Mayor backs report's call for cannabis law reform
The possession of small quantities of cannabis for personal use should be decriminalised, a report backed by the London mayor has concluded.
The report by the London Drugs Commission, chaired by former Labour cabinet minister Lord Falconer, makes 42 recommendations, including removing natural cannabis from the Misuse of Drugs Act (MDA).
Lord Falconer told BBC Radio Four's Today programme that 'continuing to have possession as a crime meant continuing have problems between the police and ethnic communities".
He said: "Stop and search in London for example is most commonly based on 'the smell of cannabis' and it is disproportionately used against young black men."
Lord Falconer said the current law 'doesn't work, is disproportionate' and is also used to relieve genuinely symptoms of certain illnesses.
He added: "The law treats cannabis the same as a whole range of much more serious drugs. The right course now, we think, is keep dealing criminal but make sure that possession is not a crime."
Sir Sadiq Khan said current rules "cannot be justified", adding that the commission's findings had provided "a compelling, evidence-based case" for decriminalisation.
David Raynes, of the National Prevention of Drugs Alliance (NPDA), said any reduction in the legal consequences around cannabis would wrongly send the message that "cannabis was less harmful".
The report makes recommendations in areas covering education, healthcare and the policing of cannabis.
Among the recommendations, it says natural cannabis should be removed from the MDA, where it is considered Class B alongside drugs like ketamine, and instead maintain it as a controlled substance under the Psychoactive Substances Act (PSA).
The report states: "The possibility of a custodial prison sentence of any length, but certainly up to the current maximum of five years, for possession of cannabis for personal use feels excessive."
While acknowledging that it is very rare for anyone to be sentenced anywhere close to the five years, the authors said the "consequences of serving any time in prison are significant".
The report states that police officers often identify cannabis possession through the use of stop and search which "continues to be utilised in a racially disproportionate way".
Its authors call for the suspicion of cannabis possession to be removed as a reason officers can initiate a search.
The authors argue even when a person is found with an amount deemed beyond personal use, the current legal consequences "feel extreme, relative to the dangers of cannabis itself".
Sir Mark Rowley, Metropolitan Police commissioner, said the law on drugs and cannabis was 'a matter for parliament' and the force would 'keep working to our current law'.
He added: "At the moment, we see drugs being at the centre of a lot of crime.
"Drug dealing is so linked to violence. We see a lot of communities complaining about public drug use and that's a big issue in terms of antisocial behaviour.
"If the law changes, we'll change around that, but it's not something we're calling for."
Among the other recommendations made in the report are to:
Improve public health services for cannabis-related harm, including better treatment access and coordination
Enhance cannabis education with earlier, age-appropriate, and credible content in schools and beyond
Support fair access to medical cannabis, including addressing cost barriers and expanding research
Monitor international developments and reassess the case for broader legalisation in five years
Cannabis clinics see rise in patients
'I break the law to buy my child's life-saving cannabis drug'
Will legalising cannabis unleash chaos in Germany?
Regulating cannabis under the PSA, the authors argue, would expose fewer people to stop and search, help tackle "racial disproportionality", and make any legal consequences "commensurate with the risks posed".
They add decriminalising it would reduce the impact on those who take cannabis for medicinal purposes but are not able to get a legal prescription.
Janet Hills, the commission's deputy chair who was a former detective sergeant and chair of the Met's Black Police Association, said it was time to "shift in our approach to cannabis enforcement".
She said the recommendations would "create a more equitable and just system".
Mr Raynes, who has long been against any liberalisation in Britain's drug policy, said that the report's authors were attempting to "modify the law as gently as possible".
"The real danger is that we send a signal to the youth of London that cannabis is less harmful," he said.
Asked about the point made in the report that cannabis is still widely used despite the current legal consequences, Mr Raynes said it was about "restricting the damage" done by illegal substances.
He added that the London Drugs Commission, which Sir Sadiq established in 2022, was "an enormous piece of self-indulgence by the mayor" in a policy area in which he has no authority over.
