logo
Charities step up pressure on Keir Starmer to scrap two-child benefit cap

Charities step up pressure on Keir Starmer to scrap two-child benefit cap

The Guardian19-05-2025

Charities and a Labour-aligned pressure group are ramping up calls on Keir Starmer to scrap the two-child limit on benefits, as polling shows support for action on youth poverty remains high, and is equally solid among Labour voters tempted by Reform.
As discussions continue in government ahead of the forthcoming child poverty strategy, a survey commissioned by a coalition of charities suggests voters want to see families prioritised.
Almost three-quarters of those polled (73%) agreed that all 'children deserve a good childhood, even if it costs the government more to support families that need it' and 71% agreed that 'children should be a priority for government investment.'
Charities involved in commissioning the research included Save the Children, the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), the Children's Society and Barnardo's.
Alison Garnham, the chief executive of CPAG, speaking on behalf of the group, said: 'Almost a year after the election, the government's manifesto commitment to tackle child poverty remains hugely popular.
'A child poverty strategy that increases living standards and improves life chances will make the crucial difference to children, their families and the country alike. The public stands in support of the 4.5 million children in the UK living in poverty and now it's time for government to act – starting by scrapping the two-child limit.'
It comes as Keir Starmer was told to bring in legally binding targets to reduce child poverty and integrate them into the missions of his government.
Baroness Ruth Lister, a former director of CPAG, argued in a new report that the two-child limit must be lifted and the benefit cap abolished. She urged Labour to to make child poverty more central to the government's actions.
The report for Compass, a progressive pressure group, is backed by Labour MP Simon Opher, who said in his foreword that the two-child limit for benefits must be immediately lifted.
'In the UK around one in three children live in poverty,' he wrote. 'As a society, and as a government, we can do better. Nothing is more important.'
No 10 currently has a child poverty taskforce working on an action plan due to be published this summer, but the government has so far resisted calls to scrap the two-child limit. Scotland is applying measures to mitigate the limit from next year, but it has been in force for universal credit or child tax credit claimants since 2017.
Whitehall insiders say one argument used by Labour strategists against removing the two-child limit is that it would be unpopular with voters, particularly those the party risks losing to Nigel Farage's Reform party.
But the polling backed by charities suggests voters who backed Labour in 2024 but are considering switching to Reform are just as keen to see child poverty tackled.
Among these Reform-curious Labour voters, 76% agreed that 'low benefit levels for families with children means children have unequal opportunities'.That figure was exactly the same as among committed Labour voters, and similar to levels among those considering a move to the Greens or the Lib Dems.
Similarly, 82% of Labour voters considering a switch to Reform agreed that 'the gap between the poorest and richest families in the UK is too large' – barely less than the 86% of Labour voters who intend to stick with the party.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Ed Dorrell, a partner at Public First, which carried out the UK-wide polling of 2,008 adults last month, said: 'Potential switchers from Labour to Reform, the Greens and the Lib Dems are united in wanting to end child poverty, in thinking the government has a role to play in this and in thinking that reversing benefit cuts would help.'
He added: 'If Labour wants to win their lost voters back, making progress on child poverty is something to prioritise, not play down.'
Scrapping the two-child limit, which means families do not receive key benefits, including the child element of universal credit for their third and subsequent children, is widely agreed by charities and thinktanks to be the most targeted and cost-effective way of tackling child poverty.
However, with little room to manoeuvre against the government's fiscal rules, ministers have recently been considering cheaper options.
These include a three-child limit or paying benefits at a lower rate for third and subsequent children.
Labour's general election manifesto promised an 'ambitious strategy to reduce child poverty' alongside a commitment to end 'mass dependence' on food banks and charity food handouts, which it called 'a moral scar on our society'.
In her report, Lister said the government must be willing to invest sufficient money if it is to achieve the manifesto commitment to an ambitious strategy, and that the money can be raised from the wealthy with the broadest shoulders.
She also called for people with lived experience of poverty to be involved in the strategy's execution and monitoring, for universal credit and child benefit to be raised and for free school meals to be made universal.
Ministers have been privately ruling out scrapping the two-child benefit cap, despite warnings from charities that a failure to do so could result in the highest levels of child poverty since records began.
Official figures this spring showed that a record 4.5 million children were living in poverty in the UK in the year to April 2024 – the final data for the last year of the Conservative government.
The figures showed an extra 100,000 children were living below the breadline. It was the third year running that child poverty had increased.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Leader Live

time16 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Glasgow Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.

Women will no longer be prosecuted for aborting own child at any stage of pregnancy under changes to the law set to be passed next week
Women will no longer be prosecuted for aborting own child at any stage of pregnancy under changes to the law set to be passed next week

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Women will no longer be prosecuted for aborting own child at any stage of pregnancy under changes to the law set to be passed next week

Women will no longer face prosecution for aborting their own baby under changes set to be passed by MPs next week that would herald the biggest overhaul of abortion law for half a century. Under the proposals abortion would effectively be decriminalised and women would no longer face prosecution if they ended their own pregnancy after 24 weeks or without approval from doctors. The changes are said to have the backing of more than 130 backbench MPs meaning it is likely to be approved when MPs are given a free vote on amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill next week. Six women have appeared in court in the last three years charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy outside abortion law - a crime with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Last month Nicola Packer, 45, was acquitted of taking abortion medicine at home when she was about 26 weeks pregnant. Under the new proposals she would not have been prosecuted for this. The MPs behind the proposed amendments say that reform is long-overdue as the current law leads to vulnerable women being prosecuted, some of whom may have had a miscarriage or stillbirth. However anti-abortion campaigners have criticised the proposals, which they warn would be the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act and could allow abortion 'up to birth'. Abortion is a criminal offence in England and Wales unless it takes place under strict conditions, including that it is before 24 weeks into a pregnancy and with the approval of two doctors. New laws passed during the pandemic allow abortion pills to be taken at home in a system known as 'pills by post', however this is only allowed up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy. There are very limited circumstances allowing a woman to access an abortion after 24 weeks, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. But two amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill would radically alter abortion law in England and Wales. One of the amendments, by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, would mean that a woman would no longer be committing an offence by ending her own pregnancy. However under this amendment anybody else, including a medical professional, who assisted a woman in accessing an abortion outside the law could still be prosecuted. Ms Antoniazzi has described it as a 'small change to the law but one that will have a huge impact on the lives of women', adding that it would protect women from prosecution while retaining the criminal law against abusive partners who end a woman's pregnancy without her consent. A second, rival amendment, put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy, goes further still and would repeal swathes of legislation and make it a human right for a woman to have access to an abortion. The decision to select one or both amendments for a vote, expected on June 17 and 18, lies with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle. However it is expected that Ms Antoniazzi's amendment would receive the backing of MPs after a leading pro-choice group yesterday came out against Ms Creasy's plan, warning it is being rushed through without enough scrutiny. Rachael Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said Ms Creasy's amendment does not have the backing of abortion providers whereas Ms Antoniazzi's is supported by more than 50 pro-choice organisations. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators - and proper debate time in Parliament.' 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store