Man donates all his possesions to live life of non-ownership
By Ben Barry
A man gave away his home, all his possessions and every dollar in his bank account to live a life of "non-ownership."
Robin Greenfield, 38, set out to experiment with having nothing to his name, while walking 1,600 miles along the Pacific Coast from the US/Canada border to Los Angeles, California.
He wanted to prove ownership and money is a concept he can live without - and Robin is continuing to live his life "below the federal poverty threshold" and live with what he needs to meet basic needs.
When he reached LA, Robin gave away all his possessions to strangers and friends, including the clothes off his back and every dollar he had.
He then entered into a three-month experiment of non-ownership, having absolutely nothing to his name, and he sat naked in Griffith Park for five minutes until a kind stranger gave him a blanket.
Robin spent the next three months living in Griffith Park, relying on the kindness of strangers, going on foraging walks and speaking to people about his mission.
Robin, an environmental activist from Asheville, North Carolina, said: "Living simply and non-ownership have been core aspects of my life since I awoke in 2011 to the reality that the 'American dream' is the 'world's nightmare'.
"Through living a life of consumeristic individuality designed around the ownership of countless possessions, I was wrapped in a web of exploitation, inequity, injustice and incredible destruction.
"Nearly every possession I had and every action I was taking was harming the Earth, my global neighbors and the plants and animals we share this home with.
"I decided to unravel the web of consumerism that was my life, taking my life back and living more harmoniously with life upon Earth."
In November 2019, Robin's journey to non-ownership truly began when he gave away his 10 ft by 10 ft tiny home.
In July 2024, Robin set off on a 1,600-mile "walk of gratitude" from along the Pacific Coast from the Canada/US border to Los Angeles.
Robin said: "The last home I had was the tiny home in Orlando, Florida, when I was growing and foraging 100% of my food. I gave away that tiny home in November 2019 when I left Florida.
"On January 26th, 2025, I sat naked in Griffith Park without a single physical possession or dollar to my name.
"I have no ID - no passport, driver's license, social security card or birth certificate - no keys, no car, no phone, no computer, no clothes.
"I have no bank account, no savings, no investments, no credit card, no credit, no insurance."
After seven months on the road - sleeping in a tent and foraging for food - Robin arrived at his destination on January 26, 2025.
Before he got there, he gave away all his belongings - including his home, clothes and dollars to his name to friends and strangers - entering into an experiment of non-ownership.
Robin said: "For three months, I lived in service to the community, practiced simple living, practiced compassionate communication, deepened my connection with earth and our plant and animal relatives.
"I practiced living in the present moment with mindfulness, deepened my wholeness and completeness within and shared my messages with those who find benefit and meaning in my experience and perspective."
Robin said many people labeled him as crazy, and "assumed" he lost his mind.
But insists he "refuses to have so much, while others have so little".
Robin said: "I refuse to meet my basic needs at the expense to others. I refuse to let my life be a burden upon life on Earth.
"In 2016, I simplified my life down to 111 possessions and in 2020, to just 44 possessions.
"I have everything I need. I am a whole and complete human being, just as I am."
Robin says ownership is not required to grow as a human being, and after doing his experiment, he's realised money and ownership are "just a concept".
He said: "Some say money makes the world go around. I've been watching, and I see no evidence of this.
"Money is a recent advent of humanity. We have lived without it for thousands upon thousands of years. The world was indeed going around then, and would continue to do so if we lost interest in this concept tomorrow.
"The reason that money works is because enough people believe it and choose to act upon this belief.
"Thus, I am fully confident that I can exist without money."
The post Man donates all his possesions to live life of non-ownership appeared first on Talker.
