US Supreme Court backs parents opting children out of LGBTQ-themed books
The justices were reviewing an appeal brought by Christian and Muslim parents against a Maryland public school district that, in 2022, introduced books aimed at combating prejudice and discussing gender identity into kindergarten and elementary school curricula.
The court found that the parents were likely to succeed in their claim that denying them the ability to withdraw their children from such instruction "unconstitutionally burdens" their right to exercise their religion.
"For many people of faith, there are few religious acts more important than the religious education of their children," wrote Justice Samuel Alito in the majority opinion.
He added that the books in question "are designed to present certain values and beliefs as things to be celebrated, and certain contrary values and beliefs as things to be rejected," citing the normalization and celebration of same-sex marriage as one such example.
In the dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor -- joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson -- argued that public schools "offer to children of all faiths and backgrounds an education and an opportunity to practice living in our multicultural society."
"That experience is critical to our Nation's civic vitality. Yet it will become a mere memory if children must be insulated from exposure to ideas and concepts that may conflict with their parents' religious beliefs," she warned.
President Donald Trump has taken aim at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives across the federal government, with particular focus on transgender issues.
His Justice Department backed the parents in the case, calling the school district's policy "textbook interference with the free exercise of religion."
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
'Shooting the messengers': Trump tears into media over Iran report
Trump has staked significant political capital on the success of last weekend's strikes, which he ordered despite criticism within his own support base for breaking his campaign promises to avoid foreign military interventions. The president has blasted press coverage of a preliminary classified report from his own administration that suggested that Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were "obliterated" was overstated. The unusually scathing attack on reporters underscores what many observers view as Trump's effort to put the media -- already battling record low public trust -- on the defensive and stifle scrutiny of the bombing raid. "Having made the decision to join the fight against Iran, being able to claim that the intervention was brief and successful has obvious political upside for Trump in repairing rifts within his coalition," Joshua Tucker, co-director of the New York University Center for Social Media and Politics, told AFP. "The discussion by the media of the preliminary intelligence report therefore complicated the president's preferred narrative about the US attack." The preliminary intelligence assessment, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, then picked up by other mainstream media, suggested that the strikes may not have destroyed the core parts of the nuclear sites and had set back Iran's nuclear program by only a few months. Trump said CNN should throw the reporter on the story out "like a dog." He said CNN and New York Times reporters were "bad and sick people" attempting to demean American pilots involved in the strikes. At a televised news conference on Thursday, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth reiterated the president's complaints and pushed back on the findings of the report -- issued by the US Defense Intelligence Agency –- but did not deny its existence. 'Increasingly ugly' Both news outlets have stood behind their journalists and defended their reporting. "President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way," said CNN's top political anchor Jake Tapper. "They're calling journalists 'fake news' for true stories," he added. Trump has also threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN over their coverage of the intelligence report. In a letter, the president's personal lawyer said the New York Times had damaged Trump's reputation and demanded that it "retract and apologize" for its report, calling it "false," "defamatory" and "unpatriotic," according to the newspaper. The newspaper said it had rejected those demands. "Trump is killing the messenger," Todd Belt, director of the political management program at George Washington University, told AFP. "He's taking it out on the press because he knows that the press are unpopular," particularly among his core Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, he said. "Additionally, he and others in the administration are using the attack line of patriotism to bolster their side against the press." 'Peace through strength' The anti-media rhetoric escalates Trump's longstanding battle with the press. Since the beginning of his second term, his administration has sought to target the finances of media organizations -- already struggling in an increasingly tough commercial climate -- by cutting government agencies' news subscriptions. He has also targeted news outlets with multi-million dollar lawsuits. Trump's latest attacks come amid a public relations campaign to portray himself as a peacemaker in the Middle East, while retaining the support of his core MAGA base. On Friday, Trump doubled down on his stance, stating that Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei "got beat to hell" in the hostilities involving the United States and Israel, while exhorting Tehran to return to the negotiating table. "If his 'peace through strength' single attack didn't work and the conflict gets drawn out, this undermines his claim as a peacemaker," said Belt. "If the public believes the single strike didn't work, then he will either have to attack again or negotiate from a position that recognizes that Iran still maintains fissile material, which may not work."
