River pollution: Phosphates too high in more protected river systems
Water quality standards have fallen in two more of Wales' most protected river networks, meaning seven of the nine river systems are failing to meet phosphate level targets.Environmental groups say "urgent action" is needed to tackle what they call "unacceptable" phosphate pollution in networks classes as Special Areas of Conservation (SACs).Environment watchdog, Natural Resources Wales (NRW), says two river systems in north west Wales, Afon Gwyrfai and Afon Eden, both previously met phosphate targets but will now face further interventions to improve water quality.The five other rivers missing the phosphate target are the Teifi, Cleddau, Dee, Usk and Wye.
Phosphates are naturally occurring minerals found in human and animal waste.They aid growth of plants but can lead to a dramatic growth in algae and deplete oxygen levels when they enter water courses in large quantities.NRW says the Afon Gwyrfai system will be subject to housing development restrictions to prevent further phosphates impacting water quality.In 2021 NRW set new targets for phosphate pollution in Special Areas of Conservation across Wales.Commenting on the latest data NRW Head of Natural Resource Management Mary Lewis said that since then there had been "action at scale – by ourselves as environmental regulators, government, industry and communities – to improve the health of our rivers""."What is important now is that we use this evidence to continue to work towards our shared goal of better river health for people and nature," she said. "We must keep up the momentum that has been built in recent years, and we must all play our part in driving down phosphorus and pollution in our waters."Tim Birch from Wildlife Trusts Wales said "urgent action" was needed."Despite public outcry and political promises, today's evidence shows worsening river pollution in seven of nine of our most protected natural rivers in Wales," he said."These special rivers are officially recognised for their high importance for wildlife, yet two more are now showing significant deterioration since their last assessment in 2021, putting water quality and even more wildlife at risk."At a time when our rivers should be improving, not worsening, these levels of phosphorous pollution are unacceptable," he added.In total, 122 individual water bodies within Wales' SAC rivers were assessed.Half were now found to be meeting targets for phosphorous compliance, compared with 39% in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
5 days ago
- North Wales Live
Annexe plan 'lesser of two evils' for 'picture postcard' Anglesey village
Plans to build an annexe in a "picture postcard" Anglesey village have been approved after being described as "the lesser of two evils". Anglesey Council's planning committee approved plans for an ancillary annexe to The Old Crown building in Moelfre during a meeting on Wednesday, June 4. The application, lodged by Kiran Purewal, was brought to the committee at the request of the local member Cllr Margaret Murley Roberts. It was felt the development would have a "negative visual impact" on the picturesque area. Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday The existing dwelling was a two-storey terraced property within the development boundary of Moelfre in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Planning officer Rhys Jones said the proposal consisted of erecting an ancillary annexe to its rear. It was situated in an elevated position at the top of the site adjacent to Lon Ty Powdr overlooking the Moelfre coast. Planners considered it met policy, as it was a smaller, improved proposal to that of a previous, larger application which had permission on the site, and they recommended it be approved. A report said the application had resulted in 32 letters being received. The objections "were all similar in relation to what concerned the local people of Moelfre," it had noted. They included the "negative visual impact on the landscape, traffic and parking, drainage, second homes/holiday let uncertainty, and structurally a weak foundation base". They had "emphasised" how erecting a new building would "significantly impact the overall panorama and aesthetics of the landscape" and "destroy the character and quality of the village scene presenting an overbearing and visually intrusive element". Objectors added: "The design would be unsympathetic and harmful to the appearance and character of the village." They also felt the design and scale of the annexe would be "out of keeping" with the main dwelling and surrounding properties. Concerns that the annexe "should not be sold separately to the main dwelling" and that "second homes and holiday lets are a big issue in Moelfre," had also been noted. Cllr Euryn Morris read out Cllr Murley-Roberts' comments, on behalf of the community council. He also spoke for himself, and Cllr Ieuan Williams. Among comments raised, it was felt the annexe would "change the image of the village". He said the Old Crown Building was "an iconic building" which featured on postcards and pictures and they were "ignoring the importance of historical buildings" which "could have a detrimental effect on the area". The impact on neighbours was also highlighted, and the effect of a concrete lorry accessing the property, via a "horse and cart" road. There was also a query over the need for an annexe. "The last thing Moelfre needs is more holiday lets," he said. The planning officer said permission existed already for an annexe and the principal of development had been "safeguarded". It was smaller than what was already permitted, and the plan was considered an "improvement," of modern build, with "smart windows". He agreed it was "a picturesque area" and important to protect, but reiterated planning permission already existed. Lon Pwdwr was narrow, but no issues were raised by highways, and until the council adopted Article 4, its potential future use as holiday accommodation was not material to the application. An Article 4 Direction is a planning tool which can remove or restrict permitted development rights on houses. It has recently been adopted by Cyngor Gwynedd, to control the use of houses as second homes and holiday lets. Councillor Robin Williams noted that Cllr Murley-Roberts had called the matter in after community council concerns, but queried why there was no response received. He urged all community councils to raise issues if they had them. Describing the plan as "the lesser of two evils" he added: "I can't see any reason to refuse this, due to the existing planning permission from 2013." He added that he "respected" comments raised.
Wales Online
5 days ago
- Wales Online
Annexe plan 'lesser of two evils' for 'picture postcard' Anglesey village
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Plans to build an annexe in a "picture postcard" Anglesey village have been approved after being described as "the lesser of two evils". Anglesey Council's planning committee approved plans for an ancillary annexe to The Old Crown building in Moelfre during a meeting on Wednesday, June 4. The application, lodged by Kiran Purewal, was brought to the committee at the request of the local member Cllr Margaret Murley Roberts. It was felt the development would have a "negative visual impact" on the picturesque area. Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday The existing dwelling was a two-storey terraced property within the development boundary of Moelfre in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Planning officer Rhys Jones said the proposal consisted of erecting an ancillary annexe to its rear. It was situated in an elevated position at the top of the site adjacent to Lon Ty Powdr overlooking the Moelfre coast. Planners considered it met policy, as it was a smaller, improved proposal to that of a previous, larger application which had permission on the site, and they recommended it be approved. (Image: IoACC planning docs) A report said the application had resulted in 32 letters being received. The objections "were all similar in relation to what concerned the local people of Moelfre," it had noted. They included the "negative visual impact on the landscape, traffic and parking, drainage, second homes/holiday let uncertainty, and structurally a weak foundation base". They had "emphasised" how erecting a new building would "significantly impact the overall panorama and aesthetics of the landscape" and "destroy the character and quality of the village scene presenting an overbearing and visually intrusive element". Objectors added: "The design would be unsympathetic and harmful to the appearance and character of the village." They also felt the design and scale of the annexe would be "out of keeping" with the main dwelling and surrounding properties. Concerns that the annexe "should not be sold separately to the main dwelling" and that "second homes and holiday lets are a big issue in Moelfre," had also been noted. Cllr Euryn Morris read out Cllr Murley-Roberts' comments, on behalf of the community council. He also spoke for himself, and Cllr Ieuan Williams. Among comments raised, it was felt the annexe would "change the image of the village". He said the Old Crown Building was "an iconic building" which featured on postcards and pictures and they were "ignoring the importance of historical buildings" which "could have a detrimental effect on the area". The impact on neighbours was also highlighted, and the effect of a concrete lorry accessing the property, via a "horse and cart" road. There was also a query over the need for an annexe. "The last thing Moelfre needs is more holiday lets," he said. The planning officer said permission existed already for an annexe and the principal of development had been "safeguarded". It was smaller than what was already permitted, and the plan was considered an "improvement," of modern build, with "smart windows". He agreed it was "a picturesque area" and important to protect, but reiterated planning permission already existed. Lon Pwdwr was narrow, but no issues were raised by highways, and until the council adopted Article 4, its potential future use as holiday accommodation was not material to the application. An Article 4 Direction is a planning tool which can remove or restrict permitted development rights on houses. It has recently been adopted by Cyngor Gwynedd, to control the use of houses as second homes and holiday lets. Councillor Robin Williams noted that Cllr Murley-Roberts had called the matter in after community council concerns, but queried why there was no response received. He urged all community councils to raise issues if they had them. Describing the plan as "the lesser of two evils" he added: "I can't see any reason to refuse this, due to the existing planning permission from 2013." He added that he "respected" comments raised. "Without the fall back situation of the permission, it would be different," he added. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Wales Online
5 days ago
- Wales Online
Council defends controversial Cosmeston Lake water park ahead of opening
Council defends controversial Cosmeston Lake water park ahead of opening The decision was made to bring visitors to the popular country park this summer but some have branded the plans a 'disgrace' The Vale of Glamorgan Council will open an inflatable Aqua Park at Cosmeston Lake this summer (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) A Welsh council has defended its decision to turn a popular scenic lake into an Aqua Park this summer. The Vale of Glamorgan Council will open an inflatable Aqua Park at Cosmeston Lake but some have branded the decision "an absolute disgrace" and raised wildlife and public safety concerns. The council said an eight-week trial period of the outdoor water park would commence from Saturday, July 5 when the eastern lake at Cosmeston Country Park in Penarth will be filled with the inflatable assault course that was once at Cardiff Bay. In an attempt to "clear a few things up" after questions from the community the council has released a statement addressing the worries and the reasons behind its decision. Saying it faced a "challenging financial position" the council said the decision was financially driven as well as wanting to increase visitor numbers. It said: "We want more people to come to Cosmeston. We think offering new activities at the park will encourage people to do so. We hope families will come for the first time to try it out and then stay to enjoy everything else the park has to offer. Article continues below "The attraction will also generate income for the council that we can use to support the country park. We have spoken many times about the challenging financial position we are in and finding new ways to help meet the cost of delivering services is one of the ways we can address this." One major concern that was raised was the impact that the new aqua park would have on the wildlife, especially for birds that are permanent residents at the lake. The council confirmed an ecological assessment undertaken by an independent local firm and Natural Resources Wales determined that the water park "will have no significant negative impact on local birdlife or water vole populations." The eastern lake at the country park has been used for other water activities for years including canoeing, paddle boarding and boating. Whilst it is unsafe for people to swim unsupervised, there will be lifeguards on duty when the park is open. Questions have arisen regarding the water quality of the lake and whether it is safe for people to swim. In response the Vale of Glamorgan Council wrote: "We have worked with a number of partner agencies to ensure that the lake is safe for Aqua Park visitors to enjoy, including a detailed programme of water testing work. "The testing has shown no issues with the quality of the water and it will continue to be monitored throughout the trial period." After the eight-week trial at the end of summer the Aqua Park will be removed and a review of the success of the feature's success. The review will also "take into account how smoothly it has operated, the number of people it has brought to the park, and the views of those who visit Cosmeston," the council added. Article continues below
