Don't Buy a Cheap Radar Detector
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
This article was updated with new information in December 2024.
Uh-oh. Yup, those are indeed red and blue flashing lights in your rearview mirror. It's a position many of us have been in, but there are ways to limit these situations. Navigation apps such as Waze will sound the alarm on potential speed traps, but they don't hold a candle to a good radar detector.
But what even is a radar detector? Well, these fancy gadgets are designed to identify police radar guns nearby and give you ample time to check your speed and avoid a ticket. But what's the best radar detector on the market? We put six to the test to find out.
More Gear Tests: | | The Uniden R8 was named Best Overall because it excels in just about every aspect of radar detecting and provides the highest confidence of any radar detector we tested.
Valentine's was tabbed Most Vigilant because its detection distances were the best of the bunch.
If you're looking for a no-frills, budget-friendly Smokey-sniffer, the Uniden DFR7 is a solid option.
Whatever you do, don't buy a cheap radar detector; this is decidedly one of those categories where you should spend wisely on a name-brand product.
The Gear Team worked in conjunction with the Car and Driver editorial team to get comprehensive testing data. We tried each device on a seven-mile trip through an Ann Arbor strip mall gauntlet and counted false alerts, verifying them on the way back. Additionally, we tested the detection range with our own radar gun emitting Ka-band radar. Here's what we tested for:
Frontal detection range
Rear detection range
90-degree corner detection range
Number of false alerts along a seven-mile stretch
Installation
Usability
Quality-of-life notes
It's easy to get mired in test results when all you want to know is, "If I stick this on my windshield, will I get a ticket?" Any of these detectors will greatly reduce your odds of a chat with the roadside tax collector. Which one you buy depends on how you expect a radar detector to behave.The Uniden R8 comes out on top in our testing thanks to its ability to excel in just about every aspect of radar detecting. We love how it toes the line between being too chatty and suspiciously quiet—it's in that "just right" Goldilocks range and provides the highest confidence of any radar detector we tested.
The detection range on this thing is insane; second only to the Valentine. It was consistent across all three runs too—locking on at the 2.0-mile mark for frontal detection each time. With that much alert time in every direction, you'll have no problem adjusting.
Yes, the price is high, but the features speak for themselves. Auto-mute memory can filter out false alerts on your routes and is Spectre Elite undetectable—meaning, police who scan for radar detectors won't find it. Better yet, users get free firmware updates so the detector is always up to date.
If you're seriously looking to invest in a radar detector to whittle down those speeding tickets, the Uniden R8 is our choice for the Best Radar Detector Overall.
$699.99 at amazon.comA long-time staple in the radar detecting game, we put Valentine's V1 Gen 2 up against the newbies. Right off the bat, the detection distances from this radar detector were the best of the bunch; its 2.1-mile rear detection is a half-mile farther than the Uniden R8's. Impressive stuff.
Setup is accomplished through the V1 Connection app, and the connection is accomplished via 5.0 Bluetooth, so you can hide the detector if you like.
Notably, the V1 Gen 2 is far and away the most chatty radar detector in this test. Some folks may see this as a nuisance, while others might appreciate the peace of mind from knowing this thing won't miss a sniff of any radar.
If you like to be alerted of every possible radar, this is the detector to get. If you prefer yours to be quieter and trust the false-alarm filtering, look elsewhere.
$748.98 at amazon.comThe Redline 360c is Escort's top-of-the-line radar detector, and its features (and price) prove it. It fared well in our detecting distance, not the best but far from the worst. Additionally, it threw just three false alerts—also right in the middle of the pack. Sensing a theme here?
The selling point of this radar detector is its plethora of features. Escort claims it's invisible to all radar detector detectors (RDD) and features an auto-learn mode to filter repeated false alerts. Escort's Drive Smarter app and community is really solid, featuring a sort of Waze-like navigation function to alert other users of staked-out cops. Escort even offers a ticket guarantee policy, something the Redline 360c qualifies for.
