New Bridford Park equipment vandalised while under construction
New equipment at a park in West Bridgford has been vandalised while still under construction, a borough council has said.Wooden benches were graffitied and fencing was damaged in order to gain access to the site at Bridgford Park over the weekend of 24 and 25 May.Rushcliffe Borough Council said it was now increasing security patrols at the park while the work continued.Councillor Jonathan Wheeler, the authority's portfolio holder for leisure & wellbeing, said it was "exceptionally disheartening" that the features were vandalised before even being used.
"We have worked hard with Nottinghamshire Police to lower anti-social behaviour in the area in recent times including using CCTV to identify culprits."In the last 12 months police have also been engaging with young people that in some cases led to home visits to speak to parents and saw arrests of those who refused to curb their criminal behaviour," he said.Sgt Che Sands, from Nottinghamshire Police, said they took reports of vandalism at the park "very seriously" and they were working with the council to ensure high-visibility patrols were taking place routinely."Bridgford Park falls under a Public Spaces Protection Order, meaning any anti-social behaviour or criminal damage offences will be dealt with by either criminal or financial punishment regardless of age."We will not tolerate this kind of behaviour in West Bridgford and continue our work to clamp down on it," he said.The council has urged anyone with information on the vandalism to contact them.The authority said the new features were still due to open in the coming weeks following a £300,000 investment.They include a new climbing structure as well as a "balancing trim trail, social hammocks and inclusive equipment".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Naan-paying customers! Hunt for dine-and-dashers who feasted on curry and butter chicken without settling their £58 bill
A hunt has been launched for a couple of alleged 'dine and dashers' accused of feasting on curry and butter chicken before failing to pay a £58 bill. The pair enjoyed a meal at Cafe Spice in Darlington, County Durham, before apparently leaving to take money from a cash machine - only to fail to return, restaurant owners say. The suspected dine-and-dashers ordered an array of food which included a chicken curry and tandoori butter chicken, priced at £11.95 and £12.95 respectively. The diners also sought special rice at £4.95, £5.25 onion bhajis, a pickle tray priced at £2.95, £3.25 chips, three poppadoms costing £2.70 and vegetable samosas at £5. The meal was washed down with a large Cobra beer, billed at £5.50, as well as a £4 pint of Pepsi. Now the restaurant traders have shared images and called for help tracking down the 'dash and diners' who allegedly left without paying. Ishy Miah, 22, whose father owns the restaurant, said: 'It's disgusting, it's theft. You wouldn't go into Sainsburys and steal your shopping so why are you coming into the restaurant and stealing the food? 'This isn't the first time it has happened, we had a couple of women run off without paying last year. We work really hard and shouldn't have to deal with this. They have appealed for information about a couple alleged to have left without paying their bill 'They were acting weird and said his card had been eaten by a cash machine and asked to pay via bank transfer. 'But then he said that wasn't working and he would have to get cash. We have received messages since the incident from him saying he will pay but he hasn't. 'We posted it on Facebook to gather more information about them before contacting the police. 'When we reported a dine and dash to the police before they said to put it online to get more information so that's what we're doing.' Cafe Spice has also released a statement appealing for help, saying: 'Imagine adding a bit of spice to your criminal record over a £58 bill. 'These two lovely folks said they were off to get cash after their card declined—never saw them again. Any info would be greatly appreciated.' Durham Police has been approached for comment. This latest alleged 'dine and dash' comes after a series of similar sprees - and the revelation this week by TV personality Katie Piper of her experience on a first date. She told how a man once left her with a £740 restaurant tab after running off due to her facial disfigurement. The British author and TV presenter, 41, was the victim of a horrific acid attack set up by her ex-boyfriend when she was 24 - leaving her with severe scarring to her face, neck, chest, arms and hands. Speaking at the Hay Festival, Piper recalled the shocking moment a man she had met in a bar invited her to the Japanese restaurant Nobu in central London, before doing a runner. She said: 'We'd met on a night out. I'd had pioneering treatment with incredible results, so when I would go out somewhere with dark lighting, where people were very drunk, often they weren't able to see what I fully looked like. 'So I met this guy and we messaged for quite a long time. He suggested we go out for dinner. 