logo
Murder of Irish-American woman shocks wealthy Brussels suburb

Murder of Irish-American woman shocks wealthy Brussels suburb

Irish Times5 days ago

The killing initially looked like a burglary gone wrong. Carmel Delaney, an Irish-American woman in her early 60s, had been stabbed to death in her home, in a wealthy
Brussels
neighbourhood popular with diplomats and business executives.
The suspected murder – and the details that would later emerge – have gripped the Belgian public for weeks.
Ms Delaney was born in New York, but her mother was originally from Ballyclerihan, Co
Tipperary
and her father from Dublin, so growing up she spent many childhood summers back visiting Ireland.
A mother of four adult children, with two young grandchildren, Ms Delaney was someone who made friends easily.
READ MORE
There were hiking and travel companions, and tennis and bridge playing partners, in Brussels and the many other cities she had lived in throughout her life. 'She was so social,' an Irish relative of Ms Delaney said.
Her husband, Chris Delaney, was a senior executive at US tire giant Goodyear, overseeing its business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, from Brussels, where the couple had lived for the last seven years.
At a little past 8pm on March 17th, St Patrick's Day, Belgian police received an emergency call.
Mr Delaney had opened the door of their apartment in the leafy Brussels suburb of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, to find his wife dead inside the home. An autopsy later revealed she had been stabbed about four times in the neck and chest, with some type of sharp object.
Police investigating the crime scene suspected a possible burglary gone wrong. 'The victim's husband had discovered her body in their home and found that three luxury watches had been stolen,' the Brussels public prosecutor said in a statement. However, there was no obvious signs of someone forcing their way into the apartment.
Then three weeks later came an arrest. A female colleague of Mr Delaney was taken in for questioning. The next day she was charged with murder.
In a statement, the prosecutor confirmed a suspect who worked with Mr Delaney had been charged with murder and possession of a weapon.
One line of investigation Belgian police had pursued was the possibility Mr Delaney and his coworker were involved in a romantic relationship, according to reports in local media. The prosecutor said they could not disclose further details.
Some early hearings in the criminal case took place in front of a French-speaking judge, but it has since been transferred to a Flemish judge. A lawyer representing the accused did not respond to requests for comment.
In the upmarket suburb where the Delaney couple lived, the killing has shocked locals.
'The whole area is one of the best in Brussels,' said a retired EU official who lives nearby. 'You would compare it with Blackrock in Dublin.'
The street in Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Brussels, where Carmel Delaney and her husband lived. Photo: Jack Power
'We say in French, it's something that can happen anywhere in the world', he said of Ms Delaney's killing.
The area is popular with wealthy diplomats and officials who work in the nearby European Union institutions. Luxembourg's ambassador to the EU lives across the road from the Delaney's home, and the embassy of Kosovo is only a few buildings down from their apartment block.
A team of four gardeners from a private firm were tending to rows of well-kept hedges that run along both sides of the whole street on Thursday afternoon. It's the sort of place you might expect to see a Porsche drive by – and, while The Irish Times was there, two did so within 20 minutes of each other.
The owner of a small local business said she only learned of the tragedy when journalists from the Belgian media began to descend on the leafy street.
Another woman on her way to work said Woluwe-Saint-Pierre was a very quiet area. 'It's not that kind of neighbourhood where you would expect ...' she said, before trailing off and stopping.
Ms Delaney and her husband had been due to retire to the United States and return to New York, after careers that had seen them both work across the world.
She grew up in Horseheads, a small village in upstate New York, before moving to Bardonia, which is closer to the city. Those who knew her said she had fond memories of summer trips back to Ireland as a child.
Her parents had met on a blind date. Her mother, Maureen O'Dwyer, was the second eldest of 11 siblings, in a family that had a farm and stables in Ballyclerihan, keeping and breeding racehorses. Her father, Jim Gallagher, was from Dublin.
After graduating from Cornell University in 1985, Ms Delaney got a job with consumer goods giant Procter & Gamble (P&G), where she worked for 15 years, across the US, Saudi Arabia, Poland and Ukraine.
It was in P&G that she met Mr Delaney. The couple later moved to Sydney, Australia, where they lived for several years. Around that time Ms Delaney set up her own company, International Education Resources, which provided assistance to international students applying to study in the US.
They had a holiday home in the Catskills, a mountainous part of New York state, where they spent summers hiking and winters skiing. 'They were a force,' one person who knew the couple said.
Then in 2017 the pair moved to Brussels, as Mr Delaney was promoted to run Goodyear tyre and rubber company's Europe, Middle East and Africa office.
The company has spent recent weeks firefighting the fallout of media coverage of Ms Delaney's killing, which often prominently mentions Goodyear. It is understood a team of 'crisis communications' consultants have been drafted in to help the firm.
Mr Delaney is no longer employed by the US company and has since retired.
During her time in the Belgian capital Ms Delaney became heavily involved in a women's social club, organising hikes and running its website.
There she was known for her 'unwavering positivity', the Brussels Women's Club committee said in a message of condolence posted online after her death. 'Her life motto, 'bloom where you are planted,' embodied her ability to adapt, grow and thrive wherever life took her,' the group wrote.
She made an effort to travel to Ireland at least once a year most of her adult life, one of her Irish relatives said. 'Carmel was a wonderful girl ... We loved her'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Richard Satchwell found guilty of murdering his wife in 2017
Richard Satchwell found guilty of murdering his wife in 2017

