Opinion: Utah deserves better than Washington's misguided budgets
Utahns value common sense, community and fiscal responsibility. We shouldn't be fooled by flashy names or lofty promises attached to federal budgets. A budget prioritizing political posturing over people isn't a blueprint for prosperity; it's a recipe for imbalance, burdening Utah families while benefiting the few. A 'big' or 'beautiful' label doesn't make a budget bright or fair for Utah.
Here, genuine investment means safe neighborhoods, quality schools, accessible healthcare and robust infrastructure for our growing communities, from Logan to St. George. Too often, however, federal budgets inflate defense spending or questionable corporate tax cuts while underfunding essentials: affordable housing, education, water security, mental health services and public lands stewardship.
Ask a West Valley City teacher about scarce resources or a rural Iron County family about accessing broadband or specialized medical care. Witness the affordable housing crisis along the Wasatch Front. These are Utah's fundamental challenges, demanding serious investment, not neglect hidden by grand rhetoric.
Alarmingly, such budgets often threaten programs vital to Utahns. Proposed cuts to Medicaid, for instance, would be devastating for our state. Medicaid is a lifeline for nearly 400,000 Utahns — one in five children, neighbors with disabilities, low-income working parents, and seniors needing long-term care that would otherwise bankrupt their families.
Slashing Medicaid wouldn't just 'strain hospitals'; it would jeopardize rural hospitals across Utah, many operating on thin margins and serving high numbers of Medicaid recipients. These facilities are often major employers and critical access points. Cuts could force service reductions, layoffs or closures, creating healthcare deserts. Urban hospitals, too, would face increased uncompensated care, shifting costs to other patients or forcing cuts to vital services like emergency and mental health care.
Medicaid cuts also directly harm Utah's economy. Federal Medicaid dollars support jobs well beyond healthcare. Reducing this funding means fewer jobs, less economic activity and a greater burden on state and local taxpayers. Labeling such cuts 'fiscally responsible' is misleading; they merely shift costs and create greater long-term burdens.
Reductions in SNAP would further squeeze Utah families battling inflation, increasing their reliance on food banks. In a state where our natural landscapes are central to our identity and economy, underinvesting in clean air, water, renewable energy and public lands is profoundly short-sighted.
Utahns embrace fiscal conservatism that champions accountability and sustainable investment. A budget that balloons the deficit to appease special interests, not to uplift families or invest in innovation, isn't conservative — it's careless, saddling future Utahns with debt.
Utahns deserve a federal budget reflecting our values: hard work, fairness, opportunity and community. We need real solutions, not empty slogans. A budget undermining healthcare, neglecting infrastructure and ignoring Utah's needs isn't 'big and beautiful.' It's bloated with misplaced priorities and blind to our realities. It's time to tell Washington: Utah expects better and demands a budget that truly invests in our people.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Project 2025 Architect Denies Far-Right Master Plan Is Guiding Trump's Decisions
With President Donald Trump's radical rehaul of America well underway, right-wing policy engineer Russell Vought wants you to believe Project 2025 was never meant to be his roadmap. During Sunday's episode of 'State of the Union,' CNN moderator Dana Bash got an icy answer when she asked Vought if the overlap between Trump's agenda and the hyper-conservative political program meant that Project 2025 was coming to fruition. Though the president repeatedly distanced himself from Project 2025 during his campaign, second-term Trump achievements like eliminating DEI, banning transgender troops and sending the military to crack down on the southern border were all detailed in the far-right policy wishlist, which Vought served on the advisory board for. But Vought, who is now Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget, shot down the idea that the Heritage Foundation-helmed initiative inspired any of the president's actions. Claiming Trump was 'very public' about his plans during his campaign, the political operative told Bash it is 'delusional' to think the president was not the sole architect of his executive strategy. 'I'm not suggesting that he's not in charge,' Bash countered. 'I'm just saying that now it's pretty clear that what he wants to do and what you planned are dovetailing.' Vought still refused to acknowledge the influence of Project 2025, which also laid out tactics for shuttering the Department of Education, banning abortion medication and imposing work requirements for Medicaid recipients in a 900-plus page blueprint titled 'Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise.' 