Russian Raiders Crawled For Miles Through Gas Pipeline To Attack Ukrainians In Kursk
Details have emerged of an extraordinary mission launched by Russian soldiers in the Kursk region, during which they penetrated deep into Ukrainian-held territory via a gas pipeline. The soldiers — reportedly around 100 in total — were apparently tasked with an assault on Sudzha, a critical Ukrainian-held town in the region. Although the results of the raid are unclear at this stage, it further underscores the huge challenge that Ukraine faces if it's to retain a foothold in this area of western Russia.
Kursk region, video from the gas pipeline that goes to Sudzha
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-08T22:57:15.221Z
New videos and photos from the gas pipeline in the Kursk Region!
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-08T20:37:52.954Z
A detailed description of the Russian mission, which took place on March 8, was provided in the Ukrainian media by journalist Yurii Butusov, whose original source was a member of a Ukrainian unit operating in the Kursk region.
Kursk region. An alleged photo of the gas pipeline through which the Russians wanted to infiltrate Sudzha unnoticed.
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-08T18:50:53.983Z
Multiple photos and videos purportedly documenting the operation have also been published by Russian military social media accounts, including showing soldiers wearing breathing gear and moving down the pipeline that is only around 4.5 feet wide. Reportedly, the raiders spent four days crawling through the pipeline, which is roughly nine miles long. Unconfirmed reports suggest that some of the soldiers may have suffocated while in the pipeline. However, at least some made it out.
According to Butusov's source: 'The enemy used a gas pipeline and came out in area N [the precise location is concealed for security purposes]… It was not a surprise, as we knew about this action. But the focus had been shifted to Kurilovka [a village south of Sudzha] a few days ago.'
Another account suggests that the Russians did achieve some element of surprise, with the use of the pipeline ensuring that these forces could be moved without being detected by Ukrainian surveillance drones. The same source notes that Russian preparations for the mission included airstrikes in the vicinity of the area, something that took place over several days.
It's reported that the Russian army has intensified attacks in Kursk region of Russia.According to unverified information,Russians have gotten to Ukrainian positions in Sudzha through the Druzhba gas pipeline this morning.Reportedly,the pipeline is under increased observation
— Anton Gerashchenko (@antongerashchenko.bsky.social) 2025-03-08T16:21:53.198Z
The exact pipeline used by the Russian soldiers is not entirely clear, although all signs point to it being part of the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhhorod gas pipeline. Also known as the Brotherhood pipeline, or West-Siberian Pipeline, this was previously used to transport Russian gas to Europe via Ukraine. Partially owned and operated by Ukraine, it has been out of use since the end of 2024.
Regardless, some of the Russian soldiers emerged from the pipeline before attempting to reach Ukrainian positions near Sudzha, a small town around 65 miles southwest of the city of Kursk. Sudzha has been occupied by Ukrainian forces since mid-August 2024 after they launched an incursion into the region.
About 100 Russians use gas pipeline to reach Ukrainian positions near Sudzha, Kursk Oblast
—
Ukrainska Pravda (@pravda.ua)
2025-03-08T11:36:34.848Z
What happened to the Russian soldiers after they arrived in Sudzha is also unclear at this stage. One report suggests that 'efforts are underway to eliminate the infiltrators,' while surveillance of the pipeline has now been stepped up to avoid a repeat of the raid.
The Ukrainian General Staff released footage purportedly showing Ukrainian troops engaging some of the Russian assault troops after they emerged from the tunnel, shown below:
Destruction of Russian soldiers who came out of a gas pipeline in the Kursk region!
—
MAKS 24 (@maks23.bsky.social)
2025-03-08T19:47:10.620Z
It's certainly possible that at least some elements of the Russian assault company linked up with other troops already on the ground in the Sudzha area. After all, Russian forces achieved a breakthrough of the Ukrainian defensive line south of the town in recent days.
The area is now a focus of fighting, as the Ukrainian Armed Forces try and hold the Russians back to avoid an encirclement and the cutting off of vital supply routes.
'Russian special forces are being detected, blocked, and destroyed. Enemy losses in the Sudzha area are very heavy,' Ukraine's military claimed.
The current situation has been developing for some time now, with the Russians increasing their focus on Sudzha. Even before the end of last year, Russian troops had entered the village of Kurilovka, south of Sudzha, and forced a Ukrainian brigade to give up its positions.
'After that, the enemy built up its forces and systematically launched assault operations,' a Ukrainian military source told Ukrainska Pravda on March 7. 'Yesterday and the day before [6 and 5 March], they made a breakthrough.'
