logo
Trial opens for woman charged with drunkenly killing man walking back to work release

Trial opens for woman charged with drunkenly killing man walking back to work release

Yahooa day ago

A trial opened Monday for a woman accused of drunkenly hitting and killing a man walking in the middle of Taft Street back to work release in January 2020 after his McDonald's shift.
Christian Megan Garza, 30, is charged with several felonies. She pleaded not guilty.
The victim, Andreas Ramos, 27, of Chicago, was still lying on her hood when Garza's father arrived minutes later to help. She claimed she hit a deer.
In opening statements, Deputy Prosecutor Shannon Philips told jurors that Garza had been drinking 'Don Julio' tequila with 'Squirt' at a Jan. 18, 2020, birthday party in St. John.
She loaded her 4-year-old daughter into a car seat in her red Volkswagen. On a cold and icy night, Garza decided to take an alternate route to avoid the curvy and twisty 93rd Avenue back to her parents' Crown Point home — where she also lived.
She got into the turn lane about 1,000 feet before the light, before hitting Ramos just after midnight. The crash happened near 91st and Taft Street in Merrillville.
There was 'no attempt' to break or swerve, Philips said.
Defense lawyer Susan Severtson clarified it was Garza's toddler niece's party.
Her parents went home first. She didn't see Ramos.
Ramos was wearing a black jacket with 'fur' trim, which is why Garza could have believed the man was an animal, the defense lawyer said.
Garza consented to a blood draw, which showed she was above the legal limit, court documents show.
'No one could have avoided this accident,' Severtson said. 'That was the cause, not any…intoxication.'
Ramos was 'violating the rules of the road' by walking in the middle of the turn lane, Severtson said.
Court documents show Sgt. Jeff Bunnell told Merrillville Detective Jeff Rice that Ramos was an inmate in the Lake County Community Corrections Kimbrough Work Release Center.
Men commonly seen walking in the middle turn lane on Taft Avenue in Merrillville – a busy street with long stretches without sidewalks – are typically returning from their jobs to work release while they serve their terms.
Police estimated Garza drove 644 feet with Ramos still on her car, documents note. Officers also found an empty vodka bottle in her vehicle.
On Monday, Lydia Ramos, the victim's mother, testified briefly.
Armando Garza, the defendant's father, said the child's party started around 5:30 p.m. He admitted he had a couple beers, but said he was good to drive.
He wasn't sure if his daughter was drinking before admitting he saw her with a red solo cup.
He arrived home shortly before his daughter called. She pulled over in a former Ultra grocery store parking lot. It was immediately clear there was a man on her hood.
'It's not a deer you hit,' he said. 'It's a person.'
She was 'shocked,' 'scared,' 'nervous' and 'crying.'
The father called 911.
When the dispatcher asked if she used drugs or alcohol that night, he said no.
He told defense co-counsel Roy Dominguez that they were all traumatized – 'Nobody's seen anything like that.'
Wouldn't it have made more sense to have his wife drive him, their daughter and granddaughter home, Philips later asked.
I wasn't impaired, Armando replied.
The woman is charged with seven felonies – two counts each of causing death when operating a motor vehicle with an ACE of .08 or more, causing death when operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, operating a vehicle while intoxicated – endangering a person less than 18 yrs old.
She's also charged with neglect of a dependent and five misdemeanors.
The case is before Judge Natalie Bokota with Deputy Prosecutor Jacob Brandewie also assigned.
Ramos is survived by two children, according to his obituary. A judge approved a $92,000 payout from Garza's sister's homeowner's insurance policy in October.
Ramos was sentenced to two years of work release in December 2019 in a robbery case.
The trial continues this week.
mcolias@post-trib.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge sentences man who killed activist Rozz Rogers to 29 years in prison
Judge sentences man who killed activist Rozz Rogers to 29 years in prison

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge sentences man who killed activist Rozz Rogers to 29 years in prison

