Stocks decline for third session in a row
Listen to article
KARACHI:
Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) on Friday closed down by over 450 points – its third consecutive session in the red – as institutional profit-taking in blue-chip stocks and global market jitters weighed on market sentiment.
Investor confidence remained shaky amid fears of US tariff retaliation under President Donald Trump's policies, coupled with declining foreign exchange reserves due to debt repayments by Pakistan and uncertainty about the upcoming International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme review.
While the KSE-100 index initially surged 918 points, late-session selling erased gains, reflecting cautious investor behaviour ahead of the weekend.
Stocks closed lower amid institutional profit-taking in blue-chip shares on jittery global equities over Trump's reciprocal tariffs on multiple trading partners, said Ahsan Mehanti of Arif Habib Corp.
Rupee instability, falling foreign currency reserves due to debt repayments, foreign fund outflows and uncertainty about the outcome of IMF review next month played the role of catalysts in bearish close at the PSX, he said.
At the end of trading, the benchmark KSE-100 index posted a decline of 478.78 points, or 0.43%, and settled at 112,085.30.
It was the third consecutive lower close for the KSE-100 index that trimmed gains to 1.6% week-on-week (WoW), wrote Arif Habib Limited (AHL) in its report.
Some 39 shares rose while 59 fell with Lucky Cement (+10%), Fauji Fertiliser Company (+0.67%) and Lucky Core Industries (+6.02%) contributing the most to index gains. Pakistan Petroleum (-3.01%), Pakistan State Oil (PSO, -4.22%) and Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDC, -2.21%) were the biggest index drags, it said.
Despite the fall, the KSE-100 maintained the 112k level while heading into the weekend, "which bodes well for the upside next week". Friday's gains failed to cross 113.5k with the index touching the intra-day high at 113,482, which keeps downside moves open.
"112k-113.5k are the key floor and ceiling levels to watch for next week; bias is for the index to surpass the ceiling and set up tradable moves," AHL added.
Topline Securities, in its market review, wrote that the KSE-100 index opened on a positive note and rose to the intra-day high of 918 points. However, jittery investors came in to sell during closing hours of the day and the index dropped to finish trading at 112,085, down 0.43%. Top positive contribution to the index came from Lucky Cement, Fauji Fertiliser Company, Lucky Core Industries and National Bank of Pakistan (NBP), which cumulatively contributed 486 points. On the other hand, Engro Holdings, Pakistan Petroleum, PSO, OGDC and Meezan Bank lost ground, weighing the index down by 583 points, it said.
Traded value-wise, PSO (Rs1.97 billion), NBP (Rs1.21 billion), DG Khan Cement (Rs1.04 billion), Hubco (Rs1.02 billion), The Bank of Punjab (Rs792 million) and Lucky Cement (Rs733 million) dominated trading activity.
Hubco, through a notice to the stock exchange, announced that Hub Power Holdings, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hubco, through its newly incorporated subsidiary Hubco Green, was entering into a new line of business pertaining to establishing and operating electric vehicle charging infrastructure, including but not limited to importing, manufacturing and assembling charging accessories.
In that regard, Hubco Green is entering into a collaboration agreement with PSO for the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure at numerous PSO locations across Pakistan, it said.
Overall trading volumes at the PSX were recorded at 457.05 million shares compared with the previous session's tally of 596.7 million. The value of shares traded during the day was Rs23.2 billion.
Shares of 432 companies were traded. Of these, 135 stocks closed higher, 237 fell and 60 remained unchanged.
