logo
On Pahalgam, imperial fortresses and Kashmir's settler colonialism

On Pahalgam, imperial fortresses and Kashmir's settler colonialism

Deccan Herald03-05-2025

Given Kargil, IC 814, Mumbai 26/11, Uri, Pulwama, and now Pahalgam, India is justified in cutting ties to Pakistan, including trade, sports, the cringe Attari circus, and even diplomatic relations. India did once mass its forces at the Line of Control in Operation Parakram, but honouring the Shimla Agreement, did not cross.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by...
Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by...

India.com

time4 days ago

  • India.com

Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by...

Scared Pakistan closes terror launchpads in...., it was targeted in Operation Sindoor, it is run by... After India's air strike, the leadership of Pakistan-based terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammed is has closed its Bahawalpur headquarters 'Jamia Subhan Allah'. India attacked Jaish-e-Mohammed's Bahawalpur headquarters in Punjab province under Operation Sindoor in early May, in which it was destroyed. Since the Indian attack, it is showing permanently closed on Google Maps. Was targeted in Operation Sindoor The Indian armed forces launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 , in which 26 people were killed. India's retaliatory strikes targeted nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and PoK, including the Jaish-e-Mohammed headquarters in Bahawalpur. The Jaish infrastructure was destroyed in the precision strike at this location, about 100 km from the Indian border. 10 people from Masood Azhar's family killed In India's action, 10 members of Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar 's family and 4 close associates were killed. Photos and satellite imagery of the site after the attack show that the place was badly damaged. A large part of the building was reduced to rubble and large holes were visible in its Pakistan Tension: Khawaja Asif's statement on Shimla Agreement causes uproar in Pakistan. Training center for Jaish terrorists The complex was displayed as a mosque for public display, but it reportedly served as a training centre for Jaish-e-Mohammed. It played a key role in the recruitment and operational planning of terrorists. Google Maps has now marked the site as permanently closed. This marking is usually done when verified sources report a long period of inactivity and damage to the place.

Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—‘nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'
Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—‘nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'

The Print

time5 days ago

  • The Print

Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—‘nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'

'So whenever there is a crisis, and if that crisis is between two nuclear weapon states, obviously, the rest of the world does not or cannot ignore it. So there are active conversations which take place in the back channel,' Tewari said Thursday, pointing out that under US President Donald Trump, such talks have been foregrounded. In an interview to ThePrint, Tewari said the Congress leadership's position that the Modi government bowed to the US pressure could be an outcome of the 'bitterly contested' nature of the Indian politics where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter'. The Chandigarh MP travelled to Egypt, Qatar, Ethiopia and South Africa as a member of the delegation headed by NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule. New Delhi: Former Union minister Manish Tewari, who travelled as part of an Operation Sindoor multi-party delegation, has downplayed the Congress party leadership's claim that the US President forced India to 'surrender' during May's four-day military conflict with Pakistan, saying back-channel conversations during such tense events were nothing new. 'It has been going on since 1990 as I documented with the Robert Gates mission when Pakistan started flashing the N (nuclear) word even eight years before its nuclear test in response to some fantasized Indian buildup in the western deserts, to Operation Parakram in 2001, to the Mumbai terror outrage in 2008, to Uri to Pulwama, and to Pahalgam and its aftermath. The only difference is while earlier back channeling was a quiet process, but now you have an incumbent in the White House who believes that back channeling is front channeling,' Tewari said. His remarks assume significance against the backdrop of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's 'Narender Surrender' jibes, suggesting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave in to US pressure to call off the military operation against Pakistan on 10 May. Gandhi reiterated his allegation Friday while addressing a rally in Bihar. Tewari, who is also a lawyer, suggested that Trump's claims that his administration played the role of a mediator was likely to be a stretch as that was a completely different format altogether. In contrast, the UN's attempt to resolve the Kashmir dispute in 1948 at the insistence of New Delhi was an attempt at mediation, Tewari said. 'Mediation has a more structured connotation to it, but, fortunately or unfortunately these terms keep getting used alternatively. And therefore it leads to a certain sense of ambiguity. But as I was earlier pointing out that when we took the dispute to the United Nations in 1948, the Jammu and Kashmir question at that point in time in pursuance of the UN resolution, there was the UN group on India and Pakistan on Kashmir. 'There was an attempt at a structured mediation. You see, a mediation or an arbitration or an alternative dispute resolution is when two parties agree to the terms of reference of a dispute, which then they allow an arbitrator or a mediator to try and adjudicate,' said Tewari. Asked about the Congress's official position, Tewari said it could be the reflection of a 'bitterly contested political space' where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter' to the other side. 'In fact, even when the delegation was traveling, the kind of rhetoric which was being articulated by certain sections of the NDA/BJP establishment, was also something which was completely avoidable. But that unfortunately is the nature of our politics, whether you like it or not,' said Tewari, serving his third term as a Lok Sabha MP. However, Tewari added, there needs to be consensus on the fact that Pakistan has been a chronic sponsor of low-intensity conflict which needs to be exposed in the court of global opinion, 'as against whatever may be your internal dynamics or the questions that you may have surrounding the events of 7th 8th of May, the night of 7th, 8th of May till the 10th of May.' 'I, for one, understand and appreciate that distinction, and that's why we were completely focused on exposing Pakistan and trying to tell our interlocutors that this is not only a threat to the stability of South Asia, this is a threat to the stability of the world, given the very nature and the the chronic disposition of that state to use violence as a means of trying to achieve its senses,' he said. Responding to a question on the Congress leadership being upset over the Centre picking leaders like him, Shashi Tharoor, Salman Khurshid for the delegations instead of the names suggested by Gandhi and party chief Mallikarjun Kharge, Tewari said such things do not bother him. 'Honestly, we have been in this contested, politically acerbic, bitter space for 25 years. And there is a larger national interest, which is at play, and that larger national interest is proscribing Pakistan, which uses terror as an instrument of state policy. And to me, that was the objective. And the rest of it, for someone who has been a card-carrying member of this noise for the last two-and-a-half decades, it's really no skin off my back,' he said. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Ex-Congress minister who worked with Indira, Narasimha Rao, heads to RSS HQ to 'bridge Sangh-tribals gap'

