logo
Former Va. Supreme Court Justice Lawrence Koontz, a pillar of the state judiciary, dies at 85

Former Va. Supreme Court Justice Lawrence Koontz, a pillar of the state judiciary, dies at 85

Yahoo18-03-2025

Lawrence Koontz, a retired justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia, passed away on Sunday. He was 85 years old. (Photo courtesy of the Virginia Mountain/Valley Lawyers' Alliance)
Ret. Virginia Supreme Court Justice Lawrence Koontz, a longtime jurist who served on every level of Virginia's court system and helped shape the state's judiciary, died Sunday in Salem, according to a news release from the Virginia Mountain/Valley Lawyers' Alliance. He was 85.
A native of the Roanoke Valley, Koontz received his law degree from the University of Richmond and spent more than five decades on the bench, including 16 years as an active Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia and another 13 years as a Senior Justice, making him one of the longest-serving jurists in the commonwealth's history.
Koontz was known for his role in the founding of the Virginia Court of Appeals, where he served as the second chief judge and established many of its administrative policies.
Among his most notable opinions was his majority ruling in Arlington County v. White in 2000, which applied Virginia's strict 'Dillon Rule' doctrine to prevent local governments from offering health benefits to unmarried domestic partners, including same-sex couples.
Later that year, Koontz also authored a dissent in Atkins v. Commonwealth, arguing that individuals with intellectual disabilities should be given special consideration in criminal sentencing. His position was later echoed in the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling overturning the death sentence in the case.
In a 2008 dissent in Porter v. Commonwealth, Koontz warned that Virginia's death penalty laws would not withstand constitutional scrutiny if courts failed to rigorously ensure fair trials. Later in his career, he presided over the Supreme Court as acting chief justice due to the illness of Chief Justice LeRoy R. Hassell, Sr. His final opinion as a Senior Justice was issued in Chesapeake Hospital Authority v. State Health Commissioner in 2022.
Koontz's judicial career began in 1968 when he was appointed to the Juvenile Court of the City of Roanoke. He was later elected to the 23rd Circuit Court of Virginia and then to the Virginia Court of Appeals upon its creation in 1985. In 1995, the General Assembly elected him to the Supreme Court of Virginia, where he served until reaching the mandatory retirement age in 2011.
Koontz's collected opinions were published in a seven-volume set titled 'Jurist Prudent — The Judicial Opinions of Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr.,' with the final volume released in 2017.
He is survived by his wife, children, and many grandchildren. Memorial service arrangements are pending.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Due process is not limited to citizens, contrary to Nancy Mace's claim
Due process is not limited to citizens, contrary to Nancy Mace's claim

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Due process is not limited to citizens, contrary to Nancy Mace's claim

The Trump administration and its supporters could still use a refresher on due process. I previously explained why White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller was wrong to suggest the constitutional protection is limited to citizens. Now it appears that Nancy Mace could use that lesson, too. Amid a series of social media posts apparently intended to be provocative, the Republican U.S. representative from South Carolina wrote Tuesday night, 'Due process is for citizens.' The implication being that noncitizens don't get that protection. That's incorrect. The constitutional amendments that provide for due process apply not only to the narrower category of 'citizens' but to the broader category of 'person[s].' Indeed, the Republican-majority Supreme Court recently acknowledged this principle. Approvingly quoting from a prior precedent on the matter, it noted, ''It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law' in the context of removal proceedings.' So while it's true that due process is for citizens, it's not limited to citizens. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on

Hungarian Supreme Court rules in favour of married same-sex couple
Hungarian Supreme Court rules in favour of married same-sex couple

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hungarian Supreme Court rules in favour of married same-sex couple

