Carney will not take up Trudeau's question period tradition
Prime Minister Mark Carney smiles as he rises for the first time in the House of Commons following the election of the Speaker on Monday, May 26, 2025 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney will take part in his first question period on Wednesday — but will not carry on a tradition started by his predecessor.
Former prime minister Justin Trudeau made it his practice to answer all questions in the House of Commons on Wednesdays, a gesture meant to improve accountability within the chamber.
A source in the Prime Minister's Office confirms Carney will not carry on the same practice.
Trudeau said in 2017 that he thought it was important for all MPs to be able to ask questions of the prime minister, not just party leaders.
There was some debate at the time among other parties about whether the move would allow Trudeau to dodge questions on other days of the week.
Wednesday will see the first question period of the spring legislative session, following the election of House Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia on Monday and King Charles reading the speech from the throne on Tuesday.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 26, 2025.
Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
32 minutes ago
- National Post
Varcoe: 'Keep calm': How Carney can deal with Trump factor to ensure successful G7
Article content The G7 summit, which is expected to begin with official sessions on Monday and Tuesday, includes the leaders of Canada, the U.S., the United Kingdom, Japan, France, Germany and Italy. Article content As host, Carney has already outlined Canada's priorities, such as strengthening peace and security — improving joint response to wildfires, for example — building energy security, developing critical minerals, accelerating the digital transition and AI adoption, and securing future partnerships. Article content Russia's invasion of Ukraine will also be raised; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has also been invited by Carney to the Kananaskis event. Article content The summit is not expected to lead to a final group communique that's usually backed by all G7 members. Instead, officials expect to see a series of shorter issue-based action statements. Article content It's not unprecedented for a summit to end without a final communique signed by all countries, which happened in 2019, noted Senator Peter Boehm. Article content Article content 'My experience with President Trump, both in 2017 in Italy and in 2018 in Charlevoix, he participates in the discussions. He's an active listener and he engages. He will have points of view,' Boehm said Thursday in an interview in Calgary. Article content 'It's nothing dramatic. Now, what is said to the media afterwards, or what is said on social media, that could maybe go in a different direction, as it did in 2018. So I fully expect that Kananaskis will be a success. There'll be a number of thematic statements that leaders will agree to.' Article content Boehm stressed that G7 participation is an important part of Canadian foreign policy. It acts as 'a very important counterweight to our overwhelming bilateral relationship with our southern neighbour.' Article content And what takes place inside the formal sessions may not be as important as one-on-one bilateral discussions for Canada's prime minister. Article content Boehm calls it 'diplomatic speed dating,' pointing out the heads of Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan will be attending their first G7 meetings as leaders and trying to establish international relationships. Article content Carney is expected to sit down with as many of the global leaders as possible, including those from non-G7 countries that have been invited to the gathering, such as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Article content The broader question of the future of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) — already set for review in 2026 — remains uncertain, as both countries face U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum and some auto parts. Article content There have been reports this week that Canada and the U.S. are quietly making progress on a new commercial and security agreement. That's a hopeful sign. Article content The sheer volume of trade between the countries highlights the importance of having a productive relationship with the United States, particularly as the North American free trade agreement comes up for review and Trump appears determined to maintain tariffs. Article content 'Our relationship with the United States, yes, it depends on having a good relationship with the president of the United States, but it goes way, way, way beyond that,' said U of C professor Ian Brodie, one-time chief of staff to former prime minister Stephen Harper. Article content
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
So you want to start a political party in B.C. Here are the logistics — and potential challenges
Social Sharing A new political party has emerged in British Columbia after two Independent MLAs, formerly of the B.C. Conservative Party, criticized the party's leader, John Rustad, for moving away from conservative values. So, what does it take to set up a political party in B.C.? And what does it mean for provincial politics? One B.C. officially registered as a political party on June 9. The party was set up by former B.C. Conservative MLAs Dallas Brodie and Tara Armstrong, born out of internal clashes within the Official Opposition as it struggled to unite a big tent party of MLAs with diverse views. Elections B.C. says to register as a political party, an organization must: have a primary purpose of fielding of candidates in provincial elections, have a proposed name that is not prohibited and have at least two principal officers — a financial agent and an auditor. There is no fee to submit a registration application to Elections B.C. As for the name, proposed political party names cannot include the words "independent" or "non-affiliated" and cannot be similar to the name of a political party that is currently registered, have an earlier application for registration pending or be likely to be confused with another political party's name that has been registered during the previous four years. A party cannot use a name that has appeared on a ballot in B.C. at any time during the last 10 years and cannot include information like a candidate's occupation, title, honours, degrees or any indication that candidates have held elected office. Because the party has two elected MLAs, they will get official party status in the legislature. That gives Brodie and Armstrong raises as party leader and house leader, respectively. All MLAs in British Columbia have a base salary of $119,532. As leader, Brodie will receive an additional $29,883 a year as party leader and Armstrong an additional $11,953. WATCH | Why these B.C. Conservatives became Independents: 3 former Conservative MLAS will sit as Independents in B.C. Legislature 3 months ago Duration 2:37 Three breakaway MLAs from the B.C. Conservative Party held a news conference on Monday. They are pondering starting a new party and hope to bring more MLAs to their side. It's left Leader John Rustad scrambling to keep his party united just three weeks into the legislative session. Brodie insists the party has a "path to victory" by courting the conservative base which is "disillusioned" with Rustad's leadership. However, there's already been a split among the three MLAs who left the B.C. Conservative fold; MLA Jordan Kealy, also a former Conservative, did not join One B.C., citing a "disagreement" over party values and leadership. It's an indication of how difficult it is to start a party from scratch, according to University of British Columbia political scientist Stewart Prest. Prest said any new political party faces the challenge of landing their message with a broad swath of British Columbians. Even established parties like the B.C. Liberals struggled to make inroads after they changed their name to B.C. United, Prest said. "At the same time, it does offer the the opportunity to start from a clean slate," Prest said. WATCH | Former B.C. United MLA starts centrist political party: Former B.C. United MLA launches new centrist party 2 months ago Duration 2:04 A former B.C. United MLA is launching a new political party aimed at attracting centrist voters after her original party collapsed. As Katie DeRosa reports, Karin Kirkpatrick says she wants to offer a balanced option in a polarized political landscape. The emergence of One B.C. means Rustad will be facing challenges to his big tent party on two fronts, said Andrew Reeve, former communications director for the B.C. Liberals-turned-B.C. United. Former B.C United MLA Karin Kirkpatrick has also launched a new political party called Centre B.C., courting former B.C. Liberals who feel Rustad has taken the Official Opposition too far to the right. "On certain issues, One B.C. will try to pull [the B.C. Conservatives] apart, probably on the cultural issues," Reeve said. "I don't know if that's a winning strategy in the province. I don't think there's enough voters in the ridings to win, and it's certainly not enough to form government. But it could be enough to split the vote and cause a lot of damage for Rustad."
