Women's college basketball power rankings: Who are NCAA Tournament title contenders?
For most of the season, the goal of these power rankings has been to combine an evaluation of a team's performance in the moment with its resume to date. I'm often reluctant to be too reactive to any single result, erring toward a team's total body of work.
But for the last power rankings as the final check-in before Selection Sunday, the only thing that really matters is how a team is playing right now. This week's top 25 is a ranking of who I trust the most heading into the NCAA Tournament, without as much consideration for record or seedings.
Dropped out: Maryland (15), Alabama (17), Richmond (22), Michigan State (23), Louisville (25)
Ben Pickman and I had this discussion last week, and at that point, five teams seemed like realistic title contenders. That number still feels right, but UCLA replaces Notre Dame in this tier after the Bruins won the Big Ten tournament. The fear with the Bruins heading into Indianapolis was that they had no-showed their biggest game of the season, continuing a troubling trend. However, when UCLA was faced with adversity yet again against USC, the Bruins showed a newfound resolve. They bounced back from a double-digit second-half deficit and showed themselves to be the team they were in every non-USC game this season.
Champions #GoBruins pic.twitter.com/LiHYRz8AwJ
— UCLA Women's Basketball (@UCLAWBB) March 9, 2025
Meanwhile, Notre Dame is amid an ill-timed slide. Even if the Irish reached a level that arguably no other team has this season during their 19-game winning streak, they aren't playing nearly as well anymore, and it's hard to know how they can recreate that magic. Coach Niele Ivey took more than an hour to emerge for postgame media after Notre Dame's loss to Florida State in the final week of the regular season. There was a similar wait for Ivey and the players after the semifinal loss to Duke on Saturday. There is something amok in the locker room, and it's spilling onto the court.
Advertisement
UConn and South Carolina continue to take care of business, with the Gamecocks executing an outstanding game plan against a big Texas frontcourt in the SEC championship. Despite the Longhorns and the Trojans losing their title games, their recent play is still strong enough to warrant inclusion in this tier.
GO DEEPER
Women's basketball conference tournaments: Who will earn overall No. 1 NCAA Tournament seed?
Each has had tremendous highs, but there are enough lows to be wary of their abilities to win six games in a row. In addition to Notre Dame's struggles, Duke's defense has been inconsistent outside the state of North Carolina; NC State has questionable depth, specifically in the frontcourt; and TCU has difficulty holding onto leads in the fourth quarter.
Still, it wouldn't be wholly surprising to see any of these teams in Tampa. Even without a true No. 1 option, the Blue Devils have enough depth to compete against the best teams, especially when Ashlon Jackson and Reigan Richardson are shooting the ball well; their defense is also plenty disruptive, especially when ACC tournament MVP Oluchi Okananwa is on the floor. The Wolfpack have an ace scorer in Aziaha James who can take over games as well as an all-world defender in Saniya Rivers, and they were in the Final Four just last year, though James' struggles after experiencing a hip stinger against Duke show how dependent NC State is on her offense.
TCU has a ton of experience — Agnes Emma-Nnopu is an NCAA champ, and Hailey Van Lith, Donovyn Hunter and Taylor Bigby were all in the Elite Eight in 2024, albeit with different teams. The Van Lith-Sedona Prince two-player action is among the nation's toughest to contain. Van Lith's ability to consistently get to the line, as she earned 18 free throws in the Big 12 semifinal and final, helps to stabilize the Horned Frogs during clutch situations.
However, other than the Irish, who are in need of serious introspection, none of these teams have beaten a Tier 1 opponent. That limits their ceiling.
LSU statistically has more in common with the teams in the above category, but the injury uncertainty with Flau'Jae Johnson and Aneesah Morrow drops the Tigers. As it stands, LSU's prospects are similar to its SEC compatriots Kentucky and Oklahoma.
Like the Tigers, the Wildcats and Sooners couldn't compete with Texas and South Carolina but were pretty good against everyone else. There are enough bad matchups for both of them that it's hard to imagine either cutting down nets in March. Kentucky struggles with physicality and can also get sped up, as Oklahoma did by turning its bigs over 16 times in the quarterfinals. The Sooners have serious turnover and transition defense issues, which killed them against South Carolina.
