&w=3840&q=100)
Apple shifts iPhone production for US market to India, confirms Tim Cook
Tech giant Apple is procuring half of its iPhones for its US market from India, as the tariffs are lower than in China, its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Tim Cook said.
Speaking to CNBC after quarterly earnings, Tim Cook also added that it is sourcing its other products from Vietnam for its US market. However, he added, the company still makes the 'vast majority' of its products for other countries in China.
Cook also confirmed that India will be the 'country of origin' for a large number of iPhones that will be sold in the US. This comes as the country tries to move away from China, owing to its high tariff rates as compared to the 10 per cent tariffs imposed on Indian and Vietnamese-made goods.
Why Apple is moving iPhone production away from China's high tariffs
Tim Cook's remarks follow US President Donald Trump's announcement of reciprocal tariffs. Talking about the impact on the company, Cook said that it saw a 'limited' effect in the March quarter, as Apple was able to optimise its supply chain.
iPhones to cost less if production is moved to India
An India Dispatch report citing JPMorgan analysis suggests that the tech giant would be able to keep the price of its phones almost the same if it completes the final steps of moving the facility to India. A cost breakdown suggests that iPhones assembled in China cost $938, whereas it would cost $1,008 if the production were moved to India. This increase of 2 per cent in the prices is relatively cheaper as compared to the 30 per cent hike in the prices of iPhones, if the company decides to manufacture phones in the US.
A report from the Financial Times suggests that Apple is planning to shift the assembly of all of its US-sold iPhones to India by 2026 as the company pivots away from China following a trade war between the two countries. Following Trump's tariff announcement, the company witnessed a wipeout of $700 billion from its market value.
This comes after the company spent almost two decades in China and spent heavily on creating a production line which helped the company to become a $3 trillion tech giant.
Moving its assembly to India would mean that the company would have to double its production output. In 2024, Apple sought to pivot towards India for the production of its iPhones, for which its main supplier, Foxconn, and Tata started importing already assembled component sets from China.
Apple Q2 results: Revenue grows to $95.4 billion, iPhone leads the charge
For the quarter ending March, Apple reported revenue of $95.4 billion, up from $90.75 billion a year ago. iPhone revenue stood at $46.84 billion. Mac revenue was $7.95 billion, while iPad revenue was reported at $6.4 billion.
In the current quarter, ending in June, Cook expects overall revenue to grow in the 'low to mid-single digits' on an annual basis. However, he admitted that forecasts beyond June are murky, indicating that the tariff situation remains fluid.
The company follows a fiscal year cycle that begins in October and ends in September. The first quarter is from October to December, and the results were reported in January.
Trump's reciprocal tariffs: What it means for Apple and iPhone supply chains
On 2 April, Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on more than 100 countries, including India and China. On 9 April, he announced a 90-day pause on these tariffs as several countries tried to negotiate a deal with the US. However, the list did not include China, which retaliated with its own reciprocal tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Startup Mantra: Accelerate business growth with sustainability
At a time when businesses across the globe are navigating a maze of sustainability regulations, a Pune-based startup is helping them find clarity—and compliance—with confidence. Founded in 2021 by Rajesh Patel, Snowkap is a Net Zero Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform that helps companies manage their Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance and reduce their carbon footprint. Born out of a problem Patel encountered firsthand—scattered ESG data, outdated tools, and a lack of business-aligned solutions—Snowkap blends artificial intelligence with human expertise to create a comprehensive, usable platform. 'We're not trying to retrofit old systems,' says Patel, who also heads the Powerweave Group. 'We wanted to create something grounded in how sustainability actually functions inside modern businesses,' he said. From pain point to platform The ideation for Snowkap began with conversations across boardrooms and factory floors. Patel and his team met sustainability officers, procurement heads, chief financial officers (CFOs), auditors, and policy advisors across geographies. 'We mapped where ESG data comes from, who owns it, where it gets stuck. The pattern was clear—manual processes, scattered workflows, and a heavy reliance on consultants just to stay compliant,' says Patel. What emerged was a business-grade ESG ERP platform—built from scratch, not retrofitted. The platform integrates directly into an enterprise's existing systems, automates data collection, matches it to global frameworks, and flags gaps, enabling quick and credible reporting. It supports the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), among others. 'Think of us as your ESG control tower,' Patel explains. 'We plug in, clean up your data, match it to global standards, and help build your reports—all from one place.' Bootstrapped but built-to-scale The product has been in the making for over 18 months, backed entirely by the Powerweave Group and developed by a core team of engineers, ESG experts, and compliance professionals. Around $1.5 million has been invested so far through internal capital and grants. Unlike many early-stage startups, Snowkap has avoided the blitz-scaling trap. 'We built with intent, not speed,' says Patel. While most SaaS companies bleed cash in the name of scale, Snowkap's infrastructure and product choices were made to grow sustainably. 'From the beginning, we asked—how can we scale without increasing burn?' adds Patel. Human and AI approach The global ESG software market, currently pegged at $3.17 billion, is dominated by giants like SAP, IBM, and Microsoft, which together command over 60% market share. Snowkap, like other Indian entrants (with <10% market share), is an emerging challenger in a rapidly growing industry. What sets Snowkap apart, says Patel, is its Human + AI approach. 'Most platforms stop at reporting. We go further—our AI does the heavy lifting, and our ESG experts help translate that into business-first action,' he says. 'It's not just about compliance—it's about helping businesses make smarter decisions.' Europe and GCC on the radar Snowkap now plans to expand into high-impact markets in Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The timing is deliberate. 'Europe is now the epicentre of sustainability regulation,' says Patel, referring to new frameworks like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), and the Omnibus Directive. 'These aren't just acronyms—they're reshaping boardroom agendas.' To enter these markets, Snowkap is strengthening its partner ecosystem. Local collaborators, especially in Europe, bring on-ground knowledge and regulatory understanding, while Snowkap provides the scalable tech backbone. Industry tailwinds The ESG software market is booming—with a global compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.7%, projected to hit $8.03 billion by 2030. India's market is smaller but growing faster—from ~$110 million now to an estimated $377 million by 2030 (CAGR of 22.9%). For Patel, it's not just a business opportunity—it's a shift in how companies define performance. 'ESG is now a boardroom priority, not just a CSR checkbox. When something becomes central to business strategy, you need infrastructure that evolves with it.'
Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tata Group needs to fine-tune key aspects of Air India's operations: Praful Patel
Mumbai: Former civil aviation minister Praful Patel has called on the Tata Group to fine-tune key aspects of Air India's operations, a day after the airline's Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft with 242 people onboard crashed shortly after takeoff in Ahmedabad. At least 265 people have been confirmed dead as of Friday, including students at a medical college's hostel and others in a residential area near the Ahmedabad airport where the plane went down. 'After three-and-a-half years of the takeover of Air India by the Tatas, the management needs to fine-tune various aspects of running a world-class airline, including maintenance,' Patel told reporters at the Nationalist Congress Party's office in Mumbai on Friday. The 68-year-old was the civil aviation minister in the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government when Boeing introduced the Dreamliners in 2011. Asked about India's proficiency in maintaining and repairing aircraft, Patel expressed concern over the 'under-utilisation' of domestic facilities. Before the Tata takeover in 2022, most of Air India's planes were maintained by Air India Engineering Services Limited, the country's largest aircraft maintenance company, which is government-owned. However, many planes are now being managed by other agencies, he said. 'We have a world-class set-up, but it is surprising why some planes of Air India are sent outside the country for maintenance. Air India Engineering Services Limited has always maintained Air India for a long time, and their services should be utilised. It is surprising that aircraft are sent outside. Boeing's maintenance and repair facility at Nagpur has a good track record. However, the facility has been underutilised,' he added. Terming the accident a temporary setback, Patel said India's aviation sector remains largely well-managed. 'We have potential for growth and a need for more aircraft, looking at the size of our country. Any accident has a temporary setback, but largely, Indian aviation is well managed. SOPs and safety norms are well in place in India's aviation growth,' he said. Thursday's accident is being probed by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which comes under the civil aviation ministry. Patel refused to speculate on the reasons behind the crash and said everyone should wait for the AAIB's report. 'The black box has been recovered. While the data will be retrieved within a few months, it will take a little longer for the government to come out with a report detailing the exact reasons behind the crash,' he said. Patel also played down speculation that a bird hit may have led to the crash. 'Even if one of the two engines had failed, technically, the plane is equipped to take off and travel the full distance. Watching the video, it seems that there was no problem at the time of the takeoff. Otherwise, the pilot would have avoided it,' he said. The NCP leader also called on passengers not to be scared of air travel following the crash. 'India's overall safety standards are well-defined and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation keeps updating these norms in line with international norms,' he said. Meanwhile, Tata Group chairman N Chandrasekaran on Friday described the crash as 'one of the darkest days in Tata Group's history.' In a letter addressed to employees, Chandrasekaran conveyed his grief over the loss of lives, calling the tragedy 'incomprehensible.' 'Words are no consolation right now, but my thoughts are with the families and loved ones of the people who died and were injured in the crash. We are here for them. I want to say that, like you, we want to understand what happened. We don't know right now, but we will,' Chandrasekaran wrote in the letter. With inputs from PTI
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Why superintelligent AI isn't taking over anytime soon
A primary requirement for being a leader in AI these days is to be a herald of the impending arrival of our digital messiah: superintelligent AI. For Dario Amodei of Anthropic, Demis Hassabis of Google and Sam Altman of OpenAI, it isn't enough to claim that their AI is the best. All three have recently insisted that it's going to be so good, it will change the very fabric of society. Even Meta—whose chief AI scientist has been famously dismissive of this talk—wants in on the action. The company confirmed it is spending $14 billion to bring in a new leader for its AI efforts who can realize Mark Zuckerberg's dream of AI superintelligence—that is, an AI smarter than we are. 'Humanity is close to building digital superintelligence," Altman declared in an essay this week, and this will lead to 'whole classes of jobs going away" as well as 'a new social contract." Both will be consequences of AI-powered chatbots taking over all our white-collar jobs, while AI-powered robots assume the physical ones. Before you get nervous about all the times you were rude to Alexa, know this: A growing cohort of researchers who build, study and use modern AI aren't buying all that talk. The title of a fresh paper from Apple says it all: 'The Illusion of Thinking." In it, a half-dozen top researchers probed reasoning models—large language models that 'think" about problems longer, across many steps—from the leading AI labs, including OpenAI, DeepSeek and Anthropic. They found little evidence that these are capable of reasoning anywhere close to the level their makers claim. Generative AI can be quite useful in specific applications, and a boon