Oldham Council votes to leave Greater Manchester's controversial housing plan
A council has narrowly voted to withdraw from a controversial housing scheme for more than 10,000 new homes after months of fierce debate about building on greenbelt land.The decision by Oldham Council, which is Labour-led but with no overall control, will see officers write to the government to request the borough is withdrawn from the Places for Everyone (PfE) scheme.The PfE housing blueprint drawn up by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) aims to see 170,000 homes built in nine of the region's boroughs, including 11,500 in Oldham.Liberal Democrat group leader on the council Howard Sykes, who voted for the withdrawal, said the "developer-led" plan did not put the needs of people first.
A group of Liberal Democract, Conservative and independent councillors have been demanding the council pulls out of the joint scheme since the local elections in May 2024, when Labour lost overall control of the council. PfE was signed off before that election by Oldham Council and eight other councils in the city region. Stockport Council, the only other authority in the GMCA, already pulled out of PfE in 2022 before it was signed off.After the narrow vote on Wednesday night, the council will now write to Secretary of State for Housing, Angela Rayner, requesting the authority be taken out of the scheme.
'A mistake'
The plans are supposed to use a "brownfield-first" approach to help fight the housing crisis. In Oldham, this would see building on land in Beal Valley, Bottom Field Farm, Broadbent Moss, south of Coal Pit Lane, and south of Rosary Road.But the scheme has long sparked resistance over its inclusion of greenbelt land.Sykes told councillors: "Expensive luxury housing on the greenbelt is not the answer to the housing crisis. "This will be a developer and profit-led plan, not a people and need based plan."Is Labour really suggesting that the best Oldham can do is back a plan that was designed in Manchester ten years ago, with no idea about the local challenges we face? "I think we can do better."Labour councillors maintained it would be a mistake to withdraw from PfE, including council leader Arooj ShahShe said: "It shocks me how brazen some people are about misleading our residents."It would be a mistake for Oldham, for the greenbelt and for our residents who desperately need housing. It would lead to further developments on the greenbelt."The Lib Dems know that because it's the same that's playing out in Stockport where [the Lib Dem leadership] are now dancing to the tune of developers."The vote was won by 31 votes to 29 to loud applause from councillors and members of the public.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Newport council placemaking plan welcomed by local groups
The city council's new placemaking plan sets out a series of 'quick wins' and more long-term ambitions for welcoming visitors and making the city centre more attractive for Newport's residents. 'The placemaking plan has been very much driven by what those who live and work in the city would like to see happen,' said Cllr James Clarke, the cabinet member for regeneration and business growth. 'This is a plan for the next 15 years – as some will need long-term planning and significant investment – but there are some short-term changes that will be community led, supported by the council, that people will see happening quite quickly.' Those short-term proposals include a food-focused outdoor market around the Steel Wave sculpture, and building a new playground, possibly in John Frost Square, to make central Newport a more 'family-friendly destination'. Efforts to make the city centre more attractive include better lighting, 'wrapping' empty shops with colourful designs, and making local art more visible in public spaces. 'I hope that in just a few months we will be able to demonstrate some tangible improvements in the city centre,' said Cllr Clarke. Other political groups have largely welcomed the Labour-led council's plans to bring improvements to central Newport – but while there is universal agreement that work needs to be done, the new plan's projects have been met with a degree of caution in some cases. Cllr Matthew Evans, who leads the Conservative group, said the plan contains 'some excellent initiatives' but insisted public concerns around safety and crime must be addressed 'as a matter of urgency'. 'We all want to see a better city and I will be there as a critical friend to ensure some of these quick wins are implemented,' he said. Cllr Evans did criticise a perceived 'lack of ambition in the longer term', however, and wanted to see the plan give 'far greater prominence' to the future of the city's Medieval Ship. He also said the council should take a 'more radical approach' to proposals to regenerate the southern end of Commercial Street, and create 'a giant open space which could host concerts and events all year round'. Cllr Mark Howells leads the Lliswerry independent group, and said he and his colleagues welcomed in principle a plan 'which has been missing for some time'. 'However, we remain cautious that it does not go far enough in setting out a bold or ambitious vision for the city's future,' he said. 'Newport faces significant challenges and opportunities, and we need a plan that matches the scale of that reality.' Cllr Howells said the local authority should provide more detail to residents and should have a 'more transparent' timescale for change. However, Cllr Kevin Whitehead, who leads the independent councillors from Bettws, said it would be 'harsh' to criticise the council's aspirations. 'Newport is all of our city, and we should all fully support any efforts to elevate its positive points while having the honest conversations around what it needs to address in order to realise this vision,' he said. Cllr Whitehead said changing negative perceptions of the city centre will be 'the biggest challenge', but added: 'I fully support the aspirations of the plan and would love to celebrate any goals it achieves. Some might say it's overly ambitious looking at it as a whole but I suppose time will tell.' Liberal Democrat councillor Carmel Townsend, said the 'run down' city centre is 'one of the biggest concerns raised' by residents. 'The placemaking plan doesn't go far enough,' she said. 'It should recognise that keeping the place well-maintained is essential and that significant investment is needed. The plan is 'gimmicky' and I can't see how lights, signs and stickers on empty shop windows are going to make much of a difference.' Cllr Clarke said the council 'recognises the challenges' facing the city centre 'but instead of just shrugging our shoulders or complaining, we are determined to make a difference'. 'To fully realise the vision, there will have to be support from a wide range of sources including Newport residents. Positivity will help transform the city centre and ensure it can achieve its full and exciting potential.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