Copyright Talker News. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Americans are obsessed with taking the 'work' out of working out
Every generation has its own version of the vibrating belt machine — the '50s-era contraption that promised to literally shake housewives into shape with minimal effort (and effect). This perpetual fitness obsession is why, on a recent Friday in June, I found myself strapped into the 2025 iteration: an electro-muscle stimulation suit. For 15 minutes, sporting an outfit that had me looking like a cross between Uma Thurman in "Kill Bill" and a Transformer, I lunged, squatted, and pressed around a compact, chic-ish space as the getup intermittently sent little electrical impulses through my body. At first, I cackled as the EMS suit gripped and vibrated me every few seconds as I attempted to move. By the end, I came to dread the waves — it felt like a shock collar people put on dogs to stop them from breaking out of the yard. Despite my discomfort, the premise of the whole thing was enticing: EMS suits supposedly give you the same results in 25 minutes as you would get from working out for four hours, at least according to the fitness studios that market them. The quest to work out without actually doing much work is eternal. We know that exercise has all sorts of benefits. It's good for our hearts, our muscles, our minds. It increases energy, helps us live longer, and prevents disease. In a society that glorifies fit bodies, exercise can help keep things aesthetically in check. The problem is that exercise isn't always the most fun endeavor, at least by many people's estimations. So we find ourselves looking for shortcuts to reap the muscular rewards for a fraction of the sweat equity. Companies are happy to oblige, offering up all sorts of quick fixes. Whether much of this works, fitness-wise, is doubtful, but psychologically, the ploys are effective. "Our capitalistic culture of fitness has really morphed into sellable life hacks, and the process has become transactional for many," says Sam Zizzi, a professor who focuses on sport and exercise physiology at West Virginia University. He compares these various fitness shortcuts to a lottery ticket. You know chances are slim to none that you'll get the winning Powerball ticket, but you buy one anyway just in case. Who doesn't want to hack their way to health, especially in an era of extreme instant gratification — and Ozempic? American fitness culture is intertwined with the American idea of individualism: You pull yourself up by your bootstraps, and success depends on individual commitment and will. An equally powerful American tradition is the desire to have something for nothing, explains Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, a history professor at The New School who's the author of "Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America's Exercise Obsession." We want to believe that there's a magical product right around the corner that will grant us miraculous results with only a small bit of input on our part. "Both of these ideas are equally powerful in making American fitness culture so long-standing," she says. It's human nature to gravitate toward shortcuts. People may think of some of the quick-fix stuff as relics of the past, like the aforementioned vibrating belt machines marketed to women in the mid-20th century, when it was thought that exercise wasn't just unbecoming of women but potentially dangerous. There were also later developments that followed in the belt's wake, like the sauna suits of the 1970s and the ab belts of the '90s. These concepts persist, just in different formats. There are the shaking weights that promise to rattle your bicep curls into overdrive, vibrating platforms for you to balance on to turbocharge your squats, and sculpting machines that promise to boost your glutes without you having to do a single squat. "It's human nature to gravitate toward shortcuts," says Cedric Bryant, the president and CEO of the American Council on Exercise. Those shortcuts sound nice, but the research on many of them is limited, and where it does exist, it's often conducted or paid for by the companies selling the products. "The concern with all of these gadgets is that, similar to supplements for weight loss and health benefits, there is no, or at least very little, data and strong comprehensive studies that show, yes, this is going to be beneficial," says Jessica Bartfield, a clinical associate professor of weight management at Wake Forest University's School of Medicine. ACE has commissioned research institutions to test the claims of many of these low-effort, heavily marketed products, Bryant says, and for the most part, they've found many offer marginal benefit at best. And none are a substitute for a comprehensive, regular program of physical activity. "The science behind most of these products is weak, often anecdotal, and almost always overhyped," he says. The effects these products do have aren't particularly impressive. Take the example of electromagnetic body sculpting treatments, such as Emsculpt, which are supposed to tighten muscle and burn fat. One review of the literature on the practice found that patients' measurements decreased by 2.9 millimeters on average, or about a 10th of an inch. "That doesn't seem like very much," says