logo
Smoke detectors in the sky: Will wildfire affect bird behavior?

Smoke detectors in the sky: Will wildfire affect bird behavior?

As thick clouds of smoke rolled across Los Angeles in early January, Allison Shultz opened a freezer and took out a stash of pristine white pigeon feathers.
The ornithology curator at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County placed handfuls of feathers between two small screens and clipped them together with zip ties. She installed one of these homemade feather filters on the roof of the museum's Exposition Park building, a few more in its surrounding gardens, another in her Gardena backyard.
As smoke engulfed the city, valuable bits of evidence accumulated in the feathers' once-white barbs.
'It's really weird to be a scientist who studies wildfire smoke,' Shultz said. 'We don't want there to be big smoke events. But then, at the same time, we do want data to understand things.'
Now stored in sealed plastic bags, the sooty plumes will help answer questions about how chronic smoke exposure affects birds, and what exactly the animals were exposed to during L.A.'s firestorms.
It's part of a broader scientific effort to understand how a disaster of unprecedented scope will alter the region's varied ecosystems, many of which were already stressed by a changing climate.
'Most fire ecology is done pretty remotely from human habitation, so therefore we have a bias in what we know in terms of how birds and vegetation and nature respond in quote-unquote, 'natural areas,' ' said Morgan Tingley, a UCLA professor of ecology and evolutionary biology who is collaborating with Shultz on the study. 'We know much less about how those same processes happen when humans are very, very strongly influencing the environment.'
Their research team will soon extract the pollutants that accumulated on the pigeon feathers. A machine in the museum's mineralogy department called a Raman spectrometer will analyze the compounds, determining how much carbon on the feathers originated from burned organic matter like trees and shrubs and how much originated from combustion and other urban sources.
They'll look for other contaminants arising from the burning of homes and vehicles, like microplastics and heavy metals.
Shultz and her colleagues were in the process of developing these methods well before January's fires broke out. They anticipated studying birds' exposure to smoke during Southern California's typical wildfire season, which traditionally peaks August through October.
They didn't expect that the smoke in question would originate so close to home.
UCLA's Tingley lives about three miles from the Palisades fire's eastern flank. He took copious notes on his observations of bird behavior as the fire raged.
The yellow-rumped warbler is a migratory songbird that spends its winters in Los Angeles. For two days, Tingley recorded a constant stream of them flying in a pattern that looked like their springtime migration.
That was expected behavior for a highly mobile species, he said. We don't know yet how L.A.'s resident bird species — some of which spend their entire lives within the area of a single kilometer (less than a mile) — will cope with a conflagration in their midst.
At the Natural History Museum, Shultz is well-positioned to compare birds from this era to those exposed to pollutants past. The ornithology department houses floor-to-ceiling archives of carefully preserved bird specimens.
On a recent morning, Shultz opened a wooden tray to reveal rows of house finches, a palm-sized bird commonly found in Los Angeles.
From one specimen's spindly leg dangled a handwritten tag bearing the year of its death: 1917. Shultz gently lifted it from the tray.
'You see how this is black, and this is black,' she said, delicately pointing at the bird's soiled feathers with a gloved finger. More than a century later, fine particles of pollution still clung to its feathers, dulling what once was a scarlet red breast to a mottled gray.
'We've known that birds are very sensitive to smoke for a long time. Think about canaries in the coal mine, right?' Shultz said. Caged birds were used as living carbon monoxide detectors starting in the late nineteenth century — thanks to their highly efficient respiratory systems, the birds died from gas leaks long before human miners did.
But there is a lot we don't know about how cumulative pollution affects these animals, and what impacts a catastrophe like this year's fires will have. Does the carbon trapped in its barbs affect a bird's ability to regulate its own body temperature? Which pollutants stick, and which ones molt away? Many species take dust baths to clean themselves — what if that dust is full of contaminants too?
Found dead birds are often donated to the museum, and Shultz was braced for an influx of new specimens as the fires raged. They didn't come. Tingley also heard few reports of bird mortality.
It's possible that most species were able to escape the smoke or minimize their exposure by reducing their activity during its peak and 'it could be that we got lucky,' he said. 'But these are questions that we'll have to keep on trying to answer.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists-In-Training Speak Out To Protect Public Research
Scientists-In-Training Speak Out To Protect Public Research

