
What's next for Brooke Rollins
Presented by
QUICK FIX
— Donald Trump is expecting to introduce sweeping tariffs this week — and farmers are closely watching Brooke Rollins.
— USDA is establishing a new program to release billions in aid to agricultural producers.
— DOGE's cuts are also jeopardizing California farmers' ability to access water.
IT'S MONDAY, MARCH 3. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow, searching for a good King Cake for Mardi Gras in D.C. Don't forget to follow us at @Morning_Ag for more from your favorite ag team.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Driving the day
ROLLINS TAKES ON TARIFFS: As Trump gears up to roll out his sweeping tariff threats, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins is promising farmers she'd be 'in the room' to protect them from the economic repercussions.
Speaking to producers and industry groups at the Commodity Classic in Colorado yesterday, Rollins promised to support farmers in the face of tariffs, the department's overhaul and the 'Make America Healthy Again' push.
Trump's tariffs: Rollins has said she'll bail out farmers who are targets for any retaliation as a result of Trump's tariff threats, as former USDA chief Sonny Perdue did during the first Trump administration. (Though MA readers will recall the bucket of funds to do so are running low.)
Trump pledged last week to enforce his planned 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico starting tomorrow, after both were put on pause in February. It's unclear how final the president's decision might be, as our colleagues reported.
'I know firsthand how important trade is to your success,' Rollins told producers Sunday. 'And I am committed, as a very top priority, to work with this president to travel this world and expand market access for all of our crops and all of our producers.'
Funding freezes: Rollins also told farmers she would release funds under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), Conservation Stewardship Program and the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program, acknowledging farmers' worries about the major federal spending freeze.
USDA has paused much of its spending that was already allocated to farmers and programs, causing chaos and uncertainty among those who weren't sure if they'd get the money they expected.
It's unclear if Rollins' announcement referred to the $20 million in already-unfrozen funds or marked a second tranche of funding released.
'I know this review process has caused concern,' Rollins said. 'And I don't say any of this flippantly. I know that among you who have participated in longstanding USDA programs, in many instances, you had no way of knowing whether these programs were funded through the farm bill or through the latest IRA funds from Joe Biden.'
Department overhaul: USDA is also working (and struggling) to rehire some employees who handle the bird flu response and loans for farmers. They're also facing a major 'reduction in force' effort and are requiring employees to come back to USDA headquarters, as Rollins touted yesterday.
'My team will be available to answer your calls 24 hours a day, seven days a week,' Rollins said. 'And if not, give me their name, because as you may have heard, our team is now seeing a little bit of reduction in force across the federal government.'
More economic aid: USDA will also be launching the Emergency Commodity Assistance Program, a new program the department will use to release $31 billion in economic and disaster aid allocated by Congress. Rollins said they're on track to roll out the $10 billion in economic aid to farmers in coming weeks and are focusing on streamlining applications for producers to receive disaster relief dollars.
On MAHA: The secretary also said she will protect farmers' interests during discussions about policy updates to make, as farmers and food industry leaders worry about potential bans on some pesticides and GMOs.
'As we speak on efforts to make America healthy again, I am certain that we will do so in a way that does not compromise you and your farms and your farming practices,' Rollins said.
Bird flu: Rollins also unveiled her initial plan to respond to the bird flu outbreak last week. But some egg producers and lobbying groups are urging USDA to keep working harder on plotting a poultry vaccine response, which they argue could be vital to protecting the industry from ruin.
USDA is still negotiating with other countries like Turkey to get deals to import more eggs into the U.S.
What did you do last week? USDA employees also received new requests from the Office of Personnel Management asking them to send in what they did last week, according to a copy of the email viewed by MA.
Public-sector employees across the government, who have been buffeted in recent weeks by large-scale firings orchestrated by DOGE, received emails late Friday with an ominous subject line: 'What did you do last week? Part II.'
USDA has since instructed employees to keep their responses short and avoid including classified information, links or attachments. The department previously told employees that replying to the email is voluntary and that there will be no penalties for non-response.
On The Hill
WHAT'S NEXT FOR RECONCILIATION: Both chambers have passed their budget resolutions, kickstarting the process for Republicans to enact their sweeping policy agenda. But now they have to settle on exactly how much they can trim from agriculture spending.
The House's plan would require the Agriculture Committee to find $230 billion in savings, which is expected to come largely from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Some House Republicans are worried that deep cuts could threaten benefits or doom farm bill talks, but are watching to make sure the $230 billion target comes down enough to prevent any major issues.
The Senate budget plan set a floor of $1 billion in cuts from the Agriculture Committee — and Republicans in that chamber won't have enough support for cutting SNAP anywhere close to the House's target.
Another thing to watch: Trump and GOP leaders are strategizing how to score and eventually count the revenue from tariffs against Canada, Mexico and China as part of their plans for a deficit-neutral bill.