Melanie Jay, the director of the NYU Langone Comprehensive Program on Obesity. It doesn't give you the same benefits as exercise or losing weight and maintaining weight loss. In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for BTL Aesthetics, the maker of Emsculpt, sent along a pair of presentations from the company touting the product's ability to increase muscle strength, prevent muscle loss, and enhance flexibility. They also pushed back on the conclusions drawn by the 2022 literature review, arguing in part that its data largely encompasses the Emsculpt, not the newer Emsculpt Neo (though two of the studies the independent paper cites include the newer version as well). They put me in touch with two doctors to vouch for the device — Jonathan Schoeff, of Rocky Mountain Advanced Spine Access, and Eugene Lou, from Minivasive Orthopedics. Schoeff said that the Emsculpt is a powerful tool to "direct metabolic change" though he advises patients it's not a replacement for the gym. Lou said the device "absolutely can be" a replacement for exercise, citing the positive experience of two of his patients in rehab settings. Schoeff is a paid educational consultant for BTL and participated in research sponsored by the company. Lou is a paid speaker for the company. Leah Verebes, a physical therapist and assistant professor at Touro University, notes that studies and independent reviews indicate that the fat loss effects of Emsculpt are modest and often within the margin of error. "Overall, Emsculpt is best suited for functional wellness and rehabilitation, not significant weight loss or body contouring," she says. She had comparable thoughts on EMS suits, like the one I tried: they have some potential in the rehab world, but their fitness value outside that is more about getting the ball rolling on a behavioral shift. In other words, if the shocking suit gets me off the couch, fine, but otherwise, I can move on. Verebes is similarly agnostic on the Shake Weight, an as-seen-on-TV classic. It's better than nothing, and the shaking may recruit more muscles than a regular weight, but it's not a replacement for a regular strength routine. "I think you might look a little funny with the Shake Weight, but you know what? If it's getting somebody who normally would just sit on the couch and flex their elbow bringing the can to their mouth, at least they're doing something that's getting their body moving," she says. Coming into this story, I expected the people I talked to to do a real LOL when I mentioned various devices, but that's not entirely what happened. Many of them seemed supportive of the idea that if a wacky little accessory is a way to get people to start doing something, so be it. But people should be realistic about how effective said devices are and whether buying them will actually change their habits. "There's a motivational piece here for people who are ready to change their health," Zizzi says. In sports psychology, motivation driven by outside factors like a new gadget or some office competition often gets "pooh-poohed," he adds, but all motivation is useful. It's just that extrinsic motivation fades fast. He points to the example of fitness trackers — when people get them, they use them and may even increase their activity, but over time that use declines. The fitness graveyard is filled with fads of the past. Who among us hasn't bought a treadmill or a bike or an ab roller, thinking, "This will finally be the thing that gets me to work out," only for it to sit in the corner and collect dust? People's starting points matter, too. Take the devices that let you pedal your legs while watching TV. "On a scale of fitness, it's a 1 out of 10 or a 2 out of 10," Zizzi says. "If you did that and you are diabetic and you don't get any other physical activity, that's probably better than telling somebody, 'Hey, you need to walk, walk 30 minutes a day, five days a week to meet guidelines, or it doesn't count.'" Of course, this isn't all just harmless. Some of these products may hurt people — the supermodel Linda Evangelista said she experienced rare but severe side effects after undergoing CoolSculpting, which is supposed to freeze away fat. Basically, all fitness-related contraptions come with some sort of disclosure or require you to sign something saying that if you get injured or die, it's on you. Jay, from NYU, says she's never recommended one of these treatment hacks to patients. "Maybe if they're trying to decide between a tummy tuck or one of these, I don't know. A tummy tuck is probably more effective, but of course, the risks and the downtime might be higher," she says. But that's not really the point. "The bigger point is that it doesn't give you the same benefits as exercise or losing weight and maintaining weight loss." If I decided I absolutely could not live without the EMS suit, it would probably be an OK addition to my normal workout routine. But I shouldn't try to get by on less than half an hour of exercise once a week. As Verebes said, these sorts of workouts might be better suited to particular applications. Bryant notes that EMS could be helpful for people recovering from an injury because "it helps to restore the connection between the nervous systems and the muscles." For a healthy person, however, the benefit is "going to be much less