Advertisement
North Carolina has its full lineup back and has the right combination of ball security, 3-point shooting and paint defense to avoid an early upset, especially since the Tar Heels earned the right to play their first two games in Chapel Hill, N.C. Ohio State is also in this group because of the expectation that the Buckeyes will get to play in Columbus.
Serena Sundell… my goodness #Big12WBB | @Phillips66Gas pic.twitter.com/9WQ4ptHd10
— Big 12 Conference (@Big12Conference) March 7, 2025
The Big 12 quartet of Baylor, West Virginia, Oklahoma State and Kansas State is hard to parse. When healthy, the Wildcats are the best of the bunch. However, without Ayoka Lee, they belong in this mishmash of teams that traded wins and losses during the conference season. The Big 12 tournament revealed that the Mountaineers have the most impressive defense but are small throughout their lineup, resulting in inherent structural disadvantages. The Cowgirls are too reliant on Stailee Heard for scoring, and the Bears are also small on the perimeter. But all of these squads are also tough and claw their way back into games. If anything, Kansas State is the most prone to lose control, but if Lee can return, the Wildcats' upside is too high to ignore.
Each has a singular strength that will make it a tough matchup, if only in the opening round of the NCAA Tournament. Vanderbilt and Florida State have dominant scorers in Mikayla Blakes and Ta'Niya Latson — Blakes kept the Commodores within five points of South Carolina in the fourth quarter at the final media timeout.
Ole Miss' defense wears teams down. The question is always whether the Rebels can stay close enough until that happens. Creighton has years of experience within its system, and that ball movement can surprise defenses. Tennessee has an unconventional full-court press to go along with its hockey subs and high volume of 3s. Georgia Tech takes the shots that defenses want to concede, which can frustrate opponents. And Michigan has freshmen with absolutely no fear, as a good Maryland team and a great USC team discovered. That's a good quality to have at this time of year.
(Top photo of MiLaysia Fulwiley: Jacob Kupferman / Getty Images)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
37 minutes ago
- Associated Press
College sports commissioners laud $2.8B antitrust settlement, call for Congress to act
Conference commissioners lauded a judge's approval of a $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit settlement as a means for bringing stability and fairness to an out-of-control college athletics industry but acknowledged there would be growing pains in implementing its terms. In a 30-minute virtual news conference Monday, commissioners of the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC renewed their call for congressional action to supplement and even codify the settlement and emphasized that cooperation at every level of college sports would be necessary to make it work. They said it was too early to address how violators of rules surrounding revenue sharing and name, image and likeness agreements would be punished and noted newly hired College Sports Commission CEO Bryan Seeley would play a major role in determining penalties. The new era of college athletics has arrived after U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken gave final approval Friday night to what's known as House vs. NCAA. Beginning July 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes and third-party NIL deals worth $600 or more will be analyzed to make sure they pay appropriate 'market value' for the services being provided by athletes. Some of the topics addressed Monday: Binding conferences to terms The conferences drafted a document that would bind institutions to enforcement policies even if their state laws are contradictory. It would require schools to waive their right to pursue legal challenges against the CSC. It also would exempt the commission from lawsuits from member schools over enforcement decisions, instead offering arbitration as the main settlement option. Consequences for not signing the agreement would include risking the loss of league membership and participation against other teams from the Power Four conferences. Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark said the document remains a work in progress but that he's gotten no pushback from his schools. 'I look to get that executed here in short order,' he said, 'and know it will be very necessary for all the conferences to execute as well.' Directives on revenue sharingThere has been no directive given to individual schools on how to determine the allocation of revenue-sharing payments, commissioners said. It's widely acknowledged that athletes in football and basketball are expected to receive the majority of the money. 'I know for all five of us no one is forgetting about their Olympic sports and continuing to make sure we've invested a high level for all of our sports,' ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips said. College Sports Commission CEOThe commissioners said Seeley, as Major League Baseball executive vice president of legal and operations, was uniquely qualified to lead the CSC, which is charged with making sure schools adhere to the rules. 