Frankly, for $800 we were hoping for better performance from the Redline 360c. Relative to the other devices we tested, it's fine but not great. Aesthetically, we do think this one looks the best—which, for a bunch of chunky gadgets, counts for something.
If you're into the advanced technology, enticing features, and slimline appearance, the Redline 360c is an excellent choice for a radar detector. But it'll cost you.
Note: Escort just dropped the latest evolution of their entry-level radar detector: the Max 4. It was released just after we concluded testing, so we're looking to include it in an upcoming update.
$799.95 at escortradar.comIf you're simply looking for a no-frills, budget-friendly Smokey-sniffer, the Uniden DFR7 is a solid option. Obviously, it's lacking some high-end features like directional notifications and stealth against radar detector detectors. But it still does what it's designed to do, and for far less than most others here.
The detection ranges were all down from the rest of the competition, but not dangerously low. Surprisingly, the DFR7 offers GPS lockout, but it's a manual input rather than automatic. It's extremely quiet—only throwing two false alarms our way. Additionally, we had a gripe with the screen being tough to read, especially during a sunny day.
Despite its relatively subpar performance, this radar detector is indeed an incredible value. While we recommend investing in a top-of-the-line radar detector if you can, this budget radar detector is our pick for a solid value.
$199.99 at amazon.comThe Radenso DS1 is an excellent radar detector, though it doesn't outshine the rest in any specific category. The 2.0-mile frontal locked range is nothing to sneeze at, but it falls behind in both rear and 90-degree range. Two false alarms was a bit quiet for us, but this can be a benefit if that's what you prefer.
We loved the display screen—which auto-dims and is color-customizable, and the small size and overall sleek look is another bonus. The automatic GPS lockout feature shores up those false alerts, even if there are just a few to begin with. Finally, it's Bluetooth-compatible with Radenso's Nexus app for easy updates.
While there's nothing wrong with this radar detector, it doesn't stand out among the rest in any particular way. If you're a Radenso fan, this detector holds the legacy intact.
$349.95 at amazon.comFor kicks, we ordered a $25 radar detector to see how it fared against higher-priced models from established brands. We purchased one made by a company called Besworlds and tested it alongside all of the other radar detectors—and it failed to detect any sort of radar at all. (It has since been discontinued on Amazon.)
We cracked it open, only to find no evidence of any radar-detecting components—just some wires and a couple of circuit boards.
After a good laugh and lots of "why am I not surprised?" reactions, we wanted to make it clear how important it is to invest in a radar detector from an established brand. You don't need to spend a thousand bucks, but don't let a suspiciously cheap price entice you—avoided speeding tickets will pay for a quality detector faster than you might think. Get a good one from a brand you recognize, and enjoy the peace of mind.To understand a radar detector, it's essential to understand what radar and radar guns are. Radar is an acronym for radio detection and ranging and, just as the name suggests, is a technology that uses radio waves to "see" an object and determine its distance and velocity. Police radar guns emit different radar bands like X band, K band, or Ka band. (If you want to do a deep-dive, there's a thriving radar detector enthusiast community on Reddit.)
However, radar detectors are not cheap. Even entry-level models will cost two or three hundred bucks, and top-of-the-line models run closer to $1000 than $500. Before you plunk down your hard-earned cash on a radar detector, here are some things you should know.
For the most part, radar detectors are legal for use in personal vehicles in most U.S. states—but there are exceptions. Radar detectors are prohibited for use in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the District of Columbia. In Puerto Rico, radar detectors are legal in all passenger vehicles but illegal in commercial vehicles. North of the border, radar detectors are legal in British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan but illegal in all other provinces. That said, anyone considering using a radar detector should check their local laws, because this article is not legal advice.
Under U.S. federal law, the use of radar or laser speed detectors is illegal nationwide in all commercial vehicles over 10,000 pounds. This includes most 18-wheelers. In commercial vehicles under 10,000 pounds, radar detectors are allowed—except in Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Radar detectors are always illegal to use on any United States military base.