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Richard Satchwell found guilty of murdering his wife in 2017

Richard Satchwell has been found guilty by a jury at the Central Criminal Court of the murder of his wife at their Co Cork home in 2017. There was audible sobbing from several members of Tina Satchwell's family as the verdict was given on Friday, with some members of the jury also in tears. Satchwell sat impassively in the court. Ms Satchwell's skeletal remains were found in a deep grave in an area under the sittingroom stairs of the couple's home in October 2023, more than six years after her husband reported her missing. READ MORE [ 'Tina had no way of getting away from him': The full story of the Richard Satchwell murder trial Opens in new window ] [ Gardaí ignored 'red flags' in Tina Satchwell murder investigation Opens in new window ] Satchwell (58), a lorry driver, had pleaded not guilty to murdering the 45-year-old at Grattan Street, Youghal, on March 19th and 20th, 2017. Friday was the 23rd day of the trial, which heard evidence from more than 50 witnesses. The jury went out at 3.05pm on Tuesday to its deliberations and continued through Wednesday and Thursday, when they had considered the matter for eight hours and 37 minutes. Tina Satchwell They resumed deliberations just after 11.30am on Friday and returned with their verdict at around 12.25pm, after nine hours and 28 minutes deliberating. Several of Ms Satchwell's relatives, including her mother Mary Collins, half-sister Lorraine Howard and cousin Sarah Howard, were in the packed court for the verdict. Lorraine Howard, Tina Satchwell's half sister, pictured leaving the Central Criminal Court in Dublin. Photograph: Collins Courts Mr Justice Paul McDermott thanked the jury for their service on a 'difficult' case. He said the next stage of the process is sentencing, which is his role, and he adjourned the matter to June 4th. The mandatory sentence for murder is life imprisonment. The three possible verdicts open to the jury were: not guilty of murder; guilty of murder; and not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter. It was also open to them to consider, depending on their view of the evidence, a defence of partial self-defence or full self-defence. [ What the jury didn't hear: How Richard Satchwell tried to have murder charge withdrawn Opens in new window ] [ 'Tina was portrayed in a way that is not true to who she was': Tina Satchwell's family describe 'kind, loving and gentle soul' Opens in new window ] The trial heard Satchwell went to Fermoy Garda station on March 24th 2017, where he told a garda his wife had left their home four days earlier. He said he believed she had left him and had taken their €26,000 in cash savings. He told a garda he was not concerned about her safety. After gardaí interviewed him in early May 2017, he formally reported his wife as a missing person. Increasingly concerned 'something untoward' had happened to Ms Satchwell, gardaí obtained a warrant to search the couple's home in June 2017 and seized devices, including a laptop. An examination of the laptop in 2021 showed two YouTube videos concerning the interaction between water and quicklime, which can be used to disguise decomposition odours, were viewed on March 24th, 2017. In October 2023, gardaí carried out a full invasive search of the property using a cadaver dog. Skeletal remains identified being those of Ms Satchwell were found on