A Milwaukee man will serve 29 years in prison for killing activist Rosalind Rogers in June 2024. In October 2024, a Milwaukee County jury found Raymond Willis guilty of killing Rogers, who went by 'Rozz.' Well-known and active in community engagement, Rogers was an advocate for the Black community. At Willis's sentencing hearing on June 11, more than a dozen of Rogers' friends and relatives filled the courtroom to await the judge's ruling, and hear Rogers' sister, Shatarrea Bradley, make a statement. Bradley addressed Willis directly when she spoke, sharply conveying the devastating impact that Rogers' loss left on her family. 'I just want to know why,' Bradley said. 'What made you think her life wasn't as important as yours?' She concluded, 'I hope to never see you again.' Rogers was killed on June 13, 2024, around 4 a.m. on the 5100 block of North Teutonia Avenue. Surveillance footage from a nearby McDonald's restaurant presented as evidence in the trial showed that Rogers was approached by a red vehicle, from which she was later seen running away as flashes "consistent with muzzle flashes" emerged from the driver's area of the vehicle. Police traced the vehicle to Willis. At the sentencing hearing, prosecuting attorney Paul Tiffin stated his belief that Willis had no apparent motive in firing his weapon at Rogers, and that the killing was the result of a "complete lack of self-control." Willis was convicted of first-degree reckless homicide with use of a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The homicide charge carries a maximum penalty of 60 years imprisonment. Judge Laura Crivello sentenced Willis to 28 years of initial confinement for the homicide charge, and another consecutive year for the firearm possession count. Willis will also face eight years of extended supervision for the homicide charge and one additional year for the firearm possession charge. Crivello's ruling is harsher than the sentences recommended by the case's prosecutor and Willis's defense attorney, who respectively advised he should serve 25 years and 15 years for the homicide conviction. When delivering the sentence, the judge referred to victim impact letters she had received describing the effect of Rogers' loss on her family. Eleven such letters were sent to Crivello, according to the Victim Witness Services office. 'Rozz was an amazing spark to have in the community,' Crivello said. Throughout his trial, a pre-sentencing investigation and the sentencing hearing, Willis did not take responsibility for Rogers' death. Although he initially admitted to police that the red car involved in the shooting looked like his vehicle, he maintained that it was not his. 'I want to say that it's just a tragedy that my family did all they can do to try to find that car,' Willis said, when given the opportunity to make a statement before the court. Crivello acknowledged that Willis' background stood out from other individuals convicted for similar offenses, referencing his older age and lack of a violent criminal history. Before his trial for killing Rogers, Willis was last convicted of a crime in 2004, when he was found guilty of manufacturing and delivering cocaine, a felony charge. Still, the judge admonished Willis for possessing a weapon and resorting to armed violence instead of engaging in disagreements through speaking. "Why couldn't you just talk to her?" Crivello asked Willis about his encounter with Rogers. "She sounds like the kind of person who would engage with anyone." In addition to the prison sentence and extended supervision, Crivello ordered that Willis participate in cognitive intervention programming and obtain a high school equivalency diploma. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Judge sentences man who killed Rozz Rogers to 29 years in prison

National Crime Prevention Council Urges McDonald's to End Snapchat Partnership Over Child Safety Concerns
National Crime Prevention Council Urges McDonald's to End Snapchat Partnership Over Child Safety Concerns

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

National Crime Prevention Council Urges McDonald's to End Snapchat Partnership Over Child Safety Concerns

Washington, D.C., June 11, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. – The National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) is calling on McDonald's to immediately end a newly created promotional partnership with a dangerous social media platform. Snapchat, and its parent company Snap, Inc., are under federal and state investigation for their role in facilitating the sale of deadly drugs, including fentanyl. In a letter to McDonald's CEO, the nation's leading crime watchdog pointed to Snapchat's inherent design features that make it a preferred platform for drug dealers and predators. 'Snapchat is the platform of choice for drug dealers, and it is unsafe for users of any age,' said NCPC Executive Director Paul DelPonte. 'McDonald's should not be promoting a service that endangers the very children it has long supported through Ronald McDonald House Charities and community safety events.' As part of the partnership, McDonald's is offering one month of free access to Snapchat+, the platform's supposed premium version. The plus version includes even more dangerous features, such as enhanced location tracking and expanded messaging capabilities, tools that NCPC says make it easier for predators and criminals to access partnership contradicts McDonald's decades-long commitment to protecting children and fostering safe communities and aligns it with a platform under federal scrutiny for contributing to the fentanyl crisis and child exploitation. McDonald's franchises have a long history of including the organization's well-known mascot, McGruff the Crime Dog®, at events such as National Night Out and Halloween safety programs 'This is not about cancel culture,' the letter states. 'This is about public safety, corporate responsibility, and protecting children.' NCPC is urging McDonald's to immediately reconsider the partnership and expressed willingness to work with the company to identify safer, more responsible ways to support children and families. CONTACT: Tatiana Peralta National Crime Prevention Council 202-919-5544 tperalta@ in to access your portfolio

Why Was Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned to the US?
Why Was Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned to the US?

