Kuwait abolishes law allowing kidnappers to escape punishment by marrying their victims
Dubai: Kuwait has approved a draft law to abolish Article 182 of the Penal Code, which previously allowed a kidnapper to escape punishment if he legally married his victim with the consent of her guardian.
The decision was announced by Minister of Justice Nasser Al Sumait following the Cabinet's weekly meeting on Tuesday. He confirmed that the Cabinet had approved the draft decree-law as part of ongoing efforts to align national legislation with both Islamic Sharia principles and international human rights conventions.
'This step reflects Kuwait's commitment to strengthening the protection of rights and freedoms, and upholding the principles of human dignity,' Al Sumait stated.
He cited the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women as key frameworks supporting this reform.
He explained that repealing Article 182 underscores the government's determination to deter crimes of abduction and eliminate any legal justification that could allow perpetrators to evade criminal accountability. The move also helps safeguard victims from social pressure that may compromise their rights or compel them into unwanted outcomes.
Al Sumait added, 'The repeal of Article 182 is part of broader legislative reforms aimed at enhancing victim protection and reinforcing the principle that crimes cannot be legitimised by violating basic human rights.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
5 days ago
- Zawya
President Ramaphosa meets with Judiciary to strengthen South Africa's justice system
President Cyril Ramaphosa supported by the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, Mmamoloko Kubayi and Deputy Minister Andries Nel, today hosted a high-level engagement with Chief Justice Mandisa Maya and Heads of Court at Mahlamba Ndlopfu, the President's official residence in Pretoria. This important engagement brought together the Executive and the Judiciary to reaffirm their shared commitment to building a stronger, more effective justice system, firmly anchored in the values of South Africa's Constitution. Also in attendance were Ministers Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, Minister in the Presidency, Enoch Godongwana, Minister of Finance, Inkosi Mzamo Buthelezi Minister of Public Service and Administration, and Dean Macpherson Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure. Chief Justice Mandisa Maya was supported by senior members of the Judiciary, including, Justice Mahube Molemela, President of the Supreme Court of Appeal, Judge Presidents, Cagney Musi of the Free State Division of the High Court, Dunstan Mlambo of the Gauteng Division and Pule Tlaletsi of the Northern Cape Division. The meeting built on prior engagements between Chief Justice Maya and Minister Kubayi, who is spearheading a multi-departmental initiative to address critical issues that have been raised by the Judiciary. In collaboration with the Ministers of Finance, Public Works and Infrastructure, and Public Service and Administration, Minister Kubayi has prioritised improvements in court infrastructure, human resources, security, and judicial independence. "Within the principle of the separation of powers, each arm of the State has a responsibility to cooperate with, and provide support to, the other arms of the State in giving full effect to our Constitution. It requires, in particular, that we create conditions in which each arm of the State can fulfill their respective mandates without hindrance. It is an opportunity to develop common approaches on issues that are critical to the effective functioning of the Judiciary. At the core of our deliberations is our shared commitment to safeguarding and entrenching the independence of the Judiciary and ensuring that it has the space and means to administer justice", said President Ramaphosa. Key discussions focused on advancing the process to ensure institutional independence and unification of a single judiciary, and enhancing the capacity of the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, and High Courts. President Ramaphosa and Chief Justice Maya, welcomed the collaborative tone of the engagement and reaffirmed their commitment to continued engagement between the Executive and the Judiciary. "This meeting is significant in that it happened days before we are due to host dignitaries of the judiciary from across the globe, to celebrate the 30th Anniversary of the establishment of the Constitutional Court on the 20th of this month," added Chief Justice Maya. Today's engagement marks a renewed determination to transform South Africa's justice sector into one that is resilient, secure, and accessible to all. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of The Presidency of the Republic of South Africa.