'I hated going out for dinner because I had a lot of oesophageal damage and often I'd choke when I ate, so the whole idea of eating in front of someone on a first date was nerve-wracking, but I agreed.' The date took place in summer so it was daylight, the star said, and she realised straight away the man had not realised she had a facial disfigurement when first meeting her in the bar. The date had chosen the dinner location and ordered a three-course meal,she added - telling the podcast: 'He said, "I've seen some people I know over there, I'm going to go and say hi to them and I'll be back". He didn't come back.' Author and TV presenter Katie Piper (pictured at the BAFTA Television Awards in London last month) told this week of her experience of being a 'dine and dash' victim on a first date Piper, now a married mother of two, said she ran through 'ridiculous excuses' as she sat at the table, considering if the man might have suddenly become ill. She did not have a lot of money at the time, living on disability benefit after the acid attack, but ended up paying the £740 restaurant bill on her own. Piper said the man got back in touch with her years later after seeing her on Strictly Come Dancing, not to offer an apology but to joke: 'We must catch up!'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves and Starmer face cabinet revolt over spending review
Rachel Reeves is facing a cabinet revolt over her spending review amid fears departmental cuts will lead to key manifesto spending promises being ditched. In what is being described as a 'proxy war', the chancellor is facing a push to consider taxes on the wealthy instead of cuts before she outlines her government spending plans next week. Room for manoeuvre is further restricted by an expectation that the government will U-turn on cancelling winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners, as well as ending the two-child benefit cap, which could cost Ms Reeves as much as £5bn. The row follows reports that major departments, including Yvette Cooper's Home Office and Angela Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) have still not settled on an agreement for the spending review due to be unveiled on Wednesday, 11 June. The mounting pressure on the chancellor comes as former adviser Lord Jim O'Neill has told Ms Reeves that she needs to borrow more for major projects to kickstart growth as the latest forecasts have seen another downgrade for the UK economy, leaving Ms Reeves with less wiggle room. And there are fears that a further squeeze on public finances, dubbed ' austerity 2.0 ' by critics, will open the door for Nigel Farage 's Reform to seize power 'as Britain's first far-right government'. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on Tuesday downgraded its estimate for the UK's economic growth this year to 1.3 per cent, from 1.4 per cent, and to 1 per cent, from 1.2 per cent, in 2026. Meanwhile, the government's crisis over whether it can afford to increase defence spending to 3 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has been exacerbated by Nato's decision to tell member states, including the UK, to hike it even further to 3.5 per cent. A senior Labour source told The Independent that the chancellor's decisions over the next week will 'see the ending of a number of manifesto pledges as actually being deliverable'. With Ms Reeves already being accused of trying to bring in 'austerity 2.0' - a reference to sweeping cuts brought in by former Tory chancellor George Osborne, it is understood that a growing number of Labour MPs and trade unions are now pushing for her to go for wealth taxes instead. The idea featured in a leaked memo from Ms Rayner, in which the deputy prime minister proposed eight different wealth taxes, including increasing dividend tax rates for higher earners and targeting property traders who use corporate structures to avoid stamp duty. A senior Labour source told The Independent: "I think the spending review is becoming a proxy war to desperately try and stop Labour facing an existential crisis — the breathtaking collapse in support continues, and to just try and deliver some of its manifesto so that ordinary voters can see and feel that they have." They added: "I cannot see how Rachel Reeves lasts." With fears that cuts will mean having to row back on promises on border control, policing, housing and social care, the source warned: "I think this spending review will realistically see the ending of a number of manifesto pledges as actually being deliverable.' Ms Reeves' strict rules on borrowing and her refusal to increase income tax, VAT or employee national insurance, there are concerns within Labour that 'the fiscal rules are destroying Labour politically and on delivery of their agenda". But the biggest fear is that a new wave of austerity will open the door to handing Nigel Farage and Reform UK power. The senior source noted: 'People are starting to get real and get vocal. People are realising the Reform threat is not just a crazy blip. It could be the legacy of this Labour government that they usher in the first far-right government in Britain's history. That cannot be allowed to happen.' Meanwhile, economist Lord O'Neill, who was brought in as an adviser to Ms Reeves, has warned that she will have to borrow more to kickstart growth. He urged her to invest in major projects he dubs 'big positive multipliers', such as Northern Powerhouse Rail or small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs). The investment is expected to be the subject of a major speech by the chancellor tomorrow as she tries to regain the initiative. However, the government is still struggling to explain how it plans to pay for defence pledges made in its strategic review on Monday. The 3 per cent of GDP on defence by 2034 pledge has been downgraded to 'an ambition', but now Nato's new general secretary Mark Rutte is set to put up a proposal for the next summit of the defence bloc for all members to pay 3.5 per cent. One senior insider said Britain would 'without a doubt' sign up, but was unable to say where the money would come from. On Tuesday, Defence Secretary John Healey failed to rule out tax rises to make Britain 'war-ready', amid concerns that the government does not have enough money to fund the plans unveiled on Monday. He said the government would 'set out how we'll pay for future increases in the future' when quizzed over how Britain can afford to boost its military funding to 3 per cent. Mr Healey said he is '100 per cent confident' the target would be met — but he struggled to say how it would be paid for after economists warned that significant tax rises would be needed.