Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated
Whole CDC programs were essentially shut down, including some focused on smoking, lead poisoning, gun violence, asthma and air quality, and workplace safety and health. The entire office that handles Freedom of Information Act requests was shuttered. Infectious disease programs took a hit, too, including programs that fight outbreaks in other countries, labs focused on HIV and hepatitis in the U.S., and staff trying to eliminate tuberculosis.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
An estimated 200 of the reinstated workers are based in the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, HHS officials confirmed. Staffers at a CDC lab that does testing for sexually transmitted diseases are being brought back, said one CDC employee who wasn't authorized to discuss what happened and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.
Advertisement
Also reinstated are an estimated 150 employees at the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, including people staffing a lab that works on lead poisoning, according to the union and employees.
Layoffs at federal agencies were challenged in lawsuits, with judges in some cases ordering federal agencies to halt terminations of employees.
Advertisement
Officials at HHS have never detailed how they made the layoff decisions in the first place. And they did not answer questions about why the notices went out, or how decisions were made about who to bring back.
HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency was streamlining operations and that 'the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective.'
'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services — whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases,' he said.
The reinstatements don't undo the damage being done by Kennedy and the Trump administration to federal public health, said members of Fired But Fighting, a group of affected CDC workers who have helped organize rallies in Atlanta. The most recent was in the rain on Tuesday, at which some attendees called for Kennedy to resign.
'Bringing a few hundred people back to work out of thousands fired is a start, but there are still countless programs at CDC that have been cut, which will lead to increased disease and death,' one of the group's founding members, Abby Tighe, said in a statement.
This is not the first time that employees at the Atlanta-based agency were told they were being terminated only to then be told to come back. After an earlier round of termination notices went out in February, about 180 CDC employees in March were told to come back.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
RFK Jr. blows up America's vaccine policy
America's vaccine policy has been set for decades, with patients, providers, scientists and insurers more or less in sync on the merits of immunizations. In the last several weeks, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has upended long-standing norms, introducing uncertainty into a once-reliable system. Why it matters: Access to health care may shift in unpredictable ways. At worst, infectious diseases once thought to be eradicated could return. Catch up quick: Kennedy sent shockwaves through the medical community two weeks ago with a controversial decision to stop recommending the COVID vaccine to healthy kids and healthy pregnant women. The CDC contradicted this just days later, recommending that healthy kids do get the COVID shot. Confusion escalated this week, when Kennedy abruptly dismissed all 17 members of the expert panel that wields a great deal of power in shaping vaccine policy and makes recommendations to the CDC. Some of the eight new members Kennedy quickly named have expressed anti-vaccine sentiment in the past. Together, these changes represent a sharp break from public health precedent — and raise questions about what happens next. Case in point: Leigh Haldeman, a pregnant woman in Seattle, was recently turned away when going to get a COVID booster shot, as recommended by her doctor, CNN reports. Cases like hers could become more common. While most doctors and pharmacies will likely still be able to recommend and administer the vaccine, access might start to erode. Insurers are likely to start denying coverage of the COVID vaccine to groups who aren't deemed eligible by the government, putting the vaccine out of reach for people who don't have the time to seek out a willing provider or the money to pay out of pocket for the shot. The other side: Kennedy has said replacing the members of the expert panel is a "major step towards restoring public trust in vaccines." He's also said the decision to stop recommending COVID vaccines to kids is common sense because they're less likely to get very sick from COVID than adults. But the vaccine can still protect kids who could develop serious symptoms — and do so with no appreciable side effects, Chris Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told the New York Times. Zoom out: The COVID vaccine could just be the beginning. The CDC advisory panel members picked by Kennedy thus far are more aligned with his skeptical views of vaccines. They could radically reshape — or even scrap — national vaccine recommendations, including those for kids. They could also require more testing of new vaccines for safety and efficacy, which could have upstream effects — discouraging academic labs and drug companies from pursuing vaccine research and development. What to watch: Big changes in America's vaccine policy come amid a major cultural shift. Vaccine skepticism is on the rise, and more kindergartners are showing up to school with exemptions.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
How a Purge at One Obscure Panel Could Disrupt Vaccinations
With two extraordinary moves, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has upended the certainty that American children will always have cost-free access to lifesaving vaccines. For decades, a little-known scientific panel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended which shots Americans should get and when. The group's endorsement means insurance companies must cover the costs and helps states decide which vaccines to mandate for school-age children. The panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, also determines which shots are provided for free through the Vaccines for Children program, which serves about half of the children in the United States. On Monday, Mr. Kennedy, long a vaccine skeptic, fired all 17 members of A.C.I.P., claiming that the group was rife with conflicts of interest and that a clean sweep was needed to restore public trust. Mr. Kennedy also reassigned C.D.C. staff scientists who oversee the panel's work and vet its members. On X, he promised not to replace the panel's experts with 'ideological anti-vaxxers.' On Wednesday, Mr. Kennedy named eight new members, at least half of whom have expressed skepticism of certain vaccines. Only one was a widely recognized expert in vaccines. For years, Mr. Kennedy has argued that American children receive too many shots and has falsely claimed that vaccines are not tested in placebo-controlled studies. Critics fear he is now setting the stage for a rollback of federal recommendations. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Flu Shot Sparks False HIV Alarm in Dialysis Patient
False-positive HIV test results following influenza vaccination are rare. However, unexpected cross-reactivity remains a concern in the evolution of vaccine formulations. After obtaining her annual flu shot, an 82-year-old woman on haemodialysis (HD) was repeatedly discovered to have positive HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test results without having risk factors, and previously, the test was negative. Only a more detailed medical history revealed a possible unexpected explanation. A case report by Rayyan Mkahal,MD, a nephrology fellow at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and his colleagues highlights the potential often-overlooked complications associated with the flu vaccine. The Patient and Her History The patient presented for HD with end-stage kidney disease on intermittent HD in one of the dialysis centres. Her medical history was otherwise significant for diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. At the start of HD, the HIV ELISA test result was negative. However, 7 months later, during routine testing, she was unexpectedly found to have a positive HIV ELISA. The patient had never received a blood transfusion and was not sexually active. The patient was clinically stable without evidence of active infection, weight loss, night sweats, fever, chills, or other systemic symptoms. She has no reported recent travel. Findings and Diagnosis On admission, her vital signs, including blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, oxygen saturation on room air, and temperature, were all within normal limits. Complete blood cell count was within the normal range. Otherwise, her immunisation history included a hepatitis B vaccine before initiating dialysis and yearly flu vaccination, the most recent of which was administered approximately 45 days before detection. Her previous COVID booster vaccine was administered 4 months ago. No illnesses, hospitalisations, or major interim events have occurred since dialysis initiation. Other probable causes of false-positive ELISA results, such as autoimmune diseases, malignancy, or recent infections, were considered but were not supported by clinical history or laboratory evaluation. An HIV polymerase chain reaction was performed 14 weeks after the initial positive test and revealed no viral replication. No HIV testing was performed between weeks 3 and 14; therefore, the precise timing of seroconversion remains unknown. Discussion 'Despite the use of relatively new vaccine formulations, cross-reactivity with ELISA remains a relevant phenomenon. Given that influenza vaccines are given annually, clinicians must remain vigilant to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment. This case highlights the need for increased awareness of this phenomenon and suggests future research to explore the persistence of vaccine-antibody interference in the vulnerable population,' the study authors wrote.