Forbes

time12 hours ago

  • Forbes

Scientists-In-Training Speak Out To Protect Public Research

Erin Morrow, a native of Powder Springs, Georgia, was diagnosed at age 20 with a cardiac conduction disorder that left her at risk of sudden cardiac arrest. A pacemaker implant made her recovery possible and allowed her to pursue a future in science. Now a PhD student in cognitive neuroscience at UCLA, she studies how emotion and stress shape the structure of our memories. Her work could improve diagnosis and treatment for PTSD. But her path to research is also a personal one. She credits decades of publicly funded research with enabling the treatment that saved her life. Erin Morrow holds the printed version of her op-ed published in the Marietta Daily Journal. This week, Morrow is one of hundreds of early-career scientists publishing opinion pieces in their hometown newspapers as part of a national campaign known as the McClintock Letters Project. The goal isn't just to inform or persuade. It's to reconnect. 'I think it's important to recognize as scientists that we're first [humans] and scientists second,' Morrow said. Her op-ed, published in the Marietta Daily Journal in Georgia, where she grew up, recounts her experience undergoing surgery at a local hospital and explains how federally funded research made her treatment possible. Amid polarized debate and funding under threat, graduate students from more than 100 institutions are turning to a distinctly low-tech form of outreach: the letter to the editor. Their goal isn't just to save their grants—it's to explain, in human terms, why science matters, and why it needs the public's support. These young researchers, in the vanguard of American science, aren't lobbying Congress. They're writing to their neighbors. The McClintock Letters Project began with a simple idea: that scientists could reach people more meaningfully — not just as experts, but as fellow citizens invested in the same shared future — not through national platforms, but by writing to the communities they came from. The idea emerged earlier this year at Cornell University, where graduate students Isako Di Tomassi and Emma Scales, co-leaders of the Advancing Science and Policy (ASAP) Club, were looking for ways to mobilize students concerned with the increasing uncertainty in federal science funding. Di Tomassi and Scales wanted to elevate early-career scientists across disciplines in a way that would bring their work back to the communities they came from. They teamed up with graduate student groups from more than 20 institutions, with organizing support from a national Slack network of early-career researchers focused on science policy. The goal: to coordinate the publication of 1,000 op-eds in local newspapers across all 50 states, timed to the week of June 16, the birthday of Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock. What unites these pieces isn't just their timing or format. It's their method: personal storytelling. 'We wanted scientists to explain what they do, why it matters, and how it connects to the communities they come from,' said Di Tomassi. 'Not as an advocacy piece, but as a way to reconnect with the public.' Barbara McClintock was a pioneering 20th century geneticist. Working largely on her own and often facing skepticism, she discovered 'jumping genes' — mobile elements in DNA now called transposons that transformed the field of molecular biology. She received her PhD in botany from Cornell in 1927. In 1983, she became the first American woman to win an unshared Nobel Prize in science. Her discoveries in maize genetics laid the groundwork for everything from genetically modified crops to gene therapies in humans. Her legacy is a powerful reminder of the importance of basic research and the uniquely American infrastructure that supports it. 1947 portrait of Barbara McClintock (1902-1992) an American geneticist who won the 1983 Nobel Prize ... More in Physiology or Medicine for her discovery of genetic transposition. (Photo by: Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images) The McClintock Letters campaign comes at a time of historic uncertainty for American science. Thousands of NIH and NSF grants — the lifeblood of basic research in the US — have been curtailed, delayed, or withdrawn. Among the most contentious proposed changes is a 15% cap on indirect cost recovery, a financing method used to support the basic operating costs of research institutions. The cumulative outcome of these disruptions has been terminations of staff, dismantling of labs, and what scientists describe as the 'decimation' of support for the next generation of researchers. According to data compiled by Grant Watch, a grassroots network of independent scientists documenting funding cuts, approximately $3.2 billion in NIH research funds have already been disrupted. For many early-career scientists, the consequences are personal. 'Grad students are being affected by canceled training fellowships. Their PIs are having their NIH and NSF grants revoked or canceled. Clinical trials are getting canceled,' said Erin Morrow. 