logo
The Knicks fired coach ‘Thibs.' That's just wrong.

The Knicks fired coach ‘Thibs.' That's just wrong.

Washington Post2 days ago

I know there are many bigger outrages in the world, but today I would like to share with you the frustration that gnaws at me as a fan of the New York Knicks following the firing on Tuesday of our gruff but beloved — and widely respected — head coach, Tom Thibodeau.
'Thibs,' as he is universally known to the Knickerbocker faithful, had just taken the team to its first Eastern Conference finals in a quarter-century. Sure, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in six games, and that was deeply disappointing — particularly after a historic Game 1 meltdown in which the Knicks somehow blew a 14-point lead with less than three minutes to go. But in the previous round, the Knicks had knocked off the defending champions, the Boston Celtics, and that was a result almost no one saw coming. (The Knicks had not beaten the Celtics once during the regular season.)
The Knicks were on a good trajectory — and worlds removed from the chaos and mediocrity in which they had been mired when Thibs was hired in 2020. Since Jeff Van Gundy stepped down in 2002, the Knicks have had 13 head coaches. Only two of them have delivered winning records, and none could match Thibs's postseason success: He has taken them to the playoffs in four out of five seasons.
This year's roster was the best Thibs ever had, anchored by two All-Stars: the clutch point guard Jalen Brunson and the sweet-shooting big man Karl-Anthony Towns. But Towns had been traded to New York just before the start of the season, while another key player, center Mitchell Robinson, was injured for most of the season. It often takes a team time to jell, and the Knicks appeared to find a new level in the playoffs.
There was every reason to give Thibs an opportunity try to build on the Knicks' success next season. But no. After helping to turn Madison Square Garden once again into the mecca of the hardcourt, Thibs has been sent packing. The decision was said to be made by team president Leon Rose, but looming in the background is the Knicks' mercurial owner, James Dolan, who has been blamed by fans for their long years of suffering.
To me, this seems to violate the fundamental compact of sports: You win and you get rewarded; you lose and you get punished. Thibs won — and he was punished just the same.
Granted, he didn't 'win the chip,' short for championship. No Knicks team has since 1973, but they were heading in the right direction, with a talented roster and a veteran, skilled coach to lead them. Notably, Thibs appeared to have a rock-solid relationship with Brunson, the team captain.
There were, of course, complaints about Thibs. There always are with any coach — or any human being, for that matter. He was often criticized for playing his starters too many minutes and wearing them down by playoff time. But, despite their heavy usage, all of the Knicks starters were healthy in the playoffs.
Another complaint was that Thibs was inflexible in his rotations, that he stuck with his five starters no matter what, despite evidence that the starters were getting outscored when on the floor together. It's a legitimate criticism, but part of the problem was the lack of bench depth. Knicks management dealt away key role players to assemble a fearsome five led by Brunson and Towns.
It would be instructive to see how Thibs would do next season if team president Rose, who has done a superb job so far of upgrading the roster, managed to restock the team with better role players. Now we will never know. Instead a new head coach will be tasked with meeting the high standards set by Thibs — which include back-to-back seasons with more than 50 wins for the first time since the Pat Riley era in the 1990s.
Thibs's firing, unfortunately, is part of a bizarre trend in the NBA of getting rid of successful, experienced head coaches. Every winner of the NBA Coach of the Year award between 2018 and 2023 has been fired. That includes Thibs, who earned the honor with the Knicks in 2021. (He had previously won it in 2011 with the Chicago Bulls.) Even coaches who win the title aren't safe: Los Angeles Lakers coach Frank Vogel won in 2020 and was fired in 2022. Milwaukee Bucks coach Mike Budenholzer won in 2021 and was fired in 2023. Denver Nuggets coach Michael Malone won in 2023 and was fired in April, before the end of the regular season. All three are now considered contenders for the Knicks job.
The holy grail that all these teams are chasing is what the Golden State Warriors did in 2014: They fired a winning head coach, Mark Jackson, and replaced him with Steve Kerr, who went on to win even more: Kerr led the team to three titles. But for every Jackson-to-Kerr switch, there are plenty of changes such as the one when the Bulls got rid of Thibs in 2015 and replaced him with Fred Hoiberg. Thibs had a winning percentage of .647; Hoiberg, .426.
I remain enthusiastic about a Knicks team that has become one of the best in the league. I just hope Rose and Dolan know what they are doing. Because what they have done to Thibodeau feels wrong. All will be forgiven if Thibs's successor brings home a title — but there will be hell to pay if the new coach squanders what he built.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Phillies place Bryce Harper on injured list with wrist inflammation
Phillies place Bryce Harper on injured list with wrist inflammation