California and Minnesota have laws against devices attached to a windshield that obstruct the driver's view. No matter where you live, we'd advise against attaching any device to your windshield that a motor officer might construe as obstructing your view. It's a judgment call, but we prefer not to give the cops any reason to judge us or our vehicle.
False alarms are a big issue, so many manufacturers advertise their detectors as "ultra-quiet"—meaning, they filter out false alarms from motion-detecting doors on storefronts and blind-spot monitors from other vehicles. If your radar detector is not quiet, i.e., not good at filtering these out, you're in for an obnoxious drive that will give your heart a workout.
However, some folks might prefer their radar detector to sniff out and alert every possible radar signal on the road. While providing more noise, they're theoretically less prone to missing actual police.
Radar detectors will sometimes miss staked-out cops due to a variety of factors. Lidar is becoming more and more prevalent, and conventional radar detectors can't pick that up. These devices aren't ticket-proof—think of them more as a wingman in case you lose track of your speed. Even if they work most of the time, it's better than not having one at all.
Lidar guns (more commonly referred to as laser guns) provide law enforcement with a virtually instant readout of your speed. Lidar is far more difficult to evade than traditional radar because it's nearly undetectable by radar detectors unless it's on and already measuring your speed—and by then, it's probably too late.
Crowdsourced apps such as Waze are actually quite handy at alerting you to a cop using a lidar gun than a windshield- or dash-mounted radar detector. If you really want to beat lidar, look into laser jammers.
Yes, some radar detector brands, like Escort and Radenso, offer ticket guarantees. Of course, there are a bunch of terms and conditions to comb through, but if you get a ticket while using one of their radar detectors, you might have a chance at getting that money back within a time period. It's something to keep in mind through your purchase process.We approached this test with two main parameters in mind: false-alert detection and overall detection range. For detection range, we took the radar detectors to the Car and Driver proving ground, and over three runs, we measured the front, rear, and approaching a 90-degree corner range average of each device with our own radar gun emitting Ka-band radar. We took notes on both initial detection (a blip) and locked detection (constant). Some radar detectors defaulted to "lock" right away, so we used that average number in the test results above.
To see how well each radar detector weeded out false alerts, we switched the detectors from their most sensitive mode to their most selective and rolled through Ann Arbor's strip-mall gauntlet. Without filtering, this drive is essentially a continuous, seven-mile-long alert due to the motion-detecting automatic doors from the dozens of storefronts that line the route. We marked false-alert locations on a map and verified those alerts by driving the opposite direction. In theory, most of these detectors are designed to learn where false alerts are and ignore them automatically, but we found it takes a few trips.
Finally, we took extensive notes on installation, how user-friendly each detector is, and other quality-of-life observations.X band alerts mean a radio wave has been detected within the 8.0-GHz to 12.0-GHz range. The X-band is the oldest radar frequency, and these days it's considered outdated if not altogether obsolete. For this reason, many radar-detector enthusiasts turn off the X-band alerts on their devices. However, we recommend keeping it on, since you can't be sure when the last time your local police or highway patrol upgraded their radar guns.
K band replaced X band back in the '80s and is the most widely used radar band in the United States, operating between 18.0 GHz and 27.0 GHz. When a K-band alert goes off, it may be the police. Still, it's also very possible it's a false alert triggered by various features like auto pilot, radar cruise control, and blind-spot-monitoring systems, since many of these systems operate on K-band frequencies.
Ka band is the latest and quickly becoming the most common radar band, typically found at 33.8, 34.7, and 35.5 GHz. In recent years, law enforcement has favored Ka-band because it is the most difficult to detect. Ka-band false alerts are uncommon, so if your detector throws a Ka alert, pay attention—it's probably the police.They do. Whether yours is powerful or high-tech enough to detect police radar reliably every time is only part of the problem. There's no nationwide standard for police radar; an officer in rural Nebraska may still use 30-year-old X-band guns (don't ask us how we know), while urban police use Ka-band radar or even laser guns.