'I think the president was very clear with his agenda and he is going forward with that agenda and he has been at the helm and the originator of all of these ideas,' he told Bash. 'What's on the agenda is what the president has put on the agenda, most of which he ran on,' Vought continued. 'And you will continue to see the things that he's interested in doing and those people like me will be executing that vision.' Though Trump's policies seem to be in sync with what was outlined by Project 2025, he told voters during his campaign he had 'nothing to do' with the program. 'I haven't read it. I don't want to read it purposely. I'm not going to read it,' he claimed during his first and only debate with Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris. Senate Confirms Project 2025 Architect As Trump's Budget Director Bradley Whitford Spots Exactly Why 'Handmaid's Tale' Is 'Terribly Relevant' In 2025 This GOP Bill, Straight Out Of Project 2025, Would Make Pornography A Federal Crime
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
81-year-old man drowns in home pool
A Shelby County man drowned Sunday after falling into his pool, according to Shelby County Sargent Matt Luthman. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Rescue crews responded to the home on the 17000 block of Mason Road around 6:30 p.m., Luthman said. The man, who was 81-years-old and had a history of Parkinson's disease, slipped and fell into the pool while walking in the backyard with his wife, according to Luthman. The wife flagged down a passing driver who contacted 911. TRENDING STORIES: FBI and law enforcement respond to 'terror attack' in Boulder, Colorado 3 accused of using $600K in stolen SNAP benefits to buy bulk amounts of candy, energy drinks in Ohio Air taxi company opening Dayton facility receives $250 million investment from Toyota Luthman says the pool water was murky, and the victim could not be seen in the water. The man was underwater for 15-20 minutes before rescuers arrived and pulled him from the deep end of the pool, according to Luthman. Crews attempted life saving measures, but they were unsuccessful. The Shelby County Sheriff's Office is investigating the incident, but are considering it an accidental drowning. They have not released the identification of the man. News Center 7 will follow this story. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Absolute Disaster:' Senate Dems Take Aim At Trump's Tax Bill
Senate Democrats laid into President Donald Trump's sweeping tax bill on Sunday, emphasizing the impact it is poised to make on millions of Americans on Medicaid. 'This Republican budget bill is an absolute disaster for the country, in particular for middle-class and poor people,' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) said in an interview on CNN's State of the Union, noting that it seeks to pay for tax cuts by curbing spending on social programs. Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) echoed these concerns in an interview on NBC News's Meet the Press, stressing that 'Republicans are trying to push forward this big ugly bill that's going to literally cut as many as seven million Americans off of their healthcare.' Murphy and Warnock's statements come as Republicans' massive tax and spending bill heads to the Senate, where it's likely to face staunch Democratic opposition as well as GOP dissent. The bill slashes spending on social programs like SNAP and Medicaid, while proposing trillions in tax cuts and billions in investments to strengthen border security. According to an initial analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would push 7.6 million people off Medicaid, in part by making it more difficult to qualify for the program. One way it does so is by imposing a new work requirement, which would force many able-bodied recipients to prove that they've worked, volunteered or attended a training program to obtain Medicaid coverage. Warnock stressed that a similar policy in Georgia has added new barriers for people in need of healthcare. This 'work reporting requirement is very good at kicking people off of their health care,' he said. 'It's not very good at incentivizing work at all.' Earlier this May, House Republicans narrowly passed the bill by just one vote. It'll take a simple majority – which Republicans have – to advance again in the Senate, though some GOP lawmakers have said they'd like to make changes of their own to tax and Medicaid provisions. GOP Senators like Rick Scott (R-FL) have also raised concerns about how the bill could add to the federal debt, an issue Murphy alluded to as well on Sunday. 'It's just unreal the amount of gaslighting this administration is doing,' Murphy said, while referring to the White House's claims that the legislation won't alter the deficit at all.