Responding to the report, the mayor said: "I've long been clear that we need fresh thinking on how to reduce the substantial harms associated with drug-related crime in our communities."
He added: "We must recognise that better education, improved healthcare and more effective, equitable policing of cannabis use are long overdue."
The Home Office has been asked to comment on the report.
In March, Dame Diana Johnson, a minister at the department, said the government had "no plans" to legalise cannabis but did not address decriminalisation.
In a 2023 interview as opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer said drug policy was "settled" in the UK.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minister Peter Kyle Boldly Compares Labour's Arrival In Government To Steve Jobs' Apple Takeover
Labour's return to government is comparable to Steve Jobs' restoration of Apple, according to the science secretary Peter Kyle. The government's finances are under intense scrutiny right now ahead of next week's spending review where the chancellor will set out how much money each department will receive in the coming years. Labour has promised to fix the foundations of the country after 14 years of the Conservatives, and the economy did grow by more than expected in the first quarter of 2025 and increasing by 0.7% of gross domestic product. Interest rates have also dropped – but the government has faced public backlash over the way it has managed to claw back this cash. Labour chose to cut winter fuel payments from pensioners – a policy it is now looking at partially reversing – and to keep the Conservatives' two-child benefit cap. In comparison, Steve Jobs was ousted from his famous tech company in 1985 but returned to Apple in 1997 when it was on the cusp of going under, and helped to reinvent the world-famous firm. Pressed on how the government would try to revive the economy with its spending plans, Kyle told Sky News: 'The key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. 'Just bear in mind how Apple turned itself around. 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. 'Now, Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, inventing a series of products like the iPod, now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions, there's going to be high growth, investing in our space sector – all these really highly innovative sectors.' 'When Steve Jobs came back to Apple they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office.'Science Sec. @peterkyle compares the government's record to Steve Jobs.#TrevorPhillipshttps:// Sky 501 & YouTube — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 8, 2025 Diane Abbott Slams Keir Starmer's Immigration Speech For Being 'Fundamentally Racist' Why Keir Starmer Believes It's Far Too Early To Write Reform UK's Political Obituary 'This Is Panic': Defence Secretary Forced To Deny Keir Starmer Is Rattled By Nigel Farage
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watch: Cyclists run red lights at roundabout as Khan pledges £6m to protect them
One of London's busiest roundabouts is about to undergo a £6 million revamp over concerns it is 'unsafe and intimidating' for cyclists. Sir Sadiq Khan's Transport for London wants to install a large protective cycle lane at Holland Park under plans to encourage people to 'walk and cycle more and drive less'. TfL says there have been 'a significant number of collisions' in which 59 people, including 14 cyclists and pedestrians, were hurt in the three years up to May 2023. But campaigners claim the changes will cause congestion for motorists, and that cyclists are being prioritised over drivers. Now they say they have proof that more than half of cyclists crossing at the busy junction are jumping red lights. Video footage shows a string of cyclists passing through traffic lights, stopping inside a yellow box area and narrowly avoiding being struck by passing buses. Some can be seen riding across the six-lane interchange in front of oncoming traffic. Campaigners from Save Our Streets (SOS) are now questioning why taxpayers' money is being spent on a project they say penalises drivers to protect cyclists who appear to be wilfully putting themselves in harm's way. Nicholas Bell, a Holland Park resident and cyclist himself, said the scheme was a 'complete waste of money'. He monitored the roundabout to examine the behaviour of cyclists and counted more than 1,000 using the roundabout over four separate days in April, during the morning and evening rush hours. About one in seven pedal bikes and two in five e-bikes entering the roundabout from Uxbridge Road on the roundabout's western arm jumped the lights in their determination to get across as quickly as possible, Mr Bell's analysis found. His weekday counts revealed that more than half of cyclists approaching from Holland Park Avenue, on the roundabout's eastern side, illegally passed through red lights. 