
Is any lead safe in the NBA? Watching this year's playoffs, it doesn't seem so.
Meanwhile, the Pacers made 14 of 27 shots, including 6 of 10 threes, and went 5 for 5 from the line. Andrew Nembhard gave the Pacers their first lead on a stone-cold bucket, stunning A.J. Green with a between-the-legs snatch-back and drilling a 30-footer that made it 52-51.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Being down by that much that early didn't bother the Pacers.
Advertisement
'We just kept talking about the wear-down effect,' Haliburton said. 'They started hot, but let's just wear on them and wear on them.'
The Pacers still needed the minor miracle of an 8-0 run in the last 34.5 seconds to pull off the win and close the series. But for a team that erased four 20-point deficits during the regular season, climbing out of a hole was the easy part.
'I'm still kind of trying to process it,' Pacers big man Myles Turner said. 'That was one of the craziest games I've personally been a part of. We never stopped believing . . . That's a perfect precursor to what the playoffs are. Now, granted we didn't want to be in the position of being down 20, but if we just so happened to be there, we knew how to manage it.'
Advertisement
The Pacers did it again against the Cavaliers in the second round, and they've personified a postseason during which huge collapses and monumental comebacks have seemed routine.
The NBA Finals start Thursday when the Pacers head to Oklahoma City for Game 1. At different points on their paths to a possible title, both teams have had to claw back after being down 20 points.
The Thunder made a 29-point Grizzlies lead disappear in the first round.
The Knicks came back from
three
20-point deficits (twice against the Celtics in the second round, then against the Pacers in the Eastern Conference finals).
Throw in the Nuggets, who blew a 22-point lead to the Clippers in the first round, and that's seven 20-point comebacks ― easily the most in a single postseason since the NBA began tracking play-by-play data in 1996-97.
It's a feeling the Celtics know all too well. No team in the play-by-play era has recovered from more 20-point deficits than the Celtics, who've done it five times. But they've also blown more than five.
This year, they were on the wrong end ― twice.
As much as injuries and illnesses affected the Celtics, there was no ducking the fact that they let huge leads slip away in back-to-back games on their home floor.
'The reality is we blew the first two games,' Celtics president Brad Stevens said during his playoff postmortem. 'I realize ― we all realize ― these leads go fast.'
Advertisement
But how does it happen?
There's the obvious: The teams that rally shoot the peel off the ball, get to the free throw line, and clamp up.
Over the 50 instances in which teams erased 20-point playoff deficits, the teams making the comebacks went from shooting 33.5 percent before their run to 55.7 during it. Their 3-point shooting percentage jumped from 20.7 to 48.4.
The teams that crumble go ice cold, commit wild turnovers in large numbers, and let everything go by the wayside on the margins.
The teams losing the leads go from juggernauts to can't-get-rights. While they're building their lead they shoot 55.9 percent from the floor and 50.5 percent from three. But when things start to spiral, those shooting clips dive to 33 percent and 23.9 percent.
There's no denying the 3-ball is an equalizer, allowing teams to take chunks out of huge deficits. From 2017-25, teams went from taking 27 threes per game to 37.6. Meanwhile, 30 of the 50 teams that erased 20-point deficits did it over that span.
The 3-pointers might be the weapon, but usually the ammunition is turnovers. The teams that fall apart average 6.4 turnovers while they're doing it.
Most coaches try to call a timeout to stop the bleeding ― on average the team watching its lead slip calls three timeouts while things are snowballing.
But there was, of course, one coach who chose to let his team sink or swim ― and it sank.
The 76ers built a 22-point, second-quarter lead on the Celtics in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference semifinals in 2018. Over the next 10 minutes, that lead vanished. Brett Brown didn't call a single timeout.
Advertisement
Stubbornness aside, it's not just that the huge leads are unraveling, it's that they're falling apart in a blink. The seven blown 20-point leads this year happened in an average of 19 minutes.
This year, the Nuggets, Celtics (twice), and Bucks blew 20-point leads in less than 15 minutes.
Related
:
Last year, the Nuggets blew a 20-point lead to the Timberwolves in 10 minutes, and the Knicks blew a 22-point lead to the 76ers in 12.
No team in the play-by-play era has blown a lead faster than the Jazz in 2018, against the Thunder. They were up, 71-46, with 8:34 left in the third quarter. By the end of the quarter, it was tied. They ended up losing, 107-99.
Donovan Mitchell, the engine of the Jazz's offense, pointed out what was obvious: 'We stopped playing defense. We stopped getting back. Our offense got stagnant. They made adjustments and we didn't make the right adjustments back.'
