logo
State restricts which flags can be displayed in schools, government buildings

State restricts which flags can be displayed in schools, government buildings

Yahoo21-05-2025

The rainbow flag of the gay pride movement and the flag of the United States flying in the sky. (Photo by Getty Images)
It's now against the law for a teacher in a school to hang a Pride flag in their classroom.
House Bill 819, brought by Flathead Republican Rep. Braxton Mitchell, puts strict stipulations on what flags can be displayed at schools and other government buildings.
Gov. Greg Gianforte signed the legislation late last week. It's unclear what penalties, if any, there will be for violation of the law.
'Allowing nongovernmental or politically charged symbols on state property creates inconsistency in enforcement, legal challenges, and public divisiveness, undermining the neutrality and inclusivity of government spaces,' the law reads.
The bill passed along party lines in both the House and Senate. During his testimony for the bill, Mitchell said it was about fairness and neutrality in government.
'I don't think in Flathead County they should be flying a Trump flag,' Mitchell said. 'I don't think in Missoula County they should be flying a Kamala Harris flag.'
The flags that are now allowed include the United States flag, as well as Montana's, and any other state, city, tribal, and military flag.
There's also a specific stipulation which states: 'Flags honoring law enforcement officers, military service members, and public service organizations provide appropriate, nonpolitical recognition of their contributions to public safety and national defense.'
It's unclear if that includes the Thin Blue Line flag, which honors law enforcement but can be viewed as political. That flag wasn't brought up in either hearing.
The flag law also says any 'federally recognized' nation's flag can be flown as well as school mascots. So while Taiwan's flag could not be flown, a high school football team is protected if they run onto the field before a game with their flag. And, since Iran and North Korea are recognized as nations by the federal government, those flags technically could be displayed under the new law.
It is, however, unclear if a Confederate flag would be protected as it is both politically charged, and a flag of historical significance, for which the law has a stipulation. The Gadsden flag — or the 'Don't Tread on Me' flag — is specifically protected under the law.
Other questions, such as if a flag in support of a labor group would be allowed, are unanswered in the new law. Opponents of the bill, which included ACLU Montana and the Montana Gender Alliance, pointed to some of the questions the bill left open.
'It's broad and contradictory, which means that certain beliefs are able to be promoted over others,' said Henry Seaton, an ACLU lobbyist who testified against the bill. 'It eliminates the ability for people to show support for particular, marginalized communities.'
Other states, including Idaho and Utah, have passed similar legislation. Some cities in those states have pushed back, with Salt Lake City adopting three new city flags to circumvent the law: One in support of the city's Black and African American residents, a trans flag rights and a Pride flag.
Classrooms were also a target, something Mitchell had on his mind during the hearings for HB 819. He said that teachers were acting as 'state officials' in the classroom and pointed to his experience.
'I know when I went to school in 2018 they had Black Lives Matter flags,' Mitchell testified to the Senate State Administration Committee on April 2. 'I don't think that's something that should be something that should be pushed in a school. There were some teachers that had pride flags.'
While Mitchell says court cases back up the state's ability to regulate speech in public buildings, students, at least, don't lose their rights at the schoolhouse gate, which the U.S. Supreme Court found in Tinker vs. Des Moines.
The bill says it does 'not infringe on private speech or individual expression, as they apply solely to government-controlled displays, ensuring personal freedoms remain intact while maintaining a neutral public environment.'
It's unclear how this law will be enacted in schools. Missoula County Public Schools Superintendent Micah Hill said his district will follow the law. In an email, he said no flags have been taken down.
He added he assumed 'that if we're out of compliance, we would request that any flag as defined by the new law be taken down.'
The state's public universities and colleges could also be impacted by the law, though they're not specifically mentioned in the legislation. Montana State University school officials referred questions on the law to the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education.
In Montana, the state Constitution gives the Board of Regents the authority to supervise the Montana University System, but the Commissioner's Office did not respond to a question Tuesday seeking comment on the legislation.
Flags have been a topic of conversation in Bozeman before. In 2021, an MSU student living in university housing displayed a Black Lives Matter flag in plain view outside of a window. The student was told to take it down because it was a 'fire hazard' and briefly did, before putting it back up.
It's likely not to impact the University of Montana, UM spokesperson Dave Kuntz said, who added they'd been in contact with the Commissioner's Office about the new law. The flags UM flies are already on the list outlined in the new law. He said the university does not plan to regulate flags in offices or in dorm rooms.
'That's just an area of personal privacy,' Kuntz said. 'As the law is passed right now, it just doesn't have a large impact on the campus.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"

