logo
IHC judges move Supreme Court over seniority dispute

IHC judges move Supreme Court over seniority dispute

Express Tribune20-02-2025

Listen to article
Five judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) have filed a petition in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, challenging judicial transfers and their impact on seniority.
The 49-page constitutional petition, filed under Article 184(3) through senior lawyers Munir A. Malik and Barrister Salahuddin, argues that the President of Pakistan misused Article 200(1) by overriding the Judicial Commission's authority in transferring judges.
The petition contends that judicial transfers cannot be made without public interest and should not affect the seniority list.
It further states that Article 200 only allows temporary transfers, and the current process violates Article 175(A) of the Constitution.
The judges have urged the Supreme Court to invalidate the Islamabad High Court's current seniority list, citing its inconsistency with Article 194 and the Constitution's Third Schedule.
The petition specifically challenges the appointment of Justice Sarfraz Dogar as acting Chief Justice of IHC, stating that he had only served two weeks in the high court before assuming administrative control.
It also calls for Justices Khalid Soomro and Muhammad Asif to be barred from judicial work.
The President of Pakistan, the federal government, the Judicial Commission, the Supreme Court registrar, and multiple high court registrars have been made respondents in the case.
The five petitioning judges are Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz, and Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan.
The petition also asserts that the failure of transferred judges to take a fresh oath is a constitutional violation.
It claims that seniority begins in the high court where a judge first takes the oath, and altering it through transfers is an unconstitutional interference in IHC's administration.
The Supreme Court has yet to schedule a hearing on the matter.
Last week, Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogarwas appointed as acting chief justice of the IHC, a move that has sparked reservations among some judges over seniority.
A notification issued by the Ministry of Law announced that President Asif Ali Zardari has appointed Justice Sarfraz Dogar as the acting chief justice of the IHC.
The appointment, made under Article 196 of the Constitution, will take effect from the date Justice Dogar takes the oath of office and remain in place until a regular Chief Justice is appointed.
The appointment followed Justice Aamer Farooq's elevation to the Supreme Court (SC) earlier this week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PTI stages protest for Imran's release
PTI stages protest for Imran's release

Express Tribune

time18 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

PTI stages protest for Imran's release

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Sindh staged a protest demonstration and rally outside the City Court Karachi, calling for the immediate release of Imran Khan and wife, Bushra Bibi. A large number of PTI leaders, lawyers, workers, and people participated in the demonstration. Protesters carried banners and chanted slogans in support of the detained leaders, demanding immediate release of Imran Khan and other party leaders and workers. PTI Sindh President Haleem Adil Sheikh said that the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law have been dismantled. "Form-47 governments, imposed through rigged elections, have pushed the country to the brink," he claimed. "Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi have been jailed in false cases, and the doors of justice have been shut. Judges go on leave when it is time to deliver justice. Today again, the judge scheduled to hear the Al-Qadir Trust case went on leave," he said, alleging a conspiracy to deny Khan justice.

‘Al-Qadir Trust scam': IHC again defers hearing on appeals of IK, Bushra
‘Al-Qadir Trust scam': IHC again defers hearing on appeals of IK, Bushra

Business Recorder

time20 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

‘Al-Qadir Trust scam': IHC again defers hearing on appeals of IK, Bushra

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Wednesday, again deferred hearing of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi's appeals seeking suspension of their sentence in 190 million pound case. A two-member bench of IHC comprising Acting Chief Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Asif was to conduct hearing of the case but the case was adjourned due to non-availability of Justice Asif. The IHC's decision to defer the case led the protests by PTI leaders and workers outside the court premises. The protestors included PTI lawyers, workers, Imran Khan's sisters Aleema Khan and Uzma Khan, along with PTI Punjab Chief Organizer Aliya Hamza and Senator Seemee Ezdi. The protesters demanded the suspension of sentences and bail for Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in the 190 million pound case. Later, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur also arrived at the IHC to join the protest while they also met Secretary to IHC Acting Chief Justice for fixation of the case. In this matter, Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi have approached the IHC seeking suspension of their sentences. They have moved the court through their counsel Barrister Salman Safdar and cited the state and Chairman National Accountability Bureau (NAB) as respondents. Counsel Salman stated in the petition that the petitioners were convicted by the Accountability Court (I) Islamabad through judgment dated 17.01.2025, wherein, they were held guilty for commission of offence of corruption and corrupt practices as defined u/s 9 (a) (ii) (iv) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and Imran was sentenced u/s 10 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 14 years and fine amounting to Rs10,00,000. Through the instant petition, they sought indulgence of this court for 'Suspension' of conviction and sentence awarded to them, till the final disposal of the main appeal already filed in the IHC. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Babar's plea against harassment by FIA: Urgent hearing to take place today
Babar's plea against harassment by FIA: Urgent hearing to take place today

Business Recorder

time20 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Babar's plea against harassment by FIA: Urgent hearing to take place today

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) fixed for urgent hearing today (Thursday), a petition filed by ex-senator Farhatullah Babar against alleged harassment by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA). The petition was filed Wednesday under Article 199 of the Constitution by advocates, Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha against the Ministry of Interior and the FIA and others as respondents, 'Seeking intervention of Court against the unlawful, illegal, arbitrary and mala fide conduct in continuously harassing the petitioner through repeated issuance of ambiguous and illegal notices and summons, in what is an illegal fishing expedition/roving enquiry by the FIA in violation of laws and principles of natural justice.' The petition said that the FIA enquiry was initiated on March 25 on the complaint of a private citizen, unknown to him, living in Morgah, Rawalpindi alleging 'suspected corruption, tax evasion and illicit asset accumulation' and he appeared before the FIA on March 28 a day before Eid holidays. No copy of the complaint was provided to him. Interestingly, on 11 April 2025, a detailed questionnaire of 12 questions was slammed at him through WhatsApp, directing him to answer them all by 7 April 2025, four days prior to receiving it. The questions delved deep into the past, requiring collecting information from multiple offices within and outside the country. Despite this, the petitioners provided answers to all the questions. Instead of acknowledging the answers provided to the questionnaire, the FIA then asked the petitioner on May 27 to explain the source of properties which it claimed to have received from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) when he served as senator and also explain some banking transactions, within five days. The petitioner rejected the alleged transactions of Rs1,500,000 in his account on 3 April 2025 and another alleged transaction of Rs3 million on 5 July 2025 (almost a month away in the future). Thereupon, the petitioner was then directed to appear in person, the petition said. Just when the petitioner prepared replies to these questions, the FIA sent him another notice by WhatsApp, asking him to appear in person, disregarding the previous notice to send written replies. A day before Eid on June 6, Farhatullah Babar uploaded on X (formerly Twitter) extracts from his replies to the FIA and said; 'Two days ago, FIA regurgitated questions already replied to by me on May 12. One Q alleged transaction of 3 M on 5-7-25 (still a month away). Just when replies were being readied, the FIA WhatsApped to appear in person next day (June 5) on eve of Eid holidays. I couldn't appear in person and sent this reply.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store