dramatic." Even the experts and their loved ones aren't immune to this stuff. Jay bought a vibrating platform, but she got really dizzy on it, so she gave it away. Mehlman Petrzela's son bought an ab belt he saw on TikTok. The modern narrative around fitness is that it's not just about being thin — it's about being strong, healthy, and fit at any weight. But underneath all that is an enduring truth: People want to look conventionally attractive. Those attitudes feed the tricks that have long plagued the fitness industry. People get duped by supplements that supposedly burn fat while they sleep and vests that claim to sculpt abs while they sit on the couch, not because they're actually trying to improve their fitness levels, but because they're looking for a shortcut to an aesthetic goal that's often unattainable. "There can be a lot of misinformation, a lot of gimmicks or gadgets or supplements where they make some promises and there is no evidence, no data, to support them," Bartfield says. Social media doesn't help the situation. It places unrealistic aesthetic expectations in front of us all the time — and lets companies sell us endless ways to attempt to achieve them in 10- or 15-second video bites. My Instagram knows that I'm fitness-curious and weight-conscious; it's filled with ads for weight-loss drugs and quick-fix fitness gear. I regularly exchange various hacky fitness ads with friends. The (very skinny) elephant in the room here is the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. Exercise can be arduous and hard. Going to the gym often isn't an instantly gratifying activity. Beyond the overarching purpose that is long-term health, you don't really noticeably accomplish anything with a single run on the treadmill or one set of squats. It's natural that people would rather skip to the fun part of nailing that summer body without sweating it out in a spin class on a frigid day in March. "People are wired for these fast, easy solutions, and your brain naturally goes toward the area of least resistance," Verebes says. The (very skinny) elephant in the room here is the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy (which is the same as Ozempic) and Zepbound (Mounjaro) that really do seem to deliver miracles. They help people with obesity lose weight and, as long as they keep taking the drugs, keep it off. For many people, these drugs can make a real change to their lives. These pretty miraculous drugs may have people looking for miracles elsewhere, which obesity doctors and fitness trainers warn against. GLP-1s need to be accompanied by healthier diets and exercise routines, especially since they can lead to muscle loss. Being thin is not synonymous with being in great shape. "We certainly do not want people to think that you can lose weight, and that equals health," Bartfield says. "There's the idea of nutritional quality, the idea of body composition, right? Maintaining muscle mass." In what would be shocking news to my younger self, I genuinely enjoy exercise. As a person who also likes to eat and drink a fair amount (a fact that would not be a surprise to younger me), I work out most days of the week as part of a perpetual balancing act. But I'm also not immune to the appeal of shortcuts. In my 20s, I tried to work while sitting on an exercise ball, but I had to stop because I couldn't stop myself from slightly bouncing up and down as I typed and making myself nauseous. A few years ago, at the advice of my mother, I spent a couple of thousand dollars on CoolSculpt, which, as far as I could tell, had little effect. I've gone farther down the GLP-1 "microdosing" research rabbit hole than I'd like to admit, though the price tag always scares me off. I don't want to work out with no work, but I'd like to work out with less work. Fitness isn't as easy as diet and exercise. It's also not something that people can hack their way into. To reap the benefits of exercise, you kind of have to exercise. That doesn't mean running a marathon, but it doesn't mean vibrating the fat cells away, either. The good news is that the simplest stuff is cheap or free — go for a walk, lift a weight, find an activity you like. The bad news is that it requires time and effort that a quick-fix mentality doesn't allow for. In the days after my little EMS suit adventure, I was a little sore, indicating the device probably did something. But I won't be going back. The price point was not within my budget — membership at the studio I went to was $225 a month, and you can do it only once a week, which means more than $50 a class. Plus, as mentioned, the intermittent shocking really was not for me. I'll be doing things the old-fashioned way, one weight and stride at a time, until an ad inevitably gets me once again, and I'm testing out the 2026 version of the vibrating belt. Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy. Read the original article on Business Insider

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Working out without working hard