CBS News

time9 minutes ago

  • CBS News

GOP leaders cite L.A. immigration protests to push for quick passage of Trump's "big, beautiful bill"

Washington — The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are urging lawmakers to quickly get behind the centerpiece of President Trump's legislative agenda, saying the ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles adds urgency to the push to secure additional resources for border security. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on X on Monday that the legislation, which addresses Mr. Trump's tax, energy and immigration priorities, "provides the ESSENTIAL funding needed to secure our nation[']s borders." Republicans call the legislation the "one big, beautiful bill." "The lawlessness happening in LA is ANOTHER reason why we need to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill IMMEDIATELY," Johnson said, pledging that Congress will support Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents who he said are "fighting to keep Americans safe against illegal aliens AND the radical left." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt shared a similar message earlier Monday, saying the scenes unfolding in some areas of Los Angeles "prove that we desperately need more immigration enforcement personnel and resources." "America must reverse the invasion unleashed by Joe Biden of millions of unvetted illegal aliens into our country," Leavitt said in a post on X. "That's why President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill funds at least one million annual removals and hires 10,000 new ICE personnel, 5,000 new customs officers, and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents." Speaker of the House Mike Johnson holds a press conference after the House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025, in Washington, legislation is now in the hands of the Senate after the House narrowly approved it last month following weeks of intraparty disagreement over its components. Though the bulk of the funding allocated in the legislation goes toward tax cuts, it also includes resources aimed at bolstering border security and defense. It provides $46.5 billion for the border wall, $4.1 billion to hire Border Patrol agents and other personnel and more than $2 billion for signing and retention bonuses for agents. It also imposes an additional $1,000 fee for people who are filing for asylum in the U.S. The disagreement among Republicans over the bill has largely centered on cuts meant to offset the bill's spending, including restrictions to Medicaid. In the House's razor-thin GOP majority, the disagreements threatened to tank the bill's progress at every stage. And as the bill moved to the Senate for consideration last week, Johnson warned the upper chamber against making significant changes that would throw off the delicate balance. Senate Republicans initially voiced support for separating the complicated tax components and border security provisions into two separate bills to deliver Mr. Trump a victory on immigration early on in his tenure. But House Republicans opposed the approach, expressing doubts that the president's agenda could pass through the narrow GOP majority in the lower chamber in separate parts. Senate Republicans are now seeking to amend the House-passed bill, sending it back to the House for approval with a goal of getting the legislation to the president's desk by the July 4 holiday. And with a 53-seat majority, the upper chamber can afford to lose just three Republicans. Last week, opposition from Elon Musk threatened to throw a wrench into the legislation's progress, after he stoked concerns by fiscal hawks about the bill's impact on the deficit. The episode, which began with Musk calling the bill "a disgusting abomination," erupted into a dramatic and public feud between Musk and the president last week. But the dispute did not appear to spark significant new opposition the the bill in Congress. The urgency expressed Monday surrounding securing additional border resources comes as Mr. Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the L.A. area amid protests over activity by ICE, prompting a clash with California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom warned that the move would inflame the situation, while urging that there is no shortage of law enforcement. The governor indicated late Sunday that his office plans to sue the Trump administration over Mr. Trump's move. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the president's move on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" Sunday, claiming Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the president chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added.

