FA chair joins protest against Gianni Infantino's late arrival to Fifa Congress after Saudi trip with Donald Trump
FA chair Debbie Hewitt joined European delegates on an unprecedented walkout of Fifa Congress in Paraguay, in protest at Gianni Infantino 's hours-late arrival from a trip to the Middle East with Donald Trump.
The situation created the embarrassing situation of the Fifa president speaking alongside rows of empty seats at the Fifa Council.
The situation could precipitate a new civil war within Fifa, football's global governing body, although senior sources insist this was more about sending 'a strong message' for Infantino 'to change his behaviour' and reassess 'his personal political agenda'.
The Norwegian football federation accused Infantino of disrespect and demanded an explanation from Fifa.
The annual Congress had already been moved due to Infantino's trip to the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, where he spent time with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and President Trump, two world leaders he has developed close links with over the past eight years. Delegates later received an email saying Infantino had been further delayed to 'unforeseen circumstances', which caused the farcical sight of senior football officials tracking his movements on online flight radars. Such absurdity was nevertheless complemented by fury.
There had already been growing unrest within European football administration about the general direction of Fifa, and how so many key decisions seem to be taken without wider consultation. Among them are calls on the newly expanded Club World Cup and the highly controversial voting processes for the 2030 and 2034 World Cups.
While Infantino eventually arrived in Asuncion and gave hurried apologies before his rushed keynote speech, numerous officials were left furious. Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin led a delegation of European Council members in deciding to walk out after the break, leaving the sight of so many empty seats for the rest of Congress. The Council is Fifa's highest body, and supposed to act as the body's main check and balance.
The Norwegian federation added that its delegation 'chose to leave the Congress venue together with several European colleagues at 2pm as initially planned' – by the previous time schedule – 'for a respectful departure'.
Infantino later defended his trip, insisting it was crucial 'to represent football' in 'important discussions' with 'world leaders in politics and economy', not to mention those central to the hosting of the 2026 (USA, Mexico and Canada) and 2034 World Cups (Saudi Arabia). But some officials were sceptical that the extended time was merely down to his personal political agenda.
There was also a feeling that this went against the Fifa president's very job description, since he is essentially supposed to serve the members who vote him in.
There was further difficulty for Infantino when a representative of the Palestine FA, Susan Shalabi, took the floor to admonish the governing body for continuously postponing a decision on their proposal that Israel should be banned for football over the claim the country has gone against Fifa statutes by staging football matches on illegally occupied land.
Some senior figures feel the issue is going to be continuously put off due to the political sensitivity, as well as the very idea that a football federation would take a decision of this nature before international bodies like the United Nations. It is also where Infantino's relationship with Trump is seen as potentially influential, given the US president's generally pro-Israel policy on Gaza.
The Norwegian FA's secretary general, Karl-Petter Loken, stayed behind to express his federation's support for the case of the Palestinian FA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump-Musk feud live updates: World's richest man ‘regrets' bombshell falling out after Epstein accusation
Elon Musk some of his social media posts about president Donald Trump, in a dramatic about-turn after a days-long public fight between the two powerful men. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk said on his X platform. The latest post from the world's richest man is an apparent bid to de-escalate the feud which began last week and rapidly descended into an acrimonious tit-for-tat. Musk said on his social media platform X that Trump's name appears in files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, later deleting that tweet. He also retweeted one X user who had said: 'Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him'. Trump retaliated by threatening to withdraw multi-billion-dollar government contracts from Musk's businesses. Musk's father, Errol Musk, said the men were fighting because they were both 'tired and stressed,' but speaking in Russia on Monday he predicted the fight 'would be over tomorrow'. How did the feud between Musk and Trump begin? Just last week, President Donald Trump was handing his friend and close aide Elon Musk a golden key to the White House, praising the work the tech billionaire had done for the administration. 'Elon gave an incredible service. There's nobody like him,' Trump said in a joint press conference with Musk last week. It seemed like a consiliatory end to their working relationship, but there were rumblings: Musk had made it clear he was deeply opposed to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Once he was out of the White House, the world's richest man had harsh words for Trump's cornerstone policy. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X on June 3. Two days later, Trump said he was 'surprised' and 'disappointed' by Musk's comments. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' he said in the Oval Office. Trump-Musk split minute-by-minute: How president and First Buddy unraveled online From a golden key to the White House to a bitter public split - how Elon Musk and Donald Trump battled on their own social media platforms Rachel Clun11 June 2025 09:15 Public apology comes after calls for investigation into Musk's alleged drug use Elon Musk's public apology for his comments about president Donald Trump comes after former White House advisor Steve Bannon urged the administration to launch an investigation into the Tesla and SpaceX owner's alleged drug use. Speaking to Chuck Todd on his new streaming show, Bannon said Trump should launch a special counsel investigation into the world's richest man. 'I think the best way to do it is as a special counsel that can kind of oversee everything. Pull the security clearance for the drugs, temporarily, investigate the whole drug situation,' Bannon said. Bannon was referencing a New York Times report that detailed the billionaire CEO's alleged drug use leading up to the 2024 election. Steve Bannon says Trump should launch an investigation into Musk for alleged drug use Steve Bannon says the Trump administration should investigate Elon Musk and look into his alleged drug abuse. Rachel Clun11 June 2025 09:09 Elon Musk backtracks Elon Musk has publicly backtracked on some of his comments about the president. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk said on his X platform. Last week, he said Donald Trump was named in files related to convicted sex offender Jeffret Epstein, and that was the reason those files had not been made public. He also seemed to agree with an X user who called for Trump's impeachment, retweeting a post that said: 'Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him'. Rachel Clun11 June 2025 09:02