Every generation has its own version of the vibrating belt machine — the '50s-era contraption that promised to literally shake housewives into shape with minimal effort (and effect). This perpetual fitness obsession is why, on a recent Friday in June, I found myself strapped into the 2025 iteration: an electro-muscle stimulation suit. For 15 minutes, sporting an outfit that had me looking like a cross between Uma Thurman in "Kill Bill" and a Transformer, I lunged, squatted, and pressed around a compact, chic-ish space as the getup intermittently sent little electrical impulses through my body. At first, I cackled as the EMS suit gripped and vibrated me every few seconds as I attempted to move. By the end, I came to dread the waves — it felt like a shock collar people put on dogs to stop them from breaking out of the yard. Despite my discomfort, the premise of the whole thing was enticing: EMS suits supposedly give you the same results in 25 minutes as you would get from working out for four hours, at least according to the fitness studios that market them. The quest to work out without actually doing much work is eternal. We know that exercise has all sorts of benefits. It's good for our hearts, our muscles, our minds. It increases energy, helps us live longer, and prevents disease. In a society that glorifies fit bodies, exercise can help keep things aesthetically in check. The problem is that exercise isn't always the most fun endeavor, at least by many people's estimations. So we find ourselves looking for shortcuts to reap the muscular rewards for a fraction of the sweat equity. Companies are happy to oblige, offering up all sorts of quick fixes. Whether much of this works, fitness-wise, is doubtful, but psychologically, the ploys are effective. "Our capitalistic culture of fitness has really morphed into sellable life hacks, and the process has become transactional for many," says Sam Zizzi, a professor who focuses on sport and exercise physiology at West Virginia University. He compares these various fitness shortcuts to a lottery ticket. You know chances are slim to none that you'll get the winning Powerball ticket, but you buy one anyway just in case. Who doesn't want to hack their way to health, especially in an era of extreme instant gratification — and Ozempic? American fitness culture is intertwined with the American idea of individualism: You pull yourself up by your bootstraps, and success depends on individual commitment and will. An equally powerful American tradition is the desire to have something for nothing, explains Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, a history professor at The New School who's the author of "Fit Nation: The Gains and Pains of America's Exercise Obsession." We want to believe that there's a magical product right around the corner that will grant us miraculous results with only a small bit of input on our part. "Both of these ideas are equally powerful in making American fitness culture so long-standing," she says. It's human nature to gravitate toward shortcuts. People may think of some of the quick-fix stuff as relics of the past, like the aforementioned vibrating belt machines marketed to women in the mid-20th century, when it was thought that exercise wasn't just unbecoming of women but potentially dangerous. There were also later developments that followed in the belt's wake, like the sauna suits of the 1970s and the ab belts of the '90s. These concepts persist, just in different formats. There are the shaking weights that promise to rattle your bicep curls into overdrive, vibrating platforms for you to balance on to turbocharge your squats, and sculpting machines that promise to boost your glutes without you having to do a single squat. "It's human nature to gravitate toward shortcuts," says Cedric Bryant, the president and CEO of the American Council on Exercise. Those shortcuts sound nice, but the research on many of them is limited, and where it does exist, it's often conducted or paid for by the companies selling the products. "The concern with all of these gadgets is that, similar to supplements for weight loss and health benefits, there is no, or at least very little, data and strong comprehensive studies that show, yes, this is going to be beneficial," says Jessica Bartfield, a clinical associate professor of weight management at Wake Forest University's School of Medicine. ACE has commissioned research institutions to test the claims of many of these low-effort, heavily marketed products, Bryant says, and for the most part, they've found many offer marginal benefit at best. And none are a substitute for a comprehensive, regular program of physical activity. "The science behind most of these products is weak, often anecdotal, and almost always overhyped," he says. The effects these products do have aren't particularly impressive. Take the example of electromagnetic body sculpting treatments, such as Emsculpt, which are supposed to tighten muscle and burn fat. One review of the literature on the practice found that patients' measurements decreased by 2.9 millimeters on average, or about a 10th of an inch. "That doesn't seem like very much," says Melanie Jay, the director of the NYU Langone Comprehensive Program on Obesity. It doesn't give you the same benefits as exercise or losing weight and maintaining weight loss. In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for BTL Aesthetics, the maker of Emsculpt, sent along a pair of presentations from the company touting the product's ability to increase muscle strength, prevent muscle loss, and enhance flexibility. They also pushed back on the conclusions drawn by the 