Conventional radio radar (X, K, Ka bands) is relatively easy to detect, and a basic radar detector should have no problem picking up these signals. Hopefully, your detector sounds the alarm in time for you to scrub enough speed before a radar gun can accurately measure how fast you were going.
Additionally, modern radar detectors often include a light-sensitive panel that detects laser beams from lidar guns, and some filter noise from motion detectors at businesses, blind-spot monitors on other vehicles, and even other radar detectors.
It's important to note that no radar detector is 100 percent effective; there's no guarantee that even with a radar detector on your dash, you won't get a speeding ticket. Radar technology is constantly improving and being upgraded—and so are radar detectors.
Think of your cellphone from just a few years ago versus the smartphone in your pocket today; much like your old flip-phone, your old radar detector may already be obsolete. Consider upgrading to one of the newer models spotlighted above.
Well, that's subjective. Radar detectors can cost anywhere from a couple hundred bucks to $700 or more, so it's no small investment. A lot of drivers swear by them, insisting their radar detector has paid for itself many times over. Others say they're a waste of money and that fastidious scanning of traffic for brake lights and a roof-mounted gumball is better practice.
We're not here to tell anyone how they ought to drive, but if you drive fast, speeding tickets are a very real risk. If you tend to speed regularly or just have bad luck with speeding tickets, a radar detector could be a solid investment.
In addition to how an individual radar detector works and the type of signals it detects, a major difference between older radar detectors and newer, higher-end devices is the number of false alerts given. False alerts can be caused by anything that, like police radar, uses X-, K-, or Ka-band frequencies. This includes traffic monitors and roadside electronic warning signs for emergency vehicles. Modern radar detectors use advanced processing to filter out false signals.
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) common in many modern cars are among the biggest sources of false alerts these days. These include things like adaptive cruise control, lane-departure warnings, and blind-spot-monitoring systems. Such systems typically use K-band radio frequencies to determine how far away an object is from a vehicle, so just being near another car could set off your radar detector.
Automatic door openers are another source of false alarms—not just garage door openers but also the auto-door openers used by retail storefronts. If you're using an aged radar detector, simply driving past your neighborhood grocery store could set the thing off. If you're getting more false alerts than ever, that's a sign your radar detector may have outlived its usefulness. Consider upgrading to one of the devices above.Autoweek relies on decades of experience in the automotive space to help you make informed purchasing choices. Our product selection and gear recommendations are editorially independent and based on hands-on testing, personal experience, and knowledge—not hype.
Autoweek has a strict policy against accepting payment for links or product placement in articles. We won't recommend something we wouldn't buy ourselves, and we'll never claim to have used or tested something we haven't. We're more concerned with our readers' trust than our bottom line.
We've evaluated dozens of product categories, like dash cams, OBD-II scanners, and home EV chargers. Read more about our product testing process here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is Liquid Glass? Internet reacts to Apple's new software design
USA TODAY and Yahoo may earn commission from links in this article. Pricing and availability subject to change. Apple's Liquid Glass made a splashy debut this week, but it might not be for everyone. Some social media users have been quick to criticize or poke fun at the "beautiful, new" software design for iOS 26, which was unveiled at the 2025 Worldwide Developers Conference, an annual information technology conference hosted by the tech juggernaut. The design, dubbed Liquid Glass, was crafted with a "translucent material [that] reflects and refracts its surroundings, while dynamically transforming to help bring greater focus to content," Apple said in a news release. Alan Dye, Apple's vice president of Human Interface Design, called the iOS 26 rollout the company's "broadest software design update ever." 