'Culture doesn't change overnight,' Seeley told The Athletic over the weekend. 'I don't expect that to happen overnight, but I do think that the schools that have signed on to the settlement want rules and want rules to be enforced. Otherwise they wouldn't have signed on to the settlement. I think student-athletes want a different system. So I think there is a desire for rules enforcement. There's a desire for transparency.' Sankey said Seeley is well-versed in areas of implementation, development and adjustment of rules and in NIL disputes requiring arbitration. Yormark said: 'You want people not to run away from a situation but to run to a situation. He ran here, and he's very passionate to make a difference and to course correct what's been going on in the industry.' Skepticism about enforcementDeloitte's 'NIL Go' program and LBI Software will track NIL deals and revenue-sharing contracts, and the commissioners shot down skepticism about the ability of those tools to enforce terms of the settlement. SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said football and basketball coaches he spoke with in February were unanimous in wanting regulation. 'They have the responsibility to make what they asked for work,' he said. Congressional actionNCAA President Charlie Baker has been pushing Congress for a limited antitrust exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits, and the commissioners want a uniform federal NIL law that would supersede wide-ranging state laws. 'We're not going to have Final Fours and College Football Playoffs and College World Series with 50 different standards,' Sankey said, 'so that's a starting point.' Big Ten Commissioner Tony Petitti said the willingness of administrators to modernize the college athletics model should prompt federal lawmakers to move on codifying the settlement. Sankey's meeting with TrumpSankey confirmed a Yahoo Sports report that he and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua played golf with President Donald Trump on Sunday. Sankey said he appreciates Trump's interest in college sports and that it was helpful to share perspectives on the path forward. Trump reportedly considered a presidential commission on college sports earlier this year. Sankey declined to disclose details of their talks. 'I think those are best left for the moment on the golf course,' he said. ___ AP college sports:
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Penn State, UCLA Take Private Equity Funding Deal With Elevate
Penn State and UCLA have become the inaugural partners in Elevate's newly unveiled $500 million College Investment Initiative, according to three individuals familiar with the situation. Accordingly, the two Big Ten institutions have emerged as the first known universities to formally embrace private capital as a means of funding their athletic departments—signaling a significant milestone in the growing convergence of institutional capital and intercollegiate athletics. More from Elevate Opens $500M College Sports Fund With Texas PSF, Velocity College Sports Commission Gives off Nonprofit Web Impression Colleges Prep for Athlete Title IX Lawsuits of the Revenue-Share Era Elevate formally introduced its college sports fund on Monday, revealing that two universities had already committed, but withholding their names. The fund is backed by private equity firm Velocity Capital Management and the Texas Permanent School Fund, a special-purpose government corporation that supports the state's schools. In a telephone interview, Elevate chief business officer Jonathan Marks declined to confirm the schools, but said they would be announced in the coming weeks along with potentially others. Representatives from UCLA and Penn State did not immediately respond to requests for comment. While neither Big Ten institution had previously been considered a frontrunner in the movement toward private financing, their participation is hardly surprising. Both rank among the top 25 in athletic spending among FBS public universities, per Sportico's college sports finance database, yet neither enjoys the same financial stability as some of their high-spending peers. For UCLA, the embrace of private investment comes amid prolonged fiscal distress. Now competing in the Big Ten following the dissolution of the Pac-12, the Bruins' athletic department has grappled with persistent deficits. Recent NCAA filings show a nearly $52 million shortfall in fiscal year 2024—even after receiving a $30 million campus subsidy. Over the past six years, the program has accrued close to $220 million in debt tied to athletics, highlighting the urgent need for alternative revenue streams. At Penn State, a similar financial recalibration is underway. In February, the university introduced a slate of new fees—including additional charges on season and single-game tickets, parking and in-stadium purchases—to establish its 'Legacy Fund,' designed to support mounting athletic department expenses from scholarships to facility improvements. Following Judge Claudia Wilken's final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement last week, Penn State athletic director Pat Kraft wrote an open letter announcing the Nittany Lions' intention to spend the maximum of athlete revenue-sharing allowable (roughly $20.5 million in 2025-26). 