Newsweek

time12 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Why Was Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned to the US?

If you've moved on to the latest Trump spectacle in Los Angeles, you may have underrated the monumental importance of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return from El Salvador. It's a watershed moment. The Justice Department has decided to obey the law. From its earlier behavior with this migrant, it wasn't clear that obeying the law was among the department's priorities. Abrego Garcia had a court order forbidding his deportation to his native El Salvador. ICE sent him there anyway, and the Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to "facilitate" his return. A member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus holds a picture of Kilmar Abrego Garcia during a news conference to discuss Abrego Garcia's arrest and deportation at Cannon House Office Building on April 9, 2025,... A member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus holds a picture of Kilmar Abrego Garcia during a news conference to discuss Abrego Garcia's arrest and deportation at Cannon House Office Building on April 9, 2025, in Washington, D.C. MoreThe Justice Department ignored the order for months, mocking the authority of Judge Paula Xinis as she tried to implement the facilitation ruling. Government lawyers pretended not to understand what "facilitate" meant. They dragged their feet, squabbling about court deadlines and document requests. Administration officials and the president of El Salvador repeatedly said Abrego Garcia wouldn't be returned. But in a stunning reversal, Abrego Garcia is back in the United States. In an equally stunning admission, President Donald Trump said that the Justice Department made the decision without him. They tried to put a fig leaf over the whole thing. The White House said Abrego Garcia was returned so he could be prosecuted as an "illegal alien terrorist, gang member, and human trafficker who has spent his entire life abusing innocent people, especially women and the most vulnerable." But they didn't mean it. The only thing the government has charged Abrego Garcia with is transporting illegal aliens. The indictment mouths off about Abrego Garcia being an MS-13 gang member who transported guns, and sexually abused migrant women, but—regardless of whether he is a good guy or not—he hasn't been charged with any gang crimes, gun crimes, or sex crimes. This means the administration didn't bring Abrego Garcia back because it had grave charges to bring against him. More likely, Justice Department lawyers—perhaps even including Attorney General Pam Bondi—are stepping back from their ultra-Trump-pleasing pronouncements and remembering that they are lawyers, not Fox News personalities. And perhaps it's just in time. It comes at the moment when Judge Xinis is beginning the sanctions process that could mean misconduct penalties against the Justice Department and its lawyers for stonewalling over Abrego Garcia. It also follows an ethics complaint against Pam Bondi filed in Florida by 70 people, including lawyers, former judges, and law professors. The complaint is specifically aimed at Bondi's alleged misconduct in forcing Justice Department lawyers to follow Trump and not the law. In light of these developments, Bondi and her team may be slowly recognizing that their right to practice law depends on adherence to ethical rules. Those rules forbid lawyers from ignoring court orders, seeking frivolous delays, and making bogus claims about things like what "facilitate" means—Bondi's playbook until now. When judges do their jobs, lawyers who violate those rules may be fined, suspended, or disbarred. Bondi could face these kinds of penalties in Florida, and other lawyers at the Justice Department may find themselves facing similar charges. It's a good time for them to clean up their acts and avoid career ending sanctions. Other lawyers should follow their lead. In particular, the prominent law firms who yielded to extortion demands from Donald Trump requiring them to do free work for his pet causes should rethink their choices. Collaborating with an extortionist rather than reporting him is a serious breach of legal ethics. Other law firms stood up to Trump, and so should they. Likewise, the lawyers representing both parties in Trump's personal lawsuit against CBS should consider their futures as the negotiations drag on. They know Trump's lawsuit is frivolous and that CBS wants to settle only because Trump controls the Federal Communications Commission, and it can block the sale of CBS' parent to its would-be purchaser Skydance. Those lawyers are negotiating a bribe. Let's hope they wise up and act like the lawyers who defeated Trump's extortion demands in court. If they do, there's hope that the Justice Department's decision to obey the Supreme Court and return Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States represents a trend: lawyers are remembering that their duty is to the rule of law and not the whims of one man. Thomas G. Moukawsher is a former Connecticut complex litigation judge and a former co-chair of the American Bar Association Committee on Employee Benefits. He is the author of the book, The Common Flaw: Needless Complexity in the Courts and 50 Ways to Reduce It. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store