Figure skating coach Matthew Power sentenced to 6 years for sex crimes against young skaters
A former St. John's-area figure skating coach who preyed on two of his teenage skaters has been sentenced to six years in prison.
In Supreme Court on Tuesday, Matthew Power, now in his 30s, learned how much time he'd spend behind bars for several charges related to the sexual relationships he forced onto minors while employed as a Skate Canada coach.
Power was a head figure skating coach at the time he sexually abused the two victims between 2016 and 2020.
Justice Valerie Marshall heard from one of the complainants herself — and the other complainant's mother — in February, as the justice weighed her sentencing decision.
Both told the court they were left traumatized and housebound after Power's years of predatory behaviour.
Power was convicted in November of crimes including sexual assault and sexual interference, for the multiple instances of sexual contact with his first victim.
She was between the ages of 14 and 16 when he abused her in various locations, including the rink where he trained her.
He was also convicted of several charges related to luring after the other complainant saved Snapchat messages that Power had sent to her, some of which contained lewd messages referring to oral sex.
That victim was under 16 at the time, while Power was in his late 20s.
He was suspended as a Skate Canada coach in January 2021, just before one of the victim's mothers reported Power to police.
For anyone who has been sexually assaulted, there is support available through crisis lines and local support services via the Ending Violence Association of Canada database. If you're in immediate danger or fear for your safety or that of others around you, please call 911.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Charges stayed in sextortion case against Winnipeg man
Prosecutors have stayed charges against a Winnipeg man accused of blackmailing men and boys in several provinces in a so-called 'sextortion' scheme after the alleged victims said they couldn't bring themselves to testify. Tongun Justin Tongun, who was 21 when he was charged by Winnipeg police with 10 counts of extortion in 2023, was accused of soliciting images from males on the internet, then threatening to post them online unless the victims sent him money. All 10 counts against Tongun were stayed in May, court records show. 'In preparation for this matter, the Crown contacted a number of victims,' a provincial government spokesman wrote in an email. 'After reviewing the matter and taking into consideration the impact to the victims, their unwillingness to relive the experience by testifying, the Crown determined not to proceed but did seek restitution for all the victims as per their wishes.' The Winnipeg Police Service began investigating Tongun after a man in his 20s came forward with allegations of extortion in February 2023. The victim told investigators he had shared intimate photos with someone online who pretended to be a young woman, before the person demanded cash and threatened to release the pictures. The victim transferred the scammer money, police said at the time. City sex crimes detectives charged Tongun with four counts of extortion that February after locating three more victims in Winnipeg, before later finding another six victims across Canada and filing more charges in June 2023. Police and cybersafety experts call the scams 'sextortion.' The scam typically involves a suspect threatening to distribute intimate or sexual images of a victim after they've gained their trust through 'sexually charged' conversations online, typically through social-media platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat, officials have said. The suspect will usually demand payment. Victims are often male teenagers or young adults who believe they are communicating with a woman. Erik PinderaReporter Erik Pindera is a reporter for the Free Press, mostly focusing on crime and justice. The born-and-bred Winnipegger attended Red River College Polytechnic, wrote for the community newspaper in Kenora, Ont. and reported on television and radio in Winnipeg before joining the Free Press in 2020. Read more about Erik. Every piece of reporting Erik produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Vancouver Sun
9 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Catholic cemetery bookkeeper sued by Vancouver archdiocese for $575,000
The bookkeeper for the Gardens of Gethsemani Catholic Cemetery in Surrey is being sued for the return of $575,000 after her employer discovered years of unauthorized payments, according to a lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court. The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Vancouver filed a notice of civil claim alleging that Marcia Terlaak wrote cheques to herself totalling at least that amount over the nine years she was operations manager for the largest Catholic cemetery in B.C., which covers 16 hectares in Surrey. Her husband, Dustin Terlaak, is named as co-defendant for his 'full knowledge and participation,' the case alleges. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Marcia Terlaak, whose online LinkedIn account as recently as a month ago listed her as Coquitlam's cemetery supervisor, was fired from the Gardens of Gethsemani in July 2021 and received a severance. She had worked there in charge of all finances since 2009. Her role included keeping books for a second Catholic cemetery, St. Peter's in New Westminster, where she had sole signing authority. The lawsuit alleges money is also missing from its accounts. The lawsuit claims that in 2018, three years before she was let go, Terlaak stopped reconciling the bank account for St. Peter's, and in July of that year stopped recording transactions in the St. Peter's bank account. The Roman Catholic Cemeteries of the Archdiocese of Vancouver, which operated both cemeteries, alleged that in August 2023 it discovered that between mid-2012 and up to May 2021, Terlaak had issued cheques from the cemetery accounts to herself, to personal credit card accounts in her name, and to other names. And it alleges she also withdrew 'unconventionally large amounts' from petty cash, and that all the unauthorized payments were for the 'personal benefit, gain and profit of herself and/or Dustin Terlaak.' The lawsuit alleges her husband's participation included 'receiving, converting, hiding and otherwise benefiting from the funds misappropriated' by her. The lawsuit claims they used the money in 2019 to purchase a Surrey property in Panorama Ridge, selling it, and then buying a White Rock condo on North Bluff Road, where they still live. The four-bedroom, 3,550-sq.-ft. Panorama Ridge property was listed on a realtor's website this week for $1.3 million. The two-bedroom, 1,710-sq.-ft. White Rock condo was purchased for $775,000, according to an online real estate website. The lawsuit said the cemeteries have suffered damages, losses and expenses because of the fraud, including loss of use of the funds and the cost of investigating. They are seeking an order that the Terlaaks pay all the money back to them, plus aggravated and punitive damages. The lawsuit asked the court to place a certificate of pending litigation against the White Rock condo and place all of the couple's other personal property, including proceeds from the sale of the Surrey property, furniture, household items, jewelry, any vehicles and any other real estate into a 'substantive constructive trust.' The Terlaaks 'do not have the ability to personally pay an award of damages equal to the funds' lost by the cemeteries, it said. None of the allegations have been proven in court. Messages left with the Terlaaks were not returned on Tuesday. The cemeteries' lawyer declined to comment. It's not surprising fraud can continue for years at not-for-profits where there are not usually enough employees to ensure separation of duties, such as having the same person responsible for recording, custody and authorizing of funds, said Michael Favere-Marchesi, associate accounting professor at Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business. Favere-Marchesi, commenting previously on a case of an employee being accused of stealing from the City of Surrey and not on the cemeteries lawsuit, said this type of individual-worker fraud is also more common in the public than the private sector, where owners have to answer to shareholders where there are internal control systems. 'When there are weaknesses in those systems, it is not unusual for fraud to happen for long periods of time before they're discovered,' he said. And fraud is easier if one person is responsible for all finances because with two or more people, 'to commit a crime, you would need collusion,' he said. Also, employees who handle finances need to be properly assessed for the 'triangle of fraud' characteristics — that is, did they have motivation, opportunity and rationalization to be able to steal funds, he said. Motivation would include anyone who lived beyond their means, for instance, and should be flagged, he said. slazaruk@
Winnipeg Free Press
18 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court,' Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling, which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'
