
One of Britain's oldest pubs closes doors for final time after nearly 500 years as owner says he's ‘very, very sad'
ONE of the country's oldest boozers has closed down after nearly half a millennium of pouring pints.
The aptly named Hole in the Wall in Torquay has survived the English Civil War and the Second World War.
4
4
The iconic pub has served pirates and smugglers since 1540- the same year that Henry VIII married and divorced his fourth wife, Anne of Cleves.
The pub has charmed Torquay, the town famous as the backdrop to Fawlty Towers, with its cobbled floors and low-beamed ceilings for nearly 500 years.
Rather than flatscreens showing sports, it boasted daily live music.
Pub landlord Richard Rossendale-Cook, 81, said rising costs meant he could no longer afford the rent.
He told ITV News last month: 'I'm very, very sad, of course, I'd like to carry on.
'But unless somebody comes up - a Russian oligarch or someone will give me £360,000 to go and pay off the bill, you are going to shut and that's the end of it.'
On March 26, the pub's Facebook page posted: 'It is with great sadness that we announce that the Hole In The Wall will cease trading from the close of Sunday, 13th April 2025.
'We'd like to thank you all for your loyal custom over the years, with many great memories created, to add to the centuries' more storied history here at the Hole.'
Richard estimated he had paid £ 1.2 million for the brewery in the past 7 years, but declining footfall had made the situation financially untenable.
But right until its last weeks, Richard couldn't believe the pub would close.
Just two weeks before its closure, he told ITV News: 'I can't see it being shut down, it's too famous- but the brewery will probably find a better way.'
4
4
But tragically, it closed its doors on April 13.
Liquidators from HMRC arrived on April 16, priced up all the fixtures and fittings and took ownership of the building.
Going out in style, legendary Prince guitarist, 'the Funktastic Mike Weave,' graced the historic hole with some tunes on April 4.
'Life goes on and so must the show…' wrote the pub.
Asked why Richard thinks the resilient pub is finally having to close the door, he mused that he thinks habits are changing.
He said: 'The world is totally changing!
'(People say) Oh, I love your pub, I've never been anywhere like it- but they don't come back.
'They've been here, they've got the T-Shirt and that's it.'
One dismayed customer, Oliver Nuther, commented on the closure: 'So we are losing a real pub, one without big sports screens and gambling machines dominating the place.
'A place to chat with people from around the country and the world who have found the Hole.
'The local musicians brought a great atmosphere to this unique pub in Torquay; it will be greatly missed.
'I hope that Richard will be able to move on from the unhelpful way he has been treated by the distant hand-off landlords.'
The pub is legendary across the world, with Debbie Swan Saunders lamenting that she had planned to visit her 'favourite old pub' when she travelled from Australia for the first time in 35 years- but she arrived a day after it was shuttered.
A third fan lamented: 'Aww no, so sad. I only managed to visit this perfect pub for the first time last year on holiday.
'I was really looking forward to coming back again! All the best for the future."
"I'm absolutely gutted. There will be no decent pubs left at this rate," fumed another.'
The tragic news comes as some 412 pubs closed in the last year in England and Wales, around 34 a month, with many demolished or converted into homes, offices and nurseries.
Covid lockdowns and soaring energy prices, along with changing drinking habits, particularly amongst the young, have hit boozers where it hurts- in their finances.
This was a rise of 6.7% on the previous year of rocketing pub closures, and the sharpest fall in numbers since 2021, when 444 pubs closed their doors.
The Pink and Lily in Princes Risborough pulled its last pint in Buckinghamshire after 7 years of business.
In the last five years, a whopping 2047 watering holes have closed, according to an analysis by Altus Group.
What is happening to the hospitality industry?
By Laura McGuire, consumer reporter
MANY Food and drink chains have been struggling in recently as the cost of living has led to fewer people spending on eating out.
Businesses had been struggling to bounce back after the pandemic, only to be hit with soaring energy bills and inflation.
Multiple chains have been affected, resulting in big-name brands like Wetherspoons and Frankie & Benny's closing branches.
Some chains have not survived, Byron Burger fell into administration last year, with owners saying it would result in the loss of over 200 jobs.
Pizza giant, Papa Johns is shutting down 43 of its stores soon.
Tasty, the owner of Wildwood, said it will shut sites as part of major restructuring plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.


Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Kemi Badenoch to launch review into ECHR exit
Kemi Badenoch is to launch a review into whether the UK should leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) - and set out plans to revive a Rwanda-style deportation scheme. In a speech on Friday, the Conservative leader will announce a commission into how lawyers could be prevented from using international legislation to block government decisions on immigration. She will also announce plans to prevent people who arrive by small boat from claiming asylum and deport them to a third country. It is unclear if this would be Rwanda or another location. One of Labour's first acts in government was to scrap the Tories' Rwanda scheme, which would have deported illegal immigrations to the African nation for them to claim asylum there. The plan was held up by a series of legal challenges and ultimately failed to get off the ground before the election, despite around £700m being spent on it, according to the Home Office. The saga sparked a debate within the Tory party about whether the UK would need to leave the ECHR, which was established after the Second World War and sets out the rights and freedoms of people in the 46 countries signed up to it. During the Conservative leadership race, Ms Badenoch said leaving the ECHR wasn't a "silver bullet" and "not even the most radical thing that we probably will have to do" to control immigration. It put her at odds with her rival Robert Jenrick, now the shadow justice secretary, who claimed the Tories would "die" if they did not back exiting the ECHR. 19:32 Ms Badenoch's commission will be chaired by Tory peer and former justice minister Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, the shadow attorney general. A Conservative Party aide close to the detail said: "Kemi has worked hard to bring the shadow cabinet together on this very difficult issue. "She has always said she will take her time to build a proper, workable plan to tackle the issue of the courts subverting parliamentary democracy. This commission, led by the brilliant lawyer Lord Wolfson, will make sure we're ready to take the tough decisions." Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, who has enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls since the general election, has also said he would leave the ECHR. Labour's policy is to remain in it, but to bring forward legislation to "ensure it is the government and parliament that decides who should have the right to remain in the UK". According to the immigration white paper unveiled last month, this would address cases where Article 8 right to family life legal arguments have been used to frustrate deportation, often in the case of foreign criminals. Article 8 was also used in the case of a Palestinian family fleeing Gaza after they applied to enter the UK through a Ukrainian refugee scheme. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Home Affairs Select Committee on Tuesday that family migration has become "so complex" that courts are applying "exceptional" human rights guarantees to about a third of cases. She said: "The proportion of decisions being taken as exceptional - often under interpretations around Article 8 - end up being about 30 percent of the cases. That is not exceptional, that is a much broader proportion." However, she rejected calls to disapply the ECHR, saying compliance with international law has helped the government strike deals with France and Germany to help crack down on criminal gangs. She said the government will draw up a "clear framework" that will be "much easier for the courts to interpret and will reflect what the public want to see".


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Nato set to approve new military purchases as part of a defence spending hike
Nato defence ministers are set to approve purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic, as part of a US push to ramp up security spending. The 'capability targets' lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment such as air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and 'strategic enablers' such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. 'Today we decide on the capability targets. From there, we will assess the gaps we have, not only to be able to defend ourselves today, but also three, five, seven years from now,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. 'All these investments have to be financed,' he told reporters before chairing the meeting at Nato's Brussels headquarters. US President Donald Trump and his Nato counterparts will meet on June 24-25 to agree to new defence investment goals. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said that 'to be an alliance, you've got to be more than flags. You got to be more than conferences. You need to keep combat ready capabilities'. Spurred on by their own security concerns, European allies and Canada have already been ramping up military spending, including arms and ammunition purchases, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some allies balk at US demands to invest 5% of their gross domestic product in defence – 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly – when they have already struggled to grow their budgets to 2% of GDP. The new targets are assigned by Nato based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shake-up since the Cold War — to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, Nato would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. The member countries are assigned roles in defending Nato territory across three major zones – the high north and Atlantic area, a zone north of the Alps, and another in southern Europe. Nato planners believe that the targets must be met within five to 10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine. Some fear Russia might be ready to strike at a Nato country even sooner, especially if Western sanctions are eased and Europe has not prepared. 'Are we going to gather here again and say 'OK, we failed a bit', and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said. Swedish Defence Minister Pal Jonson also warned that while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine right now, things could quickly change. 'We also know after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine,' Mr Jonson said. If the targets are respected, the member countries will need to spend at least 3% of GDP on defence. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said his country calculates in the medium term that 'we should spend 3.5% at least on defence, which in the Netherlands means an additional 16 to 19 billion euro (£13-16 billion) addition to our current budget.' The Netherlands is likely to buy more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and long-range missile systems, including US-made Patriots that can target aircraft, cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles.