Florida Gov. DeSantis signs execution order for man who raped and murdered Orlando woman in 1994
Continuing to accelerate the pace of executions in Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Friday signed a death warrant for a man convicted in the 1994 rape and murder of a woman in downtown Orlando.
The warrant was issued for Thomas Gudinas, 51, who is scheduled to be executed on June 24. If carried out, it would mark the seventh execution by lethal injection in Florida this year. Five inmates have already been put to death, and a sixth, Anthony Wainwright, is scheduled for execution on June 10.
Orlando woman raped and murdered after night out in 1994
Gudinas was convicted of murdering Michelle McGrath in May 1994. McGrath had been out for a night of entertainment and was last seen alive around 2:45 a.m. in the courtyard of a downtown Orlando nightclub. Authorities believe she was attacked while walking to her car in a nearby parking lot, according to a 1995 sentencing order.
Her body was discovered around 7:30 a.m. in an alley. She had been "savagely raped and severely beaten by the defendant with a blunt instrument," then-Circuit Judge Belvin Perry Jr. wrote in the sentencing order, which was posted Friday on the Florida Supreme Court website along with the death warrant and other related documents.
"The evidence quite clearly establishes that (the victim) did not meet a swift, merciful and painless death," Perry wrote. "The defendant on that night showed a disposition to be violently destructive without scruples or restraint. (The victim) was beaten and taken into an alleyway where she spent her last minutes on this earth. Not only was she beaten in this alleyway, but the defendant barbarically raped her."
Gudinas was sentenced to death in June 1995, after the trial was moved to Collier County.
DeSantis continues to ramp up Florida executions in 2025
As with other death warrants DeSantis has signed this year, Friday's action came without public comment from the governor's office.
Florida has significantly ramped up executions under DeSantis. In 2023, six inmates were executed. Only one was put to death in 2024 prior to this year's surge.
The state's record for executions in a single year is eight, set in both 1984 and 2014, according to the Florida Department of Corrections.
Florida's recent executions under Gov. DeSantis
This year, Florida has executed:
James Ford on Feb. 13
Edward James on March 20
Michael Tanzi on April 8
Jeffrey Hutchinson on May 1
Glen Rogers on May 15
Another execution scheduled: Anthony Wainwright case
Wainwright, whose execution is scheduled for June 10, was convicted of kidnapping a woman from a Winn-Dixie parking lot in Lake City in 1994, then raping and murdering her in rural Hamilton County.
His attorneys have filed motions with the Florida Supreme Court seeking to halt the execution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
29 minutes ago
- CBS News
Yolo County man speaks following rape conviction reversal, embraces freedom after 16 years in prison
Yolo County man speaks publicly for the first time since nearly 400-year sentence was vacated Yolo County man speaks publicly for the first time since nearly 400-year sentence was vacated Yolo County man speaks publicly for the first time since nearly 400-year sentence was vacated YOLO COUNTY -- A former Davis man was freed from state prison more than one month ago, after a Yolo County judge ruled his rape conviction should be overturned and his nearly 400-year sentence vacated based on new evidence and testimony presented in habeas hearings. Ajay Dev (right) moments after his release from custody May 23, 2025 Ajay Dev Ajay Dev, 58, has spent the past 16 years in prison for a crime he says he did not commit. Dev was convicted of repeatedly raping his adopted daughter back in 2009. The alleged victim maintains her allegations are truthful, but Judge Janene Beronio found the evidence was insubstantial and that there were significant flaws in Dev's original trial. "Based on my review of this entire case, I believe that, in fact, Mr. Dev could be innocent of these charges," Bernoio ruled on May 16. He was released from Mule Creek State Prison on his own recognizance and walked free from custody one week later, on May 23. Dev sat down for his first on-camera interview exclusively with CBS Sacramento. "Sixteen years ago today was one of the worst days of my life when I was falsely convicted and wrongfully imprisoned," Dev said. "This happened to me, but it does not define me." Dev considers this a second chance at life, now navigating a new world outside prison walls. "I just want to have a normal life. I did not commit this crime and I am innocent, 100 percent," Dev said. He describes listening to the judge's ruling from inside prison walls, when he learned his nearly four life sentences were vacated. Ajay Dev pictured with his two sons, now 15 and 17 years old Ajay Dev "I cried and I could hear on the audio people gasping in tears," said Dev. "I just held one of my friends. Held him, saying, 'Looks like I'm going home.' He started crying and prayed with me. As we were praying, other inmates circled and prayed with me. I think they knew that I was innocent." Dev walked out of custody and into the arms of his family. His two sons are now 15 and 17. The oldest was just a baby and the youngest not yet born at the time of his conviction. "One of the biggest losses for me out of this whole incarceration was the loss of fatherhood," Dev said. "Nothing comes close to that. It's even worse than being falsely accused of something. Traumatic as it is, no father wants to be denied their children. And that was hard." Dev got to spend his very first Father's Day celebrating with his two sons outside of prison walls this year. Dev says he did not even get to hold his youngest son in his arms until he was 8 years old due to contact restrictions at the prison. "While I was doing time, I feel like they were also doing time with me. It's not easy, and for their mother to raise two children on her own, it's been hard on her," said Dev of his wife of 20 years and one of his biggest supporters, Peggy Dev. In 2017, the couple amicably divorced. In his darkest days, he says he leaned on family and community support while working to keep his mind occupied. The former engineer for the California Department of Water Resources turned to teaching math to fellow inmates. He also spent his time studying his own legal case. "And I kid you not, I must have spent more time on my legal works than my combined bachelor and master's degrees in engineering prior to my conviction. Because I was fighting for my life," Dev said. He also had to learn to forgive as the emotional toll was heavy. "It was unbearable. Moments where I would just stare at the wall, looking at my two kids' picture, praying. There were days I'd pull the covers over my head so my cellmate would not see my in those weak times where I'd cry," said Dev. "I even thought about committing suicide, to be honest. This hatred just consumed my soul. I knew this wasn't helping me. I started to really pray and start to forgive those people who have betrayed me. I think that gave me some strength." Ajay Dev (right) and his defense attorney Jennifer Mouzis (left) Ajay Dev In the end, he says he owes his freedom to his faithful attorney and now lifelong friend Jennifer Mouzis. "To put it in one sentence, she saved my life. She did save my life," Dev said. Mouzis has been working on the case for five years of habeas hearings and says there was no actual evidence that a crime ever occurred. "There was a lot of indication it didn't happen and not a lot of evidence it did happen. When I looked at it, I saw more and more cracks in the armor. If you stripped away some of the stereotypes used to gain a conviction, some of the implicit bias incorporated into the trial about Nepali culture and people from Nepal, if you strip that away, there really wasn't evidence it occurred," Mouzis told CBS13 in May. Dev says the dark cloud hanging over him for nearly two decades has finally cleared. Still, he is not yet out of the woods. The Yolo County district attorney's office could choose to dismiss or retry Dev's case. In a June 13 hearing, the decision was continued in court to July 10. "In the interest of justice, I hope the district attorney reviews the case every carefully and reaches a sound decision, and that is to drop the case in its entirety. If not, I am confident that we will prevail in the end," Dev said. The DA's office told CBS13 in a statement, "The People are prepared to retry the matter when the defense is ready to set the matter for trial."
CNN
38 minutes ago
- CNN
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Trump legal cases Immigration Student lifeFacebookTweetLink Follow Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