The Bank of Punjab was the volume leader with trading in 70.1 million shares, losing Rs0.76 to close at Rs11.10. It was followed by Sui Southern Gas Company with 32.8 million shares, losing Rs3.54 to close at Rs32.70 and Lotte Chemical with 23.4 million shares, losing Rs1.03 to close at Rs20.20.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Realism and shifting tides of international relations
The writer is a former Secretary to Government, Home and Tribal Affairs Department and a retired IGP. He can be reached at syed_shah94@ Listen to article In the ever-evolving arena of international politics, the concept of permanent alliances or perpetual hostilities often proves to be a myth. As Lord Palmerston had put it long ago, "We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow." This preposition remains central to realist thought in foreign policy, where national interest overrides ideological consistency or historical ties. Recent geopolitical developments — from the US President Donald Trump's unconventional diplomacy to shifting alliances in South Asia -— demonstrate these powerful illustrations of this timeless truth. Trump recently visited the Middle East and had diplomatic engagements amid scenes of pomp and show. He had interactions with Saudi Arabia - which is poles apart from the US from an ideological perspective. One espouses democratic values and the other Sharia law with a dynastic rule. However, overridding considerations of lucrative arms deals and mutual economic benefits set all those ideals to naught. Trump even declared Saudi Arabia as a model for a reimagined Middle East, emphasising the promise of economic prosperity over instability in a region reeling from multiple wars. Similarly, Trump's brief chat with President Ahmed al-Sharaa of Syria, though on the sidelines of his diplomatic initiatives, was widely speculated and analysed. He also announced easing sanctions on Syria to give the country "a chance at peace". Trump's remarks and subsequent actions, however melodramatic in presentation, reflect the primacy of interest over principle. In the complex chessboard of international relations, strategic considerations often overshadow moral judgments. Perhaps one of the most glaring examples of realist foreign policy was observed during the US-Taliban talks culminating in the 2020 Doha Agreement between the two. After nearly two decades of warfare that claimed thousands of lives and cost billions of dollars, the US opted to negotiate directly with its once-archenemy. The very group that had been the target of a massive military campaign post-9/11 was now being recognised as a legitimate stakeholder in Afghanistan's future. This position from combat to the negotiating table, sidelining Ashraf Ghani and finally abandoning his government, was not a reflection of ideological transformation but rather a calculated move to pull out the US troops from a protracted and unwinnable conflict. It was a textbook case of interest-based diplomacy. This trend is not unique to the United States. China's recent diplomatic initiatives further portray the realist approach. The trilateral meeting of the foreign ministers of China, Pakistan and Afghanistan in Beijing marked a strategic reevaluation in the region. Expressing unanimity of views, the three states agreed to shore up diplomatic and economic engagement, assuring a cooperative stance on counterterrorism. From a Chinese perspective this move would further enhance security along its western borders, ensuring the success of the Belt and Road Initiative, and countering the influence of rival powers in a geopolitically sensitive area. Pakistan's participation in this meeting also reflects a realist recalibration. Once a frontline ally in the US-led War on Terror, Pakistan is increasingly leaning towards regional partnerships that align more closely with its evolving strategic and economic interests. The re-engagement with Afghanistan, under Taliban leadership no less, is a nod to regional stability over ideological divergence. It's a pragmatic choice aimed at containing security threats and fostering economic integration. The meeting has also provided a fair chance to the de facto rulers of Afghanistan to gain legitimacy and economic lifelines. By engaging with regional powers like China and Pakistan, the Taliban seek to break out of international isolation and gain access to trade routes, infrastructure investments and diplomatic recognition. Once again, national interest overrides historical enmities or ideological moorings. All those aforementioned events, underscore the relevance and utility of realism in international politics. Realism postulates that the international system is anarchic and that states primarily follow the law of self-preservation and prosperity. In such a system, moral principles, while not entirely absent, are often subordinated to strategic calculations. Ideological allies may quickly turn into enemies and former foes may transform into partners as dictated by the circumstances. Critics of realism often decry its perceived cynicism and lack of moral compass. However, proponents argue that it is a sober and necessary lens through which to view global affairs. Idealism may inspire, but it is realism that governs the actions of states when stakes are high and options are limited. Moreover, the real-world consequences of deviating from realism can be severe. History is replete with examples where ideological rigidity led to strategic blunders — from the Vietnam War to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Conversely, moments of pragmatic diplomacy — such as Nixon's visit to China or the Iran nuclear deal — have often yielded more sustainable outcomes.
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Canada hosts G7 summit as tensions with US grow over trade, foreign policy
Listen to article Group of Seven leaders gather in the Canadian Rockies starting on Sunday amid growing splits with the United States over foreign policy and trade, with host Canada striving to avoid clashes with President Donald Trump. While Prime Minister Mark Carney says his priorities are strengthening peace and security, building critical mineral supply chains and creating jobs, issues such as US tariffs and the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine are expected to feature heavily. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores hours before the leaders of the world's industrialized democracies meet. "This issue will be very high on the agenda of the G7 summit," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. He said his goals are for Iran to not develop or possess nuclear weapons, ensuring Israel's right to defend itself, avoiding escalation of conflict and creating room for diplomacy. The summit takes place in the mountain resort of Kananaskis, some 90 km (56 miles) west of Calgary. The last time Canada played host, in 2018, Trump left the summit before denouncing then Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as "very dishonest and weak" and instructing the US delegation to withdraw its approval of the final communique. "This will be a successful meeting if Donald Trump doesn't have an eruption that disrupts the entire gathering. Anything above and beyond that is gravy," said University of Ottawa international affairs professor Roland Paris, who was foreign policy adviser to Trudeau. Trump has often mused about annexing Canada and arrives at a time when Carney is threatening reprisals if Washington does not lift tariffs on steel and aluminum. "The best-case scenario... is that there's no real blow-ups coming out of the back end," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council think tank and a former White House and State Department official. Carney's office declined to comment on how the Israeli strikes would affect the summit. Diplomats said Canada has ditched the idea of a traditional comprehensive joint communique and would issue chair summaries instead, in hopes of containing a disaster and maintaining engagement with the US. A senior Canadian official told reporters that Ottawa wanted to focus on actions the seven members - Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States - could take together. Canadian Senator Peter Boehm, a veteran former diplomat who acted as Trudeau's personal representative to the 2018 summit, said he had been told the summit would last longer than usual to give time for bilateral meetings with the US president. Expected guests for parts of the Sunday to Tuesday event include leaders from Ukraine, Mexico, India, Australia, South Africa, South Korea and Brazil. "Many will want to talk to President Trump about their own particular interests and concerns," Boehm said by phone. A senior US official said on Friday working discussions would cover trade and the global economy, critical minerals, migrant and drug smuggling, wildfires, international security, artificial intelligence and energy security. "The president is eager to pursue his goals in all of these areas including making America's trade relationships fair and reciprocal," the official said. The visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to the Oval Office in February descended into acrimony and has served as a warning for other world leaders about the delicate dance they face in negotiating with Trump. But diplomats say the frustration of dealing with the Trump administration has made some keener to assert themselves. 'The big test' Canada has long been one of Ukraine's most vocal supporters. Trump came to power promising to end the war with Russia within 24 hours but diplomatic efforts have stalled. One Ukrainian official involved in preparations for the summit said hope had faded for a strong statement in support of Ukraine. Instead, success for Kyiv would merely constitute an amicable meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy. A European official said the G7 summit and the NATO summit in The Hague later in June provided an opportunity to underscore to Trump the need to press ahead with a sanctions bill put together by US senators alongside a new European package to pressure Russia into a ceasefire and broader talks. Trump's first international summit of his second term will offer some early clues on whether he is interested in working with allies to solve common problems, said Max Bergmann, a director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'The big overarching question here is, basically, is the United States still committed to formats like the G7? That is going to be the big test,' Bergmann said.
Business Recorder
19 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Japan's Ishiba heads to G7 to press Trump to drop auto tariffs
TOKYO: Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba heads to Canada on Sunday for trade talks with US President Donald Trump, hoping to persuade him to drop trade tariffs that have imperilled Japan's auto companies and threaten to undermine his fragile government. The two are expected to meet on the sidelines of a summit of the Group of Seven nations in Kananaskis, Alberta, for their second in-person encounter. It follows a sixth round of high-level trade talks in Washington on Friday. Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said he explored the possibility of an deal in detailed meetings with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The trick for Ishiba, who spoke with Trump by phone on Friday, will be to get the president to drop the 25% tariff he imposed on Japanese cars, as well as a paused 24% across-the-board levy that Trump calls a reciprocal tariff, without making concessions that could hurt the prime minister's public support at home. Returning to Tokyo with no deal would be better politically than conceding too much, analysts say. 'If it goes badly, it could even be seen as a positive for Ishiba, standing up to Trump and standing up for his country when he's under assault,' said Michael Cucek, a political science professor at Temple University in Tokyo. Ishiba and his ruling Liberal Democratic Party face an upper house election next month that comes after a lower house loss in November that left him reliant on the support of other parties to stay in power. Another poor electoral result could bring down his government and would force Trump to reset trade talks with a new Japanese administration. South Korea President Lee, Japan PM Ishiba agree to strengthen ties 'The most important thing is that Ishiba does not cave in for a bad (auto) deal,' said Joseph Kraft, a financial political analyst at Rorschach Advisory in Tokyo. 'I expect there will be some kind of deal, although it could be haphazard. Trump needs some good news and I don't think he has much interest in G7 activities.' Failing to reach an agreement in Canada might not have an immediate economic impact on Japan, but tariffs that stay in place will eventually drag down growth, said Asuka Tatebayashi, senior analyst at Mizuho Bank. 'If you look at the data for car exports to the US for April, it was quite striking. The volume in dollars was down by nearly 5%, but the number of cars has increased a lot,' she said. 'It means either they are only selling cheap cars or the manufacturers are absorbing the cost. I think the latter is the case and this is not very sustainable.' Tariffs could shave 0.9% off Japan's gross domestic product, Mizuho Research & Technologies estimated in a report in April.
