What American Catholics thought about Pope Francis
Print Close
By Paul Steinhauser
Published April 21, 2025
Pope Francis, who changed the face of the papacy, was broadly popular with the more than 60 million U.S. Catholics, according to recent public opinion polling.
Seventy-eight percent of American Catholics expressed a favorable opinion of the pope in a Pew Poll conducted in early February, shortly before Francis' lengthy hospitalization for a case of double pneumonia. The 88-year-old pope died on Monday
Francis' popularity among American Catholics was constant throughout his dozen-year tenure as pope, with his favorability peaking at 90% in a February 2015 poll by Pew.
CLICK HERE FOR LIVE FOX NEWS UPDATES ON THE PASSING OF POPE FRANCIS
"Pope Francis enjoyed broad support among American Catholics – certainly exceeding the popularity of any elected officials in the U.S.," veteran political scientist Wayne Lesperance, the president of New England College, told Fox News.
U.S. Catholics also generally viewed Francis more positively than his immediate predecessor in the Vatican, Pope Benedict XVI.
FIVE WAYS POPE FRANCIS IMPACTED THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
Benedict's favorability ratings ranged between 67% and 83% in Pew polling during his eight years as pope.
While popular with many Catholics, Francis' attempts to make the church more inclusive made him an enemy to some in the conservative wing of the church. And there was plenty of pushback against the pope's moves to overhaul a very divided church.
Those divisions may have contributed to a partisan divide when it comes to U.S. Catholics' views of Francis.
According to the February Pew Poll, 88% of U.S. Catholics who identified as Democrats or leaned toward the Democratic Party had a positive view of the pope. But favorable opinions of Francis dropped to 69% among U.S. Catholics who said they were Republicans or leaned toward the GOP.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"His reform agenda, emphasizing values that sought to lift up the poorest, most marginalized individuals in the world, played better with Catholic Democrats than Republicans," Lesperance noted.
"And despite being critical of the current administration's position on building the wall, mass deportations, and migrants, the late pope enjoyed the support of nearly two-thirds of Catholic Republicans. His legacy will be one of reform and social justice for Catholics across the globe."
Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in New Hampshire. Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/what-americans-catholics-thought-about-pope-francis
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maxwell: DeSantis orders Orlando Sentinel to stop investigating his scandal. That's not happening.
Late last week, Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration publicly threatened the Orlando Sentinel reporter who has been investigating the Hope Florida scandal. Welcome to the 'Free State of Florida,' where the governor feels free to live out authoritarian fever dreams surrounded by staff who are apparently unwilling to tell Mao ZeRon that emporers can't control journalism in this country. Just after noon on Friday, Florida's Department of Children and Families issued what it labeled a 'cease and desist' demand that Sentinel reporter Jeff Schweers stop his reporting efforts after saying it had 'heard' that Jeff might be 'threatening or coercing' foster families in Florida. There was no proof. No specifics. The letter wasn't even signed by anyone — maybe because no reputable attorney would put their name on a document that looked like it was written by a Twitter bot trying to cosplay as a lawyer. It was just an anonymous, undocumented claim that someone had heard something about harassment, which the governor then tweeted along with the comment: 'Bottom feeders gonna bottom feed…' The governor's tweet — which included Jeff's email address — prompted the kind of online reaction DeSantis surely expected. One of the governor's followers called for Jeff to be arrested. Others responded to the governor's name-calling with more name-calling, either opting for antisemitism or just blanket statements like: 'Journos are some the worst people alive. Scum of the earth.' By this point, you might be wondering: So what did Jeff do? Well, for months now, he's been trying to track down how the DeSantis administration has been spending money — some of it public, some of it private donations that are supposed to be carefully accounted for the IRS. That apparently scared the hell out of the governor and his staff. Specifically, Jeff was trying to find out what happened to public money given to the beleaguered Hope Florida program championed by Ron and Casey DeSantis. And Jeff isn't the only one. Legislative Republicans have flat-out said they believe crimes were committed. A prosecutor is looking at the issue as well. But apparently Jeff was getting too close to the truth for comfort. So the DeSantis administration bogusly claimed he was 'threatening' foster families and ordered him to stop his reporting. Well, that ain't gonna happen. As the Sentinel's executive editor, Roger Simmons said: 'We stand by our stories and reject the state's attempt to chill free speech and encroach on our First Amendment right to report on an important issue.' Editorial: Intimidation won't make the Sentinel back down on Hope Florida story Reporting, after all, is what newspapers do. We search for answers. And Jeff has been doing