October 11th, 2023, in a grave site about one metre deep in an area under the stairs in the sittingroom. The scene at Richard and Tina Satchwell's home in Youghal as her remains were removed following a search in 2023. Photograph: Michael Mac Sweeney/Provision After the remains were found, Satchwell was rearrested and told gardaí his wife had come at him with a chisel on the morning of March 20th, 2017. He said he fell and she came on top of him trying to stab him with the tool. He said that while he fended her off with the belt from her dressing gown robe, which was up around her neck, she went limp and died. He told gardaí there was 'no premeditation' and he had not called emergency services due to 'panic and shame'. He said he put Ms Satchwell's body on the couch and then stored it in their freezer for about two days before burying her on March 26th in a grave he dug under the stairs and then cemented over. He was charged with her murder on the evening of October 12th, 2023, after his solicitor, with whom he had 25 earlier consultations, had left the station. He replied: 'Guilty or not guilty, guilty.' The defence argued that was done without him having legal advice and without having the ingredients of murder and manslaughter being explained to him. A postmortem on the decomposed remains was unable to establish a cause of death. The jury heard there was no evidence of fractures to the bones, including the hyoid bone in the neck. In her closing address to the jury, prosecuting counsel Gerardine Small said Satchwell was an 'arch manipulator' who told 'a plethora of lies' about his wife's disappearance with the objective of putting everyone 'off the scent' because he 'murdered her'. Richard Satchwell arriving at the District Court where he was charged with murdering Tina Satchwell in October 2023. Photograph: Brian Lawless/PA Wire The manner in which he buried his wife was 'absolutely disrespectful' and, after her remains were found, he gave a 'nonsense' account of how she died, counsel said. She said Ms Satchwell's death was 'not an accident' nor a result of him acting in self-defence and that his account to gardaí was 'totally focused on trying to protect himself'. Ms Small said the prosecution did not know the cause of death because Satchwell had 'ensured that' was the case, but there was sufficient evidence to return a murder verdict. Closing the case for the defence, senior counsel Brendan Grehan said Satchwell was guilty of weaving 'a web of lies' and engaging in 'disreputable' conduct after his wife's death, including his 'awful' offer to her cousin of the freezer where he stored his wife's body, but that 'did not make him a murderer'. He was 'certainly guilty of causing his wife's death' but there was no evidence he intended to kill or seriously injure her, counsel argued. The evidence was that the accused loved and 'worshipped' his wife, that she 'wore the trousers' in the relationship and was sometimes violent towards her husband, counsel said. There was no evidence he was ever violent towards her, he added. He said the prosecution had not called any expert evidence to show Satchwell's account of how his wife died was not possible. Towards the close of the trial, the jury was told by a tearful Lorraine Howard that, after Ms Satchwell's remains were returned to the family, they placed half of her ashes on the grave of her brother Tom and the other half on the grave of her grandmother, Florence.