2022 literature review, arguing in part that its data largely encompasses the Emsculpt, not the newer Emsculpt Neo (though two of the studies the independent paper cites include the newer version as well). They put me in touch with two doctors to vouch for the device — Jonathan Schoeff, of Rocky Mountain Advanced Spine Access, and Eugene Lou, from Minivasive Orthopedics. Schoeff said that the Emsculpt is a powerful tool to "direct metabolic change" though he advises patients it's not a replacement for the gym. Lou said the device "absolutely can be" a replacement for exercise, citing the positive experience of two of his patients in rehab settings. Schoeff is a paid educational consultant for BTL and participated in research sponsored by the company. Lou is a paid speaker for the company. Leah Verebes, a physical therapist and assistant professor at Touro University, notes that studies and independent reviews indicate that the fat loss effects of Emsculpt are modest and often within the margin of error. "Overall, Emsculpt is best suited for functional wellness and rehabilitation, not significant weight loss or body contouring," she says. She had comparable thoughts on EMS suits, like the one I tried: they have some potential in the rehab world, but their fitness value outside that is more about getting the ball rolling on a behavioral shift. In other words, if the shocking suit gets me off the couch, fine, but otherwise, I can move on. Verebes is similarly agnostic on the Shake Weight, an as-seen-on-TV classic. It's better than nothing, and the shaking may recruit more muscles than a regular weight, but it's not a replacement for a regular strength routine. "I think you might look a little funny with the Shake Weight, but you know what? If it's getting somebody who normally would just sit on the couch and flex their elbow bringing the can to their mouth, at least they're doing something that's getting their body moving," she says. Coming into this story, I expected the people I talked to to do a real LOL when I mentioned various devices, but that's not entirely what happened. Many of them seemed supportive of the idea that if a wacky little accessory is a way to get people to start doing something, so be it. But people should be realistic about how effective said devices are and whether buying them will actually change their habits. "There's a motivational piece here for people who are ready to change their health," Zizzi says. In sports psychology, motivation driven by outside factors like a new gadget or some office competition often gets "pooh-poohed," he adds, but all motivation is useful. It's just that extrinsic motivation fades fast. He points to the example of fitness trackers — when people get them, they use them and may even increase their activity, but over time that use declines. The fitness graveyard is filled with fads of the past. Who among us hasn't bought a treadmill or a bike or an ab roller, thinking, "This will finally be the thing that gets me to work out," only for it to sit in the corner and collect dust? People's starting points matter, too. Take the devices that let you pedal your legs while watching TV. "On a scale of fitness, it's a 1 out of 10 or a 2 out of 10," Zizzi says. "If you did that and you are diabetic and you don't get any other physical activity, that's probably better than telling somebody, 'Hey, you need to walk, walk 30 minutes a day, five days a week to meet guidelines, or it doesn't count.'" Of course, this isn't all just harmless. Some of these products may hurt people — the supermodel Linda Evangelista said she experienced rare but severe side effects after undergoing CoolSculpting, which is supposed to freeze away fat. Basically, all fitness-related contraptions come with some sort of disclosure or require you to sign something saying that if you get injured or die, it's on you. Jay, from NYU, says she's never recommended one of these treatment hacks to patients. "Maybe if they're trying to decide between a tummy tuck or one of these, I don't know. A tummy tuck is probably more effective, but of course, the risks and the downtime might be higher," she says. But that's not really the point. "The bigger point is that it doesn't give you the same benefits as exercise or losing weight and maintaining weight loss." If I decided I absolutely could not live without the EMS suit, it would probably be an OK addition to my normal workout routine. But I shouldn't try to get by on less than half an hour of exercise once a week. As Verebes said, these sorts of workouts might be better suited to particular applications. Bryant notes that EMS could be helpful for people recovering from an injury because "it helps to restore the connection between the nervous systems and the muscles." For a healthy person, however, the benefit is "going to be much less dramatic." Even the experts and their loved ones aren't immune to this stuff. Jay bought a vibrating platform, but she got really dizzy on it, so she gave it away. Mehlman Petrzela's son bought an ab belt he saw on TikTok. The modern narrative around fitness is that it's not just about being thin — it's about being strong, healthy, and fit at any weight. But underneath all that is an enduring truth: People want to look conventionally attractive. Those attitudes feed the tricks that have