New Pope Leo tells Jews he wants to strengthen dialogue
VATICAN CITY, May 13 (Reuters) - Pope Leo XIV has told the world's Jewish communities he wants to strengthen the Roman Catholic Church's dialogue with them, in a message coming after a souring of relations between the Vatican and Israel over the war in Gaza.
The first U.S.-born pope sent a letter to Rabbi Noam Marans, the Director of Interreligious Affairs of the American Jewish Committee, who posted the letter on the social platform X late on Monday.
'Trusting in the assistance of the almighty, I pledge to continue and strengthen the Church's dialogue and cooperation with the Jewish people in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council's declaration Nostra Aetate,' Leo said in the letter.
Nostra Aetate was a landmark document in the 1962-1965 Council that repudiated the concept of collective Jewish guilt for the death of Jesus and urged dialogue with non-Christian religions.
The brief document revolutionized Catholic relations with Jews after centuries of persecution and mistrust. Dialogue that ensued over the following two decades made it possible for Pope John II to become the first pontiff to visit a synagogue, giving a speech in Rome's main temple in 1986, where he called Jews 'our beloved elder brothers'.
After years of often tense relations, the Vatican and Israel signed a 'fundamental agreement' in 1993 and exchanged full ambassadors the next year.
A Vatican source said Marans would attend Leo's inaugural Mass on Sunday. More than a dozen other Jewish leaders from around the world were also expected to attend, the source said.
It was not yet clear if any Israeli government leader would attend the Mass.
While the late Pope Francis often condemned antisemitism, relations between the Vatican and Israel soured after the start of the war in Gaza in 2023.
Hamas militants attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing about 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages to Gaza. More than 52,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since then, Palestinian authorities say, and swathes of the heavily built-up enclave have been laid to waste.
The Israeli delegation to Pope Francis' funeral last month was headed by its ambassador to the Vatican Yaron Sideman, which sources said at the time was an intentionally low-level representation because of Francis' comments about Gaza.
Francis, who visited the Holy Land in 2014, suggested last November that the global community should study whether Israel's military campaign in Gaza constituted genocide, in some of his most explicit criticism of Israel's conduct in its war with Hamas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's sanctions on Israel are disgraceful folly
It is one thing for the UK to impose sanctions on autocratic enemies like Russia. But to do the same to a democratic ally is reprehensible. The decision to pick out two members of the Israeli government for prohibition is extraordinary from a Government which refuses to proscribe Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or the Muslim Brotherhood. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, has banned Itamar Ben-Gvir, the National Security Minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, the Finance Minister, from visiting the UK over comments they made on Gaza. Any assets in this country will be frozen. It is true that these individuals are on the extremes, even in Israel where their support for expanding West Bank settlements is controversial. Both politicians are ultra-nationalists whose continued presence in Benjamin Netanyahu's Cabinet is preventing the collapse of the coalition. But after initially declaring support for Israel after the October 7 2023 atrocities, Labour is in danger of being seen to side with Hamas. Backbench MPs are agitating for a far tougher line than the suspension of trade talks or curbs on arms sales. They want the UK to recognise a Palestinian state at a conference in New York later this month. That would be a serious mistake and perhaps Mr Lammy thinks he can head off party critics with limited action against individuals. But where does it stop? The two ministers are not being targeted for something they have done but for what they have said. It is unprecedented for Britain to treat politicians serving in the government of a friendly power in this way. How will Mr Lammy feel if Israel now bans him for the criticism he has voiced?