SNP minister Mairi McAllan claims Scots don't like party members 'sniping' at John Swinney
Some Nationalists have questioned their leader's future after the party suffered a shattering loss at the recent Hamilton by-election. A senior SNP figure has claimed Scots don't like party members "sniping" at John Swinney. Some Nationalists have questioned their leader's future after the party suffered a shattering loss to Labour at the recent Hamilton and Larkhall by-election. Nat veterans Alex Neil and Jim Sillars both said it was time for a change of direction after Katy Loudon failed to win in the South Lanarkshire constituency. Other members have also been briefing anonymously against Swinney in the days after the Hamilton disaster, which handed a major boost to Scottish Labour. But Mairi McAllan warned against infighting and insisted she was 100 per cent behind Swinney. The new Housing Secrertary, whoi returned from maternity leave last week, said: "Frankly, he's a man of empathy and kindness and experience, and I think that is truly what the people of Scotland are,' she said. "They don't particularly take kindly, I don't think, to small groups of folks trying to cause instability in a Government when people just want their Government to get on with the job of governing and trying to make life easier for people. 'Sniping and trying to cause instability, I think, is really unwelcome.' McAllan was a key part of the by-election campaign and was at the count last week where Labour's Davy Russell was declared the winner. The SNP, she said, needs to 'reflect' before next year's election, but added: 'In terms of the First Minister's leadership, I have not been hearing gripes. 'And if I did, I would be very strongly rebutting them, because I think a year ago our party wasn't in a good place and John Swinney has stabilised our party. He has brought focus to the Government." The Housing Secretary said she will also 'advocate for the greatest possible funding' for her new portfolio, but could not commit to passing on all UK Government funding to the sector. She took up the role on Wednesday – the same day she returned from maternity leave – as the First Minister upgraded housing to a standalone capital position. The decision comes more than a year after the Scottish Parliament declared a housing emergency as a result of record homelessness figures, which worsened earlier this year. It also comes as the Scottish Government could see a windfall from the UK Government after it announced a 10-year, £39 billion housing programme. Shelter Scotland, one of the country's leading housing charities, urged McAllan to commit to passing on all extra funding sent to Scotland to the affordable housing budget. But the minister refused to make such a commitment. "I need to have those discussions with my colleagues, not least my colleague Shona Robison,' she said.
South Wales Guardian
4 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Bowie challenges Tories to ‘step up' against Miliband's ‘eco-zealotry'
The Scottish Conservative MP criticised both Labour and the SNP over their opposition to new oil and gas developments in the North Sea. Accusing the UK Government of 'overseeing the wilful deindustrialisation of this nation', Mr Bowie hit out at the 'frankly dangerous eco-zealotry of Ed Miliband', the Energy Secretary. Speaking at the Scottish Conservative conference at Murrayfield in Edinburgh Mr Bowie told his party: 'We must step up. Britain needs us more than ever.' The Tory insisted: 'The future of Scotland and Britain is at stake, our country's security depends on a strong Conservative Party to stand up for what is right.' He recalled how former US president Ronald Reagan had 'once said the first duty of government is to protect' – but added that 'on every front the SNP and Labour are failing to do that'. Attacking both Labour and the SNP, Mr Bowie, who is also his party's shadow Scottish secretary, said: 'They haven't protected everyone's economic security, by raising taxes, or ripping away their winter fuel payment, even if they are now apparently going to hand it back to them. 'They haven't protected our energy security by insisting on no new oil and gas developments.' The Conservative MP continued: 'We can all see what is happening in the world, there is more risk out there, we as a country are more vulnerable. 'That is why the decisions of this Labour Government are so gravely concerning. Their economic incompetence, coupled with their frightening ineptitude when it comes to our energy security is making the United Kingdom more vulnerable.' He attacked the Labour Government over its 'madcap drive to clean power by 2030', as he said ministers were 'actively accelerating the decline of our North Sea'. This, he said, was 'forcing us to become increasingly exposed to over-reliance on imports from overseas, imports that are shipped in diesel-chugging tankers across the Atlantic from America or from Norwegian wells'. The Tory said the opposition to new oil and gas developments meant 'investment is drying up, work is being put on pause, companies are literally shutting up shop and jobs are being lost'. But he added: 'This hostility for our oil and gas workers is not simply the preserve of the zealots in the Labour Party. 'The SNP have their fingerprints all over the job losses, the well closures.' It's Scottish Conservative Conference! 🇬🇧🏴 Hello Murrayfield! @ScotTories @Conservatives — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) June 13, 2025 Mr Bowie added: 'We need Conservative leadership because we know where the SNP and Labour will take us.' He also used his speech to attack the 'snake oil salesmen' in Reform UK, insisting that Nigel Farage's party do not 'care one jot for Scotland, or for our United Kingdom'. The Tory said: 'Let me be clear. Reform is quite simply not a conservative party, not a unionist party, frankly they are not a serious party.' The Scottish government energy secretary Gillian Martin said: 'The Scottish Government is clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with climate change commitments and energy security. 'We are deeply concerned at recent announcements of planned job losses in the North East and have called on the UK Government for the earliest possible end to the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) – which was supposed to be a temporary measure but was extended by the previous Conservative UK Government.'
