Is Trump about slap sanctions on SA for misguided 'white genocide?'
Possible sanctions have been debated for some time.
Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House in Washington on Wednesday morning. Picture: Screengrab.
Questions around possible sanctions against South Africa have been thrown back into the spotlight.
While neither US President Donald Trump nor his Secretary of State Marco Rubio have officially and publicly spoken about possible sanctions in the aftermath of a dramatic White House meeting with SA President Cyril Ramaphosa, a social media commentary account using Rubio's name has broached the subject.
'Do you support President Trump putting sanctions on South Africa until they stop the White Genocide? Yes or No,' the account asked its X followers on Wednesday. A large number of its followers said they would back action against the country.
🚨Do you support President Trump putting sanctions on South Africa until they stop the White Gen*cide?
YES or NO? pic.twitter.com/sN6OPMVct5 — Marco Rubio 🇺🇸 News (@MarcoRubioSoS) May 27, 2025
According to the account's profile, it provides 'daily news unfiltered, State Department news and updates'.
The account is not affiliated with Rubio, and the post was not reposted or shared by the politician.
Sanctions
Possible sanctions have been debated for some time.
In April, US Congressman and Republican Ronny Jackson introduced the US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act, providing tools to impose sanctions on 'corrupt South African government officials' who support America's adversaries like China, Russia and Iran, among others.
The bill came at a time when relations between the US and South Africa were at an all-time low after Trump cut financial aid to South Africa, alleging 'white genocide' against South African farmers.
Such claims have been denied by the SA government and are not backed by official statistics.
ALSO READ: Piers Morgan slams Ramaphosa for defending 'Kill the Boer' chant [VIDEO]
South African bill
Jackson introduced the U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025, which would mandate a full review of the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa.
This is a follow-up of legislation that passed the House of Representatives in the last Congress but was not taken up by the Democratic-led Senate. Republicans now control both Houses.
Ramaphosa-Trump meeting
Amid simmering tensions between the two countries, President Cyril Ramaphosa travelled to Washington last week to meet with Trump to 'reset' relations between South Africa and the US.
However, Trump ambushed Ramaphosa with graphic footage falsely claiming 'white genocide' against South African farmers.
During the bilateral talks, which played out before the media, the US president showed videos of EFF leader Julius Malema chanting 'Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer' to support his false belief in genocide against whites in the country, asking why the red berets leader has not been arrested.
'White genocide'
Trump also brandished a stack of printed articles, which he handed to Ramaphosa, claiming they documented a genocide against white people in South Africa. But some of the images were actually from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
Footage shown during the meeting was also falsely portrayed as depicting 'burial sites'.
However, Ramaphosa said the visit was a major success.
'We were able to have a robust engagement with Trump, and it was also good to have a number of members of the delegation to field either a number of questions or make comments. So, that in my view, it was really good'.
'Kill the Boer '
On Tuesday, Ramaphosa said 'Kill The Boer' is a 'liberation chant' and should not be taken literally.
Ramaphosa was slammed by controversial UK talk show host Piers Morgan for his comments.
'Oh, come off it, Mr President. It's literally a threat, and incitement to kill,' Morgan said in a post on X.
Ramaphosa said South Africa is a country where 'freedom of expression is the bedrock of our constitution'.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa says Trump meeting a success despite ambush [VIDEO]
Trump transactional
Earlier this month, The Citizen reported how Trump is a transactional president and may have wanted some concessions from Ramaphosa when they met.
'President Trump approaches diplomacy and engages in a very transactional manner, with economics as the foundation and driving force behind international affairs,' retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, the president's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, explained at an event in Washington this past week.
Leverage
On Tuesday, former SA ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool said South Africa should know its leverage with the US, act on it, and avoid unnecessary discussions.
'We should take the Chinese approach and know our leverage. In this case, the president was very aware that critical minerals would be our leverage, the thriving 600 US companies in South Africa are our leverage, and the 20 South African companies that employ US citizens in the United States can be our leverage.
'China has taught us to know your leverage, act on the leverage and then absorb the punishment and stay out of unnecessary discussions with the United States,' Rasool said.
Rasool returned to South Africa in March after Rubio expelled him and stripped him of his diplomatic privileges.
ALSO READ: WATCH: 'Dim the lights' — Ramaphosa pokes fun at Trump meeting
Trump to attend G20
Last week, Rubio said Trump would not join a meeting of G20 leaders in South Africa in November, stressing that Pretoria has been 'consistently unaligned' with US policy.
In his weekly newsletter on Monday, Ramaphosa said one key outcome of the 'substantive discussions' he and his delegation had with Trump was agreeing on an 'economic cooperation channel between the US administration and South Africa to engage further on tariffs and a broad range of trade matters.'
'President Trump agreed that the US should continue playing a key role in the G20, including attending the G20 Leaders' Summit in Johannesburg later this year, where South Africa will hand over the Presidency of the G20 to the US.'
Ramaphosa said they also discussed exploring new opportunities for companies from South Africa and the US in each other's markets.