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The sanctions are not about hurting Israel but capitulating to sectarian politics
Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich shame Israel. It disgraces the country that they serve in its cabinet, and their presence in the government demonstrates that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu puts his own career above the needs of his own people. All of which has nothing to do with the British government, which has no business deciding who should and should not be in the government of foreign nations. We gave up ordering the colonials around when we stopped running the Empire. The sanctions against Ben-Gvir and Smotrich will have precisely zero impact on Israel. For one thing, it's a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy: I doubt either of them have the least desire to visit a country with a Government that so brazenly panders to the anti-Israel brigade. Because it is obvious what this is about. The statement announcing the sanctions was jointly signed by Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway – four of the most obsessively anti-Israel nations on earth under their current governments. Last week, for example, Australia banned an Israeli tech entrepreneur, Hillel Fuld, from entry over his supposed 'Islamophobia rhetoric' – in reality, exposing Hamas' Islamist supporters – and, in a deeply Orwellian accusation, for denying media reports of alleged Israeli war crimes. All today's statement needed was the signatures of Spain and Ireland for the full set. Labour has spent its first year in office pandering to its anti-Israel MPs, with a mix of dangerous and performative gestures that expose the shallowness of its foreign policy. Restoring funding to Unrwa, despite the allegations that some of its employees took part in the October 7 massacre; banning the export of some arms to Israel; backing the ICC arrest warrants against Netanyahu and the former Israeli defence minister, Yoav Gallant; now this. But it is not even Labour's own MPs that this gesture is really aimed at. Rather it is the potential supporters of the next cadre of so-called 'Independent Gaza' MPs. Labour is scared witless by the rise of sectarian politics in its constituencies. There are 37 constituencies with a Muslim population over 20 per cent, and in a further 73 seats the Muslim population is between 10 and 20 per cent. Labour's vote fell by over 14 per cent last year from 2019 in those constituencies where the Muslim population was above 15 per cent. This is a huge problem for Labour. It is not Israel that the party is most concerned will notice the sanctions, but Muslim voters in Britain. As for the sanctions themselves: the hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Qatar funds and houses Hamas. But we do not sanction Qatar. We beg for its money. But then hypocrisy and cant define this Government.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Independent Scotland would sever ties with Israel, says SNP
An independent Scotland would sever diplomatic ties with Israel and shut its embassy there, the SNP's Westminster leader has said. Stephen Flynn said he was 'deeply upset and angry' about what was happening in Gaza as he hit out at the UK Government's 'weak' position on the issue. The Aberdeen South MP said the Israelis were 'ignoring' the UK, and ministers should 'do something that captures their attention'. Speaking to The News Agents podcast, he said a separate Scotland would break off diplomatic relations with Israel and shut its embassy in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv. 'The world is judging' His intervention comes amid mounting pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to take further action against Israel over its military campaign in Gaza. Last month, Foreign Secretary David Lammy condemned Israel 's expansion of its ground operation in Gaza as an 'affront to the values of British people' and warned that 'the world is judging – history will judge them'. The Prime Minister has also signed a joint statement with France and Canada threatening to take ' concrete actions ' if Israel did not stop its military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid entering the Gaza Strip. The move prompted a furious response from Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who accused Sir Keir of offering a 'huge prize' to Hamas. On Monday, the Government imposed asset freezes on ultra-nationalists Itamar Ben-Gvir, the Israeli security minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and banned them from entering the UK. But Mr Flynn said: 'I've gone into the House of Commons on God knows how many occasions now and listened to David Lammy and Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, and they've told us how 'we're going to do this, or we're going to do that, and this is the latest thing we're going to do'. 'And then he stands up and says, 'but they're ignoring us'. Well, if they're ignoring you, then do something that captures their attention.' He said SNP MPs would not be 'wise' to visit Israel, adding: 'I'd be amazed if any of them did, because they're not daft, and they probably know that they would get turned around and stuck on a plane right back out of Israel. 'Look, I'm deeply, deeply upset and angry about what's happened in Gaza and what continues to happen in Gaza, and the fact that the UK position has been so weak for far too long in respect of this. And I think it's important that you convey your views to people who are rational actors.' 'Student-politics approach' But Rachael Hamilton, the Scottish Tory deputy leader, said: 'Stephen Flynn has once again betrayed the SNP's lack of credibility on international affairs with his simplistic, student-politics approach to the Middle East crisis. 'I'm sure his Aberdeen South constituents would rather he focused on the threat to their livelihoods posed by the SNP's hostility to oil and gas, rather than grandstanding on global issues.'