'It combines the optical qualities of glass with a fluidity only Apple can achieve, as it transforms depending on your content or context," said Dye in a statement. Here's what to know about Liquid Glass, and what people are saying about it. Liquid Glass is a new software design, or aesthetic, described by Apple CEO Tim Cook as "Expressive. Delightful. But still instantly familiar." Expressive. Delightful. But still instantly our new software design with Liquid Glass. — Tim Cook (@tim_cook) June 9, 2025 According to Apple, the "look" makes apps and system experiences more expressive and delightful while being instantly familiar. It is translucent and behaves like glass in the real world and its color is informed by surrounding content and intelligently adapts between light and dark environments. The new design, unlike previous iterations, will extend across platforms, including iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS Tahoe 26, tvOS 26 and watchOS 26. Many people like the idea of Apple's "Liquid Glass," but the execution, not as much. Some of the most prominent concerns include the readability of notifications and the distortion to the image behind the squiggly, bubble-shaped app outline. "The new liquid glass looks abysmal and is a perfect example of focusing on form/prettiness/design over of functionality/readability/practicality like, what are we doing here," an X user wrote in a June 9 post. Some have also speculated the new design would not have passed the sniff test of the late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. "Steve Jobs had very famously said that design was how it works, not how it thoughts on liquid glass would have been interesting," one user wrote, referencing a famous quote from the founder. Others, still, felt that Apple completely missed the mark by offering the "liquid glass display" instead of revisiting the AI upgrades unveiled at last year's WWDC. Memes, critiques and threads have surfaced on social in the wake of Apple's announcement. See a compilation of posts made about "Liquid Glass" below: So Apple's next big thing, aka Liquid Glass, is random icon packs from the Android world.🤣😂🤣😅 #WWDC25 #iOS26 #Apple #Android — Sadeeq (@Bunis_Malli) June 9, 2025 Market: "we want AI"Apple: best we can do is liquid glass display$AAPL #WWDC25 — Javelin Capital (@Jimmy_Javelin) June 9, 2025 My 85% battery health iPhone 13 trying to run Liquid Glass on iOS 26 — GSX (@GigaSyntax) June 9, 2025 Let's ignore those readability concerns for a at these satisfying Liquid Glass animations & visual effects on iOS 26. — Alvin (@sondesix) June 9, 2025 Liquid Glass definitely looks totally fine and normal — Rich Woods (@TheRichWoods) June 9, 2025 The thing is, Liquid Glass looks great at the component level, like the ones in this video. But once you put everything together and fill the screen, it turns into noise and makes things feel way too — Shayan (@ImSh4yy) June 9, 2025 Apple's Liquid Glass rollout is actually genius: the design ensures that you can't read the comically-wrong Apple Intelligence notification summaries. — Trung Phan (@TrungTPhan) June 10, 2025 Liquid glass…. 'this new material'. Ffs it's a graphic. — Asoz Rashid (@AsozRashid) June 9, 2025 I like the idea of liquid glass but the readability is not good at all…#WWDC25 — Bradley (@VerdeSelvans) June 10, 2025 I don't think the reaction to Apple's liquid glass is a 'who moved my cheese' moment. This is just objectively bad design: — Bryan Jones (@bdkjones) June 10, 2025 Liquid Glassに対する既視感 — あるごす (@argos_M1111) June 9, 2025 the Liquid Glass effect is so satisfying on menus — † lucia scarlet 🩸 (@luciascarlet) June 10, 2025 liquid glass looks sick — Dan Toomey (@dhtoomey) June 9, 2025 steve jobs in heaven watching apple introduce the liquid glass design. — Sahil (@sahilypatel) June 9, 2025 Apple trying to convince us they've done something groundbreaking by adjusting the opacity of the control center and calling it 'liquid glass' should be a crime. — no chaser, neat. (@Pvleng) June 10, 2025 Contributing: James Powel and Mike Snider, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is Liquid Glass? New Apple iPhone aesthetic sparks discussion
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI-Google cloud deal, metals rally, Insmed trial results
Yahoo Finance host Josh Lipton tracks today's top moving stocks and biggest market stories in this Market Minute, including OpenAI's reported deal with Google's (GOOG, GOOGL) cloud service, silver (SI=F) and gold futures (GC=F) rallying, and Insmed (INSM) stock surging on new drug trial results. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. It's time for Yahoo! Finance's Market Minute. US stocks little changed here as investors wait for clues on trade talks between the US and China. Open AI inked a deal with Alphabet's Google Cloud service, that's according to Reuters. The deal comes as Open AI looks to meet its growing needs for computing capacity. This would mark a surprising collaboration between the two AI competitors. Shares of Alphabet rising in today's trade. Turning to precious metals, silver and gold retreating, taking a breather from their recent rally. Pullback coming after the metals have surged higher amid the decline of the US dollar and uncertainty over President Trump's tariff policies. InMed shares surging to the highest intraday level in nearly 24 years. Company reporting positive results for its mid-stage trial of its experimental hypertension drug. Stifel viewing InMed's data as quote "a best case scenario" and easily exceeding expectations. And that's your Yahoo! Finance Market