Modi govt move to punish Pakistan by suspending Indus water treaty leaves Pakistan…, Bilawal Bhutto makes shocking remarks
Modi govt move to punish Pakistan by suspending Indus water treaty leaves Pakistan…, Bilawal Bhutto makes shocking remarks

India.com

time5 days ago

  • India.com

Modi govt move to punish Pakistan by suspending Indus water treaty leaves Pakistan…, Bilawal Bhutto makes shocking remarks

Pakistan has once again warned of nuclear war against India. This time, the threat comes in response to India's decision to suspend the Indus Water Treaty. Former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and Pakistan People's Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari made the comments during his visit to the United States. On Thursday, June 5, 2025, Bilawal was speaking at the Middle East Institute in Washington, D.C. While addressing the gathering, he strongly criticized India and accused it of violating the water-sharing treaty, which he claimed is putting Pakistan's water resources at serious risk. According to a report by Pakistan's newspaper Dawn, Bilawal said, 'We have made it clear that cutting off our water supply is an act of war.' He added in a serious tone, 'This isn't just about nationalism or political statements. We're not saying this for effect—this is about our survival. No country in the world, no matter how big or powerful it is, will sit quietly if its water and future are threatened. Every country will fight for its water.' 'Water wars were once just a theory,' Bilawal said. 'But by shutting off Pakistan's water supply, India is laying the foundations for an existential conflict — one that could escalate to nuclear proportions.' He also requested the United States to step in and bring India to the discussion table regarding the Indus Water Treaty, saying dialogue is the only way forward to avoid conflict. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said that India must follow the Indus Water Treaty, and countries like the United States and others should take a strong stand to prevent India from breaking this agreement. He added that if talks and diplomacy are to succeed and if Pakistan wants to have positive relations with India, including new deals and agreements, then India must first honor the old treaties and take back its decision to suspend the Indus Water Treaty. Bilawal also mentioned that tensions between the two countries increased after the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22. Following this, India suspended the Indus Water Treaty. In response, Pakistan decided to use its right to suspend all bilateral agreements with India, including the Shimla Agreement. Pakistan also announced the closure of the Attari-Wagah border and suspended all trade with India. The Indus Water Treaty was signed in 1960, with the World Bank acting as a mediator. Under this treaty, India was given control of the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej), and Pakistan got the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab). But after the Pahalgam terrorist attack, India took strict steps against Pakistan, which included suspending this treaty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store