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline
Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline

A privately owned company is proposing a pipeline across five states. While some of the state governments appear to be on board, the project is facing backlash from a large and formidable population: property owners. The pipeline, known as Summit Carbon Solutions, would span 2,500 miles and transport carbon dioxide (CO2) captured at 57 ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and the Dakotas to a permanent underground storage site in North Dakota. Construction of the $9 billion pipeline is expected to begin this year, with operations kicking off in 2026. In June 2024, the project received regulatory approval from the Iowa Utilities Commission, despite landowner protests. Julie Glade and her husband, Paul, are Iowans who oppose the project because of its use of eminent domain. Their property aligns with the proposed route, and in 2022 the couple was visited by a land agent. "The guy who came to our door wanted us to sit down and sign it without reading it," Glade tells Reason. "They swooped in and tried to contact as many people as possible right away before the people knew what the consequences were. It's very unethical." Several other landowners in the state share the Glades' worries. During a hearing conducted by the Iowa Utility Commission, landowner Joan Gaul testified against the pipeline, which she said would cross a large portion of her farmland. Gaul said Summit Carbon Solutions mailed two easements, which would give the pipeline a legal right to her land, to her without notice. "This letter came telling us about taking our land using eminent domain. It was a difficult pill to swallow," she said. Gaul said she didn't accept the easements and has indicated that she will continue to fight the project. The Glades visit the Iowa Capitol nearly every week to voice their opposition to the pipeline. They are joined by what the couple calls a diverse coalition united by their concern for the basic constitutional right to land ownership. "We have MAGA Republicans and we have lefties. We put our differences aside and we work together," she says. The Glades' efforts could soon pay off. In May the state Senate passed House File 639, which would prevent CO2 pipelines from using eminent domain unless the company proves the pipeline meets the definition of public use. The bill would also prevent CO2 pipelines from operating longer than 25 years. The bill is awaiting the signature of Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds, who is reportedly weighing opinions from pipeline supporters and detractors. If passed, the bill would represent a significant win for the rights of Iowa property owners. It would also be the latest setback for the Summit Carbon Solutions project. After the company launched a blitz of eminent domain lawsuits in South Dakota, Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden signed a bill into law in March preventing carbon dioxide pipelines from receiving eminent domain permission in the state. The post Iowa Landowners Fight Seizure of Private Property for a Pipeline appeared first on

Comptroller confirms property assessor errors; county mayor calls for resignation
Comptroller confirms property assessor errors; county mayor calls for resignation

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Comptroller confirms property assessor errors; county mayor calls for resignation