'These are patients who are enrolling in these clinical trials as a last resort for the conditions that they're in. So, yeah, it's really disturbing.' A recent federal court ruling by Judge William Young temporarily blocked some of the government's plan to cancel NIH funding, offering a brief reprieve. But the broader future of federal support for science remains unsettled. That's what prompted so many young scientists to speak out — not in protest, but in dialogue — with the communities that shaped them. They want those communities to understand that policy decisions made in Washington don't just affect distant researchers at elite institutions. They shape the future of public health, education, and innovation in every part of the country. The McClintock Letters aren't about policy details or partisan takes. They're about people. They're about early-career scientists like Isako Di Tomassi, a plant pathologist at Cornell, whose research was disrupted when her PhD advisor — an employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture — was suddenly fired. Di Tomassi was forced to change labs and advisors, abandoning a major line of inquiry. One of her projects, a proposed genome-wide association study to identify virulence traits in Phytophthora infestans, the pathogen behind potato blight, was scrapped. Her experience illustrates how disruptions in federal research institutions ripple outward to shape the careers and contributions of young scientists. Cornell student Isako Di Tomassi studies the fungus that causes potato blight. 'We believe science became too distant from the public,' explained Alex Rich, a 4th-year neuroscience PhD candidate at Yale University and one of the organizers. 'We lost sight of the fact that all scientists come from communities, and that in many cases, they were inspired to pursue science by their communities, and the reason they do science is to give back to their communities.' Another contributor, Margot Schmitt, a former inpatient social worker who now studies how alcohol use and aging affect brain structure, distilled her motivation in the Brattleboro Reformer this way: 'To fix something, we need to understand it. To understand it, we need to study it. To study it, we need scientists and funding.' Amanda Finn's op-ed, entitled 'In Defense of Education', appeared in The Signal of Santa Clarita Valley, and shared how her path to a Ph.D. in nutrition science was shaped by family values and public investment. The daughter and granddaughter of Central American women who saw education as the one thing no one could take from you, Finn described learning how to do research through a federally funded NIH training program. She now studies how large-scale factors like neighborhood poverty limit health choices. 'After all this work,' she wrote, 'I can't bear to see biomedical research be forever marred by Trump's policies.' For many contributors, writing an op‑ed required learning a new form of communication. At UCLA, Erin Morrow organized a writing workshop in her department to help peers think through narrative strategies for local audiences. Across the country, participants received similar support through informal peer networks and guidance from organizers. Science Homecoming, a nonprofit that promotes public engagement by scientists, also offered free editorial feedback to any contributor who submitted a draft. The goal wasn't just polish, but pedagogy. Participants learned to distill complex research into human terms and to write as scientists and neighbors. 'Often as trainees in science, we're encouraged to take the personal out of the work that we do,' said Erin Morrow. 'I really wanted this project to help bring people back to that space of thinking about the community that formed them.' Organizers hope the McClintock Letters Project won't be a one-off event. With over 1,000 scientists signing an accompanying open letter, the initiative is already seeding longer-term infrastructure for public engagement. The national Slack channel now serves as a coordinating hub for early-career researchers. 'We started a campaign — but I think we might have started a movement,' said Di Tomassi. Yale student Alex Rich was one of the organizers of the McClintock Letters, a project by graduate ... More students from around the US that sought to connect with Americans about the importance of federal science funding through a large scale letter writing campaign to local newspapers. Some have described the policies of the Trump administration as a war on science. But, if it is, the McClintock Letters Project is not a counterattack. It's an invitation. Rather than frame the current situation in terms of conflict, its organizers have chosen to lean into something quieter and harder: trust. That trust is not earned through credentials, but through openness. As Morrow explained in an interview, the premise of the project is that scientists are not just stewards of knowledge — they are members of communities, and their work can only be meaningful if it's understood and valued by the society it's meant to serve. That's why this campaign turns away from confrontation and toward connection. It asks scientists to step into the public square not as experts but as neighbors. And it encourages the public not just to defend science, but to claim it as their own. A list of op-eds associated with the McClintock Letters project is available on their website.