long plagued the fitness industry. People get duped by supplements that supposedly burn fat while they sleep and vests that claim to sculpt abs while they sit on the couch, not because they're actually trying to improve their fitness levels, but because they're looking for a shortcut to an aesthetic goal that's often unattainable. "There can be a lot of misinformation, a lot of gimmicks or gadgets or supplements where they make some promises and there is no evidence, no data, to support them," Bartfield says. Social media doesn't help the situation. It places unrealistic aesthetic expectations in front of us all the time — and lets companies sell us endless ways to attempt to achieve them in 10- or 15-second video bites. My Instagram knows that I'm fitness-curious and weight-conscious; it's filled with ads for weight-loss drugs and quick-fix fitness gear. I regularly exchange various hacky fitness ads with friends. The (very skinny) elephant in the room here is the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs. Exercise can be arduous and hard. Going to the gym often isn't an instantly gratifying activity. Beyond the overarching purpose that is long-term health, you don't really noticeably accomplish anything with a single run on the treadmill or one set of squats. It's natural that people would rather skip to the fun part of nailing that summer body without sweating it out in a spin class on a frigid day in March. "People are wired for these fast, easy solutions, and your brain naturally goes toward the area of least resistance," Verebes says. The (very skinny) elephant in the room here is the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy (which is the same as Ozempic) and Zepbound (Mounjaro) that really do seem to deliver miracles. They help people with obesity lose weight and, as long as they keep taking the drugs, keep it off. For many people, these drugs can make a real change to their lives. These pretty miraculous drugs may have people looking for miracles elsewhere, which obesity doctors and fitness trainers warn against. GLP-1s need to be accompanied by healthier diets and exercise routines, especially since they can lead to muscle loss. Being thin is not synonymous with being in great shape. "We certainly do not want people to think that you can lose weight, and that equals health," Bartfield says. "There's the idea of nutritional quality, the idea of body composition, right? Maintaining muscle mass." In what would be shocking news to my younger self, I genuinely enjoy exercise. As a person who also likes to eat and drink a fair amount (a fact that would not be a surprise to younger me), I work out most days of the week as part of a perpetual balancing act. But I'm also not immune to the appeal of shortcuts. In my 20s, I tried to work while sitting on an exercise ball, but I had to stop because I couldn't stop myself from slightly bouncing up and down as I typed and making myself nauseous. A few years ago, at the advice of my mother, I spent a couple of thousand dollars on CoolSculpt, which, as far as I could tell, had little effect. I've gone farther down the GLP-1 "microdosing" research rabbit hole than I'd like to admit, though the price tag always scares me off. I don't want to work out with no work, but I'd like to work out with less work. Fitness isn't as easy as diet and exercise. It's also not something that people can hack their way into. To reap the benefits of exercise, you kind of have to exercise. That doesn't mean running a marathon, but it doesn't mean vibrating the fat cells away, either. The good news is that the simplest stuff is cheap or free — go for a walk, lift a weight, find an activity you like. The bad news is that it requires time and effort that a quick-fix mentality doesn't allow for. In the days after my little EMS suit adventure, I was a little sore, indicating the device probably did something. But I won't be going back. The price point was not within my budget — membership at the studio I went to was $225 a month, and you can do it only once a week, which means more than $50 a class. Plus, as mentioned, the intermittent shocking really was not for me. I'll be doing things the old-fashioned way, one weight and stride at a time, until an ad inevitably gets me once again, and I'm testing out the 2026 version of the vibrating belt.


Elle
18 hours ago
- Elle
The Best Summer Nail Designs Based On Your Horoscope
From chic French tips and chrome nails to cat-eye designs and marble nails, deciding on a fresh manicure can be overwhelming - which is why determining the best summer nail design based on your horoscope might make the process a little easier. Whether you're an Earth sign who deserves maximalist nails for being everyone's emotional support or the Fire sign who's looking for an aesthetically-pleasing set (try a painterly ombre design) that won't further overwhelm her senses, looking to the stars can be a helpful starting point before your next manicure appointment. The creative Pisces might gravitate towards aura nails or chrome designs, while perfectionist Virgos will appreciate the refined finish of a minimalist nail art. Elsewhere, romantic Libras will enjoy the serenity of white nails. When it comes to finding the perfect summer nail colour, classic red will please the elegant Taurus while a soft pink