to worker productivity. OpenAI claims 500 million monthly active ChatGPT users—astonishingly far reach and fast growth for a service released just 2½ years ago. But these critics argue there is a significant hazard in overestimating what it can do, and making business plans, policy decisions and investments based on pronouncements that seem increasingly disconnected from the products themselves. Apple's paper builds on previous work from many of the same engineers, as well as notable research from both academia and other big tech companies, including Salesforce. These experiments show that today's 'reasoning" AIs—hailed as the next step toward autonomous AI agents and, ultimately, superhuman intelligence—are in some cases worse at solving problems than the plain-vanilla AI chatbots that preceded them. This work also shows that whether you're using an AI chatbot or a reasoning model, all systems fail utterly at more complex tasks. Apple's researchers found 'fundamental limitations" in the models. When taking on tasks beyond a certain level of complexity, these AIs suffered 'complete accuracy collapse." Similarly, engineers at Salesforce AI Research concluded that their results 'underscore a significant gap between current LLM capabilities and real-world enterprise demands." Importantly, the problems these state-of-the-art AIs couldn't handle are logic puzzles that even a precocious child could solve, with a little instruction. What's more, when you give these AIs that same kind of instruction, they can't follow it. Apple's paper has set off a debate in tech's halls of power—Signal chats, Substack posts and X threads—pitting AI maximalists against skeptics. 'People could say it's sour grapes, that Apple is just complaining because they don't have a cutting-edge model," says Josh Wolfe, co-founder of venture firm Lux Capital. 'But I don't think it's a criticism so much as an empirical observation." The reasoning methods in OpenAI's models are 'already laying the foundation for agents that can use tools, make decisions, and solve harder problems," says an OpenAI spokesman. 'We're continuing to push those capabilities forward." The debate over this research begins with the implication that today's AIs aren't thinking, but instead are creating a kind of spaghetti of simple rules to follow in every situation covered by their training data. Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist who sold an AI startup to Uber in 2016, argued in an essay that Apple's paper, along with related work, exposes flaws in today's reasoning models, suggesting they're not the dawn of human-level ability but rather a dead end. 'Part of the reason the Apple study landed so strongly is that Apple did it," he says. 'And I think they did it at a moment in time when people have finally started to understand this for themselves." In areas other than coding and mathematics, the latest models aren't getting better at the rate that they once did. And the newest reasoning models actually hallucinate more than their predecessors. 'The broad idea that reasoning and intelligence come with greater scale of models is probably false," says Jorge Ortiz, an associate professor of engineering at Rutgers, whose lab uses reasoning models and other cutting-edge AI to sense real-world environments. Today's models have inherent limitations that make them bad at following explicit instructions—the opposite of what you'd expect from a computer, he adds. It's as if the industry is creating engines of free association. They're skilled at confabulation, but we're asking them to take on the roles of consistent, rule-following engineers or accountants. That said, even those who are critical of today's AIs hasten to add that the march toward more-capable AI continues. Exposing current limitations could point the way to overcoming them, says Ortiz. For example, new training methods—giving step-by-step feedback on models' performance, adding more resources when they encounter harder problems—could help AI work through bigger problems, and make better use of conventional software. From a business perspective, whether or not current systems can reason, they're going to generate value for users, says Wolfe. 'Models keep getting better, and new approaches to AI are being developed all the time, so I wouldn't be surprised if these limitations are overcome in practice in the near future," says Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, who has studied the practical uses of AI. Meanwhile, the true believers are undeterred. Just a decade from now, Altman wrote in his essay, 'maybe we will go from solving high-energy physics one year to beginning space colonization the next year." Those willing to 'plug in" to AI with direct, brain-computer interfaces will see their lives profoundly altered, he adds. This kind of rhetoric accelerates AI adoption in every corner of our society. AI is now being used by DOGE to restructure our government, leveraged by militaries to become more lethal, and entrusted with the education of our children, often with unknown consequences. Which means that one of the biggest dangers of AI is that we overestimate its abilities, trust it more than we should—even as it's shown itself to have antisocial tendencies such as 'opportunistic blackmail"—and rely on it more than is wise. In so doing, we make ourselves vulnerable to its propensity to fail when it matters most. 'Although you can use AI to generate a lot of ideas, they still require quite a bit of auditing," says Ortiz. 'So for example, if you want to do your taxes, you'd want to stick with something more like TurboTax than ChatGPT." Write to Christopher Mims at
