City Council awards $2.5M bid for replacement of 3 pedestrian bridges in Jamestown
May 6—JAMESTOWN — The Jamestown City Council unanimously approved on Monday, May 5, awarding a bid for more than $2.5 million to Industrial Builders Inc. to replace three pedestrian bridges in Jamestown.
The city of Jamestown's share is just over $490,000. Federal funds obligated for the project won't exceed about 81% of the total eligible project cost.
Mayor Dwaine Heinrich said there will be a citywide special assessment to pay for the local share.
The three pedestrian bridges that will be replaced are at Klaus, McElroy and Nickeus parks. Plans call for replacing the bridges with wider structures for easier maintenance and better access.
The bridges in Nickeus and Klaus parks were built in 1909 and 1908, respectively. The bridge at McElroy Park was built sometime after 1957.
"This is something that needs to be taken care of," said David Steele, city councilman.
The pedestrian bridge project is a collaboration between the city of Jamestown and the Jamestown Parks and Recreation District.
City Engineer Travis Dillman said the estimated cost for the project was about $3.75 million in 2023 with the local share being about $1.2 million. The local share has grown to about $1.5 million. He did not say what the total estimated cost has increased to.
Dillman said the project went through a North Dakota Department of Transportation process and included an archaeological study among others.
He said the Jamestown Parks and Recreation Commission will need to approve the bid from Industrial Builders as well at its next meeting on Monday, May 12.
The City Council unanimously approved awarding a bid for about $2.5 million to Scherbenske Inc. for a portion of the 2025 water main replacement project.
Dillman said this portion of the project includes replacing the water main at Business Loop West. He said the project needs to get completed before Business Loop West is reconstructed in 2027.
In related business, the City Council unanimously approved awarding a bid for about $1.2 million to Crow River Construction for a portion of the 2025 water main replacement project.
The awarding of the bids is contingent on approval from the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality.
The entire project includes replacing deteriorated water mains and associated infrastructure in the following areas:
* between the 1100 and 1300 blocks of 4th Avenue Southwest
* between the 400 block Southwest and 200 block Southeast of 10th Street/U.S. Highway 52
* between the 800 and 1000 blocks of 1st Avenue South
* 400 block of 7th Street Southwest
* between the 1100 and 1600 blocks of 4th Avenue Northwest
Dillman said a Department of Water Resources Pre-Commission meeting is scheduled for May 22 when additional funds for the water main replacement project could be approved. He said the city will receive a $1.2 million forgivable loan through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for the water main replacement project.
The City Council also unanimously approved a letter of intent to meet conditions set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture for a potential grant for a 96-inch storm water disaster project. In addition, the City Council approved a request for an obligation of funds from USDA Rural Development for the 96-inch storm water disaster project for up to $2.35 million in grant funds.
The water main replacement project began after stormwater runoff and flooding resulted in the failure of a 96-inch stormwater pipe located south of 25th Street Southwest and east of 8th Avenue Southwest.
The first phase included replacing the stormwater pipe near Applebee's. The second phase included replacing the water main from 25th Street Southwest to the parking lot where Perkins Restaurant & Bakery was formerly located. The final phase includes replacing the 96-inch storm sewer from U.S. Highway 281 to Interstate 94, Heinrich said.
Heinrich said the total cost of the water main replacement project is about $9 million.
"We really owe the people up at Interstate Engineering that were on top of some of these grants really a big thank you because they really zeroed in on a couple of things and had the relationship with some people and the knowledge of how to fill out these grant requests to be able to get this," he said. "This $9 million project is going to be completed without using any local money. ... It's going to be paid for with money from the State Water Commission, the USDA and the use of Prairie Dog funds."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
East Grand Forks considers first increase in trash fees since 2015
Jun. 10—EAST GRAND FORKS — The East Grand Forks City Council on Tuesday considered the first increases to residential trash fees in more than a decade. The need to increase the fees is quite pressing, East Grand Forks Public Works Director Jason Stordahl told the council during Tuesday's work session, as the city's refuse fund is nearing unsustainable low levels. "City Council has kept rates for services very low in the last few years," Stordahl said. "The reason that we're bringing this before you tonight is that our refuse enterprise (fund) balance is shrinking and we need to raise the rates." The last rate increase was in 2015. Since then, landfill fees have increased by 22% and fees for refuse and recycling have increased by 61%. Raising the rates would eventually close the gap between what the city is charged and what the city charges residents for trash collection. Currently, a 35-gallon container with recycling services costs a resident $13. The city is charged $15.45 for that from Countrywide Sanitation, the company with which the city contracts for residential curbside pickup. Per the contract City Council agreed to last year, that rate will increase to $16.07 on July 1 and 4% each year after. That $2.45 gap is covered from the reserve balance in the refuse enterprise fund. After doing this for a decade, the fund has been depleted. To bring the fees back up to what it actually costs to pick up trash, Public Works has proposed incremental increases to the rates over the next year. Under the proposed structure, a 35-gallon container with recycling services would increase to $16.33 in July, $19.67 in January 2026, and finally to $23 in July 2026. At that point, the fees would then be reviewed on an annual basis. "It's going to take a while (to build up reserves again)," Mayor Mark Olstad said. "That's something we have to be cognizant of, trying to make sure that by statutory reasons, we get that backup." Public Works also will be bringing forward a review of commercial rates in the near future. Unlike residential services, the city collects the trash from commercial buildings and doesn't contract that service out. Potentially having the city also go into residential collection is something to consider as a potential cost savings, City Council member Don Casmey said. Additionally, revamping how Greensite fees work is being discussed. Rather than having a separate, additional fee, it's being proposed that everyone is charged a fee. That would also mean that all residents could use the site instead of only those who pay a fee to use it. Often, access to the site is broken or troublesome with "never-ending" issues for Public Works and actually policing who is and is not using the site is difficult under the current system. In other news, the council: * Received updates about the Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan. Public comment on a final draft of the plan will open June 16 and both the Grand Forks City Council and East Grand Forks City Council are proposing to have a joint meeting in July to provide comment as a group. * Discussed authorizing the creation of designs for the renovation of Fire Station No. 2. Located at 243 Fifth Ave. SE in the South Point area, the last renovations occurred to repair damage after the Flood of 1997, but it hasn't seen any other work since it was built in 1977. Structurally, the building is fine, but the mechanicals are reaching end of life and it has accessibility issues . Council President Brian Larson said staff should also look into material remediation to see if there's asbestos in the building. * Reviewed plans to drill soil borings near the Point Bridge in preparation for a rehabilitation project. An in-depth study of issues with settling and sliding has not been done in some time, City Engineer Steve Emery said, and doing these borings will allow the city to figure out the best way to eliminate the dip the road takes.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Councilor wants paid parking at Willard Beach for non-residents
Jun. 10—The city of South Portland is considering charging people from out of town to park at Willard Beach as early as next summer. On Thursday, Councilor Natalie West will request that the City Council set up a workshop to discuss the potential parking change. This is a preliminary step, and at least two other councilors must support this workshop for it to move forward. In her request, West argued that the city needs to identify a revenue source to maintain Willard Beach, and that it is appropriate that non-residents contribute to covering these costs. She recommended converting the Willard Beach parking lot, which has approximately 60 parking spaces, and the Willard Hose parcel, which could potentially fit 75 parking spaces, into paid parking lots for non-residents. She also proposed the creation of a seven-person subcommittee with two councilors and members from the Conservation, Economic Development and the Bike-Ped committees to look into the practicalities of instituting paid parking for non-residents. The Willard Beach Master Plan, a comprehensive document that was approved by the City Council in 2023, first recommended the idea of paid parking for non-residents. This document presented a number of considerations for the implementation of paid parking: the need for additional staff, the purchase of residential stickers, the installation of a digital parking machine and the bounds for which the paid parking should extend within the neighborhood. Approval of the master plan stipulated that if the city wanted to move forward with any of the suggestions, they would need to bring it forth in the workshopping process. If approved on Thursday, that process would begin. Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYC mayoral candidates answer questions on taxes, affordability, spending
The Brief The Citizens Budget Commission sent out a questionnaire to the New York City mayoral candidates. Nine of the candidates responded, answering questions regarding government efficiency, taxes and other topics. NEW YORK CITY - The Citizens Budget Commission's (CBC) new questionnaire sheds some light on the potential future spending habits of New York City's mayoral candidates. All answers provided by the candidates were taken from their responses to the CBC's 2025 New York City Mayoral Candidate Questionnaire. What we know SKIP TO: Services and operations | Education | Attracting residents and businesses | Taxes Twelve candidates were sent the questionnaire – only New York City Mayor Eric Adams, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Senator Zellnor Myrie did not submit responses. The other candidates are as follows: Former Assemblymember Michael Blake Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo New York City Comptroller Brad Lander Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani Senator Jessica Ramos (who just recently endorsed Cuomo) Curtis Sliwa Former New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer Whitney Tilson Jim Walden A more comprehensive look at each candidate can be found here. What they're saying Here are some of the subjects broached by the questionnaire. A majority of the candidates rated the efficiency of NYC's services and operations from fair to poor, with only Jim Walden rating the efficiency as "good" – Mamdani, Sliwa and Tilson were the three to rate the services and operations as "poor." In comparison, none of the candidates rates the quality of these services as "poor," with Stringer and Blake going so far as to label them "good" (the other candidates all settled on "fair"). "If you can't afford rent, find a good school or feel safe walking home, you're not staying in New York City." Senator Jessica Ramos The variation of answers was far greater when the candidates were asked which two major agencies offer significant opportunity to improve said efficiency. Blake and Ramos highlighted NYCHA (NYC Housing Authority) as one of their two chosen agencies; Blake, Mamdani and Sliwa pointed to education. While on the subject of education, only one candidate argued against the concept that increasing public school per-student spending would increase achievement: Curtis Sliwa. "Results come from better leadership, not blank checks." Tilson did not commit to a yes or no answer: "Higher per-pupil spending generally does not increase achievement, but I want to invest in certain areas, such as expanding 3-K and reading tutors in elementary schools, for struggling children." All seven other candidates agreed with the idea that an increase in per-student spending would lead to higher achievement rates. Every candidate who participated in the questionnaire agreed that public safety and housing affordability were the two most pressing issues regarding attracting new residents and businesses. "New Yorkers with children under the age of six are leaving the city at more than twice the rate of those without young children." Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani When asked to choose a third factor, the candidates began to diverge in perspective. Lander, Ramos, Stringer, Tilson and Walden concurred that the city's quality of education offered is an obstacle to attracting newcomers. Sliwa cited high taxes as his suspected issue, while Mamdani zeroed in on childcare, or more accurately, a lack of affordable childcare options. Cuomo and Blake settled on similar matters, with Blake attributing the issue to the cost of living overall, while Cuomo pointed to "quality of life write large" as the issue. All candidates involved said they would keep the city's sales tax as it is currently – answers diverged in regard to personal income taxes and property taxes. Ramos and Mamdani would increase the personal income tax of New Yorkers, while Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease them, with the other candidates saying they would keep them the same. Walden, Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease the property tax rate, while Blake would increase it – most other candidates would keep the rate as it is now, except for Ramos, who did not provide an answer. The Source This article includes information from a Citizens Budget Commission questionnaire.