Business Wire
12 hours ago
- Business Wire
FranklinCovey Appoints Dariusz Paczuski as Chief Marketing Officer
SALT LAKE CITY--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- FranklinCovey (NYSE: FC), one of the largest and most trusted leadership companies in the world, today announced it has appointed Dariusz Paczuski as its Chief Marketing Officer. Paczuski said, 'I'm honored to steward and shape the future of such an esteemed brand. I look forward to maximizing our impact on a global scale and advancing our mission to enable greatness in people and organizations everywhere.' Share 'We're thrilled to have Dariusz join us,' said Paul Walker, FranklinCovey CEO. 'He has an impressive track record of building iconic brands in highly competitive sectors in media, services, and tech. His passion for our mission, customer-centric focus, and expertise in AI and brand amplification will further strengthen our market position, accelerate our business growth, and enable greatness in even more people and more organizations everywhere.' 'It's inspiring to join such a passionate and purposeful team,' said Paczuski. 'FranklinCovey is the world leader in transforming organizations by building exceptional leaders, teams, and cultures that get results. I was introduced to the 7 Habits early in my life and having built a decades-long career in B2B and B2C media and tech, what stands out to me as a business leader and attracts me to this opportunity is the proven durability and impact of these core principles. It's exciting to think about how we will position, package, and deliver powerful solutions to help leaders improve people and organizational performance at scale and in the digital age.' Paczuski is a global marketing executive with 25+ years of experience driving customer-led growth, repositioning brands, and leading digital transformation across media and technology companies. He has held marketing leadership roles at media companies and tech pioneers including Verizon, Yahoo, Microsoft, Tellme, AOL, Netscape, and NBC. His expertise spans public and private enterprises, VC and PE-backed firms, and subscription and advertising-based companies with revenues of up to $7.5 billion. He was most recently the Global CMO at Globalization Partners, the leading global employment platform, where he helped launch Gia, a global HR agent powered by AI. Previously, at Verizon, he launched the Verizon Media brand, rebranded Yahoo, and helped execute a strategic turnaround that reignited user and revenue growth. Paczuski added, 'I'm honored to steward and shape the future of such an esteemed brand. I look forward to maximizing our impact on a global scale and advancing our mission to enable greatness in people and organizations everywhere.' He holds a bachelor's degree in marketing and an International Business Certificate from California State University Long Beach. He is a graduate of the Stanford Executive Program, Microsoft Member Bench, and GE Financial Management Program. Paczuski was born in Poland and has lived in the UK, Norway, and now resides in the San Francisco Bay Area. About FranklinCovey FranklinCovey (NYSE: FC) is one of the largest and most trusted leadership companies in the world, with directly owned and licensee partner offices providing professional services in over 160 countries and territories. The Company transforms organizations by partnering with clients to build leaders, teams, and cultures that get breakthrough results through collective action, which leads to a more engaging work experience for their people. Available through the FranklinCovey All Access Pass, FranklinCovey's best-in-class content, solutions, experts, technology, and metrics seamlessly integrate to ensure lasting behavior change at scale. Solutions are available in multiple delivery modalities in more than 20 languages. This approach to leadership and organizational change has been tested and refined by working with tens of thousands of teams and organizations over the past 30 years. Clients have included organizations in the Fortune 100, Fortune 500 and thousands of small and mid-sized businesses, numerous government entities, and educational institutions. To learn more, visit and enjoy exclusive content across FranklinCovey's social media channels at: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.