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Daniel Levy urged to make shock U-turn and re-hire Ange Postecoglou after bizarre statement from Australian official
The Lord Mayor of Melbourne has urged Daniel Levy to reconsider his decision to sack Ange Postecoglou after sharing a passionate statement on social media. On Friday Tottenham released a statement to announce that Postecoglou had been relieved of his duties 16 days after he led the club to their first silverware since 2008. Victory in Bilbao served as a glorious conclusion to what had been an otherwise disastrous campaign for the north London club. In a season in which his squad was ravaged by slew of injuries, further compounded by a congested fixture list, Spurs suffered 22 league defeats, a club record in a 38-game season. However, despite the worrying domestic form, many feel as though Postecoglou was hard done by - including Lord Mayor of Melbourne, Nicholas Reece. On Tuesday night, Reece said: 'On behalf of the people of Melbourne, and Premier League fans around the world, I call on Tottenham Hotspur FC to reconsider its decision to sack coach Ange Postecoglou. 'In @cityofmelbourne we have followed Ange's career closely for decades. He began his junior and senior career in Melbourne as a player and later coach at @southmelbournefc in the 1980s. 'Never underestimate Ange's determination to win, and his ability to carry teams to greatness. We have seen this time again over his career. 'This year Tottenham made history by winning the Europa League trophy - its first such win in 17 years. We will see with further trophies follow if Ange is given the chance. 'Don't let Tottenham be known as the team that is allergic to silverware. Let Ange lead the players onto greatness in next years Premier League campaign.' Despite his passionate message, the club are pushing forward in their search to replacement the Australian and are closing in on appointing Thomas Frank. Mail Sport understands that Spurs have made a formal approach for the Dane – and that an unveiling could take place in the coming days. Frank has a release clause thought to be around £10m, but those with knowledge of the situation believe it is heading towards a positive conclusion and that Frank will soon be announced as successor to Ange Postecoglou, who was sacked on Friday. Negotiations have now started, with chairman Daniel Levy representing Tottenham and Phil Giles, Brentford's director of football, in talks. Aside from the release fee, discussions are also likely to focus on Frank's backroom staff, and the level of compensation needed to allow them to follow him from west to north London. The Bees will demand suitable recompense for a manager whom has been with the club for close to a decade and who has overseen a period of remarkable success. Frank arrived at the club in 2016 as assistant head coach and was appointed manager in 2018. In his first full season in charge he led them to the play-off final and followed it up with promotion to the Premier League. Over the past four years he has firmly established Brentford as a top-flight club.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Rachel Reeves says she ‘chooses investment' ahead of unveiling Labour's spending review
Update: Date: 2025-06-11T08:19:01.000Z Title: Rachel Reeves Content: Good morning. The government plans to be spending almost £1.4tr in 2026-27, rising to almost £1.5tr in 2028-29. Those annual limits are already agreed. Today, when , the chancellor, stands up at 12.30pm to present the spending review, she will explain how she has decided to divvy up that money between government departments over the next three years. This is not a budget, and she will not be announcing changes to tax policy. But it will feel like a budget because, like a budget, it will involve decisions that affect the public services people rely upon. And it is bound to intensify speculation about whether taxes will have to go up in the next budget, in the autumn. Public spending is hideously complicated, and Reeves needs a clear, simple narrative that will land with the public at large. We know what it is because the Treasury sent out a press release last night with words from her speech today where Reeves will sum up what she is trying to achieve. She will say: This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it. This government's task – my task – and the purpose of this Spending Review – is to change that. To ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities. So that people can see a doctor when when they need one. Know that they are secure at work. And feel safe on their local high street … I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. These are my choices. These are this government's choices. These are the British people's choices. The government differentiates between current, day-to-day spending ('resource' spending, in Treasury jargon) and capital spending. In so far as Reeves has 'good news' to announce, much of it is in the capital spending area, because she changed her fiscal rules last year to allow more borrowing for infrastructure projects. That is why she is saying 'In place of decline, I choose investment', not 'I choose spending'. Some government departments will face real-terms spending cuts. But there is an obvious political problem with this, well summarised by John McDonnell, shadow chancellor when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader, in this comment to the Financial Times. Capital spend takes years to produce political results, while cuts in revenue spending on services like council services are felt adversely quickly. It is easy to promise national renewal, but it is a lot harder to make people believe it is happening. Today's decisions will have a big effect on what voters do end up concluding about this, but it will take a while to know for sure what that effect will be. Here is Aamna Modhin's assessment of what to expect in the spending review in her First Edition briefing. And here is our overnight preview story, by Kiran Stacey, focusing on the proposal to spend £39bn on affordable housing. Here is the agenda for the day. 9am: Keir Starmer chairs cabinet, where , the chancellor, will be briefing colleagues on what is in the spending review. Noon: Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs. 12.30pm: Reeves makes a statement to MPs about the spring statement. 4pm: The Institute for Government thinktank holds a briefing on the spring statement. 4.15pm: The National Police Chiefs' Council gives its response to the spending review. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