If there was ever a sign that the idea of a large lead is changing, it came in 2019, when the Warriors had their feet kicked up in Game 2 of their first-round series against the Clippers, up, 94-63, in the third quarter.
The lead seemed safe, but Warriors coach Steve Kerr admitted his team got too cozy, too soon.
'We stopped playing,' Kerr said. 'As soon as we got up, 31, we shut down.'
Before the Warriors could blink, Clippers guard Lou Williams lit them up for 17 points in the third quarter and the Clippers recorded a stunning 135-131 victory.
It was the first time a team had overcome a 30-plus-point deficit in a playoff game.
Advertisement
The Warriors still reached the NBA Finals that year, but it would be hard to call that night a wake-up call. They blew a 20-point lead to the Rockets in the next round.
In the 18 years prior to that night in 2019, only 28 teams had climbed out of 20-point deficits, let alone 30 points.
In the six years since, 20 teams have made 20-point deficits disappear.
These days, it feels like 20 points ― the same as $20 ― doesn't go as far as it used to. But make no mistake, epic comebacks and monumental collapses are still hard to pull off.
Of the 860 teams that have built 20-point leads in the playoffs since 1997, only 50 have let those leads slip away. In this year's playoffs, on 35 occasions teams have gone up by at least 20. Six of those teams fumbled the bag and lost.
As much as the comebacks make it seem as if no lead is safe, on the whole, 20-point leads are still close to bulletproof.
But when a team does blow a 20-point lead? That's when things get tricky.
Of the 50 playoff teams that have blown 20-point leads in the play-by-play era, 22 still won, while 28 lost. This season, they're 1-6.
That kind of momentum is tough to slow. The only team to blow a 20-point lead this postseason and survive to tell the tale was the Nuggets in Game 4 of their first-round series against the Clippers.
So, how big does a lead have to be for a team to feel safe taking its foot off the gas?
Advertisement
No one's come back after being down by at least 32, at least not yet.
Julian Benbow can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Daigneault reveals Thunder's no-expectation ‘process' before NBA Finals
The post Mark Daigneault reveals Thunder's no-expectation 'process' before NBA Finals appeared first on ClutchPoints. OKLAHOMA CITY — Four wins from an NBA title, head coach Mark Daigneault and the Oklahoma City Thunder navigated the 2024-25 campaign without expectations. Daigneault's meticulous approach forces his team to focus on what's in front of them, one play, quarter, half, and game at a time, rather than looking ahead or setting benchmarks. For the first time in 13 years, the Thunder have reached the NBA Finals. Advertisement In his first media availability since clinching the Western Conference Finals, Daigneault addressed the Thunder's approach throughout the season. 'I try not to operate with any expectations, just do my best every day, help everybody else do their best every day, and see where that lands us, and be comfortable with it,' Daigneault said. 'What we've learned is when you do that and repeat that process, it can take you great places, and this is a great opportunity for us. But what makes it great every day is simple: it's the people, starting with our players. These are guys with unbelievable makeups. 'They come from awesome circles. They have unbelievable stories. And they bring an authentic and genuine sense of self to the gym every day that creates positive momentum, and it's just a joy to be around,' Daigneault concluded. Relating to his words from the Western Conference Finals championship trophy ceremony, Daigneault reiterated what he said about his team during his speech. Advertisement 'I meant everything I said the other night,' Daigneault added. 'This is a great accomplishment/opportunity for us, but I want the season to keep going. There's not a part of me that wants this to end. I just want to keep coaching this team because of how much of a joy it is to be around these group of guys every day. I probably speak for everybody when I say that. There's just a great energy to our gym every day, regardless of what's going on in our season. As much success as we've had, it still feels like that after we lose a game.' Mark Daigneault calls Thunder players 'idiots' during WCF speech Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault assessed his team on national TV, calling them 'idiots' amid some of the kindest words a coach can say about his players. For Daigenault, it best encapsulated the character of this year's Thunder team, which approached the campaign without zero expectations but instead focused on how to improve as a squad. Advertisement 'These guys are uncommon. They do everything right,' Daigneault declared. 'They're high character, they're idiots, they're competitive, and most of all, they're team-first, and embody everything it means to be a team.' The Thunder will host Game 1 of the NBA Finals on June 5.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kendrick Perkins dishes on why 2025 Thunder is best in franchise history
