logo
CPAC leader calls for US-born congresswoman to be deported alongside Columbia activist Mahmoud Khalil

CPAC leader calls for US-born congresswoman to be deported alongside Columbia activist Mahmoud Khalil

Independent12-03-2025

Conservative Political Action Conference host Mercedes Schlapp suggested on Tuesday night that the Trump administration should 'deport' Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) alongside Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, even though Tlaib is an American-born citizen.
Following ICE's arrest and threatened deportation of Khalil — who is a legal permanent resident of the United States — for helping lead anti-war campus protests against Israel, 14 members of Congress signed a letter demanding Khalil be released. Tlaib, a member of 'The Squad' and a Palestinian-American who has been outspoken about Israel's military campaign in Gaza, was one of the signatories.
'Khalil has not been charged or convicted of any crime. As the Trump Administration proudly admits, he was targeted solely for his activism and organizing as a student leader and negotiator for the Gaza Solidarity Encampment on Columbia University's campus,' the members of Congress wrote in the letter addressed to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
'Khalil's constitutional rights have been violated,' the letter added. 'He has been denied meaningful access to counsel and any visitation from his family. This is absolutely unacceptable — and illegal.'
President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has defended the arrest and promised 'many more to come' while his administration claims it has the authority to remove Khalil under the Immigration and Nationality Act, even though he has not been charged with any actual crime.
'The secretary of state has the right to revoke a green card or a visa for individuals who serve, or are adversarial to the foreign policy and the national security interests of the United States of America,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'Mahmoud Khalil was an individual who was given the privilege of coming to this country to study at one of our nation's finest universities and colleges and he took advantage of that opportunity, of that privilege, by siding with terrorists, Hamas terrorists.'
While Khalil has been transferred to a Louisiana prison facility where he's being staged for removal, hundreds of demonstrators have taken to the streets of New York to protest his detention. Khalil's case headed to a Manhattan court on Wednesday, where his lawyers called the arrest 'completely unprecedented.'
With MAGA media backing Trump's attempted deportation of a green card holder over political speech and 'threats to national security,' Schlapp went further during an appearance on Newsmax's primetime panel show The Right Squad by floating the notion of U.S.-born citizens getting sent out of the country for their political positions.
'Speaking of the pro-Hamas — Rashida Tlaib, and who doesn't talk about our pro-Hamas Rashida Tlaib — she was the lone vote, the only vote against a bill in the House of Representatives yesterday requiring an annual report to Congress on the cross-border cartel smuggling tunnels,' Right Squad host Chris Plante said.
'You know, like the ones under Gaza, but under the border from Mexico to the United States. 402 people voted yes,' he continued. 'And Rashida Tlaib was the single no vote, the single no vote when it comes to the tunnels coming from Mexico into the United States smuggling children and adults, human trafficking, fentanyl killing.'
After Plante added that Tlaib is 'not on our side,' Schlapp — who is married to CPAC organizer Matt Schlapp and is a former Trump adviser — chimed in to call for the Detroit-born congresswoman to be removed from the country.
'I'm thinking that maybe they should deport Rashida Tlaib as well,' she groused. 'Just take her out along with Mahmoud at this point. I mean, it's just outrageous.'
Schlapp added: 'It just shows how she has been someone who has supported terrorists and has been, what I say, not putting America first or Americans first. And I don't know why they keep sending her back to Congress.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Israelis are doing the world a big favour
The Israelis are doing the world a big favour

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The Israelis are doing the world a big favour