In particular, it seems Russian forces are aiming to take control of the road running between Sumy, Yunakivka, and Sudzha, which provides Ukrainians with a critical access route into the Kursk region.
A string of other villages to the north of Sudzha have already been recaptured, including Staraya, Novaya Sorochina, and Malaya Loknya, as well as other small settlements to the immediate east of the town.
Overall, the situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region is becoming increasingly precarious.
Ukrainian reports state that the Russians are 'carrying out massive attacks along the entire front of the Kursk sanitary zone … and are assaulting relentlessly.'
As well as having significantly more firepower — especially artillery — the Russians are backed up by North Korean troops, bolstering what is already a significant numerical advantage.
Russia's ex-president, Dmitry Medvedev, recently claimed that Ukrainian forces in Kursk were almost surrounded and would soon be driven out. 'The lid of the smoking cauldron is almost closed. The offensive continues,' he posted on Telegram.
Holding territory in Kursk over the long term was always going to be a huge challenge for Ukraine.
Even with adequate supplies of ammunition, the flanks of the so-called 'sanitary zone' are being repeatedly attacked by Russian ground forces and airpower. Meanwhile, the front of the zone has narrowed, making it more difficult to hold.
At the same time, the United States has now hit pause on military support for Ukraine, as well as access to intelligence and satellite feeds.
There are now increasing calls from Ukrainian analysts to withdraw entirely from Kursk, with the tables now apparently firmly tilted in the Russians' favor.
On the other hand, the political importance of Ukraine having a foothold in Russia shouldn't be discounted. Indeed, with critical talks between Ukraine and the United States due to be held in Saudi Arabia this week, holding onto what is a key bargaining chip is perhaps now more important than ever for Kyiv.
It's expected that the talks will see Ukraine propose a peace plan that will include an end to aerial drone and missile strikes, together with a suspension of military activity in the Black Sea.
The pipeline raid highlights the importance to Russia of recapturing this territory. Less clear is how long Ukraine can hold out as losses mount and the tide of public opinion threatens to turn against what was, at the start, a notably bold operation but one that now is becoming increasingly perilous for the forces that Kyiv has committed there.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
King Charles Makes History as He Delivers Throne Speech in Canada
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." King Charles is in Canada—one of 15 nations he reigns over—for the first time since becoming king. Today, King Charles, as Canada's head of state, attended the State Opening of Parliament to deliver the 'Speech from the Throne,' or Throne Speech, which sets out the new government's priorities at the start of the parliamentary session. According to the BBC, the address 'would traditionally be given by the governor general, who is the monarch's top representative in Canada.' Per Buckingham Palace, 'This is just the second time in history that the Sovereign has opened a Parliament, following Queen Elizabeth II opening the twenty-third Canadian Parliament in October 1957, and the third time a Sovereign has delivered a Speech from the Throne, marking a significant moment between the Head of State and the Canadian people.' Queen Elizabeth delivered the address in 1957 and 1977. When she did so in 1957, she became the first reigning monarch to open the Canadian Parliament session. For the occasion, she wore her coronation dress and Queen Alexandra's Kokoshnik Tiara, created by Garrard. When she returned twenty years later to once again deliver the Throne Speech, Queen Elizabeth again opted for the Kokoshnik Tiara. Per Garrard, 'the idea for the design came from Alexandra herself. Inspired by a diamond kokoshnik tiara belonging to her sister, Empress Maria Feodorovna, that she had long admired, the classic halo shape borrowed from the style of a traditional Russian peasant headdress.' The tiara is made of 61 vertical bars, set with more than 400 perfectly matched diamonds. Today, Queen Camilla did not wear a tiara, instead opting for a wide-brimmed blue hat. You Might Also Like 12 Weekend Getaway Spas For Every Type of Occasion 13 Beauty Tools to Up Your At-Home Facial Game
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns Moscow is 'playing with fire' in new criticism of Putin
US President Donald Trump doubled down on his criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday, accusing him of "playing with fire." "What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. The US president levelled unusually harsh criticism against Putin at the weekend after Moscow launched another large-scale drone attack against Ukraine. "We're in the middle of talking and he's shooting rockets into Kiev and other cities. I don't like it at all. And I'm surprised. I'm very surprised," Trump told reporters on Sunday. When asked, he said he was "absolutely" considering further sanctions on Russia. He followed up his comments with a post on Truth Social: "I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" Since taking office in January, Trump has presented himself as a mediator for a peaceful solution to the war. He has also clearly distanced himself from his predecessor Joe Biden's policy of supporting Ukraine. Russia dismissed Trump's criticism of Putin as an overreaction. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the US president's comments were down to "emotional overload" amid uncertainty over the status of negotiations.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's threats cast dark clouds over this year's NATO summit