it for years. In fact, before he started working for the Sentinel a few years ago, Jeff worked for the Tallahassee Democrat where he investigated scandalous behavior by Andrew Gillum. Gillum, as you may recall, was the Democratic candidate for governor against … wait for it … Ron DeSantis. And some of Jeff's reporting was so damning to Gillum that the stories generated by Jeff and his colleagues were used by the DeSantis campaign to help DeSantis eke out a 0.4% victory. So to recap: When newspapers investigate a Democrat, everyone should pay attention. But if they investigate DeSantis, it's bottom-feeding that needs to be shut down. The latest scandal involves Hope Florida — the moniker for both a state program and affiliated private charity that the DeSantises have championed. The couple say the programs have been successful at getting struggling citizens off welfare. But GOP legislators (yes, lawmakers from the governor's own party) say they believe public money was inappropriately 'laundered' to political causes and campaigns. For journalists, a common mantra is: Follow the money. But that's been particularly challenging in this story that involves two entities by the same name, money transfers and incomplete financial records. Maxwell: Scandals for Dummies. Breaking down the Hope Florida fiasco It has been my experience that, when financial stories are complicated, that's often intentional. Someone doesn't want you to follow the money. But Jeff and other Florida reporters have kept on digging. And that's what has the DeSantis administration nervous. Last month, Jeff tracked down one of the few, specific people Hope Florida had touted as a success story for being weaned off public assistance only to learn that she appeared 'no better off than she was. She lives with her three youngest daughters in a double-wide mobile home … not working, and she and her children are still on Medicaid … just as they were three years ago.' Financial independence eludes Hope Florida 'graduate' 3 years later This week, Jeff combed through IRS records to learn that a golf-tournament fundraiser staged by the Hope Florida Foundation actually reported losing $17,000 — only to have the foundation's attorney say that the foundation would soon be filing an amended report. How fortuitous for the charity that Jeff was able to help it sort out its finances. Hope Florida Foundation to amend tax return to show golf tourney made more money And those are just the stories Jeff was able to ferret out with access to limited records. He said he's still waiting for the state to provide specific details about how it spent more than $20 million in federal relief funds — a request he filed back in October 2024 If Hope Florida looks like a three-alarm dumpster fire right now, one wonders how many alarms would go off if journalists and the public ever get to see the full financial picture. To that end, when the governor of America's third-largest state took to Twitter to try to debase and bully, Jeff responded with a pretty simple, nine-word question: 'Why not respond to my numerous public records requests?' The answer to that is becoming increasingly obvious. Because the more the facts get out, the worse things look for DeSantis. So the state's top elected official is trying to use all the influence he can to stop journalists from even asking questions. smaxwell@
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15
Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed a bill Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, his latest move to frame himself as a new kind of pro-worker Republican. Hawley's legislation is not in any danger of actually becoming law — his fellow Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and have been blocking minimum wage increases for years. But the proposal aligns him with a core Democratic demand and further separates Hawley from the traditional anti-union, free-market wing of the GOP when it comes to labor policy. 'Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford anything,' Hawley told HuffPost. 'Right now, the federal minimum wage, if you index it for inflation, or relative to inflation, it's the lowest level since the 1940s.' The federal minimum is just $7.25 per hour and hasn't been raised in more than 15 years, by far the longest such stretch since it was created during the Great Depression. It prevails in the 21 states that currently don't mandate a higher one, many of them clustered in the South. Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford Josh Hawley of Missouri (R) Hawley's bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, would raise the wage floor to $15, then tie it to an inflation index so that it goes up with the cost of living — a common feature in more progressive legislation. Such a hike would force increases in all but the mostly blue states where the wage floor has already been raised above that level. Hawley did not pretend that his proposal stands much chance of becoming law. 'I will try to move it. I mean, I'd love to get a vote on it,' he said. The proposal puts Hawley far ahead of other Republicans, but still behind Democrats on the issue. Most Democratic lawmakers are now pushing for a $17 minimum wage, arguing that $15 — the rallying cry of the Fight for $15 labor campaign, which began in the fast food industry in 2012 — has become inadequate as a living wage due to inflation. Although he supports a more aggressive raise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) seemed pleased to see Hawley separate himself from other Republicans on the issue. 