Taoiseach warns against forgetting Gaza as Israel-Iran conflict intensifies
Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
has warned that
Gaza
could be forgotten as international focus moves to the war between
Iran and Israel
.
Mr Martin said the diplomatic process relating to
Iran
's nuclear programme should have been allowed to play itself out but what was required now, he said, 'is a complete de-escalation, an ending of the war and also we cannot forget Gaza'.
'There's a huge danger that Gaza will be sidelined and marginalised in terms of the international profile. The continuing loss of life in Gaza is appalling. The number of children facing malnutrition and death from malnutrition is simply unconscionable and the international community needs to maintain its focus on ending the war in Gaza, allowing for a huge surge in humanitarian aid in, the release of all hostages and the commencement of the reconstruction of Gaza and the peace process there.
Mr Martin said that he would tell
European Union
leaders at the summit this week in Brussels that the EU's trade agreement with
Israel
should be suspended, though he accepted that this would require unanimity among EU members.
READ MORE
However, he said Ireland would be looking for 'actions in the context of that agreement ... elements of its could be suspended'.
'But it certainly isn't acceptable that the human rights clauses of that agreement would be so clearly broken. International humanitarian law has been breached by Israel in the conduct of its war in Gaza ... There should be consequences.'
Mr Martin said 'dialogue and diplomacy in relation to the nuclear issue in Iran' would have been preferable but he avoided saying directly that the US had broken international law.
'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite some time. It even got involved in Ukraine war by providing drones and so forth. But in particular its support of
Hamas
, Hizbullah, the Houthis, its declaration, its position of destroying Israel, makes for a very complex scenario in the Middle East,' he said.
Speaking in Brussels, where he was attending a meeting of EU foreign ministers, Tánaiste
Simon Harris
said that while Ireland continued to support a full suspension of the EU-Israel deal, there was a lack of necessary consensus within the EU for such a move.
The EU's response to what was happening in Gaza had been much too slow and 'far too many people have been left to die as genocide has been carried out,' Mr Harris said.
The credibility of the EU was on the line, to make clear that human rights clauses in deals the union signed with other countries were not 'discretionary' and had to be respected, he said.
Domestically Mr Harris said an initial draft of legislation to ban trade coming from Israeli settlements in illegally occupied Palestinian territories would be brought to Cabinet on Tuesday.
The
Occupied Territories Bill
would propose banning the trade of goods, but Mr Harris said he remained 'open' to the legislation being expanded to also ban the trade of services. 'We need to have legal clarity as to whether that's possible or not, I've asked the Attorney General in relation to that,' he said.
The recent EU review noted international agencies had documented Israel bombing hospitals and destroying vital civilian infrastructure, as well as blocking the entry of all aid into Gaza, which left people in the Palestinian enclave facing starvation.
Israel fiercely denounced the EU review, calling it 'outrageous and indecent' and accused the EU of accepting biased evidence and refusing to give Israel a chance to respond.
EU views are hardening against Israel, with the Spanish government also calling for the trade agreement to be suspended, but there is far from agreement on the issue.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
37 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
NATO summit seeks to keep Trump happy
NATO leaders will seek to lock in US President Donald Trump's commitment to their alliance with a summit pledge to boost defence spending, as they gather in The Hague with global tensions soaring over Iran. The overriding focus of the gathering - which kicks off with dinner hosted by the Dutch king - has been on keeping Mr Trump happy after his return to power sparked fears he could blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. From meeting his spending demand to limiting the participation of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky, everything is being done to try to avoid the chances of a damaging confrontation with the volatile leader. But despite the careful planning the meeting still risks being overshadowed by the fallout from Mr Trump's decision to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. Central to the effort to keep Mr Trump on board - given his threat not to protect lower-spending NATO allies - will be a pledge to satisfy his insistence that members cough up 5% of their GDP on defence. To give him a headline victory, NATO's 32 countries have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5% to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5% to broader security-related areas like cybersecurity and infrastructure. "This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic and fundamental to securing our future," said NATO chief Mark Rutte, who warns the alliance must be ready to confront the threat of a Russian attack within five years. Deep divisions "We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said yesterday in announcing the UK's commitment to meet NATO's spending target. In a joint Financial Times op-ed on the summit's eve, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz likewise argued that Europe must rearm "not because someone asks us to, but because we are clear-eyed and owe it to our citizens to do so". In the run-up to the meeting, Spain had sparked fears of undermining the alliance's carefully choreographed unity by refusing to commit to the headline figure of 5%. But Mr Rutte stressed Spain had not been granted an "opt-out" from the pledge. "The summit will be historic," US NATO ambassador Matthew Whitaker said. "This summit is really about NATO's credibility and we are urging all of our allies to step up to the plate and pay their fair share for transatlantic security." But while the promise of more spending looks like it could win Mr Trump over, deep divisions remain over the approach to Europe's key security issue: Russia's war in Ukraine. Since storming back to power Mr Trump has upended the West's approach to the three-year conflict by turning his back on Kyiv and opening the door to closer ties with Moscow. Zelensky downgraded Mr Zelensky, who had an infamous Oval Office bust-up with Mr Trump, has been downgraded from the central role he played at recent NATO gatherings. This time he is set to attend the king's dinner, meet EU leaders and attend an industry forum - but he will not hold formal talks with the alliance's 32 leaders. Mr Rutte said the summit would still send the message that support for Kyiv was "unwavering and will persist". The French and German leaders, in a message aimed at Mr Trump, said they would jointly press for a ceasefire in Ukraine and ramped-up pressure on Russia "including through sanctions" while in The Hague. But despite Mr Rutte's insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains "irreversible", the alliance will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Mr Trump ruled it out. Allies have also had to push hard just to get Washington to name Moscow as a "threat" in a summit declaration set to be released when NATO leaders hold their main session tomorrow. The push to make sure the United States remains on the same page comes as Washington is weighing whether to pull forces from Europe as it focuses more on the threat from China. The Pentagon is set to announce the results of a review of its global deployments later in the year - but diplomats at NATO say they don't expect Mr Trump to make any announcements in The Netherlands.


