logo
FDA to offer faster drug reviews to companies promoting ‘national priorities'

FDA to offer faster drug reviews to companies promoting ‘national priorities'

The Hill3 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. regulators will begin offering faster reviews to new medicines that administration officials deem as promoting 'the health interests of Americans,' under a new initiative announced Tuesday.
Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency will aim to review select drugs in one to two months. FDA's long-standing accelerated approval program generally issues decisions in six months for drugs that treat life-threatening diseases. Regular drug reviews take about 10 months.
Since arriving at the FDA in April, Makary has repeatedly told FDA staff they need to 'challenge assumptions' and rethink procedures. In a medical journal commentary published last week, Makary suggested the agency could conduct 'rapid or instant reviews,' pointing to the truncated process used to authorize the first COVID-19 vaccines under Operation Warp Speed.
For the new program, the FDA will issue a limited number of 'national priority vouchers' to companies 'aligned with U.S. national priorities,' the agency said in a statement. The special designation will give the selected companies access to extra FDA communications, streamlined staff reviews and the ability to submit much of their product information in advance.
Speeding up drug approvals has long been a priority of the pharmaceutical industry, which has successfully lobbied Congress to create a variety of special programs and pathways for faster reviews.
Many aspects of the plan announced Tuesday overlap with older programs. But the broad criteria for receiving a voucher will give FDA officials unprecedented discretion in deciding which companies can benefit from the fastest reviews.
'The ultimate goal is to bring more cures and meaningful treatments to the American public,' Makary said in a statement.
Makary previously said the FDA should be willing to ease its scientific requirements for certain drugs, for instance, by not always requiring randomized studies in which patients are tracked over time to track safety and effectiveness. Such trials are generally considered the gold standard of medical research, though the FDA has increasingly been willing to accept smaller, less-definitive studies for rare or life-threatening diseases.
In several recent cases, the FDA has faced criticism for approving drugs based on preliminary data that didn't ultimately show benefits for patients.
The push to rapidly accelerated drug approvals is the opposite approach that Makary and his boss, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have taken on vaccines.
Promising a 'return to gold-standard science,' Kennedy previously announced that all new vaccines would have to be compared to placebo, or a dummy shot, to win approval. Kennedy and Makary also have announced a stricter policy on seasonal updates to COVID-19 shots, saying they will have to undergo new testing before they can be approved for use in healthy children and most adults.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dental Care of Stamford announces Breakthrough Bite-Based Treatment During Migraine Awareness Month
Dental Care of Stamford announces Breakthrough Bite-Based Treatment During Migraine Awareness Month

Business Upturn

time19 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Dental Care of Stamford announces Breakthrough Bite-Based Treatment During Migraine Awareness Month

STAMFORD, CT, June 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As Migraine Awareness Month shines a spotlight on one of the most debilitating chronic conditions in the world, Dr. Jerry Simon, a leading dental expert in craniofacial pain and neuromuscular dentistry, is offering a fresh perspective on how migraines could be a dental issue hiding in plain sight? Migraines affect more than 35 million Americans annually, often derailing daily life with searing pain, nausea, and visual disturbances. Despite modern medicine's advancements, many patients still struggle to find a sustainable solution, leaving them stuck in a cycle of temporary relief and recurring agony. Dr. Simon believes the answer for many could be closer than they think , right inside their mouth. 'Too many people suffer unnecessarily because the true cause of their pain is being overlooked,' says Dr. Simon. 'What if the root of your migraines isn't neurological, but dental?' The Dental Link to Migraines: An Overlooked Connection Dr. Simon, founder of Dental Care of Stamford and innovator of the FDA-approved Best-Bite Discluder™, is challenging conventional approaches by investigating a common yet often missed culprit: bite imbalances. According to his research and clinical practice, nearly 75% of chronic migraines, neck aches, facial discomfort, and tension headaches stem from misaligned bites also known as malocclusion. This overlooked factor causes the muscles in the jaw and face to overcompensate, leading to inflammation and persistent pain. 'You use your mouth all day—to chew, talk, breathe, even clench unconsciously. If your teeth don't come together properly, your jaw muscles are constantly adjusting, and over time, that stress adds up,' Dr. Simon explains. Quick, Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tool Offers New Path to Relief To pinpoint whether migraines are bite-related, Dr. Simon developed a diagnostic device known as the Best-Bite Discluder™, which helps determine within minutes if a patient's bite is contributing to their head pain. The small, comfortable appliance temporarily disengages the back teeth to relieve pressure. If patients experience immediate relief, even if momentary, it signals that the bite may be the root cause. 'The most powerful moment is watching someone realize that their pain doesn't have to be permanent,' says Dr. Simon. 'If the discluder test helps, it gives us a clear path forward.' Real Stories, Real Relief Former patient S.W., once plagued by chronic migraines and disappointed by countless specialist visits and inconclusive scans, found hope with Dr. Simon. 'I had migraines forever. Undergone endless tests from multiple doctors with no answers. Dr. Simon suggested my teeth could be the issue & then tested my bite. After a few visits, I was already feeling great! He gave me my life back, pain-free!' A Collaborative, Personalized Approach If a bite issue is confirmed, Dr. Simon and his team at Dental Care of Stamford create a customized treatment plan tailored to each patient's unique physiology. This plan may involve bite adjustments, physical therapy, and advanced dental procedures aimed at achieving harmony between the jaw and surrounding muscles – offering lasting relief without reliance on medications or invasive treatments. Raising Awareness, Changing Lives During Migraine Awareness Month, Dr. Simon hopes to educate the public about this little-known yet significant link between dental health and migraines. His goal is to help people who feel like they've exhausted every option and are still searching for answers. 'Migraines are not something people should have to just live with,' says Dr. Simon. 'By identifying and treating the actual source of pain—instead of just masking symptoms – we can truly transform lives.' Schedule Your Consultation Today If you or a loved one has struggled with chronic headaches or migraines, there's no need to wait any longer. Relief could be a simple consultation away. Call (203) 324-6171 or visit Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash

Breyers voluntarily recalls mislabeled ice cream product
Breyers voluntarily recalls mislabeled ice cream product

USA Today

time42 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Breyers voluntarily recalls mislabeled ice cream product

Breyers voluntarily recalls mislabeled ice cream product Show Caption Hide Caption How to make fried ice cream without frying it Make fried ice cream without actually frying it. Problem Solved, USA TODAY Breyers, the popular ice cream brand, has voluntarily recalled one of its products due to mislabeling and "undeclared allergens," according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Class II recall, as reported by the FDA, initiated on June 2, is for Rocky Road ice cream that was placed in a Chocolate Truffle ice cream packaging. The container also has a Rocky Road Ice Cream lid on it. The federal agency said that the tub says "may contain tree nuts," while the lid declares almonds as an ingredient. Recalls: Gummy vitamins sold at Amazon and Aldi recalled. See impacted products. How many products were impacted? According to the FDA, 6668 cases were affected. In a notice on the website, Breyers warned consumers with almond allergies that the ice cream could run the risk of a severe and life-threatening reaction. "The products we are voluntarily recalling are Breyers Chocolate Truffle 1.5 quart tubs with UPC 077567457288 and Expiration date/Lot code of JUL1026GB3," the company statement said. What should people who bought the recalled ice cream do? Breyers said those who don't have almond allergies should discard the product to prevent those who do from mistakenly consuming it. Those who have the product were advised to contact the company. "If you need assistance, please contact us at or call 1-800-931-2826," the notice says. Taylor Ardrey is a news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at tardrey@

UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases
UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases

UK MPs on Tuesday voted to end contentious prosecutions of women in England and Wales for terminating a pregnancy, paving the way for a huge overhaul of how the country's abortion laws are enforced. Currently, a woman can face criminal charges for choosing to end a pregnancy after 24 weeks or without the approval of two doctors, under laws which technically still carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The issue has gained attention in the UK due to recent court cases. In one, a woman was cleared by a jury at trial, while another was released from prison on appeal. MPs voted by a majority of 242 on Tuesday in favour of an amendment put forward by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, which would ensure that no woman would be criminally pursued for terminating her own pregnancy at any time -- even though the amendment leaves the underlying abortion laws unchanged. The full crime and policing bill must now be voted on by parliament and then pass the upper House of Lords before becoming law. "Women are currently being arrested from hospital bed to police cell and facing criminal investigations on suspicion of ending their own pregnancy," Antoniazzi told AFP. "My amendment would put a stop to this," she said, adding it was "the right amendment at the right time". Abortion in England and Wales is a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act, passed in 1861 during the Victorian age and which theoretically carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The Abortion Act 1967 made terminations legal in certain circumstances, including by permitting it up to 23 weeks and six days of gestation if done by an authorised provider. Abortions are allowed in limited circumstances after this time, such as if the mother's life is in danger or there is a "substantial risk" the child could be born with a serious disability. An update to the law introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic allows women to take abortion pills at home up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy. In May, Nicola Packer was acquitted after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the 10-week legal limit. The 45-year-old told jurors during her trial, which came after a four-year police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for so long. "It was horrendous giving evidence, absolutely awful," she told The Guardian newspaper last month. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has however called the proposed amendment "the greatest threat to unborn babies in decades". - 'Optimistic' - Antoniazzi's amendment will not change any of the laws regarding the provision of abortion services, including the time limits. And anyone assisting a woman in getting an abortion outside the remits of the law, such as medical practitioners, will still be liable for prosecution. Some 50 organisations, including abortion providers, medical colleges, and women's rights groups, have backed the amendment. They say six women have appeared in court in England charged with ending or attempting to end their own pregnancy outside abortion law in the last three years. Carla Foster was jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant. The Court of Appeal eventually suspended her sentence. Antoniazzi said police have investigated "more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths". "This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest," she told the BBC Tuesday. When asked about the vote, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that women have the right to a "safe and legal abortion". Northern Ireland decriminalised abortion for women in 2019. Scotland is currently reviewing its abortion laws. pdh/jwp/gv

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store