'I think every Democrat, last month, voted to raise the minimum wage to $17, and I'll look forward to working with Sen. Hawley,' Sanders told HuffPost on Tuesday, referencing an April vote on an amendment to a symbolic budget resolution. The amendment failed by a vote of 47 to 52 with every Republican except Hawley voting no. Hawley said that if the Republican Party wants to brand itself as the party of working people — which it does, according to statements from President Donald Trump and other leaders — then Republicans need to back policies that benefit the working class. 'This is what President Trump ran on. I mean, if we're going to be a working party, we have to do something for working people, and working people haven't gotten a raise in years,' Hawley said. Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. Hawley is not the first Republican to back a minimum wage increase. Back in 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and then-Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) proposed a boost from $7.25 to $10. But the bill included an immigration measure that would have mandated nationwide use of e-Verify to crack down on undocumented workers, a poison pill for Democrats that isn't part of Hawley's legislation. Earlier this year, Hawley released a policy platform dubbed a 'Pro-Worker Framework.' It included some pro-labor reforms typically associated with Democrats, like putting limits on mandatory 'captive audience' meetings, in which employers pressure workers not to form unions. Then, in March, he joined Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) in proposing a bill that would speed up the process for workers to secure their first union contracts, the sort of legislation a typical Republican wouldn't go near. As with Vice-President J.D. Vance, Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. But when it comes to maybe moving legislation, lawmakers like Sanders like the idea of having a Republican to work with. 'It would be great if we could get some other Republicans,' the Vermont senator said. '$7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. We've got to raise it.'
Boston Globe
41 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Social Studies: Two things that are bad for business; rethinking a computer science major
Advertisement Major malfunction Students have always been more interested in going into fields that are hot (i.e., they're featured in the news and/or high-paying). In the 1960s, it was aerospace engineering; in more recent decades, it has often been computer science. But a new study suggests students should be more cautious about following the herd. The study finds that the existence of superstar industries — defined as those that have a small subset of prominent companies with exceptional stock price performance — does indeed spur students to major in related subjects. However, this surge is associated with a decrease in pay for entry-level employees in the superstar industry, because net hiring is not necessarily greater in those industries than in others. Moreover, students who are seduced into a major associated with a superstar industry are more likely than people with other majors to end up in a job unrelated to their major and to earn less, with lower job satisfaction, even many years later. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Choi, D. et al., 'Superstar Firms and College Major Choice,' Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics (forthcoming). Advertisement Safe business districts Gerrymandering might be good for business. A study found that a company's stock market value tends to suffer if congressional redistricting puts its headquarters into a House district that is closely balanced between Democrats and Republicans instead of assigning it to one that is safe for one party or the other. The hypothesis is that being in a safe district allows a corporation to build a long-term relationship with its representative in Congress, whereas a representative in a competitive district faces a greater threat of losing reelection and has to be more responsive to voter concerns. Artés, J. et al., 'The Value of Political Geography: Evidence From the Redistricting of Firms,' Journal of Law and Economics (May 2025). The psychology of psychology In theory, evidence should resolve scientific uncertainty. But this is often not the case, especially in the social sciences. In fact, these fields can be riven by sharp differences in worldview akin to those in politics and culture. A study of thousands of researchers in psychology explores this phenomenon by examining how the researchers' own psychology shapes their views of their field. For example, psychologists with a high personal tolerance of ambiguity are less likely to believe that human behaviors can be explained by rational self-interest, evolution, or neurobiology and more likely to believe in social, contextual, and holistic explanations. The authors of the study conclude that many debates in this field can thus be explained largely by the personality traits of the psychologists involved. 'In the worst-case scenario,' they write, 'cognitive differences could be exploited to prop up or even canonize an evidentially weak position that is intuitively attractive to researchers in positions of power.' Advertisement Sulik, J. et al., 'Differences in Psychologists' Cognitive Traits Are Associated with Scientific Divides,' Nature Human Behaviour (forthcoming).