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Oil slumps as Iran-Israel ceasefire goes into effect
Oil prices fell sharply to their lowest in more than a week today as US President Donald Trump said a ceasefire has been agreed between Iran and Israel, alleviating worries of supply disruptions in the Middle East - a major oil-producing region. Brent crude futures were down $2.08, or 2.9%, at $69.40 a barrel around 0330 GMT, after earlier tumbling more than 4% and touching its lowest level since June 11. US West Texas Intermediate crude declined $2.03, or 3.0%, to $66.48 per barrel, having dived 6% to its weakest level since June 9 earlier in the session. Mr Trump announced yesterday that Israel and Iran have fully agreed to a ceasefire, adding that Iran will begin the ceasefire immediately, followed by Israel after 12 hours. If both sides maintain peace, the war will officially end after 24 hours, concluding a 12-day conflict. "If the ceasefire is followed as announced, investors might expect the return to normalcy in oil," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. "Moving forward, the extent to which Israel and Iran adhere to the recently announced ceasefire conditions will play a significant role in determining oil prices," Sachdeva said. Mr Trump said that a "complete and total" ceasefire will go into force with a view to ending the conflict between the two nations. "With the ceasefire news we are now seeing a continuation of the risk premium built into crude oil price last week all but evaporate," said Tony Sycamore, analyst at IG. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer, and the easing of tensions would allow it to export more oil and prevent supply disruptions, a major factor in oil prices jumping in recent days. Both the oil contracts settled over 7% lower in the previous session after rallying to five-month-highs after the US attacked Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend, stoking fears of a broadening in the Israel-Iran conflict. The direct US involvement in the war had also focused investor squarely on the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow and vital waterway between Iran and Oman in the Mideast Gulf through which between 18 and 19 million barrels per day of crude oil and fuels flow, nearly a fifth of the world's consumption. Concerns were growing that any disruption to maritime activity through the strait would catapult prices, possibly into three-digit territory. For now, however, traders were catching their breath from the recent oil price spike. "Technically, the overnight sell-off reinforces a layer of resistance between approximately $78.40 (October 2024 and June 2025 highs) and $80.77 (the year-to-date high), and it's clear that it will take something extremely unexpected and detrimental to supply for crude oil to break through this layer of resistance," Sycamore added.


Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
Taoiseach: I don't approve of ‘excessive' US visa vetting
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said that he doesn't agree with 'excessive' social media vetting announced by the US Embassy in Dublin as a requirement for Irish students seeking J1 visas to travel and work in the US. Applicants will be asked to list all their social media profiles going back five years and to make their accounts publicly accessible or their visa could be rejected, the embassy said in a statement yesterday. It also announced that the measures were aimed to identify applicants who pose a threat to American national security and that a US visa 'is a privilege, not a right'. The announcement was criticised by the Taoiseach as well as student groups. Micheál Martin. Pic: Michael Chester Mr Martin said: 'I believe those measures by the United States are excessive. I don't approve of them. I don't agree with them. 'One of the great things in the world, in the modern world, has been the capacity for young people to travel and mobility is important.' 'There is an issue around freedom of speech, but it's more the atmosphere that's created by these measures, the fear and the anxiety that young people will now experience travelling.' The changes also apply for other exchange visitor applicants in the F and M non-immigrant classifications. The F visa allows people to enter the US as a full-time student, while the M visa is a US student visa for vocational and non-academic programmes. The US Embassy said appointments for J1 applications will resume soon after they were paused at the end of May. Pic: Shutterstock The president of the University of Galway's student union, Faye Ní Dhomhnaill, called the announcement 'disappointing' and said she's certain J1 applications will fall as a result. She added: 'Most people who would have considered going to America will probably end up inter-railing instead. Already I've seen people that were on the fence about a J1 this year just decide that it wasn't worth the hassle, so they would instead go to Europe. It's incredibly disappointing that this is supposed to be 'the land of the free', and champions of free speech. 'Five years of your social media history is a long time, especially for young people going on J1s, you could be 20. Five years ago you were 15. I wasn't the smartest person in the world at 15.' Aontas na Mac Léinn in Éirinn, the representative group for student unions in Ireland, voiced concern over what it called a 'significant and disproportionate intrusion into students' personal lives'. Tánaiste Simon Harris also said he was 'very concerned' by the updated advice.