logo
Worcester's ICE storm

Worcester's ICE storm

Politico27-05-2025

ON THIN ICE — As federal immigration enforcement actions ramp up in Massachusetts, so is the debate over what level of coordination there should be between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and local police. A deportation operation in Worcester earlier this month threw the discourse into sharp relief.
ICYMI: Two people were arrested by Worcester police after a crowd gathered as ICE officers were attempting to take into custody a woman they said was in the country illegally.
The kerfuffle spurred outrage from immigration advocates and hardliners alike. Protesters r allied outside Worcester City Hall, calling on police to do more to shield residents from ICE, while Worcester's police union and Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin took aim at Worcester City Councilor Etel Haxhiaj, who stood in front of the woman in an effort to keep officials from taking her. Days later, Stephen Miller, one of President Donald Trump's top deputies, was weighing in on X.
The uproar prompted Worcester City Manager Eric Batista to sign an executive order 'reaffirming how the Worcester police interacts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.' The order prevents city employees from participating in a federal operation 'solely for the enforcement of federal civil immigration laws, except in response to a request to assist with support services deemed necessary to ensure officer safety.'
But not everyone is satisfied. The measure, critics pointed out, doesn't require local police to verify that federal officials have the authority to carry out an arrest — by determining they have a warrant, for example.
'Worcester police should be involved in protecting the peace in the city of Worcester and enforcing the laws of Massachusetts. I don't think that they should be helping ICE do things that are constitutionally questionable at best,' said Miles Gresham, policy director for Neighbor to Neighbor Massachusetts, a nonprofit that sent members to the scene as the ICE operation was taking place.
Some are calling on more action from the state's top Democrats. At a rally over the weekend, roughly 100 protesters marched from Boston City Hall to Boston Common, urging Gov. Maura Healey to take a stronger stand against ICE. And a petition circulated by the LUCE Immigrant Justice Network of Massachusetts asks the governor to declare ICE 'a rogue federal agency operating outside the law.'
But others, including Republicans challenging Healey for her seat, have been making the case for more coordination between federal and state officials. A spate of Republican-sponsored bills on Beacon Hill would do just that, though they face long odds of passing without support from Democrats who hold a supermajority in the Legislature.
GOOD TUESDAY MORNING, MASSACHUSETTS. Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget for the Playbook? Drop me a line: kgarrity@politico.com.
TODAY — Gov. Maura Healey, Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey and state and local officials hold a press conference on impacts to Medicaid in the megabill at 1:45 p.m. in Revere. State Auditor Diana DiZoglio attends Get Konnected's speed mentoring event at 5:30 p.m. in Boston. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu announces the city's summer safety plan at 10 a.m. in Dorchester and hosts a luncheon for Boston Public Schools valedictorians at 12:30 p.m. in Fenway.
DATELINE BEACON HILL
— DEP delays electric vehicle sales requirements for two years by Colin A. Young, State House News Service: 'The Healey administration said Friday it will not enforce minimum electric vehicle sales requirements for model years 2026 and 2027, administratively taking a step that lawmakers have repeated sought to force legislatively. Under the Advanced Clean Cars II regulation that Massachusetts adopted following California's lead in 2023, vehicle manufacturers are supposed to produce and make available for sale a gradually-increasing percentage of zero-emission vehicles starting at 35% in model year 2026, rising to 43% in model year 2027 and eventually hitting 100% in model year 2035 and beyond.'
WATCH — Massachusetts Secretary of Veterans' Services Jon Santiago talks funding cuts, homeless veterans by Ed Harding and Sharman Sacchetti, WCVB.
FROM THE HUB
— Boston launches review of school bus safety following collision death of 5-year-old by Carrie Jung, WBUR: 'Boston city leaders said they are launching an independent review into the safety policies and performance of Transdev, the school bus contractor for Boston Public Schools. The move comes nearly a month after a bus operated by a Transdev driver struck and killed kindergarten student Lens Joseph during drop-off after school.'
FROM HARVARD YARD
— Harvard foreign students feel like 'poker chips,' consider transfer after Trump attacks by Juliet Schulman-Hall, MassLive.
— In extremely rare move, Harvard revokes tenure and cuts ties with star business professor by Kirk Carapezza, GBH News: 'Harvard University has stripped a world-renowned scholar of her tenure status. The university's top governing board, the Harvard Corporation, decided this month to revoke Francesca Gino's tenure and end her employment at Harvard Business School. Gino, who was celebrated for her research on honesty and ethical behavior, had faced scathing allegations of academic misconduct and fraud.'
THE RACE FOR CITY HALL
— Kraft-aligned super PAC pours $1.4 million into attacks on Wu in mayoral race by Matt Stout, The Boston Globe: 'The super PAC backing Josh Kraft in his challenge to Mayor Michelle Wu is dropping more than $1.4 million on ads, billboards, and text messages attacking the incumbent Democrat, marking the first significant infusion of outside cash into a race that's already splattered with mud-slinging. The spending, disclosed in a late Friday filing, is an extraordinary sum for an outside group to drop so early in the citywide contest. The timing of the push — and willingness of deep-pocketed donors to bankroll it — suggests voters' televisions and social media feeds could be inundated with political spots through the summer and fall.'