What the jury didn't hear in the Richard Satchwell murder trial: how the husband tried to have murder charge withdrawn
What the jury didn't hear in the Richard Satchwell murder trial: how the husband tried to have murder charge withdrawn

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

What the jury didn't hear in the Richard Satchwell murder trial: how the husband tried to have murder charge withdrawn

Lawyers for Richard Satchwell unsuccessfully tried to have the murder charge against him withdrawn and substituted with manslaughter in the fourth week of the trial. Mr Justice Paul McDermott rejected arguments from Satchwell's defence team – made at the end of the evidence and in the absence of the jury – there was no evidence on which the jury could safely find Satchwell had the necessary legal intention for murder, to kill or cause serious injury to his wife, Tina . That was 'a huge lacuna' in the prosecution case, defence counsel Brendan Grehan argued. There was no expert evidence that Satchwell's account of how his wife died was not possible, he said. A belief by gardaí that she could not have died in the manner he described was not evidence, he said. READ MORE Satchwell had claimed his wife flew at him with a chisel and that he fell, and she was on top of him trying to stab him with the chisel. He said, in an attempt to protect himself, he was holding her up by the belt of her dressing-gown, which was around her neck, when she suddenly collapsed. If the murder charge was not withdrawn, counsel asked that the jury be directed to consider self-defence as a full or partial defence. [ Richard Satchwell found guilty of murdering his wife in 2017 Opens in new window ] Opposing the application, prosecuting counsel Gerardine Small said there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer intent to kill or cause serious injury. This included Satchwell's reply: 'Guilty or not guilty – guilty,' when he was charged by gardaí with murder on October 12th, 2023. There was no evidence on the cause of death because Satchwell buried his wife in a manner that ensured it was not available, Small said. There was 'a wealth of evidence' from the surrounding circumstances from which the jury can infer intent, she argued. There was also a potential motive: Satchwell said his wife was threatening to leave him and she had 'wasted 28 years' on him, the prosecuting barrister argued. Tina Satchwell In his ruling, the judge said it was exclusively for the jury, not him, to decide which elements of the prosecution evidence, including Satchwell's account, were to be preferred or rejected. He said that it was also up to the jury to decide any inferences to be drawn and the reliability and weight of the evidence. An intention to kill or cause serious injury could be formed in a moment or over time, he said. Evidence of intent is almost always drawn from surrounding circumstances and an accused's actions before, during and after the event. In this case, there was a 'prolonged' period before Tina Satchwell's remains were discovered and no direct evidence of cause of death. Because Richard Satchwell disposed of her body, there was no evidence of fractures, or of bruising, on the 'very small amount' of muscle tissue found on her remains, and no body organs. A motive was not necessary to prove intent but its existence might assist, he said. There were inferences to be drawn from Satchwell's actions and what he did at the time of the killing, he said. He had not called gardaí or sought assistance for his wife and had created the false impression she was alive from that day on, said the judge. [ 'Tina had no way of getting away from him': The full story of the Richard Satchwell murder trial Opens in new window ] There was evidence that Satchwell had, over years, told 'lie after lie', repeatedly saying she had gone away but he was willing to have her back while telling 'parallel stories' which 'destroyed her character', including scenarios of sudden desertion. There were 'quite cynical' attempts to engage her family's help in making public appeals, including asking her cousin Sarah Howard to take the freezer he had used to store her body. Satchwell had also said he was assaulted by his wife and suggested she had mental health issues. The judge said there may be a conflict whether some of these matters were true. His lies could properly be relied on as evidence to establish his state of mind at the time of the killing, the judge said. His attempts to avoid guilt appeared 'breathtaking and cynical' and the prosecution was entitled to rely on his burial of the body and the 'disrespect' in his wife being 'disposed of in a hole under the stairs that he cemented in'. Richard Satchwell arrives at the District Court in Cashel, Co Tipperary, charged in connection with the murder of his wife Tina Satchwell in October 2023. Photograph: Brian Lawless/PA Wire The jury was entitled to consider this as evidence of 'a degree of malevolence' and 'total focus on protecting himself against discovery' and might conclude it belied his asserted respect and love for her, the judge said. The jury was entitled to consider, in context, what weight to be given to his replies to gardaí in his October 12th, 2023 interview, including his reply when he was charged by gardaí with murder. It was for the jury to decide what his acts were and their 'natural and probable consequences', bearing in mind all the evidence. As a matter of law, the murder charge should not be withdrawn, the judge ruled. On Tuesday, after the judge completed his directions to the jury on the law and evidence, the defence applied to have the jury discharged that would have led to a fresh trial. Grehan, Satchwell's defence barrister, argued the judge's charge was not balanced and was akin to a second prosecution speech. He argued that it contained an excessive focus on the prosecution's interpretation of evidence. Small, the prosecuting counsel, said there was no basis for the 'last resort' discharge remedy, and the charge was fair and balanced. A vigil for Tina Satchwell attended by family and friends in Fermoy in 2023. Photograph: Michael Mac Sweeney/Provision The judge rejected the defence's complaints and refused the discharge application but said he would address the jury on two additional matters. He did so, telling them that, in the context of Satchwell's potential motivation, and the context of whether he intended to kill or cause serious injury, they must bear in mind he had said he was besotted with his wife. The judge told them that Satchwell loved his wife notwithstanding a situation where, on his own account and that of some witnesses, he had been subject to violence by her, she had ceased sexual relations and he would have liked them to have children but she did not want children. The evidence was he 'attended to her in very great detail' and there was no evidence he ever assaulted her, the judge said.