Iran has been behind most of the instability in the Middle East for at least the past two decades. Its militias ignited Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and enabled Islamic State to develop across parts of the Arab world. Hezbollah, its proxy in Lebanon and Syria, kept the dreadful Assads in power for a generation and enabled the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. I saw Hezbollah up close in Syria for 10 years and I saw this year the huge joy of the Syrian people when the Iran-backed militia was vanquished there. Iran has also directed the Houthis to bring global shipping to its knees and backs the bloody-handed murderers of Hamas. But the mullahs' grand strategic plan has always been to develop a nuclear arsenal. This would have been an intolerable danger not only to Israel but to other nations regarded as enemies by the Tehran regime – including us. Sadly, President Donald Trump proved unable to persuade the mullahs to give up their nuclear programme. It must now be abundantly clear that the leadership in Iran has no intention of giving up its nuclear weapons programme, and Iranian bombs menace London and Washington as much as Tel Aviv. Like President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, the Supreme Leader in Tehran has no concern for his civilian population. Hence, whatever people think of Israel, their efforts in this case to end the nuclear ambitions of Iran must be applauded and supported by the entire free world. There is huge concern, and rightly so, about escalation but nobody is or should be keen to support Tehran. Even though Iran has given much support to Putin in his illegal fight with Ukraine, he has barely lifted a finger or even said anything to help. Of course, the truth is that Putin actually disdains everyone in the Middle East and without gold, missiles or some other inducement he would never do anything for Iran. Other traditional supporters of the mullahs have been deafening in their silence. Any escalation will only come from Iran, and only if we let it. This dangerous situation, in my view, makes it even plainer than it already was that we British must spend – as an absolute minimum – 3 per cent of GDP on defence. And that figure must not be achieved by pretending that intelligence, spies, diplomacy or pensions are defence spending, as we are doing now with our current, misleading, 2.6 per cent aspiration. We need an actual genuine increase in spending on actual genuine defence, not more smoke and mirrors from the Treasury. Hopefully even the 'wokerati', who bizarrely seem to support everyone who would do us harm – and who seem blind to the fact that those they support do not share their values in the slightest – will realise that hiding behind their fake shemaghs and liberation flags won't protect them in any way from the mullahs who would see us all burn in hell, with gay people and feminists first in the queue. Meanwhile with our limited resources we are doing the right things. I applaud the deployment of RAF jets to the region. Force is the only useful currency in dealing with Iran. The Israelis are doing our work for us, but we should stand ready to help if required. And help may, in fact, be required, though we Brits cannot provide it. The deepest parts of the uranium enrichment complex at Natanz are probably beyond the reach of any weapon the Israelis have. It might be necessary to deploy the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a huge and heavy steel spear with an explosive payload like the bunker-busting bombs of WWII. Only heavy US bombers can carry the MOP, and so the decision would be one for President Trump. An alternative might be some kind of daring special operation. Mossad and the various other Israeli secret services would seem well able to manage this sort of thing, as they have proved against Hezbollah. There are many people in this country who are concerned that this conflict will ignite a wider war across the Middle East. They worry that the UK could be drawn into the fight, and I understand that. As a British soldier I went to war twice in the region. Nevertheless, I believe that Israel's necessary strikes on Iran's nuclear weapons programmes will make the world in general, and Britain in particular, much safer than allowing the Islamic Republic to gain possession of 'the bomb'. It is better to deal with such festering problems before they have fully developed, rather than later.

Minnesota is no longer the ‘state that works'
Minnesota is no longer the ‘state that works'

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Minnesota is no longer the ‘state that works'

Fifty-two years ago, TIME magazine featured Governor Wendell Anderson on its cover, dressed in the state's unofficial uniform of a flannel shirt and large smile. He was on one of our 10,000 lakes, hoisting his catch of the day up in the air. This was 1973, and the headline read, 'The Good Life in Minnesota'. The story went on to describe Minnesota as the 'state that works'. Its people are mild-mannered do-gooders who are content with the reputation of being humble, hard-working, and unglamorous: 'California is the flashy blonde you like to take out once or twice. Minnesota is the girl you want to marry.' Five decades later, the state that worked no longer does. Just days after the state's 2025 legislative session ended, targeted political violence ended the lives of one state lawmaker and her husband and seriously injured two more people – a state senator and his wife. According to local news reports, 'State Rep. and Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman of Brooklyn Park and her husband, Mark, were killed early Saturday morning in what officials are calling 'targeted' attacks by a suspect posing as a law enforcement officer. State Sen. John Hoffman of Champlin and his wife, Yvette, were shot multiple times at their home but are recovering'. The suspect, who is still at large at the time of writing, has been identified by the Associated Press as 57-year-old Vance Boelter. It is unclear what the exact reasons are for the targeted attacks, but they are alleged to be politically motivated. It is not breaking news that modern politics has permeated much of the culture and forced deep ideological divides and tribes. Everything – from what car a person drives to the shops they buy groceries in and the music they listen to – is politicised. Politics, more than religious affiliation or cultural heritage, is most likely to form one's identity. And the divide has tested the very fabric of American society, family relations, and friendships. The Spectator World's editor-at-large Ben Domenech recently highlighted the trend: According to Cygnal's latest national survey of 1,500 likely voters (conducted 6–8 May, with a 3 per cent margin of error), more than half of voters (53 per cent) say 'it's at least somewhat common that their friends and neighbours have ended a friendship because of Donald Trump and the 2024 election', while '39 per cent say not that common or not at all common. Despite the 'Minnesota nice' image, a visible, vocal, dangerous ideological fringe has found, if not a home, a sympathetic ear with the political mainstream. Most Minnesotans had front-row seats to the destruction after George Floyd's death in 2020. Minneapolis and the Twin Cities still have not fully recovered from the psychological shock, nor the persistent unease that has prevented the state from moving forward with civility. When respect, and law and order, are cast aside by our leaders to score political points or to stoke emotional fires, generally, the people follow suit. Moreover, the hyperbolic messaging and one-upmanship rhetoric – 'othering' people of different political persuasions and labelling them as unredeemable villains in the fight for democracy – is a form of modern-day self-destruction. I have experienced that destruction first-hand: last year, my office in Golden Valley, Minnesota was firebombed. It was a politically motivated attack on our organisation and two others in the same building who work for conservative causes. It's the place where I brought my (now two-year-old) baby girl to work with me every day. Thankfully, no one was hurt. Yet it was barely a blip on the news. Debate, especially political debate, is crucial to sort out the myriad of nuances shaping our nation's policies and culture. But when unstable, unbearably radicalised people latch onto the unceasing firehose of the most intense and excessive political soliloquies – and when members of the media class take it all as fact – we have a problem. Because words aren't violence, but they do have power. Politicians flippantly use hyperbole and deranged rhetoric to appeal to their base's worst instincts, insisting that every step that strays towards compromise or compassion is the end of democracy. Those same politicians are often silent in the face of violence, which has a normalising effect. We've entered into an era of shoulder-shrugging at outrageous, anti-social behaviour: the kind we saw in LA last weekend, with cars set on fire in the name of social justice. None of this is an inevitability; it's a choice. After years of being on edge – due to rounds of rioting and violent protests at ground zero for the 'Summer of Love' – Minnesota is no longer what Governor Anderson described as 'remarkably civil'. Nor is any part of the country. The assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, the attacks on the US Supreme Court, the murder of two young Israeli embassy staff members, the arson at Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's residence, and assassination attempts on President Trump suggest every corner of the country has lost its way. A state that was seen as a representative of the nation's best qualities now reflects its worst. It remains to be seen if what is broken can ever be fixed.