Washington Post

time36 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Phillies place Bryce Harper on injured list with wrist inflammation

PITTSBURGH — The scuffling Philadelphia Phillies suffered a blow Saturday when they placed first baseman Bryce Harper on the 10-day injured list because of right wrist inflammation before their game against the Pirates. Harper sat out Friday night's 5-4 loss to the Pirates. The move is retroactive to Friday. The two-time National League MVP and eight-time All-Star is hitting .258 with nine home runs, 34 RBIs and eight stolen bases in 57 games. He missed five games from May 26 to June 2 with a bruised right elbow after being hit by a pitch from Atlanta's Spencer Strider.

Thunder-Pacers NBA Finals Game 1 Draws Lowest Audience in Nearly 40 Years
Thunder-Pacers NBA Finals Game 1 Draws Lowest Audience in Nearly 40 Years

Newsweek

time42 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Thunder-Pacers NBA Finals Game 1 Draws Lowest Audience in Nearly 40 Years

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entering the 2025 NBA Finals, one of the biggest debates around the series was how the ratings would play out. With both the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers being small-market teams, many wondered whether fans would be tuning in. More NBA news: Thunder Star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Speaks Out Following NBA Finals Game 1 Collapse Game 1 between the two teams was electric, but the fears of the NBA did play out. According to Sports Media Watch, Game 1 of the NBA Finals generated the lowest audience since 1988, excluding the 2020 and 2021 series, which were impacted by COVID-19. The game reportedly averaged a 4.7 rating and 8.91 million viewers on ABC. This is far lower than Game 1 of last season between the Boston Celtics and Dallas Mavericks, which drew in around 11 million viewers on average. OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA - JUNE 05: Tyrese Haliburton #0 of the Indiana Pacers scores a basket with .3 seconds remaining during the fourth quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game One of the 2025... OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA - JUNE 05: Tyrese Haliburton #0 of the Indiana Pacers scores a basket with .3 seconds remaining during the fourth quarter against the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game One of the 2025 NBA Finals at Paycom Center on June 05, 2025 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. More Photo byBut there is one saving grace for the league. With the game being close at the end, the NBA Finals peaked around 11 million viewers to witness the game-winning shot by Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton. The NBA also reports that Game 1 generated nearly three times more viewers than any other network. Additionally, the game registered more than 500 million views on social media, which is an all-time record. 🏀 Indiana's Game 1 victory over Oklahoma City in the NBA Finals on ABC peaked with 11 million viewers at the end of the 4th quarter when Tyrese Haliburton hit the game-winning shot. 🏀 Game 1 averaged nearly 3 times more viewers than the next most-watched program on any other... — NBA Communications (@NBAPR) June 7, 2025 It seems that more people were tuning in online, rather than actually watching the game. This could be part of the new digital era, or people simply not wanting to pay for all the different streaming services to watch games. This could either help set up more excitement for the next game, or it could just be a spur-of-the-moment situation for the NBA. Either way, the league could be in trouble if ratings continue to be low throughout this series. More NBA news: Shaquille O'Neal Shares Harsh Criticism for Thunder After NBA Finals Loss But with two tiny markets in the NBA and no established stars in the series, things could be tough for the league. Haliburton and Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander are superstars in the NBA, but neither one of them is established enough to draw in an audience of casual fans. Entering the series, many believed that Oklahoma City would dominate the Pacers. But Indiana showed some tricks up its sleeve, and that could help generate more interest as the series goes forward. More NBA news: Knicks and Former MVP Have 'Mutual Interest' Amid Trade Rumors: Report Kevin Durant Trade Speculation Will Reportedly Get Aggressive in Coming Weeks Clippers Seen as Sleeper Team to Land Former NBA MVP: Report For more on Pacers, Thunder, and general NBA news, head over to Newsweek Sports.