ALSO READ: 'There is doubt in Trump's head about genocide in SA,' Ramaphosa says [VIDEO]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Thursday, 5 June 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Thursday, 5 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the G.O.P's bill would swell the U.S. debt by $2.4 trillion. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that spycraft and homegrown weapons powered Kyiv's surprise attack. The Hindustan Times' front page reported that the government has finally announced the long-postponed census. Daily Mail's front page reported that battle lines have been drawn over immigration. The Guardian front page reported that chaos fears arise over the return of winter fuel payments. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
DSD briefs parliament on basic income support policy
The Department of Social Development aims to provide basic income support for citizens between the ages of 18-59. During a briefing with the Portfolio Committee on Social Development, DSD updated parliament on the progress of the development of the Basic Income Support Policy. 'Work on the policy has been ongoing, with the first draft of the policy having been presented to the Social Protection, Community and Human Development Cluster Cabinet Committee on 26 November 2024', said DSD spokesperson, Bathembu Futshane. The committee raised that more consultations were needed in order to discus the policy. It was further suggested that meetings should be held with internal stakeholders. The meeting would focus on the affordability of the policy and linkages of its proposed beneficiaries with economic opportunities. An interdepartmental workshop was held in order to communicate the directive of collaboration. According to Futshane, the workshop affirmed the need to link the policy's beneficiaries to other employment and sustainable livelihood opportunities. 'A follow up workshop will be held in June 2025. Followed by bilateral engagements with the Presidency, the Department of Labour and National Treasury', said Futshane. He said once the consultations are concluded, DSD will approach the SPCHD Cabinet Committee in the second Quarter of the 2025/26 financial year. They will request cabinet to consider the revised policy. Once the policy is approved, it will be published for public comments. Futshane said that in order to ensure stability during the consultation period, the department will consult National Treasury for the R370 Social Relief of Distress grant be extended. The grant will remain in place until the legislative process is complete. Beneficiaries will be protected from extreme poverty and vulnerability while they wait for the policy to come into effect. 'The Department, has for the interim, been granted an extension by the National Treasury to continue with this provision for the 2025/26 financial year', concluded Futshane. DO YOU THINK SOCIAL GRANTS ARE HELPING SOUTH AFRICANS OR ENCOURAGING A CULTURE OF LAZINESS? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
MTN, Turkcell legal wrangle over allegations of bribery continues
Turkcell is set to oppose MTN's bid in the Constitutional Court Image: supplied Turkish mobile network operator, Turkcel, is set to oppose MTN's bid in the Constitutional Court to appeal a recent ruling that will allow allegations of bribery against MTN to be heard in South Africa. MTN, Africa's largest mobile network operator, approached the Constitutional Court arguing that South Africa doesn't have jurisdiction to hear legal bids over alleged corruption in Iran, and the matter should be heard there. In April, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) allowed Turkcell to present evidence alleging MTN committed bribery and corruption to overturn an Iranian GSM licence award. The SCA ruling marked the first time a South African court determined whether misconduct allegations abroad could be heard locally. On Thursday, Turkcell said it was opposing MTN's application to the Constitutional Court. In a statement, it said that this was 'in Turkcell's ongoing pursuit of justice for damages estimated at over $4.2 billion, stemming from allegations that MTN paid bribes to Iranian and South African officials to overturn a public tender awarded initially to Turkcell for a multi-billion-dollar GSM telecom license in Iran'. Should Turkcell be victorious in its defence of MTN's appeal, Turkcell can take its allegations of bribery to the Johannesburg High Court. Its previous bid, two years ago, failed with a finding then by that court that South Africa was not the correct geography to hear the matter. This is the decision that has been overturned through the SCA ruling. Turkcell's legal wrangle with MTN dates back more than a decade, when it initially approached the US courts in an action it later retracted, contending that MTN secured its 49% stake in a telecommunications licence in Iran through bribery. Turkcell said that the local 'case has significant implications for South Africa's stance on international bribery and corruption'. The Turkish operator argues that MTN paid off both Iranian and South African officials to overturn a public tender, which it lost to Turkcell, for a multi-billion-dollar opportunity to run an Iranian GSM telecom licence. MTN has denied these allegations, publicly stating that it has always 'maintained that the Turkcell litigation was without merit and has expressed confidence that it would successfully defend these proceedings'. In 2012, the UK's Lord Leonard Hoffmann released a report that exonerated MTN of any shady dealings in securing the licence. In part, the report stated: 'All the allegations are a fabric of lies, distortions and inventions.' Cedric Soule, counsel for Turkcell, said that MTN's reliance on this report, which its commissioned, is improper as 'the process that MTN put together lacked the independence, rigour and transparency of a judicial proceeding'. Soule added that 'the Hoffmann Committee failed to interview key witnesses, did not independently gather or assess evidence, and did not use independent counsel; its conclusions are therefore unreliable and irrelevant to the current proceedings'. MTN, however, has said that 'these claims were the subject of a comprehensive and independent investigation led by Lord Hoffmann, the findings of which did not support the allegations'. The Constitutional Court will now decide whether to grant the request for leave to appeal filed by MTN and the other defendants. Turkcell expects a decision within three months.
