What parents should know about the new car seat regulations effective June 30
Starting June 30, 2025, all car seats sold in the U.S. will be required to meet new federal safety standards. The change is designed to better protect children in side-impact (T-bone) collisions, a type of crash known for causing severe injuries.
Here's what this update means for you—whether you already have a car seat or are planning to buy one soon.
If you already own a car seat, there's no need to panic or replace it—as long as it:
Has not expired
Hasn't been recalled
Is properly installed and appropriate for your child's weight and height
As the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) explains, 'Current child seats are highly effective in reducing the likelihood of death or serious injury in vehicle crashes.'
So if your current seat checks those boxes, you're in the clear.
Related: A parent's guide to car seat safety: Tips, rules & product picks
The updated regulation—Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213a (FMVSS 213a)—adds a new crash test specifically for side-impact collisions.
Why this matters: These crashes often happen at intersections and are especially dangerous for children seated on the side of the car.
The new test simulates a 30 mph side crash and ensures that car seats:
Keep children properly restrained
Prevent head contact with the vehicle interior
Reduce the force of impact on the chest
The new rule applies to seats made for kids under 40 pounds—typically infant and toddler seats.
Many manufacturers are already producing car seats that meet the new FMVSS 213a standard, but it may not be clearly labeled on the box.
Ask the retailer if the model complies with the new standard
Contact the brand's customer service to confirm
Use the NHTSA's car seat guide to match your child's age and size with the correct seat
Use the NHTSA's installation locator tool to get your seat checked by a certified technician
Yes, , and it's more important than it sounds.
Over time, plastic parts can degrade, safety technology evolves, and newer standards (like this one) come into effect. An expired seat may no longer offer optimal protection.
Look for the expiration date printed on the bottom or side of the seat
If there isn't one, check the date of manufacture and visit the manufacturer's website for their specific lifespan (typically 6–10 years)
Related: 10 car seat guidelines every parent needs to know
If you're the research-loving type, you can view the actual crash test data and technical breakdowns behind the regulation update on the NHTSA website:
NHTSA side-impact test database
Already own a seat? Check for expiration, recalls, and proper installation
Buying a new one? Ask if it meets FMVSS 213a and confirm with the brand
Use NHTSA tools for choosing and installing the right seat
No need to panic—but being informed puts you in the driver's seat
This update is a positive move toward safer rides for our little ones—and by staying aware, you're doing exactly what matters most: protecting your child with love, care, and confidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans Call Distracted Driving Dangerous, But Few Admit to Doing It
According to a new Verra Mobility study released for Distracted Driving Awareness Month, 85% of Americans believe distracted driving is just as dangerous as drunk driving. That stat alone should give anyone pause. But here's the kicker: while most drivers say they see reckless behavior on the road all the time, far fewer are willing to admit they've done it themselves. So what did the numbers really show, and what should they mean for everyday drivers like us? Verra Mobility surveyed 2,000 frequent drivers across the U.S. The vast majority say they're noticing bad behavior regularly: 89% say they see speeding at least a few times per week 67% report seeing someone run a red light at least once a month 65% have spotted drivers using their phones while behind the wheel 60% have witnessed someone speeding in a school zone And overall, 63% of respondents believe the average driver has gotten worse in recent years. These observations line up with national data. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving led to more than 3,000 deaths in 2024. That's not just a statistic—it's thousands of families impacted by something as preventable as checking a text message. Here's where things get interesting. When asked about their own driving, people painted a much rosier picture. 65% say they've never driven distracted in the past year 74% claim they haven't used their phone behind the wheel 85% say they've never sped in a school zone It's a bit of a reality check. We may see ourselves as safe and alert, but the numbers suggest we're often not as careful as we think. But here's the disconnect: AAA has found that 87% of U.S. drivers engage in unsafe behaviors behind the wheel. And according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving was responsible for more than 3,000 deaths and over 400,000 injuries in 2022 alone. So, while we're pretty quick to notice risky behavior in others (like speeding or phone use), we're not always as honest about our own habits. Despite the disconnect between what people see and what they report doing, one thing is clear: most Americans want safer streets, especially when kids are involved. 59% support automated enforcement to curb dangerous driving 77% support it for school zones A whopping 96% support it for school buses These tech-enabled tools, like speed cameras and red-light enforcement, aren't just about catching bad behavior — they're designed to reduce it. And they're shown to work, especially in school zones and high-risk areas. Jon Baldwin, EVP of Government Solutions at Verra Mobility, summed it up this way: "I believe that the average American is a good driver and cares about safety... being self-aware is key to making our roads safer so that everyone takes responsibility for their own driving behavior." If you're reading this and thinking, 'Yeah, I've seen bad drivers,' maybe it's also a good moment to ask: How often am I fully focused when I'm behind the wheel? The next time your phone buzzes, or a shortcut tempts you to speed through a yellow light, take a beat. Our streets — and the lives on them — deserve your full attention.
Digital Trends
5 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
Welcome to Digital Trends' weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. Buckle up, folks — this week we're taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let's bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities. Recommended Videos Even if you're mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it's become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we're talking about this week's public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump. What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla's Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump's election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years. Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about FSD's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow. When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla. It didn't help that the Trump administration followed Musk's recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis. The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk's companies, it's unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it. Back to the tech Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology. For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it's the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators. Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon's upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech. For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception. Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo or compete effectively with Zoox? We'll have to wait and see. Flying cars In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle. What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey. But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation's Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby's slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more… driveable. Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the 'car' back in 'flying car.' This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it's not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year. On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It's refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world. But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer). The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights. While the $300,000 price tag won't fit everyone's budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don't have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Mazda recalls involving air bags and indicator lights affect about 180,000 vehicles
Federal safety officials have issued two recent recalls on Mazda cars. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration recalls affect about 180,000 vehicles. A recall from May 29 said that air bags on Mazda vehicles may not deploy in a crash, increasing the risk of injuries. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The Sophisticated Air Bag Sensor units may set an error code and deactivate the air bags because of a low battery. The federal safety alert said 171,412 vehicles are affected. Models with the potential flaw include the 2024-2025 Mazda3 and 2024 - 2025 CX30 vehicles. Dealers will reprogram the device with improved software or replace it free of charge. Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed July 28. Mazda's number for this recall is 7525E. TRENDING STORIES: Lawsuit tied up in litigation for family of H.S. football player who suffered traumatic brain injury Former 'Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta' cast member Khadiyah 'KD' Lewis dies GA ringleader of fraud scheme sentenced for creating fake recruiting websites to steal identities The NHTSA issued another recall on May 23 warning that a traffic control indicator light may not light up on 2024-2025 Mazda MX-5s, increasing the risk of a crash. The Traction Control System and Dynamic Stability Control indicator light may not light when it should because of a software error, causing these cars to not comply with federal standards. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter] Dealers will replace the unit free of charge. Mazda is expected to mail notification letters to owners on July 21. Mazda's number for this recall is 7425E. Owners may contact Mazda customer service at 1-800-222-5500, Option 6.