'I thought cyclists would be more hesitant at a major junction. I was quite surprised how gung-ho they were,' he said. Danny Lidgate, another campaigner, who runs the 175-year-old butcher's shop Lidgates on Holland Park Avenue, agreed that building more cycle infrastructure when riders already ignore current provision was a waste of time and money. He said he feared TfL's plans would lead to the area around Holland Park and Shepherd's Bush railway station becoming 'jammed up with traffic'. He said: 'All the customers we have coming into our shop, and all the local residents, they all feel the same.' Andrew Boff, the Conservative deputy chairman of the London Assembly, said on a visit to the roundabout with The Telegraph: 'They're going to make life in this area and all around for the residents absolute misery.' Mr Boff said he would tell the mayor of London, whose Vision Zero scheme is driving projects such as the Holland Park roundabout cycle lanes: 'Why don't you pause for breath and actually deliver a scheme that's good for cyclists? 'Focus on where your problem is, and not trying to create year zero at Holland Park roundabout by throwing everything out and then starting again.' Helen Cansick, TfL's head of healthy streets investment planning, said: 'The Holland Park roundabout is an unsafe and intimidating junction for people cycling, and the changes at the roundabout have been carefully designed to tackle road danger while enabling everyone to travel through the area efficiently. 'The results of our consultation showed strong support for the proposed changes. We always take congestion, including impact on bus journey times and air quality, into careful consideration when designing schemes, and we value feedback from local residents and businesses. 'We will continue to engage with the local community as we move forward with these important safety measures. 'Everyone using the roads must obey the law and follow the Highway Code and we continue to work closely with the police to enforce the rules of the road.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Abbott calls Starmer's immigration comments ‘fundamentally racist' at rally
Backbench Labour MP Diane Abbott has criticised Sir Keir Starmer's comments on immigration as 'fundamentally racist' at a protest rally, suggesting the Government was copying the rhetoric of Reform UK. Thousands of trade unionists, campaigners and activists gathered to 'send a message' to the Government at a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform in central London on Saturday. Former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Ms Abbott were among those who gave speeches at the rally outside Downing Street following a march. Organisers The People's Assembly accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. The Prime Minister said the UK risked becoming 'an island of strangers' when he unveiled plans for tighter controls on immigration in a major speech last month, leading to a mixed reaction from different parties. Addressing the protest crowd in Whitehall, Ms Abbott – who was previously suspended by Labour in 2023 before being allowed to run in last year's general election – said there was an international struggle to 'fight the rich and the powerful (and) to fight the racists', including in her own party. The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said: 'I was very disturbed to hear Keir Starmer on the subject of immigration. 'He talked about closing the book on a squalid chapter for our politics – immigrants represent a squalid chapter. 'He talked about how he thought immigration has done incalculable damage to this green and pleasant land, which, of course, is nonsense – immigrants built this land. 'And, finally, he said we risk becoming an island of strangers. 'I thought that was a fundamentally racist thing to say. It is contrary to Britain's history. 'My parents came to this country in the 50s. They were not strangers. They helped to build this country. 'I think Keir Starmer is quite wrong to say that the way that you beat Reform is to copy Reform.' Reform's leader Nigel Farage previously said his party 'very much enjoyed' Sir Keir's speech, as it showed he was 'learning a great deal' from them. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could be seen at the demonstration's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. Mr Corbyn, who also criticised Sir Keir's 'island of strangers' comments, told protesters at the rally: 'As the wars rage around the world – the killing fields in Ukraine and Russia, the abominable, deliberate starvation of children in Gaza and the genocide that's inflicted against the Palestinian people continues – surely to goodness we need a world of peace. 'We need a world of peace that will come through the vision of peace, the vision of disarmament and the vision of actually challenging the causes of war, which leads to the desperation and the refugee flows of today.' The Independent MP for Islington North urged protesters to 'go forward as a movement of hope, of what we can achieve together (and) the society we can build together'. The People's Assembly said trade unionists, health, disability, housing and welfare campaigners with community organisations came together for the protest under the slogan 'No to Austerity2.0'. A spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.'