Mayor Michelle Wu's campaign is out with a scathing statement in response this morning, accusing the Krafts of 'trying to buy' the election 'by trashing our city with millions of dollars of negative attack ads.'
'This is an unprecedented early start to outside money raining down on a Boston city election as Kraft runs the most negative mayoral campaign in generations,' the statement said.
DAY IN COURT
— Bar advocates to halt indigent defense work over stagnant pay by Aaron Curtis, The Lowell Sun: 'According to Massachusetts bar advocates, without a long-overdue raise, the justice system is headed for some serious trouble. In 2004, bar advocates — private attorneys paid by the state to represent clients unable to afford legal counsel — stopped taking new cases in protest of low pay. This move ultimately influenced lawmakers to raise the district court hourly rate to $50, as highlighted on baimnar.com, a website created by attorney Todd Siegel advocating for increased compensation for attorneys who represent indigent clients. Bar advocates say that their wages have barely budged in the two decades since. … Now, history appears to be repeating itself as bar advocates, citing stagnant wages and legislative inaction, once again prepare to refuse new cases starting Tuesday.'
FROM THE DELEGATION
— Massachusetts Rep. Trahan's 'Les Miz' moment on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' by John L. Micek, MassLive: 'In the early hours of last Thursday morning, as U.S. House Republicans got ready to send President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' over to the Senate, a Massachusetts lawmaker stepped into the breach, all Henry V-style, to try to stop it. That lawmaker, U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan, D-3rd District, offered what's known as a 'Motion to Recommit,' a parliamentary Hail Mary that would have sent the bill back to committee rather than allowing the eventual 215-214 vote to approve it.'
FROM THE 413
— Clean energy measures, $7.68M budget coming to Shutesbury Town Meeting on Saturday by Scott Merzbach, Daily Hampshire Gazette: 'Prioritizing purchase of zero-emission vehicles, supporting municipal decarbonization by 2050 and opting into the state's specialized energy code, while enhancing the existing safe community bylaw and adopting a town spending plan for the fiscal year beginning July 1, are among articles voters will decide at annual Town Meeting Saturday.'
— Budget cuts hours for some Easthampton employees by Alexa Lewis, Daily Hampshire Gazette: 'Although the city's proposed fiscal 2026 budget avoids direct cuts to municipal employee salaries, six workers are facing reduced hours and a hiring freeze is being put in place. According to Mayor Nicole LaChapelle, some municipal employees 'had extended hours,' meaning the city approved working hours for some positions beyond their typical 34-hour workweek. The hourly adjustment heading into the next fiscal year, she said, is an act of 'resetting' back to the 'base workweek' for these positions. However, the citywide hiring freeze is an act of abundant caution, following the lead of the Healey administration amid fiscal uncertainty.'
— Amid conversations about public health and accessibility in downtown Pittsfield, homeless people still lack reliable access to public restrooms and showers by Claire O'Callahan, The Berkshire Eagle.
THE LOCAL ANGLE
— Narrow timeline creates strain on New Bedford's elections by Colin Hogan, The New Bedford Light: 'Calendars, packets, papers, and check-lists cover the tables inside New Bedford's elections office. Five months will pass before city elections take place this fall, on Oct. 7 and Nov. 4, but already this office is humming — and it's maybe a little more tense than usual. … Because the City Council rejected election officials' advice — including [New Bedford Election Commission Chair Manuel] DeBrito's, his staff's, and the Secretary of the Commonwealth's — New Bedford will be the only city in Massachusetts to host its preliminary election in October this year. That leaves a short window for voters to return mail-in ballots for the Nov. 4 general election.'
— Trump's DOJ retracts investigations of 8 police departments. What about Worcester? by Brad Petrishen, Telegram & Gazette: 'President Donald Trump's Justice Department has announced it is 'retracting' its findings of constitutional violations by most of the police departments it cited under President Joe Biden. However Worcester's findings, for now, remain intact.'
— More details emerge about health director's exit by Jim Sullivan, The Newburyport Daily News: 'As the city looks to replace former Health Director Laura Vlasuk, now running Malden's health and human services department, more details are surfacing as to why she decided to leave and how the news was shared with local leaders. After more than three years leading Newburyport's health department, Vlasuk left her role on May 14, roughly a week after the Malden City Council unanimously approved her appointment on May 5.'
— Assistant to the mayor and city social worker positions being considered by Attleboro city council by Rhianwen Watkins, The Sun Chronicle.
— Brockton's downtown homeless shelter moves to Manley Street by Chris Helms, The Brockton Enterprise.
— 'Gulf of Weymouth' shirts raise $7,000 for new veterans' memorial by Jessica Trufant, The Patriot Ledger.
HEARD 'ROUND THE BUBBLAH
TRANSITIONS — Joanne Landers will be the new vice president of student affairs and Austin Gilliland has been tapped to serve as vice president of academic affairs at Northern Essex Community College.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY — to Melissa Ludtke, state Rep. Steven Owens, Andrew Fowler and Brian Choquet. Happy belated to Sabrina Correa, who celebrated Monday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live Update: Trump and Musk Attack Each Other in Remarkable Break
Live Update: Trump and Musk Attack Each Other in Remarkable Break