‘We finally have justice for Tina': Tina Satchwell's family said she was a ‘kind, loving and gentle soul'
‘We finally have justice for Tina': Tina Satchwell's family said she was a ‘kind, loving and gentle soul'

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘We finally have justice for Tina': Tina Satchwell's family said she was a ‘kind, loving and gentle soul'

The family of Tina Satchwell , who was murdered by her husband and buried in a secret grave beneath the stairs of their home, has said that their 'precious sister, cousin, auntie and daughter' was portrayed in a way during the trial that was 'not true to who she was'. Speaking outside the Criminal Courts of Justice building on Friday after Richard Satchwell was found guilty of murdering his wife of 25 years, Tina Satchwell's half-sister, Lorraine Howard, made a statement on behalf of the family. Tina Satchwell's mother, Mary Collins, half-sister Lorraine Howard and cousin Sarah Howard appeared outside the court an hour after Richard Satchwell was found guilty of the murder of his wife at their home in Youghal, Co Cork, in 2017. Upon the announcement of the guilty verdict, there was 'audible sobbing' from Ms Satchwell's family inside the courtroom. READ MORE Family members respond following the verdict in which the jury has found Richard Satchwell guilty of murdering his wife Tina at their home in Youghal, Co Cork, in 2017. Pictured (L-R) Tina's mother Mary Collins, her half sister Lorraine Howard and her cousin Sarah Howard. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw / The Irish Times Ms. Satchwell's sister Lorraine thanked their legal team for their support throughout this process. 'Your hard work and professionalism shone through like the classy ladies you are. We will never be able to put into words how thankful we are for you', she said. She thanked Mr Justice Paul McDermott and the 12 jurors for 'their dedication', and the witnesses 'for helping us reach this verdict today'. She personally thanked Sarah Howard, 'who came up to give evidence and her support two weeks postpartum'. 'We will never be able to put into words how thankful we are for you. We want to sincerely thank the judge and jury for their dedication. We would like to thank all the witnesses who helped us reach this verdict today'. [ 'Tina had no way of getting away from him': The full story of the Richard Satchwell murder trial Opens in new window ] 'I would like to personally thank Sarah Howard, who came up to give evidence and her support two weeks postpartum with a beautiful baby girl, you did yourself and Tina proud. Thank you to Anne Marie Twomey and David Kelleher for putting the pieces together and finding Tina.' Tina's cousin, Sarah Howard then made a statement, telling the media: 'During this trial Tina was portrayed in a way that is not true to who she was. 'Tina was our precious sister, cousin, auntie and daughter. Her presence in our lives meant so much to us all. We as a family can never put into words the impact her loss has had on us. 'Tina was a kind, loving and gentle soul, who loved her animals like they loved her and that's the way we want her remembered. Today as a family we finally have justice for Tina and at this time our family would like to ask for privacy to begin our healing. Thank you'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store