HOUSE AG MEMBERSHIP FINALIZED: Reps. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) and Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) are officially back on the House Ag Committee this Congress. House Democrats finalized waivers for members to fill up the Ag Committee's two open Democratic slots.
Several Democrats who were on the panel last Congress — including a couple of senior members — will not be on the committee this year: Reps. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), Jasmine Crockett (Texas), Greg Casar (Texas), Darren Soto (Fla.) and Sanford Bishop (Ga.).
SENATE DEMS ASK: Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), the top Democrat on the Senate Ag Committee, and Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) led 13 other Democrats in writing to Rollins to encourage the swift disbursal of disaster assistance for farmers.
The senators pointed to tariff threats and other economic concerns farmers are facing as they prepare for the coming months.
'Farmers are making decisions right now about fertilizer usage and their crop mix and are working with their bankers to figure out if they can secure the financing they need to continue farming this year,' they wrote.
Congress passed $21 billion in disaster relief and $10 million in economic aid for farmers at the end of 2024.
DOGE WATCH
WATER WOES IN THE GOLDEN STATE: DOGE-ordered firings at the federal agency responsible for delivering water to farms and cities across California are getting in the way of Trump's order to maximize the state's water supplies, our Annie Snider and Camille von Kaenel write.
The Bureau of Reclamation's California office has lost 10 percent of its staff due to buyouts and orders by Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency to fire short-tenured employees, according to three people close to the office who were granted anonymity because they feared retaliation.
DOGE's cuts are already hurting Reclamation's ability to move water through a sprawling system of pumps, canals and reservoirs to roughly a third of the state's farmland — and impeding the agency's ability to ratchet up deliveries in line with Trump's demand, the people said.
The sharp cuts' impact on a dusty corner of the federal bureaucracy that has taken outsized importance in the president's mind offers a case study in how DOGE's bulldozer approach stands to upend one of the president's dearest policy goals.
Trump's long-running feud with state Democrats over water restrictions escalated in January when the president falsely linked hydrants that had run dry during the Los Angeles wildfires to those restrictions. His first month in office was marked by an obsessive focus on the state's water issues, with the White House issuing not one, but two executive orders on the topic and ordering an abrupt water dump from a pair of dams.
Row Crops
— Rep. Monica De La Cruz (R-Texas) said she's working with Trump's legislative affairs team to obtain water that's owed to the U.S. by Mexico. The missing water deliveries, as required under a 1944 treaty, has hurt citrus and sugar farmers in South Texas.
— The Senate Ag Committee still hasn't received paperwork required to move forward with Stephen Vaden's nomination to be deputy secretary of USDA.
— Leaders of 1890 universities wrote to congressional leaders in support of USDA-funded ag research and the 1890 National Scholars Program, which was paused and unpaused by the department recently.
THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@politico.com, marciabrown@politico.com, jwolman@politico.com, gmott@politico.com and rdugyala@politico.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
21 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

24 minutes ago
Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud
NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance breaks his silence on Trump and Musk feud after seeing Elon's Epstein tweet during Theo Von interview
Vice President JD Vance's first reaction to Elon Musk's Trump-Epstein tweet was caught Thursday on Theo Von's podcast. On the 'This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von,' episode released Saturday, Von showed Vance one of the most viral tweets from the pair's feud, in which the Tesla CEO claimed, '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' 'Ok, wow. I haven't even seen this one,' Vance said, explaining he was on a plane amid Musk and Trump's online exchanges. 'First of all, absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein,' Vance said. 'Whatever the Democrats and the media says about him, that's totally BS.' The social media exchange came just a week after Musk left his DOGE role in the Trump Administration. Vance chalked Musk's online outbursts up to him 'being new to politics' and frustrations that his 'businesses are being attacked non-stop' since he joined the White House. In responding to a clip posted on X of Vance saying that he hoped the pair could become friends again, Musk tweeted: 'Cool.' Musk's departure followed a Wall Street Journal report citing insiders who claimed that even Trump was getting frustrated with Musk and was doubtful whether his goals within DOGE could be reached. Musk has since spoken out about his disapproval of the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which includes various policy changes, including tax cuts, welfare reform, and infrastructure investments. 'Elon is entitled to his opinion,' Vance told Von on the podcast. 'I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying. I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man — I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — to be at war with the world's most powerful man, who I think is doing more to save the country than anybody in my lifetime.' Vance added, 'I just think you've got to have some respect for him and say, 'yeah, we don't have to agree on every issue.' But is this war actually in the interest of the country? I don't think so.' Despite Musk going 'so nuclear' online, Vance is hopeful that he can 'come back into the fold' within politics. 'I know the president was getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon,' Vance said. 'But I think it has been very restrained, because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk. And I actually think that if Elon chilled out a little bit everything would be fine.'