Why is NHS England being axed – and will it save the government money?
NHS England will be abolished with the loss of 9,000 jobs to divert more money to frontline services and bring management 'back into democratic control'.
Sir Keir Starmer said an 'arms-length' body should not make decisions about the more than £150bn annual NHS England budget as he promised the move would allow the government to deliver better care.
The prime minister warned the state was 'weaker than ever' while the health service is operated by an independent body and said the NHS is 'overstretched, unfocused, trying to do too much, doing it badly'.
Bringing it back under the department for health and social care would put an 'end to the duplication resulting from two organisations doing the same job in a system currently holding staff back from delivering for patients'.
But how exactly does NHS England spend taxpayers' money, and how much has the government claimed it would save?
NHS England is a quango - Quasi-Autonomous Non-Governmental Organisation - an arm's-length body that oversees the budget, planning, delivery and day-to-day operation of the health service in England.
It employs more than 15,000 staff and was set up in 2013 by then-Conservative health secretary Andrew Lansley to give the NHS greater autonomy.
It is funded by taxpayers and is not controlled directly by central government.
Sir Keir said the move would free up cash for doctors, nurses and frontline services, and cut red tape to help speed up improvements in the health service amid frustrations about the pace of change. He added the cuts, which will see the workforce more than halved, will 'refocus' the NHS on cutting waiting times across the board.
Public funding for health services in England comes from the department of health and social care's budget.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is a ministerial department which is responsible for developing policies on health and social care in England.
In October, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the health and social care budget will increase to £200.5 billion in 2025/26 and its sub-budget for NHS England will increase to £192 billion.
Around 95 per cent of this spending is on daily costs such as staff salaries and medicines. The remainder is allocated to central budgets of the DHSC and its other arms-length bodies.
The NHS spends around £70 billion on salaries each year. According to NHS guidance, the 2024/25 pay grades range from £23,615 in Band 1, up to £121,271 at the highest end of Band 9.
It is unclear what distribution of salaries on the NHS England administrative staff are set to be cut; but even on the lowest end, slashing 9,300 jobs could save at least £219 million in staff pay each year. In the short-term, the government will likely face redundancy costs from letting staff go and reorganising the health departments.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the Commons on Thursday he wanted the transition of moving NHS England into the department of health to be completed within two years.
'Today we're abolishing the biggest quango in the world,' Mr Streeting told MPs.
Mr Streeting said that half of the 15,300 jobs in NHS England's administrative arm would be cut, alongside half of the 3,300 DHSC positions which work on the NHS.
The NHS is the largest employer in the UK, and the sixth largest worldwide, with 1.5 million staff as of November 2024.
The cuts – estimated to be around 9,300 positions – make up a minuscule fraction of the total NHS workforce, representing just 0.6 per cent of all employees.
Cutting staff 'will deliver hundreds of millions of pounds worth of savings', but the exact figures will depend on how the service is reorganised, Mr Streeting said.
Across the NHS, over 13,400 senior managers are employed as part of infrastructure support, according to NHS workforce statistics. These workers are likely part of the administrative staff at risk of losing their jobs.
The number of senior managers has risen substantially in the past decade, increasing by 51 per cent from 8,876 in November 2014, while the overall NHS workforce only grew by a third.
The government said work would begin 'immediately' to return many of NHS England's functions to the Department of Health and Social Care.
But the process will not be a quick one and is expected to take two years, Mr Streeting told the Commons.
A new leadership team, Sir Jim Mackey and Dr Penny Dash, will oversee the transition, while 'reasserting financial discipline and continuing to deliver on the government's priority of cutting waiting times'., the government said.
Mr Streeting said the abolition of NHS England will generate £100m in savings.
The prime minister's official spokesperson said: 'A more efficient, leaner centre will free up capacity to help deliver significant savings of hundreds of millions of pounds a year, which will be reinvested into frontline services to cut waiting times for the government's change.'