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Keir Starmer facing scrutiny over failure to establish new ethics watchdog
No 10 is facing scrutiny over its failure to bring in a new ethics watchdog almost a year after the election, as a new inquiry was launched to examine the seeming lack of progress. Amid signs the plans have been kicked into the long grass, parliament's public administration committee said it was launching an inquiry to push the government on what has happened to its ethics commitments. It was one of Keir Starmer's flagship manifesto pledges that the new Labour government would 'establish a new independent Ethics and Integrity Commission, with its own independent chair, to ensure probity in government'. The party promised to 'restore confidence in government and ensure ministers are held to the highest standards', and enforce restrictions on ministers lobbying for companies they used to regulate, with meaningful sanctions for those breaching the rules. However, there was no blueprint for a commission ready to go when Starmer formed the government last year. It has barely been mentioned by ministers since last July. He published a new ministerial code last year, allowing the independent adviser on ministerial standards to start his own investigations into misconduct without requiring permission from the prime minister. But the standards regime is otherwise largely unchanged, with no updates either to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which is now without a permanent chair after the departure of Eric Pickles. Its interim chair until December is an HR executive from the banking and energy sectors. Government sources insisted that work was ongoing on the ethics and integrity commission, but also suggested that voters care more about tough outcomes in relation to misconduct than they do about the process of setting up new bodies. Insiders also pointed to the fact that Starmer has pushed out two ministers who failed to uphold high enough standards under the current rules. Tulip Siddiq resigned in January as a Treasury minister after accepting the government was being harmed by the furore over her close ties to her aunt, the ousted prime minister of Bangladesh now accused of corruption. She denies wrongdoing. In November, Louise Haigh, the transport secretary, was told to resign by No 10 for a possible breach of the ministerial code, after she did not declare her spent conviction for fraud to the government when she became a cabinet minister. Since April, the government has twice avoided the question about setting up its ethics and integrity commission when asked about it in parliament. Pressed on what progress had been made, one Cabinet Office minister, Abena Oppong-Asare, said: 'We are restoring confidence in government and the highest standards in public life and have already taken steps to improve probity and transparency, including through issuing a new ministerial code which highlights the importance of the principles of public life, by strengthening the terms of reference for the independent adviser, and by introducing a new monthly register of gifts and hospitality.' Georgia Gould, another Cabinet Office minister, said the government was improving standards in public life and was 'committed to establishing the right structures to do so' – without specifically mentioning the new commission. Simon Hoare, a former minister under Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, said: 'Significant commitments have been made to overhaul the ethics regime but we are yet to see much evidence of progress from the Cabinet Office. An upstanding government and good ministers should not fear, but welcome, a strong, rigorous and independent ethics and propriety regime. 'This inquiry will allow us to push the government on its commitments, ensuring changes are properly stress-tested and scrutinised by parliament.' The committee said it will be 'aiming to understand what progress has been made' on the independent ethics commission. It will look at how trust in government and its officials can be restored and ensured in light of concerns around lobbying and ministerial conduct. It will also study how enforcing high standards could positively affect the public's trust in government and the wider political system in the UK. It will also look at how effective the existing propriety and ethics structures have proved to be, with critics having long said the landscape is far too fragmented with multiple different bodies responsible for policing different parts of politics from the parliamentary commissioners on standards, to the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme to the Electoral Commission, the adviser on ministerial standards and Acoba. The Cabinet Office has been approached for comment.