manicure taps into the gentle spirit of Libras. Unexpected moody tones like inky black will satisfy the non-conformist nature of Scorpios. It goes without saying that you have the final word on your manicure, but if you've ever sat in a nail salon and felt paralysed by the endless colour and design options available, this is certainly a great place to start. Whilst you're at it, why not find out your new favourite summer shoes, bob hair transformation and TV shows based on your horoscope too? Sometimes, when the choices are too much, its best to leave it ups to the stars... Aquarians love a bit of whimsy and they're unafraid to push the boundaries - it's no wonder their social circle looks to them for the latest trends. A glassy red manicure brings the drama, but the translucency gives them that extra edge that sets it apart from the crowd. Pictured: Moschino SS25 Imaginative, creative and with a penchant for the mystical, Pisceans are loved for their sensitive souls. They also tend to be intuitive, and have a way of feeling the vibe of those that surrounds them. What better way to channel a Piscean's magical aura than with an otherworldly silver chrome manicure complete with 3D organic lines on top? A Pisces' aesthetic is anything but basic. Pictured: Private Policy SS25 Yes, the Aries is revered for their magnetic presence and sparkling personality (think fellow Aries Elle Fanning and Pedro Pascal), but for your manicure, lean into the April birth stone: diamonds. Go with an immaculate, nude manicure and add on a crystal or two just one fingertip for an elevated take on embellished nails. Considering that Aries can have a competitive side, this manicure will certainly get the compliments rolling in. Pictured: Peet Dullaert haute couture SS25 Taureans tend to appreciate having a sense of stability, so a classic, vampy red manicure is will keep them feeling at ease. Try a rich scarlet rather than a typical orange-red that's so popular in the summer months. A high-shine finish will please the regal side of Taurus signs. Pictured: Elisabetta Franchi SS25 Considering just how charming, sociable, and versatile a personality Gemini tends to be, a neutral manicure with gilded 3D art is perfect for their suitably full summer calendar. This manicure will take you from boardroom to the bar, and goes with sundresses and a laidback jeans and tee combo. Pictured: PatBo SS25 There is a softness to the Cancer's personality that makes pink nails perfect for them. Seeing as this water sign also appreciates all things pretty and classic, a ballet pink glazed manicure feels trendy and cool, without going too overboard or maximalist. If you are willing to go the extra mile, why not ease in with minimalist nail charm? Pictured: Sinead Gorey SS25 It's no secret that Leos enjoy a bit of drama and glamour. You'll no doubt be putting your best foot forward this summer with showstopping swimwear and perhaps a brand new summer bob haircut, so let your nails complement that. A neat and short silver manicure goes with pretty much everything, and jazzes up the fingertips without competing with the rest of your look. Pictured: Anteprima SS25 Virgos tend to have an eye for exacting details. Couple that with their perfectionist side and an understated nail art is exactly up your street. Try tiny dots on a barely-there base for a something-but-nothing manicure vibe. Pictured: Eudon Choi SS24 Librans often have a serene, dreamy vibe to them. With Venus as their ruling planet, this star sign also has an affinity for romance. White nails capture the tranquility of the Librans perfectly, but why not take it a step further with white on white embellishments and 3D designs? Librans appreciate order, so a tonal manicure brings interest, yet keeps things from being overstimulating. Pictured: PatBo SS24 Scorpios do what they love and love what they do, which means traditional rules and trends do not apply for this star sign. Why do yellow for summer when it's much cooler and off-kilter to do a black manicure for the warmer months? Pair your sunkissed flush with an onyx French tip. Bonus points for a gold nail accessory ala Di Petsa. Pictured: Di Petsa SS25 This free spirited star sign is all about self-expression and their inquisitive nature means they're unafraid to try new things. Ombre, watercolour-esque nails will fulfil a Saggitarian's love for a good time. Take a cue from the December birth stone and try varying shades of blue, whether it's navy or baby blue. Pictured: Ahluwalia SS24 This Earth sign is often the friend who's grounded, hard-working and responsible which means no one deserves a maximalist, magical set of nails more than the Capricorn. This shimmery, star-studded design gives off a princess vibe that'll no doubt please the Capricorn when the compliments come in. Pictured: Adeam SS24 Medina Azaldin is the beauty editor of ELLE and Harper's Bazaar UK, working across print and digital features. She has more than seven years journalism experience and has previously written for Red and Good Hoousekeeping. When she's not demystifying the latest skincare ingredient, sniffing out the next big perfume trend or uncovering the science behind wellness practices, you'll most likely find her in Hatchards Piccadilly or watching a crime series with her cats. Oh, and she's a competitive cheerleader, too.