However, Sir Keir's spokesperson admitted it may need to make 'one off capital investments or upgrades in order to release savings in the budget'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘I'll use private sector to help clear NHS backlog', says Streeting
Wes Streeting has said he will consider leaning more heavily on the private sector as he bids to clear NHS waiting lists. The health secretary said he will not be 'bound by outdated ideological battles' when tackling the crisis in the service, where 7.39 million people are currently waiting to be seen by doctors. He said it would be 'foolish to turn away' from the private healthcare sector, but cautioned that 'we must see it for what it is'. Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, Mr Streeting said: 'Some ask if using private capacity contradicts NHS principles. Nonsense. What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. 'The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters. The independent healthcare sector won't affect this principle, and so it would be foolish to turn it away when we so desperately need it in certain specialities. But at the same time, we must see it for what it is.' The health secretary, who previously received treatment for kidney cancer, added: 'Cancer taught me that time is precious. When you're waiting for treatment, every day matters. That's why I won't waste a single day, or a single available appointment slot, in our mission to give patients the care they deserve.' His comments are likely to spark uproar from MPs on the left of the Labour Party, who fiercely opposed expanding the role of the private sector under Jeremy Corbyn. The former Labour leader has previously accused Sir Keir Starmer of 'betraying' the health service for relying more on private care. The government has said partnerships with the private sector under Labour so far have delivered more than 500,000 treatments, with waiting lists having fallen to a two-year low of 7.39 million in April. Darren Grewcock, a security guard, had hip replacement surgery at the Meriden Hospital through a full NHS referral after an injury left him unable to work. He said: 'The X-rays revealed that I had bone-on-bone osteoarthritis on my left hip. I was referred for surgery and given a list of places you can go – which included options in the independent sector. 'Within three days of booking, I had an appointment booked with the consultant. I couldn't believe how quickly he got back to me and the process started. My recovery has been a huge success. I am fitter, stronger, and more mobile than I was at 50." The charity, Patients Association, welcomed the greater role of the private sector in the NHS. Chief executive Rachel Power said: 'As the NHS continues to tackle the backlog, communication and choice must remain central to how care is delivered because patients don't just need treatment, they need to feel informed and empowered.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New 'state-of-the art' diagnostic centre opens
A "state-of-the-art" healthcare facility has opened at Woking Community Hospital. The new centre aims to provide quicker, more accessible diagnostic services and will provide faster diagnoses. The Woking Community Diagnostic Centre is part of the NHS initiative to expand access to diagnostic testing. Louise Stead, group chief executive said the centre will "improve healthcare accessibility for local residents". She said: "This facility will streamline the process for patients who require diagnostic services and reduce travelling time." Ms Stead added the facility aims to reduce waiting times and alleviate pressures on local hospitals. It will also include MRI and CT scanning, which allows patients to be diagnosed locally in a comfortable and convenient environment. The centre is operated by Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. It is also working with North West Surrey Integrated Care Services, CSH Surrey, Alliance Medical Ltd, Skin Analytics, and partners operating out of Woking Community Hospital. Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, on X. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Thousands to benefit from new NHS hub Royal Surrey NHS Trust leadership rated 'outstanding' Specialist children's dental service under threat Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a GP, and I'm sick of the NHS always winning
Another Spending Review, another promise of increased funding for the NHS. This week Rachel Reeves has said £30 billion will be invested over the next five years in day-to-day maintenance and repair of the health service estate. But will these cash injections ever be enough? Or is a centrally run and funded system simply no longer able to keep pace with the population's needs and demands for healthcare in our modern era? The Times has also reported on Government plans to drastically shift care from hospitals into the community, in a bid to create a 'neighbourhood health service'; with the bulk of routine specialist appointments delivered in locations such as GP surgeries and high street opticians. How GP surgeries are expected to cope with the extra demand – when many patients are already unable to secure an appointment – is not made clear. Yet the crux of the matter is not primarily where appointments take place; but individual decisions made by the public around when, where and how they use the health service. Starmer is clutching at straws to meet his manifesto pledge for 92 per cent of patients to be seen within 18 weeks after referral for non-urgent conditions. Currently only 60 per cent of patients are receiving treatment within this timeframe. However, since Labour are focussing on the wrong problem, their solution will fail. Working as a GP in the NHS, it has frequently struck me how much of the healthcare demand in the UK might disappear if the public were contributing in some way. Take the patient who calls to discuss their child's difficult bedtime routine, or one who recently asked for exceptional NHS funding to have a small fatty lump removed from their back. Day after day, GPs see patients who would not contact the health service if they even had to pay £10 for an appointment. The same is repeated in A&E departments and outpatient clinics. Demand has been spiralling for years without the counterbalance that comes from a degree of personal responsibility. The result is that patients are offered tests and investigations they don't need, hospital referrals that may offer minimal benefit, and now many simply cannot get through to their GP at all. Emergency departments in the UK mirror scenes you might expect to see in a warzone: patients covered in blood and vomit, writhing in pain, or being left for hours in hospital corridors. Nobody seems able to rationalise which services the NHS should be delivering; meanwhile the system is descending into chaos and delivering increasingly substandard care. The Amazon Prime generation expects healthcare demands to be met at the click of a button – but better still, it is free! If the NHS can offer weight loss surgery, knee replacements, diabetes medication and more; then what is the point in striving to improve your health? The British public have, to a degree, learnt to expect the health service to pick up the pieces for their poor lifestyle choices. The results are seen across society: from overweight children in our primary schools, to millions declared unfit to work due to mental health conditions. Despite healthcare expenditure continuing to increase, and accounting for a larger share of the UK's GDP; productivity in NHS hospitals has fallen, waiting times for outpatient appointments have ballooned, the UK has markedly higher cancer mortality rates than other countries, and life expectancy improvements have stalled. Coupled with the number of working-aged people who are economically inactive due to long-term sickness, it is not unreasonable to wonder how long this can continue. Labour are right to identify that too many patients currently receive hospital treatment for conditions that could be managed by GPs, but they fail to see the bigger picture on the need for healthcare reform. If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results – this seems to reflect our position on the NHS. Dr Katie Musgrave is a general practitioner Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.