The marriage of same-sex couples tying the knot abroad must be acknowledged in Hungary as a registered partnership, the Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday. The Budapest-based court gave parliament until October 31 this year to entrench the provision in law. It was responding to legal action brought by a Hungarian-German same-sex couple who had married in Germany. While same-sex marriage is not permitted in Hungary, the option of a registered partnership was introduced in 2009. In addition, a 2016 government regulation provided for same-sex marriages concluded abroad to be recognized as registered partnerships in Hungary. This provision has not been implemented, as the appropriate legislation has not been passed. The Supreme Court has now decided that this failure is anti-constitutional, ruling that the protection and recognition of same-sex relationships are part of human dignity and the right to self-determination. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz party, which has been in power since 2010, seeks to restrict the rights of people who are not heterosexual. In the spring, parliament, where the conservative nationalist Fidesz holds a majority, created the basis for banning the annual Pride Parade celebrating the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans people plus the wider queer community LGBT+ through changes to the law and the constitution. Fidesz cites the need for protecting children as the grounds for the changes. Budapest's Pride Parade has been scheduled for Saturday June 28, but whether it will take place is not yet clear, with talks proceeding between police, the government and Budapest's liberal city council. Justice Minister Bence Tuzson has proposed the city's horseracing track as a venue, as access can be restricted. The proposal drew a response from Budapest Mayor Gergely Karácsony. "I would like to inform the justice minister that the people demonstrating for freedom and love are people, and not horses," Karácsony said.

Harvey Weinstein's accusers 'all said no,' prosecutor tells jury as rape retrial ends
Harvey Weinstein's accusers 'all said no,' prosecutor tells jury as rape retrial ends

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein's accusers 'all said no,' prosecutor tells jury as rape retrial ends

By Jack Queen NEW YORK (Reuters) -A prosecutor on Wednesday told jurors in Harvey Weinstein's Manhattan retrial that the evidence clearly showed the former movie mogul raped three women, pushing back on a defense lawyer's efforts to paint the accusers as liars. Prosecutor Nicole Blumberg picked up where she left off during closing arguments the previous day, seeking to show that Weinstein forced himself on the women despite their pleading with him to stop. The Academy Award-winning producer and Miramax studio co-founder is accused of raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013 and assaulting the two other women in 2006 and 2002. Weinstein, who has denied ever having non-consensual sex or assaulting anyone, has pleaded not guilty. The trial began in April. "Members of the jury, he raped three women. They all said, 'no,'" Blumberg said. Weinstein, 73, is on trial for a second time after a New York state appeals court threw out his conviction in April 2024. Experiencing a litany of health problems, Weinstein was present in court on Wednesday in a wheelchair, wearing a dark suit and tie. Before Blumberg's pitch to jurors Wednesday, defense lawyer Arthur Aidala twice moved for a mistrial based on the prosecutor's arguments the previous day, but the motions were swiftly denied by state Supreme Court Justice Curtis Farber. The 12 jurors are due to begin deliberations after closing arguments are completed and Farber instructs them on the law. Blumberg on Tuesday called Weinstein a serial predator who promised career advancement in Hollywood to women, only to then coax them into private settings where he attacked them. She urged jurors Wednesday to disregard the defense's claim the Weinstein was on trial because he was famous and that prosecutors were trying to criminalize consensual sex. "We heard a lot about 'policing the bedroom' yesterday," Blumberg said, referring to Aidala's closing argument on Tuesday. "We don't want to police bedrooms either - unless you're forcibly raping someone inside them." Aidala on Tuesday accused the three alleged victims of lying on the witness stand out of spite after consensual sexual encounters with Weinstein failed to deliver them Hollywood stardom. "They are lying about what happened. Not about everything, but about a small slice - just enough to turn their regret, their buyers' remorse, into criminality," Aidala said of the accusers. The lawyer hoisted a dozen poster-sized placards showing emails from the accusers where they seek Weinstein's company after the alleged attacks, saying they showed the women were lying. Weinstein faces a maximum sentence of up to 29 years in prison if convicted on all charges. He already will likely spend the rest of his life in prison due to a 16-year prison sentence given to him after being found guilty in December 2022 of rape in California. He was convicted of rape by a jury in the previous trial in Manhattan in February 2020, but the New York Court of Appeals threw out the conviction and ordered a new trial, citing errors by the trial judge. Weinstein had been serving a 23-year sentence in a prison in upstate Rome, New York, when the conviction was overturned. That conviction was a milestone for the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct by powerful men. More than 100 women, including famous actresses, have accused Weinstein of misconduct. Weinstein has been held at New York City's Rikers Island jail since his conviction was overturned. He has experienced several health scares while being held at Rikers, and in September was rushed to a hospital for emergency heart surgery.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store