Zawya
6 days ago
- Zawya
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): Victims still waiting for justice, truth and reparations 25 years on from Kisangani war
Twenty-five years since the six-day war in Kisangani in Democratic Republic of Congo in which hundreds of civilians were killed and thousands more injured, victims are still waiting for truth, justice and, for the most part, reparations, Amnesty International said in a new briefing today. The briefing Is anyone moved by Congo's pain? 25 years without justice for the six-day war in Kisangani, documents how there has not been a single criminal investigation or trial since the bloody conflict between Rwandan and Ugandan forces. During the fighting in the north-eastern city, which started on 5 June 2000, both armies engaged in intense and indiscriminate shelling of heavily populated civilian areas, intentionally killed civilians, raped women and pillaged houses. With the DRC courts' failure to pursue justice and the International Criminal Court's (ICC) lack of jurisdiction over crimes committed in DRC before 2002, those suspected of criminal responsibility for these crimes have never been prosecuted and punished. 'It is utterly unacceptable that for 25 years, not a single person has been held to account for crimes perpetrated in Kisangani, not one,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. 'This lack of criminal accountability for past crimes has led to a cycle of violence in the DRC, with similar actors, similar weapons and similar suffering. Justice cannot wait another 25 years. It is the responsibility of Congolese judicial authorities to investigate and, if there is sufficient admissible evidence, prosecute those suspected of criminal responsibility for crimes committed on DRC territory.' In 2022, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Uganda to pay reparations, following a case brought by the DRC against Uganda and Rwanda. The ICJ did not have jurisdiction over Rwanda. In 2024, some victims finally started to receive compensation, but the process by been wrought by complaints of mismanagement and embezzlement. Amnesty International interviewed over 50 people, mostly survivors, as well as civil society organizations and justice sector officials. The 'Three-Day, One-Day and Six-Day wars' in Kisangani The six-day war was one of a series of conflicts between the Ugandan and Rwandan armies in Kisangani between August 1999 and June 2000 that left behind a trail of death and destruction. The first war – 'the three-day war', started on 14 June 1999, with the two armies exchanging indiscriminate fire and shelling, which killed more than 30 civilians and wounded more than 100. After close to a year of relative quiet, fighting started again on 5 May 2000 and lasted only one day. Exactly a month later, the 'six-day war', which was more intense, started. Without differentiating between civilians and combatants, the two armies indiscriminately shelled Kisangani, killing several hundred civilians and injuring thousands. A civil society activist who survived and reported on the three wars in Kisangani recounted: 'For six days there were only bombs falling, we did not know if we were going to live. There were a lot of fatalities…' A woman who was seven at the time of the war, recalled: 'I was walking with my grandmother when I was struck by a bomb in my leg. I didn't know how to get to hospitals, it was dangerous, so we were dealing with the injury at home, but the foot was rotting. On the fifth day I went to the hospital, but it was too late, they cut off my leg. 'A gentleman who could not go home until the war ended, returned at the end of the six days and found his wife and three children dead, their corpses decomposing. The house had been hit by bombs. 'He went mad and died shortly after.' People want truth, justice and reparations Despite the lack of judicial criminal proceedings either in the DRC or internationally, the people's demands for justice and reparations remain strong decades later. A man, who also survived the wars, said: 'My dearest wish was the establishment of courts. This is the wish of the Congolese people. Now we have a sense of frustration in the population. Why were there blockages? It is unclear why crimes that have already been documented have not been tried. Is there nobody emotionally moved by the crimes committed in Congo?' At least 40 people interviewed told Amnesty International that there was no political will to institute criminal proceedings or deliver justice. Lack of judicial independence has also meant that without the support of political leaders, some of whom are former belligerents, judicial officials could not open investigations. The complete lack of prosecutions has led to a loss of trust in the country's justice system and the government. With regards to reparation programmes, the Special Fund for the Distribution of Compensation to Victims of Uganda's Illicit Activities in the DRC (FRIVAO), tasked to manage the millions of dollars Uganda has been ordered to pay for reparations by the ICJ, has been criticised for lack of transparency and adequate consultations with victims of the Kisangani wars. One activist said: 'People have no decency; there has been bloodshed… and they are embezzling funds that were intended for public interest work and victims! That is not what we fought for.' Tigere Chagutah said: 'Amnesty International reminds DRC of its obligations to investigate and, if enough admissible evidence is found, to prosecute in fair trials those suspected of criminal responsibility for the serious crimes committed in the territory of the DRC for over 30 years, including the Kisangani war.' 'The government must also offer adequate, effective and prompt reparations to victims following genuine consultations with survivors and civil society.' Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Amnesty International.
Dubai Eye
7 days ago
- Dubai Eye
UAE, Ireland reaffirm cooperation following extradition case
The UAE and Ireland have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening legal cooperation after the extradition of an Irish national accused of murder and links to a criminal network. Sean McGovern, who is believed to be part of the Irish Kinahan criminal network, was arrested in Dubai in October 2024 after an Interpol Red Notice was issued. According to reports, McGovern was flown to Dublin on May 29 on an Irish military aircraft. It was in October 2024 that the UAE and Ireland signed two agreements aimed at enhancing cooperation in extradition and legal assistance. During a phone call, UAE Minister of Justice, Abdullah bin Sultan Al Nuaimi, and his Irish counterpart Jim O'Callaghan said the successful extradition demonstrates a firm and ongoing commitment to upholding the rule of law. "It highlights our joint dedication to ensuring that criminal prosecutions may be brought against those who attempt to evade justice," the ministers said in a joint statement. The ministers also praised the efforts of Dubai Police and An Garda Síochána, Ireland's national police service, for their close cooperation in the case. They acknowledged the importance of continued police-to-police engagement to counter the global threat of organised crime.