'While change can be difficult, it also can provide new opportunities, and I assure you we will embrace every opportunity this new model creates,' Kraft wrote. Over the past three years, universities, athletic conferences and private investors have engaged in ongoing discussions as the college sports economy shifts toward a model that increasingly acknowledges and compensates its athlete workforce. In this evolving landscape, it is fair to assume that nearly every Power Four institution—along with a growing number of non-P4 schools—has at least explored the potential implications of incorporating private capital into their athletic operations. Florida State University emerged as a notable early mover, becoming the first known institution to actively pursue private investment in its athletic department. In 2022, FSU initiated discussions with private equity firms Sixth Street and Arctos Partners under an in initiative internally dubbed 'Project Osceola.' While the talks demonstrated significant initial interest and ambition, the effort has yet to yield a formal agreement. Nevertheless, the initiative served as a clear signal to the broader market: Intercollegiate athletics may be prepared to venture into heretofore uncharted territory to maintain competitiveness in an increasingly professionalized landscape. With the pace of that transformation accelerating, many anticipated a wave of deals—whether through private equity, private credit or alternative financing structures—would soon materialize. Yet to date, such transactions have remained largely theoretical. In May 2024, RedBird Capital and Weatherford Capital—co-founded by FSU trustee and former Seminoles quarterback Drew Weatherford—unveiled Collegiate Athletic Solutions (CAS), an investment platform designed to deploy between $50 million and $200 million into select major athletic departments. Despite the ambition and capital behind the fund, CAS has yet to finalize or publicly announce any completed partnerships. Some universities that initially appeared to be strong candidates for private equity investment—such as the University of North Carolina—were ultimately put off by Wall Street's expectation for immediate returns. 'We have been approached numerous times about different private equity options, but nothing was appealing enough for us to pursue any further,' UNC athletic director Bubba Cunningham told Sportico last August. 'The cost of capital for us is fairly low. They've got some good ideas and thoughts about some other uses of the capital, but we're not there yet.' The Big 12—arguably the most enthusiastic supporter of private capital among the conferences—recently came to a similar conclusion after a year-long evaluation process that reportedly included discussions with global investment firm CVC Capital. Meanwhile, the Big Ten, which was previously lukewarm on the idea, retained investment bank Evercore earlier this year to begin soliciting preliminary PE pitches. Best of Tennis Prize Money Tracker: Which Player Has Earned the Most in 2025? World's 50 Most Valuable Soccer Clubs 2025 Rankings NBA Playoff Games Really Are Different, Data Shows
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Nets projected to take F Drake Powell 27th overall in 2025 NBA Draft
Nets projected to take F Drake Powell 27th overall in 2025 NBA Draft The Brooklyn Nets have five picks to use in the upcoming 2025 NBA Draft, including four in the first round of what could be a class full of talent. Brooklyn may be trying to pull off a deal or two to lessen the load on player development, but until then, there are players that they can take at each spot, including a player from North Carolina with some upside. "Teams figure to put extra stock into Drake Powell's NBA combine performance and workouts after he spent the year spotting up on 49.2 percent of North Carolina's possessions and taking just 5.7 shots per game," Jonathan Wasserman wrote in his most recent mock draft for Bleacher Report. Wasserman has the Nets taking Powell with the 27th overall pick in the Draft, the pick they received from the Houston Rockets. "Despite the lack of production, there could still be first-round interest based on his outstanding physical profile, defensive projection and 37.9 percent three-point shooting," Wasserman continued. Following the conclusion of the 2024-25 college basketball season, Powell was projected to be a second-round pick after what he showed at North Carolina which wasn't much when just looking at his stats. Powell, 19, averaged 7.4 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 1.1 assists per game while shooting 48.3% from the field and 37.9% from three-point land in 37 appearances. Powell was an integral part of a Tarheels team that finished with a 23-14 record, allowing them to make the NCAA Tournament where they made it past the First Four before losing in the first round to Ole Miss. While Powell did not put forth much in terms of statistics to show that he would be a prospect with high upside, his performance at the NBA Draft Combine showed scouts differently, as Wasserman alluded to. Powell, who Wasserman compares to New Orleans Pelicans forward Herb Jones, displayed his athletic ability that gave many the impression that he could be an elite defender and shooter on the wing in the right situation.