The post Kendrick Perkins dishes on why 2025 Thunder is best in franchise history appeared first on ClutchPoints. Before the Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 4-1 to reach the NBA Finals, ESPN's Kendrick Perkins crowned Shai Gilgeous-Alexander the franchise's best player ever. Perkins doubled down on that take. After watching Gilgeous-Alexander lead the Thunder in Game 5 at the Paycom Center, Perkins says this year's Oklahoma City team is a deeper roster compared to his 2012 squad. Advertisement When asked to compare the two, 13 years removed from the last Thunder team to reach the NBA Finals, Perkins explained why this year's group gets the edge over Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Perkins' 2012 squad, per ESPN's NBA Today. 'I got this year's Thunder team, 2025, and it's no knock to ours in 2012,' Perkins said. 'Their depth. You talk about bringing in a Cason Wallace, Alex Caruso, guys who are gonna get into you defensively, and all of a sudden you have a guy like Jalen Williams, who's not afraid to mix it up, who was crucial for them in that Denver Nuggets series against Jokic. They're just too deep. We're talking about one of the greatest defensive teams in NBA history.' Despite the Hall of Fame careers Durant, Westbrook, and Harden are leading, Perkins explained why the 2024-25 Thunder team as a whole would win in a hypothetical best-of-7 series. 'Now, it's no knock when it comes down to what Russ or KD, or James brought to the table, or even Serge Ibaka, but this team is just more polished,' Perkins added. 'They have more adults in the room than just have old souls. They act like they've been there before, and that's the scary part, and that's why I give them the edge. But it would go seven games.' Advertisement The Thunder enter the NBA Finals with a 12-4 record. Kendrick Perkins doubles down on strong SGA, Thunder take Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images ESPN analyst Kendrick Perkins doubled down on his take on Thunder All-Star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Before his former team clinched the NBA Finals, Perkins labeled Gilgeous-Alexander the greatest Thunder player in franchise history. While predicting the Thunder to win the NBA Finals, Perkins says it'll solidify Gilgeous-Alexander as the greatest player in the franchise's history. 'He will be the greatest Thunder ever. Yes, past Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook,' Perkins said. 'Third consecutive season of averaging over 30 shooting over 50% from the field, scoring title, MVP, conference MVP, going to the NBA Finals, winning the championship, and he's going to win Finals MVP.' Perkins also believes the title would solidify Gilgeous-Alexander's place in the league's top-tier level of superstars.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Daigneault says Sam Presti relationship influenced Thunder success
The post Mark Daigneault says Sam Presti relationship influenced Thunder success appeared first on ClutchPoints. OKLAHOMA CITY — After coaching the Oklahoma City Blue, the organization's G League affiliate, for five seasons, GM Sam Presti named Mark Daigneault the Oklahoma City Thunder head coach. He joined Billy Donovan's coaching staff as an assistant before taking over. Then, four seasons later, Daigneault guided the Thunder to the NBA Finals, leading a 2024-25 team that some consider as the best in franchise history. Advertisement During his first media availability since beating the Minnesota Timberwolves in the Western Conference Finals, Daigneault reflected on his relationship with Presti and how smooth it's been since the very beginning of his NBA coaching career. 'When I started as the head coach, I already had six years in the organization. So, that's a six-plus-year relationship that we already had,' Daigneault said. 'He knew me very well. I knew him very well. We had seen each other over the course of a long period of time in a lot of different situations. So, there wasn't a relational feeling out process there. It was a continuation of an existing relationship that we already had — which the communication between those two positions is essential — and I think that comfort helped with that.' Daigneault has been in the NBA long enough to have seen that the relationship between a head coach and a team's GM isn't always smooth or a seamless fit as his bond with Thunder GM Sam Presti. 'A lot of those challenges come from philosophical differences,' Daigneault added. 'And I was like raised here in professional basketball. I didn't work anywhere else in pro basketball prior to coming here. I didn't know much about professional basketball before I came here. So, my entire philosophy in professional basketball was underneath the umbrella of the Thunder organization. So, our philosophical alignment is so tight because of that.' Advertisement 'This is the only place I've ever worked, and this is the only way I've ever done it. And a lot of it is stuff I learned from Sam and learned from being in this organization.' Mark Daigneault reveals his no-expectation process for Thunder Alonzo Adams-Imagn Images Thunder head coach Mark Daigneault operates without expectations for his team. It's been his approach throughout the 2024-25 campaign, which has led to the Thunder's 12-4 postseason record and their first NBA Finals appearance since 2012. 'I try not to operate with any expectations, just do my best every day, help everybody else do their best every day, and see where that lands us, and be comfortable with it,' Daigneault said. 'What we've learned is when you do that and repeat that process, it can take you great places, and this is a great opportunity for us.' The Thunder will host Game 1 of the NBA Finals on June 5.