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
PM Carney says he has no plans to tackle 24 Sussex question during his mandate
The Canadian prime ministers' residence, 24 Sussex, is seen on the banks of the Ottawa River in Ottawa on Monday, Oct. 26, 2015. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — Almost a decade after 24 Sussex Drive was abandoned as the official residence of the Canadian prime minister, taxpayers are still shelling out tens of thousands of dollars a year to maintain the vacant property, and the new prime minister has signalled he's in no rush to deal with the crumbling building. Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters in May that it's up to the National Capital Commission to decide what to do with 24 Sussex. 'It's not a challenge for today, this month, this year and it's probably a challenge for this mandate,' Carney said in French, adding that multiple ideas on how to renew 24 Sussex have been put forward by former prime ministers. The home is a 35-room mansion that was built in 1896, and served as the prime minister's official residence starting in 1951. It has been a federal heritage site since 1986. But former prime minister Stephen Harper was the last leader to live at 24 Sussex. When Justin Trudeau took over as prime minister in November 2015, he and his family instead moved into Rideau Cottage, a home on the grounds of Rideau Hall. Carney and his family now also live at Rideau Cottage. While the grounds of 24 Sussex were used during Trudeau's tenure for some social events, it was closed by the National Capital Commission in 2022 for 'health and safety reasons.' Those included an infestation of rats that was so severe they found rodent carcasses and excrement in the home's walls, attic and basement. The commission has since spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on maintaining the building. A document detailing expenses for 24 Sussex, obtained via information access law, shows that upkeep of the building cost taxpayers more than $680,000 between January 2018 and June 2023. Those costs included elevator maintenance, janitorial services, boiler maintenance, the removal of a bees' nest, pest control, roof repair and pool cleaning. In 2022, the NCC spent just over $76,000 to repair a stone wall and steel fence after a tourist bus crashed into the gates of 24 Sussex. NCC spokesperson Valérie Dufour said the organization is unable to provide any up-to-date information on operations and maintenance costs for the building. She confirmed the NCC continues to pay to maintain the building. A separate document from 2023, obtained via an access to information request, shows the Trudeau government looked at three main options for the official residence. The first option would be to establish Rideau Cottage as the prime minister's permanent residence by investing in additional residential infrastructure, such as laundry and staff offices. The second option would be to build a new 'modern facility' at 24 Sussex with 'limited heritage elements,' which would accommodate both residential and official functions. The third option would be to build an entirely new residence on NCC-owned land elsewhere in Ottawa. Dufour said the commission presented options on the future of the official residence to the government and is awaiting a decision. In a letter addressed to then-procurement minister Jean-Yves Duclos, Trudeau asked for a proposal on new options for the official residence to be drafted by January 2026. Trudeau said the proposal should include a plan to transfer all responsibility for the official residence, except for general maintenance, from the National Capital Commission to Public Services and Procurement Canada. Andrew MacDougall, who was director of communications to former prime minister Stephen Harper, said that while Carney is right to focus on more important files, Canada still needs to maintain 'symbols' of its nationhood — including 24 Sussex. 'Imagine a U.S. president leaving the White House in a dilapidated state. They would never,' he said. 'And so why do we tolerate it?' MacDougall argued that Carney is already 'opening the taps and spending like there's no tomorrow' and he might as well take on a problem that too many prime ministers have ignored. Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, said the real problem is that the National Capital Commission is 'too good at wasting our money but bad at managing properties.' 'With debt interest charges blowing a $1 billion hole in the budget every week, Prime Minister Mark Carney must make it a priority to hold the NCC accountable to stop wasting so much money,' he said. 'Canadians also shouldn't be paying for an official residence for any opposition leader or Speaker, and the prime minister doesn't need multiple residences.' Katherine Spencer-Ross, president of Heritage Ottawa, said Carney's reluctance to tackle 24 Sussex is 'hardly surprising' given the amount of work on his plate. 'I'm not holding my breath,' she said. 'I think he's got another fish to fry.' Spencer-Ross said that while prime ministers have been afraid to do anything about 24 Sussex because of the political optics, the prime minister of the day is still the 'steward' of the building. 'It is not their home. It is not their party's home. It belongs to the people of Canada,' she said. Spencer-Ross said Heritage Ottawa wrote to Trudeau in 2018 to suggest setting up an external advisory committee to look at options for the residence. She said nothing happened with that idea until Trudeau included it in his letter to Duclos. She said her organization believes the building should be maintained, renewed and kept in public hands, even if it's no longer the official residence. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 13, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