UCLA and K Medical Researchers say that Alternating-pressure mattresses should increase--not decrease--pressure for preventing pressure ulcers (bedsores)
UCLA and K Medical Researchers say that Alternating-pressure mattresses should increase--not decrease--pressure for preventing pressure ulcers (bedsores)

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

UCLA and K Medical Researchers say that Alternating-pressure mattresses should increase--not decrease--pressure for preventing pressure ulcers (bedsores)

LOS ANGELES, June 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Researchers at UCLA and K Medical recently discovered that a major key to preventing pressure ulcers (a.k.a., bedsores, pressure injuries, or decubitus ulcers) using alternating-pressure support surfaces is to increase—not decrease—the pressures that they impart. This unexpected finding was identified using a programmable bed consisting of 1,260 closely packed actuators, which was created to rapidly impart numerous alternating-pressure patterns on users to collect large amounts of data. From this study the principles and parameters were learned for creating a fundamentally different alternating-pressure mattress that uses compliant mechanisms (i.e., mechanisms that deform to achieve their objective) to provide higher loading and lower off-loading pressures compared with existing technologies, which typically inflate air bladders to alternate pressure. Experimental results indicate that the compliant-mechanism mattress successfully eliminates areas that would be persistently occluded of blood flow in both states of alternating pressure because its peak pressures are higher than usual while remaining comfortable and safe. This new compliant-mechanism mattress, along with the nonintuitive insight that peak pressures should be increased—not decreased, are disruptive since the primary aim of alternating-pressure technologies has historically been to reduce peak pressures. Consequently, no affordable alternating-pressure solutions have been created for both homecare and hospital use that consistently and decisively prevent pressure ulcers for all individuals. Even though the United States spends $11 billion each year on pressure ulcers (second only in cost to cardiovascular disease and cancer), pressure ulcers remain the cause of 60,000 deaths and great suffering annually. Thanks to the work of UCLA and K Medical, this ancient scourge may finally be eliminated. To learn more about the advantages of the compliant-mechanism mattress, see this YouTube video: UCLA and K Medical's study can be accessed through Science Robotics, where it was recently published as a peer-reviewed journal article: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE K Medical LLC Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Dr. James Y. Wang Joins Epicutis as Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board
Dr. James Y. Wang Joins Epicutis as Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Dr. James Y. Wang Joins Epicutis as Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Board

Harvard-Trained Dermatologist Brings Expertise to Biotech Skin Health Brand IRVINE, Calif., June 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Epicutis, a pioneering biotech skincare brand known for its science-backed, clean formulations that prioritize skin health over beauty, proudly announces the appointment of Dr. James Y. Wang as Chairman of its Scientific Advisory Board. As a Harvard and UCLA-trained double board-certified dermatologist and dermatopathologist, Dr. Wang brings a wealth of expertise in medical and aesthetic dermatology, reinforcing Epicutis' mission to deliver clinically advanced, non-toxic skincare solutions to market. James Y. Wang, MD, Founder of Metropolis Dermatology, with five locations in California, is widely recognized as a leader in dermatology, specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers, psoriasis, eczema, and acne. His impressive academic background includes graduating summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa in biology from Washington University in St. Louis, followed by earning his MD from Harvard Medical School and an MBA in healthcare policy from Harvard Business School. "As a physician, I am committed to evidence-based skincare that is not only safe for all skin types but also effective," shares Dr. Wang. "Epicutis represents the perfect fusion of biotechnology and dermatological science, delivering formulations that truly transform skin health at a cellular level, and I am honored to contribute to this next chapter of innovation." Epicutis was founded on the principles of biotech-driven skincare, leveraging the research of Dr. Jeffrey Stock, a distinguished biophysicist and Princeton University professor. By harnessing proprietary, patented active ingredients, Epicutis formulates small-batch, high-performance skincare products available exclusively through skin professionals. With a focus on transparency, efficacy, and the elimination of unnecessary additives and stabilizers, the brand continues to set new standards in professional skincare. "We are thrilled to have Dr. Wang join us as Chairman of our Scientific Advisory Board," said Maxwell Stock, Founder and CEO of Epicutis. "His deep understanding of dermatological science and passion for cutting-edge innovation align perfectly with our mission to clean up the skincare industry and support clinicians with science-backed, 100% non-toxic products that make a true impact on skin health." With Dr. Wang's leadership, Epicutis is advancing its commitment to safe, biotech-driven skincare solutions while championing higher regulation to ensure safety and efficacy in an industry often dominated by misleading marketing and mass production. By prioritizing science-backed formulations with patented, highly concentrated therapeutic ingredients, Epicutis is empowering skincare professionals to stand a chance against big beauty. More than just providing innovative products – the brand is actively investing in its partners' success, helping aesthetic businesses grow with exclusive, clinical-grade solutions that drive real results and build lasting patient trust. For more information on Epicutis and its revolutionary approach to skincare, visit About EpicutisEpicutis is a science-based, luxury professional skincare line that treats skin health and not age. Honoring a commitment to clean beauty and fewer ingredients, Epicutis offers science-based skincare using patented active ingredients in small-batch formulations created by expert formulator Masanori Tamura. Epicutis' novel ingredients are developed in-house by a team of scientists at Signum Biosciences utilizing technology discovered by Dr. Jeffry Stock at Princeton University. Signum Biosciences is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of innovative products to address major consumer and medical needs, and the development of compounds and botanical extracts that are mimetics of natural lipid ligands crucial to cellular regulation and signaling. To learn more about Epicutis, visit To learn more about Signum Biosciences, visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Epicutis Skincare Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store