New York Times

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Live Update: Trump and Musk Attack Each Other in Remarkable Break

Pinned Elon Musk and President Trump openly feuded over the Republican domestic policy bill on Thursday, with Mr. Trump criticizing Mr. Musk during an Oval Office meeting with the chancellor of Germany, and Mr. Musk replying in kind on his X, the social media platform he owns. President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded with that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, and after Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.

Trump responds to Biden dismissal of autopen probe, says he didn't know 'what was going on'
Trump responds to Biden dismissal of autopen probe, says he didn't know 'what was going on'

Fox News

time9 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump responds to Biden dismissal of autopen probe, says he didn't know 'what was going on'

President Donald Trump maintained his belief that former President Joe Biden didn't have "much of an idea what was going on" when he served as president when asked Thursday to respond to Biden's dismissal of an investigation into his administration's use of an autopen. "He was never for open borders. He was never for transgender for everybody. He was never for men playing in women's sports. I mean, he changed," Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I mean, all of these things that that changed so radically. I don't think he had any idea … I said it during the debate and I say it now, he didn't have much of an idea what was going on." "Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president, and that is wrong," he added. "It's illegal. It's so bad, and it's so disrespectful to our country." Trump sent a memo to the Department of Justice Wednesday directing Attorney General Pam Bondi's department to investigate whether Biden administration aides conspired to deceive the public about his mental state, and simultaneously using an autopen to sign key presidential actions. "In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority," Trump wrote. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." Biden responded to the memo Wednesday evening, brushing it off as "ridiculous" and a "distraction" put forth by the GOP. "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden said. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations." Trump continued in his Thursday comments that the Biden administration's use of an autopen is one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history, remarking that autopens are typically used to send mass amounts of letters — not for official presidential actions. "I sign important documents. Usually, when they put documents in front of you, they're important. Even if you're signing ambassadorships or — and I consider that important, I think it's inappropriate," Trump continued. "You have somebody that's devoting four years of their life or more to being an ambassador. I think you really deserve that person deserves to get a real signature, not a not an autopen signature." The president added that he can easily identify autopen signatures from genuine pen-to-paper signatures due to "two little pinholes from pulling the paper" that are found on documents. "I think it's very disrespectful to people when they get an autopen signature," Trump said. "Autopen to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country, and you want to get them back and, you know, people use auto pens for that to send, a little signature at the bottom of a letter. We have thousands of them. We get thousands of letters a week, and it's not possible to, you know, though I'd like to do it myself, but you can't do it. That's where autopens start and stop." Autopen signatures are automatically produced by a machine, as opposed to an authentic, handwritten signature. The conservative Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project first investigated the Biden administration's use of an autopen earlier in 2025 and found that the same signature was on a bevvy of executive orders and other official documents, while Biden's signature on the document announcing his departure from the 2024 race varied from the apparent machine-produced signature. The reports led to speculation that Biden aides had approved of executive orders and sweeping pardons, not the president.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store