EXCLUSIVE Top Republican previews big Trump-backed crypto move that could usher in a windfall of cash for the nation
EXCLUSIVE Top Republican previews big Trump-backed crypto move that could usher in a windfall of cash for the nation

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Top Republican previews big Trump-backed crypto move that could usher in a windfall of cash for the nation

A top House Republican is looking forward to passing major crypto reform later this year following the passage of President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Sitting in the House Whip's office, Minnesota Republican Tom Emmer revealed to the Daily Mail that Congress will move full steam ahead on multiple crypto bills later this summer or early this fall. When asked what he is most 'excited' about on the upcoming legislative calendar, Emmer immediately answered 'the digital asset stuff.' Emmer named the CLARITY Act, STABLE Act and GENIUS Act as a trio of crypto legislation that he wants passed by the end of this year. Taken together, these bills seek to regulate stablecoins - cryptocurrencies designed to have stable values linked to assets like the U.S. dollar or gold - an industry that could soon be worth trillions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified this week about the Trump administration's commitment to stablecoin legislation backed by the U.S. dollar that will supercharge a worldwide market. Though that won't come until after the Congress passes the multi-trillion-dollar Trump-backed Big Beautiful Bill Act, which could soon get a vote in the GOP-controlled Senate. That measure contains provisions to cut tax on tips or overtime and reforms to Medicaid and SNAP, and Emmer believes it will be signed into law by Independence Day - a self-imposed deadline congressional Republicans are desperate to meet. 'I'm more than confident that we will pass it and get it to the president's desk on or before July 4,' Emmer said confidently, though some in the Senate have called that timeline unlikely. The White House and Congress have been pushing this year to open the U.S. markets up to wider stablecoin adoption, hoping that foreign countries would seek to invest in American crypto over foreign digital currencies. The CLARITY Act seeks to set the regulatory foundation for the U.S. crypto market, aiming to protect consumers while boosting innovation; the STABLE Act zeroes in on stablecoins, requiring banks to fully back them with reserves and to submit monthly audits; and the GENIUS Act mirrors the Stable Act in the Senate, expanding rules to both banks and non-banks for issuing stablecoins. Trump's crypto czar David Sacks said passing the GENIUS Act would unlock 'trillions of dollars of demand for our Treasuries practically overnight.' Already the CLARITY Act has cleared the House Financial Services Committee and will next receive a full House floor vote. Emmer also forecasts a vote for Stable Act. 'The Senate should be sending over their GENIUS Act anytime soon, if they don't, so be it,' Emmer said. The GENIUS Act has hit some turbulence in the Senate as Democrats have take issue with the Trump family's foray into crypto - and specifically stablecoins - this year. 'The launch of a stablecoin directly tied to a sitting President who stands to benefit financially from the stablecoin's success is an unprecedented conflict of interest presenting significant threats to both our financial system and our democracy,' Sens. Elizabeth Warren Jeff Merkley wrote in a joint letter this week. World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's crypto venture, has already struck deals to issue stable coins, including one with a partner in the U.A.E. worth $2 billion. Getting these bills passed shouldn't be too difficult, Emmer reasoned, since crypto interests lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. 'I mean digital assets is fun because it's not a partisan issue,' he told the Daily Mail. 'When it comes to digital assets, it's nameless, faceless, genderless.' But there are still powerful interests aligned against passage. Some regional banks fear that wide use of stablecoins could undermine their market share in the financial industry. Meanwhile, financial reform groups believe the legislation would permit Big Tech firms to act as private banks with unregulated currencies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store