That was the assessment of the Trump administration recently offered in a private conversation with a senior European diplomat from a major NATO country. That gloomy view of transatlantic relations is widely shared in Europe, and not just because a leaked Signals chat revealed that the U.S. vice president and secretary of defense privately described Europeans as 'pathetic' geopolitical freeloaders. Or because of the administration's brusque treatment of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office, and relative coddling of Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. Nor is it simply about Trump's unilateral imposition of tariffs or recent insistence that the European Union was 'formed in order to screw the United States.' The gloom is not even primarily about Trump's threats to take Greenland from Denmark by force if necessary or to make Canada the 51st U.S. state, even though those comments were deeply insulting to both NATO allies. At core, the profound unease that has descended over European capitals is about being left largely leaderless at a time of vulnerability and great peril, with the Russian bear on the prowl on the continent, Chinese mercantilism threatening the European economic model and Washington constantly casting doubt over the future of the alliance they have relied on for decades. The Trump administration has been so slow to appoint senior State and Defense Department officials to key positions in Europe, and so unwilling to issue definitive guidance on a host of major issues, that some senior American military officers on the continent have reportedly taken to asking their European counterparts for insights into what is actually happening back in Washington, D.C. For all those reasons, the upcoming June 24 to 25 NATO Summit in The Hague is shaping up as one of the most consequential and uncertain in the alliance's history. America's closest allies have a host of questions and the Trump administration is providing few answers. Will the U.S. follow through on rumored troop withdrawals from Germany, or even from Europe writ large? Will it surrender the position of Supreme Allied Commander-Europe, always held by a senior U.S. military officer in the past, further eroding American leadership in Europe? Will Trump offer critical backing for a European coalition willing to put troops on the ground to guarantee Ukraine's sovereignty in the event of a peace deal with Russia? How will the Trump administration react if a settlement is reached and Russia repositions hundreds of thousands of battle-hardened troops on NATO's eastern border? Can Europe even still trust in the American nuclear umbrella? What NATO allies most fear at the upcoming summit is that President Trump, in a fit of made-for-television pique similar to his Oval Office dressing down of Zelensky, might upend the geostrategic chessboard and walk away. They recall his outburst last year, encouraging Russia to do 'whatever the hell they want' to any NATO member nation that doesn't meet the alliance's target of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense. Trump has more recently doubled the ante, saying allies should be spending 5 percent of GDP on defense, even though the U.S. does not even reach that thresholdm spending roughly 3.4 percent of GDP on defense. Certainly, European allies have not forgotten the havoc Trump unleashed at his first NATO summit in 2018 when he publicly berated allies and threatened to pull the U.S. out of the alliance altogether if they didn't increase defense spending. That pressure, combined with the growing threat of Putin's Russia, has resulted in 23 out of the 32 NATO countries reaching the 2 percent target today, up from three in 2014. The larger issue is that the transatlantic alliance and its 'one for all, and all for one' commitment, expressed in somewhat vague terms in Article V of NATO's treaty, is built on a foundation of trust. The cracks in that foundation are widening, especially given the disruptions of recent months. John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, has stated publicly that Trump's ultimate goal remains laying the groundwork for withdrawing the U.S. from NATO. 'Trump has essentially said that the nation was stuck with this consensus since 1945 that the U.S. was going to carry the world on its back, and it turns out that status quo was very brittle,' said author and historian H.W. Brands Jr., speaking recently at an event hosted by the Council on Foreign Relations. After just a few months back in office, he noted, Trump has already upended the expectations other nations have in terms of U.S. foreign policy and security guarantees. 'Other nations that had the expectation that U.S. presidents will all value past commitments, and that they can rely on the United States to the extent that some don't need their own independent foreign and defense policies, like Germany and Japan, are now hearing from the White House that we're not interested in defending the rest of the world,' said Brands. 'When U.S. voters elect a president who insists he wants to make Canada the 51st state, I'm not sure you can ever get back that trust.' James Kitfield is a senior fellow at the Center for the Study of the Presidency & Congress, and a three-time recipient of the Gerald R. Ford Award for Distinguished Reporting on National Defense.