depths, reports the Express. Finding the ship had been deemed a lost cause until an expedition in 2015 used underwater drones to capture images of the wreckage on the seabed. Now, experts believe that the mystery has finally been solved after 300 years. "This body of evidence substantiates the identification of the wreck as the San Jose Galleon, a hypothesis that has been put forward since its initial discovery in 2015," the academics concluded. "The finding of cobs created in 1707 at the Lima Mint points to a vessel navigating the Tierra Firme route in the early 18th century. The San Jose Galleon is the only ship that matches these characteristics. ‌ "This find presents a rare opportunity to explore an underwater archaeological site and deepen our understanding of colonial maritime trade and routes." But as the discovery makes headlines, a legal row has ensued on where (and with whom) the treasure belongs. ‌ Photographs of the undersea wreck show dazzling artefacts including silver coins minted in 1707 at the Lima Mint, exquisite Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period (1662-1722), and ancient cannons emblazoned with markings tracing back to 1665. Colombia, Spain and Peru are all gunning for the treasure, with each nation laying historical claims over the sunken bounty that dates back centuries. Indigenous groups along with descendants of the miners who originally extracted the gold and silver from Peruvian soil also demand recognition and rights to the wreck's riches. ‌ Adding to the high seas drama is Glocca Morra, a determined treasure-hunting outfit asserting that it pinpointed the wreck years ago, as early as 1981. The enterprise's modern-day incarnation, Sea Search Armada, is seeking a whopping £7.9 billion, claiming that the current discovery falls within "a mile or two" of where they first detected something in the waters. ‌ A 2020 Colombian statute is also standing firm in its declaration that all galleon-bound remnants firmly belong to the state, a regulation that other treasure seekers firmly oppose. The sinking of the San Jose was a major setback for Spain's war effort in the 18th century. The War of the Spanish Succession concluded with Britain taking control of Gibraltar, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, but the legendary treasure remained concealed. Now, after centuries submerged, the riches of the San Jose might finally be revealed - but only if an agreement can be reached on who will take ownership of the treasure. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

'Holy grail of shipwrecks' carrying £16bn in treasure sparks legal row
'Holy grail of shipwrecks' carrying £16bn in treasure sparks legal row

Daily Mirror

time2 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Holy grail of shipwrecks' carrying £16bn in treasure sparks legal row

The confirmation that the wreck of the San Jose, a Spanish galleon that sank in 1708 while carrying an estimated £16 billion in gold, silver and emeralds, has ignited a fierce legal battle over who owns the treasure Researchers have confirmed the existence of a shipwreck believed to contain one of history's greatest lost treasures, sparking a multi-billion-pound legal battle over its ownership. The Spanish galleon San Jose, laden with gold, silver and emeralds estimated to be worth around £16 billion, had been lost beneath the Caribbean waters for more than 300 years. ‌ However, academics in Colombia have now definitively identified the wreckage found near Baru Island, off the coast of Cartagena, in 2015 as the legendary ship that sank in 1708 following a fierce battle with the Royal Navy, according to The Telegraph. ‌ Known as the "holy grail of shipwrecks", the San Jose was transporting treasure from Peru to Spain to finance the Spanish side of the War of the Spanish Succession when it was intercepted by a British squadron led by Charles Wager, who later became First Lord of the Admiralty. During the clash, the ship's powder magazines detonated, sending it and its valuable cargo to the ocean floor, reports the Express. The vessel was presumed lost forever until an expedition in 2015 used underwater drones to capture images of the wreckage on the seabed. Now, experts are confident that the mystery has finally been solved. "This body of evidence substantiates the identification of the wreck as the San José Galleon, a hypothesis that has been put forward since its initial discovery in 2015," the academics concluded. Historians believe they have finally discovered the long-lost San José Galleon after finding silver coins created in 1707 at the Lima Mint. "The finding of cobs created in 1707 at the Lima Mint points to a vessel navigating the Tierra Firme route in the early 18th century. The San José Galleon is the only ship that matches these characteristics." ‌ The underwater archaeological site offers a unique glimpse into colonial maritime trade and routes. Photographs show silver coins minted in 1707, Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period, and cannons dating back to 1665 - all of which researchers believe point to the San Jose. However, the discovery has sparked a heated dispute over who should claim the treasure. Colombia, Spain, Peru, indigenous communities, and descendants of Peruvian miners are all vying for ownership. Treasure hunters Glocca Morra, who say they discovered the wreck in 1981, are now demanding £7.9 billion. The firm's successor, Sea Search Armada, claims the latest find is just "a mile or two" from their original coordinates and is contesting a 2020 Colombian law that declares everything on the galleon belongs to the Colombian government. The sinking of the San Jose was a major setback for Spain's war effort in the 18th century. The War of the Spanish Succession concluded with Britain taking control of Gibraltar, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, but the legendary treasure remained concealed. After centuries submerged, the treasures of the San Jose might finally be revealed - if an agreement can be reached on who they rightfully belong to.

Wildfire prevention urged by London Fire Brigade after dry spring
Wildfire prevention urged by London Fire Brigade after dry spring

BBC News

time06-06-2025

  • BBC News

Wildfire prevention urged by London Fire Brigade after dry spring

Fire breaks should be introduced to open areas to prevent wildfires this summer, the London Fire Brigade (LFB) has is likely to be one of the driest on record, according to the Met Office, and landowners and councils are being asked to play their part to reduce the under half of the capital is considered to be green space, many of which lie next to homes and breaks can be created by removing grass or ploughing earth to exclude any flammable vegetation, forming a barrier that prevents the easy spread of flames. LFB's deputy commissioner Charlie Pugsley said grass fires could spread particularly rapidly, as seen in the capital as well as worldwide in California and South 2022, London experienced record-breaking temperatures and long periods of dry weather that resulted in some of the most severe wildfires the city has ever had. James St John Davis, from the City of London Corporation's natural environment board, said: "As custodians of some of London's most iconic open spaces, we manage complex landscapes that are often right next to people's homes where the threat of wildfire is very real."We reduce risk through seasonal grass cutting, natural fire breaks, and widespread staff training to respond swiftly, often before emergency crews arrive. This year we've also invested in three new fire fogging units to tackle contained fires, such as those caused by barbecues." Grass fires can be prevented by avoiding the use of disposable BBQs in parks and open spaces, ensuring cigarettes are put out completely and disposed of correctly, and taking rubbish home if no bins are can also help by maintaining their gardens by preventing them becoming overgrown.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store