The state will correct Rutherford Property Assessor Rob Mitchell's inacurate appraisals because he "was unable or unwilling to comply" with Tennessee law, a state June 2 letter said. The letter came from Bryan Kinsey, the director of Division of Property Assessments for the Tennessee Comptroller's Office. Kinsey's letter sent to Mitchell and other Rutherford County officials follows the State Board of Equalization decision March 4 giving Mitchell 60 days to correct the appraisal records. "The board required the county to review a total of 22,180 properties with suspected errors," Kinsley's letter to Mitchell said. "The Division's 10% sample contained 2,223 properties. At the conclusion of the review on May 29, 2025, the division determined that the county erred in its determinations and corrective action for 251 properties, culminating in an 11.3% error rate." Rutherford County Mayor Joe Carr suggested that Mitchell should resign over recent state findings of inaccurate appraisals. "I am committed to ensuring that our county's property taxpayers are treated fairly and equitably," Carr said in a June 4 press release sent to The Daily News Journal. "I would not think it strange if Mr. Mitchell wanted to submit his resignation." Government accountability: State board gives Rutherford property assessor 60 days to comply with law to correct appraisals Mitchell emailed a press release to The Daily News Journal June 5 in response to the mayor suggesting that he consider resigning. "I want to be clear about the structure and independence of the assessor's office," Mitchell's release said. "As an independently-elected constitutional officer, the assessor's office does not take directives from the county mayor. The Tennessee Constitution establishes the assessor as an independent office, elected directly by the people of Rutherford County to serve their interests in property assessment matters. "This matter is not something that should be litigated in the court of public opinion. Complex legal and administrative issues require proper channels and due process, not public spectacle or political theater. "I have full faith and trust in our judiciary and administrative officials at both the state and local levels. I am happy to follow any directives that the appropriate state offices provide through proper legal channels. The citizens of Rutherford County deserve to have these matters handled professionally and according to established legal procedures. "I remain committed to serving the taxpayers of Rutherford County with integrity and will continue to fulfill the duties of the office to which I was elected." 2024 election results: Property Assessor Rob Mitchell captures GOP primary for reelection over opponent Mitchell through his attorney Bud Carman, a former director of the comptroller's division of property assessments, filed a legal challenge to the board of equalization's decision on correcting property appraisals. "Mayor Joe Carr has used half-truth to convict an honorable man without due process," Carman said in a statement emailed June 5 to The Daily News Journal. "Abraham Lincoln is quoted as saying, a half-truth is often the biggest lie of all.' The effect of a 'half-truth public statement' by a county mayor with a political agenda, is at issue as to an ethical consideration." Carman on behalf of Mitchell filed the legal challenge to the comptroller's office's actions in Davidson County Chancery Court. "The finding of non-compliance by the State Board of Equalization by law is subject to a petition for judicial review," Carman said. Comptroller's spokesman John Dunn said his office has no comment about the legal challenge. "We have been advised to not answer any questions," Dunn said. "The (Tennessee) Attorney General's Office is representing us in that matter." Regulating the government: TN Comptroller chastises Rutherford Property Assessor about improper appraisal practices Rutherford Mayor Carr responded to a request for comment from The Daily News Journal through a June 4 press release from the county government spokeswoman Lisa Kaye about the issue with Mitchell's office. Carr was notified by whistleblowers in the summer of 2023 of "possible malfeasance and irregularities" in the property assessor's office. Due to the mayor's legal obligation in state law, Tenn. Code Annotated 8-4-503(a), Carr was required to report the whistleblower concerns to the comptroller's office, according to the press release. Whistle blower issue: Complaint filed against property assessor raises 'ethical, moral and legal concerns' "It is frustrating that it has taken so long to move forward, but an issue of this magnitude must be undertaken carefully," Carr said in the press release. "The assessor's office staff are more than competent; some really good people are there. This is a dereliction of duty and a failure of Rob Mitchell's leadership. For a number of years, he has violated the basic equity application of the law regarding the assessment of property values in this county." The press release from the mayor's office suggested the inaccurate property appraisals violates public trust for a community that deserves better. Another whistleblower: 2nd complaint outlines 'conflict of interest' in Rutherford Co. Property Assessor Office Based on the error rate of 11.3% and the fact that there are over 130,000 parcels in Rutherford County, there could be over 15,000 parcels that are incorrectly assessed, and should be addressed and rectified immediately, the press release from the mayor's office said. "My office has been cooperating with the comptroller's office and will continue to do so," Carr said in the press release. The press release also said the mayor thanks the officials with the comptroller's division of property assessments officials and commends them and Mitchell's employees for their diligence "in trying to uncover the wrongs, so that confidence can be restored to the Rutherford County Property Assessor's Office." Response to ethics complaint: Ethics Committee asks DA, TN Comptroller to investigate Rutherford Property Assessor Rob Mitchell The error rate of property appraisal records exceeded the 5% rate established by the board of equalization in directing the comptroller's staff to take steps to bring Rutherford into compliance of state law, according to the letter from Kinsey, the director of the division of property assessments. "The division will promptly notify the assessor of the error rate and begin making corrections in accordance with the law," the letter said. "Furthermore, the division will maintain records of the costs incurred pursuant to this action and invoice thecounty at the conclusion of the compliance effort." Dunn, the comptroller's spokesman, said the division of property assessments is unsure how long the corrections will take or what the estimated costs will be to Rutherford. "Our office will work to ensure we make the necessary corrections in the most efficient and responsible way possible," Dunn said. This is a developing story. More government accountability: TN official accuses property assessor of assessments that are 'contrary to state law' Reach reporter Scott Broden with news tips or questions by emailing him at sbroden@ To support his work with The Daily News Journal, sign up for a digital subscription. This article originally appeared on Murfreesboro Daily News Journal: TN Comptroller: Rutherford property assessor has unlawful appraisals

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store