Hamlin undeterred by ruling siding with NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row
Hamlin undeterred by ruling siding with NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hamlin undeterred by ruling siding with NASCAR in lawsuit filed by Jordan-owned 23XI and Front Row

FILE - Michael Jordan, center, and Curtis Polk, left, co-owners of 23XI Racing, watch during qualifying beside 23XI Racing President Steve Lauletta, right, for a NASCAR Cup Series Championship auto race, Nov. 9, 2024, in Avondale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher, file) Denny Hamlin waits to be introduced before a NASCAR Cup Series auto race Sunday, June 1, 2025, in Lebanon, Tenn. (AP Photo/George Walker IV) Denny Hamlin waits to be introduced before a NASCAR Cup Series auto race Sunday, June 1, 2025, in Lebanon, Tenn. (AP Photo/George Walker IV) FILE - Michael Jordan, center, and Curtis Polk, left, co-owners of 23XI Racing, watch during qualifying beside 23XI Racing President Steve Lauletta, right, for a NASCAR Cup Series Championship auto race, Nov. 9, 2024, in Avondale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher, file) Denny Hamlin waits to be introduced before a NASCAR Cup Series auto race Sunday, June 1, 2025, in Lebanon, Tenn. (AP Photo/George Walker IV) BROOKLYN, Mich. (AP) — Denny Hamlin is unfazed that a three-judge federal appellate panel vacated an injunction that required NASCAR to recognize 23XI, which he owns with Michael Jordan, and Front Row as chartered teams as part of an antitrust lawsuit. 'That's just such a small part of the entire litigation,' Hamlin said Saturday, a day ahead of the FireKeepers Casino 400. "I'm not deterred at all. We're in good shape.' Advertisement Hamlin said Jordan feels the same way. 'He just remains very confident, just like I do,' Hamiln said. NASCAR has not commented on the latest ruling. 23XI and Front Row sued NASCAR late last year after refusing to sign new agreements on charter renewals. They asked for a temporary injunction that would recognize them as chartered teams for this season, but the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, on Thursday ruled in NASCAR's favor. 'We're looking at all options right now,' Hamlin said. The teams, each winless this year, said they needed the injunction because the current charter agreement prohibits them from suing NASCAR. 23XI also argued it would be harmed because Tyler Reddick's contract would have made him a free agent if the team could not guarantee him a charter-protected car. Advertisement Hamlin insisted he's not worried about losing drivers because of the uncertainty. 'I'm not focused on that particularly right this second,' he said. Reddick, who was last year's regular-season champion and competed for the Cup title in November, enters the race Sunday at Michigan ranked sixth in the Cup Series standings. The charter system is similar to franchises in other sports, but the charters are revocable by NASCAR and have expiration dates. The six teams may have to compete as 'open' cars and would have to qualify on speed each week to make the race and would receive a fraction of the money. Advertisement Without a charter, Hamlin said it would cost the teams 'tens of millions,' to run three cars. 'We're committed to run this season open if we have to,' he said. 'We're going to race and fulfill all of our commitments no matter what. We're here to race. Our team is going to be here for the long haul and we're confident of that.' The antitrust case isn't scheduled to be heard until December. NASCAR has not said what it would do with the six charters held by the two organizations if they are returned to the sanctioning body. There are 36 chartered cars for a 40-car field. 'We feel like facts were on our side,' Hamlin said. 'I think if you listen to the judges, even they mentioned that we might be in pretty good shape.' ___ AP auto racing:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store