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
French senator accused of spiking fellow MP's drink sent for trial
A French senator accused of having drugged a fellow member of Parliament with the intention of sexually assaulting her has been sent for trial, Agence France-Presse (AFP) learnt on Friday, June 27, from a source close to the case Two investigating magistrates sent Senator Joël Guerriau for trial for the alleged November 2023 incident, said the source, confirming a report by France 2's Complement d'enquete, an investigative television program. The judges' report, seen by AFP, says Guerriau, 67, is suspected of having spiked a glass of champagne with ecstasy that his colleague Sandrine Josso, now 49, was drinking. His intention, they alleged, was to rape or sexually assault her. Guerriau will also be tried for possession of drugs. "Joël Guerriau contests the allegations against him," said his lawyers, Henri Carpentier and Marie Roumiantseva. The truth will come in court, "far from the caricatures and rumors put about until now," they added. "Mr Guerriau does not fear the truth: He desires it." Josso's lawyer, Arnaud Godefroy, said she was relieved at the decision, "which reflects the seriousness of her complaint." On November 14, 2023, Josso, who's with the centrist MoDem party, went to the Paris home of her "political friend" – as she described him during the investigation before the judges – who was celebrating his re-election. The only guest, she left with 388 ng/ml of ecstasy in her blood, according to toxicology tests seen by AFP. This was a dose "close to double" the recreational amount, the prosecutor's office said. The tests also showed no traces of drugs in her system during the seven months prior to that evening. The judges write that although "no intimate or sexual acts were reported" during the evening, Guerriau's actions, as described by the complainant, were "consistent with those of a person with sexual intent." The Horizons party, led by former prime minister Edouard Philippe, suspended Guerriau in November 2023. Guerriau has denied any intention to sexually assault the lawmaker and has rejected the accusation that he deliberately drugged her, describing it as a "handling error."
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Teachers pay dispute shuts schools for months in Nigerian capital
Affecting more than 400 schools in Abuja, the prolonged closure has left over 50,000 pupils without lessons, according to the teachers' union, in a country where more than 20 million children are already out of school. The Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) in the capital says it will not call off its strike until the 70,000 naira ($45) national minimum wage is implemented and outstanding salaries and entitlements are settled. President Bola Tinubu signed the new wage into law in July 2024, more than doubling the west African country's previous minimum wage of 30,000 naira. The move was meant to soften the effects of rampant inflation that has followed the government's economic reforms over the past two years. Yet implementation has lagged nationwide as local governments have been left to institute the wage hikes. "We went on two warning strikes and we are currently on the third," union leader Abdullahi Mohammed Shafas told AFP. "Despite arguments and promises, the government has not been able to fulfil any till now." Critics have blamed Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, which includes Abuja, for the impasse. Wike says he has approved the new wages, accusing the local government councils of failing to pay. 'Sitting at home' Elisha Goni, a teacher at a public elementary school in Abuja's Garki neighbourhood, said he hardly scrapes by on his 120,000 naira salary -- which would also be bumped up if the new minimum wage is applied. "I can barely cater for myself, not to talk of my family, from the little I am earning," said Goni who lives 50 kilometres (30 miles) from his workplace to evade the expensive rent in the city centre. "Teachers cannot be lecturing on empty stomachs." At a Local Education Authority (LEA) primary school, the gate creaks in the wind as an AFP reporter entered while a security guard dozed off in his wooden chair -- his new routine since the classrooms went quiet early this year. "I used to be busy controlling students from roaming around the gate, helping teachers, watching the kids," the 54-year-old, who gave his name as Abdu, said. "Now, I just sleep after breakfast till lunch. There is nothing else to do." For many pupils, the disruption means more than boredom. Blessing, 10, should have been preparing for her final exam to enter junior secondary school. But instead she sat under the scorching sun, scooping ground chillies into small plastic bags at her mother's roadside milling shop. Her mother Mary, who only gave her first name, said she was considering enrolling Blessing in a nearby private school, "even though it is poorly rated". "At least she won't just be sitting at home," Mary muttered, her eyes fixed on the busy roadside. Nigerian television footage has shown small protests by placard-waving pupils in uniform, chanting that they want to return to school. One of the placards read: "You call us leaders of tomorrow while stopping our school for nine weeks." The strike comes as a further blow to an already creaky education system that sees millions of children fail to attend regularly, while adults contend with Nigeria's worst cost-of-living crisis in a generation.
